809.801(9)(L)(L) For documentary exhibits submitted directly to the supreme court or court of appeals, parties shall submit a copy of the exhibit and not the original. The clerk of court shall image each documentary exhibit and enter the imaged document into the court record. Copies of documentary exhibits so imaged may be discarded as provided in SCR 72.03 (3). If inspection of the original document is necessary to the court proceeding, the court may order that the original document be produced. Any original document so produced shall be retained as an exhibit as provided in SCR 72.03 (4). 809.801(9)(m)(m) When an action or proceeding requires a record to be submitted by a party directly to the court, the record shall be imaged and electronically submitted using a method provided by the electronic filing system. The electronic record shall be the official record in the action or proceeding. If inspection of an original document is necessary to the court proceeding, the court may order that the original document be produced. 809.801(11)(a)(a) Notaries public who hold valid appointments under ch. 140 may issue certificates of notarial acts for electronically filed documents as provided in this section. 809.801(11)(b)(b) Court officials authorized by law to perform notarial acts may do so by application of their electronic signatures provided through the electronic filing system. 809.801(11)(c)(c) Unless specifically required by statute or court rule, electronically filed documents are not required to be notarized. 809.801(11)(d)(d) Documents notarized by traditional methods may be filed through the electronic filing system if a handwritten signature and physical seal appear on the original document. The user shall submit an imaged copy of the notarized document to the electronic filing system, and the court shall maintain the imaged copy as the official court record. The court may require the submitting party to produce the original paper document if the authenticity of the notarization is in question. 809.801(11)(f)(f) The director, in his or her discretion, may approve the use of an electronic notary technology compatible with the existing electronic filing system. 809.801(12)(a)(a) To be considered electronically signed, a document must be submitted by or on behalf of a user through the electronic filing system. A document requiring the signature of a user shall bear either an electronic signature or a handwritten signature applied to a document before it is imaged. An electronic signature shall state “Electronically signed by” followed by the name of the signatory, and shall be placed where the person’s signature would otherwise appear. Either form of signature shall be treated as the user’s personal original signature for all purposes under the statutes and court rules. 809.801(12)(b)(b) An initiating document that is signed in compliance with par. (a) bears a sufficient signature under s. 802.05. 809.801(12)(c)(c) Each electronically filed document shall bear that person’s name, mailing address, electronic mail address, telephone number, and state bar number if applicable. Users shall notify the electronic filing system of any change in this information, consistent with sub. (3) (d). 809.801(12)(d)(d) An attorney may delegate the authority to submit documents to the electronic filing system to a person under the attorney’s supervision. Any document requiring the attorney’s signature is deemed to have been signed by the attorney if submitted to the electronic filing system and signed as provided in par. (a). Every attorney is responsible for all documents so submitted. 809.801(12)(e)(e) Every attorney is responsible for electronically filed documents to the same extent as for paper filings. Attorneys using the electronic filing system are subject to sanctions under s. 802.05 and contempt procedures under ch. 785, and are subject to discipline for a violation of any duty to the court under the supreme court rules. 809.801(12)(f)(f) Self-represented parties and filing agents under s. 799.06 are responsible for electronically filed documents to the same extent as for paper filings. Self-represented parties and filing agents using the electronic filing system are subject to sanctions under s. 802.05 and contempt procedures under ch. 785. 809.801(12)(fm)(fm) An electronically filed certification required by this chapter may be signed by applying the user’s signature as provided in par. (a). 809.801(12)(g)(g) A stipulation will be considered signed by multiple persons if it bears the handwritten signatures of all signatories or if it bears the printed name of each signatory and contains a representation by the filing party that the filing party has consulted with the signatories and all have agreed to sign the document. This paragraph does not apply to the signature requirements of s. 809.107 (2) (bm) 6., (5) (a), and (6) (f), where a signature is required from the appellant or petitioner, other than the state, on whose behalf the document is filed. 809.801(12)(h)(h) For paper parties, every document requiring a signature shall be signed using a handwritten signature. If a document requiring a signature is filed by traditional methods, the filing party shall file a copy of that document and not the original paper document, as provided under sub. (9) (h). 809.801(12)(i)(i) Documents containing handwritten signatures of third parties, such as affidavits, may be filed through the electronic filing system if a handwritten signature appears on the original document. The user shall submit an imaged copy of the signed document to the electronic filing system, and the court shall maintain the imaged document as the official court record. The court may require the submitting party to produce the original paper document if validity of the signature is challenged. 809.801(12)(j)(j) The director, in his or her discretion, may approve the use of other signature technologies to the extent that they work with the existing electronic filing system. 809.801(13)(a)(a) If the signature of a court official is required on a document, an electronic signature applied through the court case management system may be used. The electronic signature shall be treated as the court official’s personal original signature for all purposes under Wisconsin statutes and court rules. Where a handwritten signature would be located on a particular order, form, letter, or other document, the official’s printed name shall be inserted. 809.801(13)(b)(b) The electronic signature of a court official shall be used only by the official to whom it is assigned and by such delegates as the official may authorize. The court official is responsible for any use of his or her electronic signature by an authorized delegate. 809.801(13)(c)(c) A court official may delegate the use of his or her electronic signature to an authorized staff member pursuant to the security procedures of the court case management system. Upon learning that the confidentiality of the electronic signature has been inadvertently or improperly disclosed, the court official shall immediately report that fact to the consolidated court automation programs. Court officials shall safeguard the security of their electronic signatures and exercise care in delegation. 809.801(14)(a)(a) The confidentiality of an electronic record is the same as for the equivalent paper record. The electronic filing system may permit access to confidential information only to the extent provided by law. No person in possession of a confidential electronic record, or an electronic or paper copy thereof, may release the information to any other person except as provided by law. 809.801(14)(b)(b) Parties shall exercise care with respect to redaction of protected information, as defined in s. 801.19 (1), identification of confidential material, and sealing of filed documents. 809.801(14)(c)(c) If a document is confidential, it shall be identified as confidential by the submitting party when it is filed. The clerk of court is not required to review documents to determine if confidential information is contained within them. 809.801(14)(d)(d) If a user seeks court approval to seal a document, the user may electronically file the document under temporary seal pending court approval of the user’s motion to seal. 809.801(14)(e)(e) If the clerk notes that a document has been identified as confidential or sealed, the electronic filing system shall place a visible mark on the document to identify it as confidential or sealed. 809.801(14)(f)(f) An amicus party may, in the court’s discretion, be granted access to confidential, redacted, or sealed portions of the court record upon motion to the court and a showing of good cause. 809.801(15)(a)(a) A transcript filed in the circuit court shall be electronically transmitted to the clerk of the court of appeals when made part of the record on appeal. 809.801(15)(b)(b) The transcript of any proceeding originating in the court of appeals or supreme court shall be electronically filed by the court reporter in accordance with procedures developed by the director. The clerk shall note in the court record that the transcript has been prepared and filed with the court. 809.801(15)(c)(c) Arrangements for payment of the court reporter, access to the transcript, and service shall be as directed by the court. 809.801(15)(d)(d) Any notice to the clerk of the supreme court and court of appeals filed under s. 809.11 (7) (a) or 809.32 (5) or any motion filed under s. 809.11 (7) (c) shall be electronically filed. The court reporter shall serve paper parties by traditional methods. 809.801(15)(e)(e) A transcript, when filed under this section, becomes a part of the court file. The transcript shall be made available to the public in accordance with the statutes and rules governing court records and any court orders. 809.801(15)(f)(f) A court reporter may certify that the transcript is a verbatim transcript of the proceedings by applying the court reporter’s signature in the same manner as provided in sub. (12) (a) and then electronically filing the transcript. 809.801(16)(a)(a) A user whose filing is made untimely as a result of a technical failure may seek appropriate relief from the court as follows: 809.801(16)(a)1.1. If the failure is caused by the court electronic filing system, a user may move the court for relief on the basis that the user attempted to file the document with the court in a timely manner by submitting it to the electronic filing system. The court may enter an order permitting the document to be deemed filed or served on the date and time the user first attempted to submit the document electronically or may grant other relief as appropriate. 809.801(16)(a)2.2. If the failure is not caused by the court electronic filing system, the court may grant appropriate relief upon satisfactory proof of the cause. Users are responsible for timely filing of electronic documents to the same extent as filing of paper documents. 809.801(16)(b)(b) A motion for relief due to technical failure shall be made on the next day the office of the clerk of court is open. The document that the user attempted to file shall be filed separately and any fees due shall be paid at that time. 809.801(16)(c)(c) This subsection shall be liberally applied to avoid prejudice to any person using the electronic filing system in good faith. 809.801 HistoryHistory: Sup. Ct. Order No. 20-07, 2021 WI 37, 397 Wis. 2d xiii; 2021 a. 240 s. 30; Sup. Ct. Order No. 23-05, 2024 WI 20, filed 5-2-24, eff. 7-1-24. 809.801 NoteNOTE: Sup. Ct. Order No. 20-07 states that “the Comments to the statutes created pursuant to this order are not adopted, but will be published and may be consulted for guidance in interpreting and applying the rule.” 809.801 NoteComment, 2021: Although proposed s. 809.801 is new, the numbering reflects an effort to stay parallel with the section numbering of the circuit court eFiling rule, s. 801.18.
809.801 NoteSection 809.801 is built on the template of the circuit court electronic filing rule, s. 809.18, with respect to structure, language, and procedure. There are no major differences between the two systems with respect to how electronic filing works. Sub.(2) (k) provides that the two rules “shall be interpreted consistently to the extent practicable”.
809.801 NoteAt the direction of the supreme court, subs. (2) (b) and (c) provide for the use of an implementation schedule to govern the availability of electronic filing according to the type of proceeding involved and the type of court.
809.801 NoteSub. (3) (a) mandates that three types of filers participate in the electronic filing system. An exception for attorneys representing themselves was included in the circuit court electronic filing rule but is eliminated here. Experience has shown that electronic filing is straightforward to use, with minimal technical impediments and expense.
809.801 NoteSubs. (3) (d) and (f) require electronic filing users to promptly opt in and opt out from the cases where they are representing parties or participating as litigants. Users are required to keep their contact information up to date to receive electronic service.
809.801 NoteUnder sub. (3) (j), persons filing documents in cases where they are not parties, such as amicus curiae, may register to use the electronic filing system and file a document.
809.801 NoteSub. (4) (am) provides that filing occurs when the document is submitted to the electronic filing system as long as it is accepted by the clerk at a later time. Extending the filing day to 11:59 p.m. is consistent with the circuit court electronic filing rule and federal court electronic filing rules. This supersedes the decision in St. John’s Home v. Continental Casualty Co., 150 Wis. 2d 37, 441 N.W.2d 219 (1989), per curiam, requiring filing to occur only within the office hours of the clerk. This gives a user an extra few hours to file on the last day a document is due but does not otherwise affect the calculation of time. If a user submits a document or the court issues an order on a day when the clerk’s office is closed, it is considered filed on the next day the clerk’s office is open, except as provided by other statutes and rules, or by court order. 809.801 NoteSince 2009, the appellate clerk has reviewed electronic briefs to make sure that rule requirements relating to form have been met. Together with s. 809.80 (5), subd. (4) (b) provides that the clerk may review all types of documents, both paper and electronic.
809.801 NoteSub. (4) (c) is consistent with s. 809.80 (2) (d), which provides that a document filed by a paper party will be served on the electronic users when the clerk scans and dockets the document and a notice of activity is generated.
809.801 NoteSub. (5) addresses how the first document or group of documents should be filed in each type of appellate proceeding.
809.801 NoteSub. (6) (a) provides that the electronic filing system now serves as the means of delivery between users for documents filed after the case is initiated. Electronic filing users will receive a notice of activity letting them know that a new document has been filed in the proceeding. Paper parties will continue to be served by traditional methods for both initiating and subsequent documents.
809.801 NoteSub. (6) (e) provides that if an email to a party is returned as undeliverable, the clerk will attempt to locate the party and correct the problem. The other parties must serve that party by traditional methods in the meantime.
809.801 NoteSub. (6) (f) outlines how mandatory electronic filing will be initiated on previously filed cases. The clerk will work with attorneys to opt in on their open cases and will provide voluntary users with instructions on how to participate in the electronic filing system if they choose.
809.801 NoteSub. (8) (a) requires electronic filing users to keep their hardware, software, and staff training up to date with the minimum requirements set by the court.
809.801 NoteUnder former s. 809.18 (12), the supreme court required that briefs, no-merit reports, and petitions for review be submitted in text-searchable portable document format (PDF). Sub. (8) (e) broadens this requirement to include most documents submitted to the court, including motions, writs and petitions. Appendices, exhibits, and affidavits must be submitted in portable document format but are not required to be text-searchable.
809.801 NoteSub. (8) (g) provides for the permissive use of external hyperlinks to sources of information such as published cases and statutes posted on the Internet. Hyperlinks come with a small amount of risk for the introduction of malicious software into the electronic filing system and into law office case management systems. For that reason, hyperlinks may be used only in accordance with guidance posted by the court, and the court may limit the sites that users may link to. The use of hyperlinks is not required.
809.801 NoteSub. (9) provides that appellate court case files going forward will be kept electronically. Mandatory electronic filing users are required to file all documents electronically, with only a few exceptions. The documents submitted by paper parties will be imaged and converted to electronic format by the clerk of court. Because any paper submitted will be discarded after it is imaged, parties should not submit original documents to the court.
809.801 NoteSub. (12) (a) is amended to clarify the required format of an electronic signature. Handwritten signatures continue to be used despite the availability of electronic signatures and are permitted as long as the document is imaged and submitted through the electronic filing system. Either form of signature provides the level of accountability to client and court called for by the appellate rules. Compliance with this section is intended to satisfy the signature requirements of ss. 802.05 (1) and 809.19 (1) (h), as well as all other statutes and rules relating to court documents.
809.801 NoteSub. (12) (fm) is added to permit the use of electronic signatures for certifying briefs, appendices, and no-merit reports as to length, confidentiality, and client counseling.
809.801 NoteSub. (12) (g) responds to a recent legislative change requiring the signature of both counsel and parents on the notice of appeal in proceedings for termination of parental rights. A representation that all signatories have agreed to sign the document cannot be used in lieu of the parents’ signatures in this situation.
809.801 NoteSub. (14) (b) refers to circuit court requirements regarding confidential, redacted, and sealed documents. Documents added to the circuit court record since 2016 should already be in compliance with ss. 801.19 to 809.21.
809.801 NoteSub. (15) (a) notes that circuit court transcripts are generally not filed directly with the appellate court. Transcripts are electronically transmitted by the clerk of circuit court as part of the record on appeal.
809.801 NoteWhen transcripts are filed directly with the appellate court, sub. (15) (c) provides that arrangements for payment, copies and service shall be as directed by the court.
809.802809.802 Rule (Service on the state in certain proceedings). 809.802(1)(1) Any document required or authorized to be served on the state in appeals and other proceedings in felony cases in the court of appeals or supreme court shall be served on the attorney general unless the district attorney has been authorized under s. 978.05 (5) to represent the state. Any document required or authorized to be served on the state in appeals and other proceedings in misdemeanor cases decided by a single court of appeals judge under s. 752.31 (2) and (3) shall be served on the district attorney. Every petition for review of a decision of the court of appeals in a misdemeanor case shall be served on the attorney general. 809.802(2)(2) Where service on the attorney general is required under sub. (1), the clerk of the court of appeals shall opt in the attorney general as an attorney for the state and provide the notice of docketing to the attorney general through the appellate electronic filing system. For the attorney general, receipt of the notice of docketing provides access to the proceeding and constitutes service of the initiating document and other documents filed with the initiating documents. 809.802 HistoryHistory: Sup. Ct. Order No. 20-07, 2021 WI 37, 397 Wis. 2d xiii. 809.802 NoteNOTE: Sup. Ct. Order No. 20-07 states that “the Comments to the statutes created pursuant to this order are not adopted, but will be published and may be consulted for guidance in interpreting and applying the rule.” 809.802 NoteComment, 2021: Former s. 809.80 (2) is recreated as sub. (1). The requirement to serve the attorney general under this section applies to both traditional and electronic modes of service. Sub. (2) describes the mechanism the clerk will use to assure service on the attorney general in cases where the other electronic parties are served with initiating documents through the circuit court electronic filing system or when the attorney general did not participate in a proceeding before a petition for review was filed.
809.81809.81 Rule (Form of papers). The format of a document filed in the court must conform to the following requirements unless expressly provided otherwise in these rules: 809.81(1)(1) Size. Formatted to fit 8.5 by 11 inch paper. 809.81(3)(3) Style. Produced using either a monospaced or a proportional serif font. If handwriting is used, the text must be legibly printed and not include cursive writing, except the person’s signature. 809.81(4)(4) Spacing and margins. Double-spaced with a minimum of a 1.25-inch margin on the right and left sides, and a minimum of a 1-inch margin on the top and bottom. 809.81(5)(5) Pagination. Paginated at the center of the bottom margin using Arabic numerals with sequential numbering starting at “1” on the first page. 809.81(6)(6) Appearance. Any process that produces a clear, black image on a white background. Carbon copies may not be filed. Imaged documents should be scanned at a resolution sufficient to ensure legibility. 809.81(7)(7) Binding. Pages must be secured together at the top left corner. 809.81(8)(8) Confidentiality. Every notice of appeal or other document that is filed in the court and that is required by law to be confidential shall refer to individuals only by one or more initials or other appropriate pseudonym or designation. 809.81(9)(9) Captions. Except as provided in s. 809.81 (8) or when “petitioner” has been substituted for an individual’s name in the caption in an appeal from a domestic abuse protective order or harassment injunction, or when the clerk has given notice of a different caption, the caption of any document shall include the full name of each party in the circuit court and shall designate each party so as to identify each party’s status in the circuit court and in the appellate court, if any. In the supreme court, “petitioner” shall be added to the designation of a party filing a petition for review. The designation of a party responding to a petition for review shall remain the same as in the court of appeals. 809.81 HistoryHistory: Sup. Ct. Order, 83 Wis. 2d xiii (1978); Sup. Ct. Order, 104 Wis. 2d xi (1981); Sup. Ct. Order No. 93-18, 179 Wis. 2d xxi (1993); Sup. Ct. Order No. 93-20, 179 Wis. 2d xxv (1993); Sup. Ct. Order No. 00-02, 2001 WI 39, 242 Wis. 2d xxvii; Sup. Ct. Order No. 02-01, 2002 WI 120, 255 Wis. 2d xiii; Sup. Ct. Order No. 14-01, 2015 WI 21, filed 3-2-15, eff. 7-1-15; Sup. Ct. Order No. 20-07, 2021 WI 37, 397 Wis. 2d xiii. 809.81 NoteJudicial Council Committee’s Note, 1978: The 8-1/2 x 11 letter size paper is adopted as the standard size for all papers to be filed in the Court of Appeals in place of using both 8-1/2 x 14 and 8-1/2 by 11. A standard size paper simplifies records management. There is a national trend away from legal size paper. [Re Order effective July 1, 1978]
809.81 NoteJudicial Council Committee’s Note, 1981: Sub. (2) is amended to clarify that an original must be filed with the 4 copies in the court of appeals or with the 8 copies in the supreme court. [Re Order effective Jan. 1, 1982]
809.81 NoteJudicial Council Note, 2001: Subsection (2) was amended to eliminate the distinction between “original” and “copy,” because current technology produces copies of quality as good as the original. Subsection (8) requires that only the first name and last initial be used in all documents in confidential cases. [Re Order No. 00-02 effective July 1, 2001]
809.81 NoteJudicial Council Note, 2002: Subsection (9) is created to clarify that the same caption should be used on all documents filed in an appellate case, and specifies that caption. Captions on pleadings and other documents filed pursuant to this rule are consistent with the current s. 809.19 (9) requirement governing captions on briefs. [Re Order No. 02-01 effective January 1, 2003]
