This is the preview version of the Wisconsin State Legislature site.
Please see http://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov for the production version.
n = Total number of “y” hazardous waste streams treated by process
Qx = Annual mass quantity of hazardous waste stream “x”, kg/yr
Qy = Annual mass quantity of hazardous waste stream “y”, kg/yr
= Average VO concentration of hazardous waste stream “x” at the point of waste origination determined according to sub. (1), ppmw
NR 665.1084(2)(e)(e) Procedure to determine the organic reduction efficiency (R) for a treated hazardous waste:
NR 665.1084(2)(e)1.1. Determine the organic reduction efficiency (R) for a treatment process based on results for a minimum of 3 consecutive runs.
NR 665.1084(2)(e)2.2. Identify all hazardous waste streams entering the treatment process and all hazardous waste streams exiting the treatment process. Prepare a sampling plan for measuring these streams that accurately reflects the retention time of the hazardous waste in the process.
NR 665.1084(2)(e)3.3. For each run, determine information for each hazardous waste stream identified in subd. 2. using all of the following procedures:
NR 665.1084(2)(e)3.a.a. Determine the mass quantity of each hazardous waste stream entering the process (Qb) and the mass quantity of each hazardous waste stream exiting the process (Qa).
NR 665.1084(2)(e)3.b.b. Determine the average VO concentration at the point of waste origination of each hazardous waste stream entering the process (
b) during the run according to sub. (1) (c). Determine the average VO concentration at the point of waste treatment of each waste stream exiting the process (
a) during the run according to par. (c).
NR 665.1084(2)(e)4.4. Calculate the waste volatile organic mass flow entering the process (Eb) and the waste volatile organic mass flow exiting the process (Ea) using the results determined according to subd. 3. and the following equations:
(
)
(
)
å
å
=
=
´
=
´
=
where:
Ea = Waste volatile organic mass flow exiting process, kg/hr
Eb = Waste volatile organic mass flow entering process, kg/hr
m = Total number of runs (at least 3)
j = Individual run “j”
Qb = Mass quantity of hazardous waste entering process during run “j”, kg/hr
Qa = Average mass quantity of hazardous waste exiting process during run “j”, kg/hr
= Average VO concentration of hazardous waste exiting process during run “j” determined according to par. (c), ppmw
= Average VO concentration of hazardous waste entering process during run “j” determined according to sub. (1) (c), ppmw
NR 665.1084(2)(e)5.5. Calculate the organic reduction efficiency of the process using the results determined according to subd. 4. and the following equation:
´
-
=
where:
R = Organic reduction efficiency, percent
Eb = Waste volatile organic mass flow entering process determined according to subd. 4., kg/hr
Ea = Waste volatile organic mass flow exiting process determined according to subd. 4., kg/hr
NR 665.1084(2)(f)(f) Procedure to determine the organic biodegradation efficiency (Rbio) for a treated hazardous waste:
NR 665.1084(2)(f)1.1. Determine the fraction of organics biodegraded (Fbio) using the procedure specified in appendix C of 40 CFR part 63, incorporated by reference in s. NR 660.11.
NR 665.1084(2)(f)2.2. Calculate the Rbio using the following equation:
´
=
where:
Rbio = Organic biodegradation efficiency, percent
Fbio = Fraction of organic biodegraded determined according to subd. 1.
NR 665.1084(2)(g)(g) Procedure to determine the required organic mass removal rate (RMR) for a treated hazardous waste:
NR 665.1084(2)(g)1.1. Identify all of the hazardous waste streams entering the treatment process.
NR 665.1084(2)(g)2.2. Determine the average VO concentration of each hazardous waste stream at the point of waste origination according to sub. (1).
NR 665.1084(2)(g)3.3. For each individual hazardous waste stream that has an average VO concentration equal to or greater than 500 ppmw at the point of waste origination, determine the average volumetric flow rate and the density of the hazardous waste stream at the point of waste origination.
NR 665.1084(2)(g)4.4. Calculate the RMR using the average VO concentration, average volumetric flow rate and density determined for each individual hazardous waste stream, and the following equation:
(
)
å
=
ê
ë
é
-
´
´
=
ú
û
ù
where:
RMR = Required organic mass removal rate, kg/hr
y = Individual hazardous waste stream “y” that has an average VO concentration equal to or greater than 500 ppmw at the point of waste origination determined according to sub. (1)
n = Total number of “y” hazardous waste streams treated by process
Vy = Average volumetric flow rate of hazardous waste stream “y” at the point of waste origination, m 3/hr
ky = Density of hazardous waste stream “y”, kg/m 3
= Average VO concentration of hazardous waste stream “y” at the point of waste origination determined according to sub. (1), ppmw
NR 665.1084(2)(h)(h) Procedure to determine the actual organic mass removal rate (MR) for a treated hazardous waste:
NR 665.1084(2)(h)1.1. Determine the MR based on results for a minimum of 3 consecutive runs. The sampling time for each run shall be one hour.
NR 665.1084(2)(h)2.2. Determine the waste volatile organic mass flow entering the process (Eb) and the waste volatile organic mass flow exiting the process (Ea) according to par. (e) 4.
NR 665.1084(2)(h)3.3. Calculate the MR using the mass flow rate determined according to subd. 2. and the following equation:
-
=
where:
MR = Actual organic mass removal rate, kg/hr
Eb = Waste volatile organic mass flow entering process determined according to par. (e) 4., kg/hr
Ea = Waste volatile organic mass flow exiting process determined according to par. (e) 4., kg/hr
NR 665.1084(2)(i)(i) Procedure to determine the actual organic mass biodegradation rate (MRbio) for a treated hazardous waste:
NR 665.1084(2)(i)1.1. Determine the MRbio based on results for a minimum of 3 consecutive runs. The sampling time for each run shall be one hour.
NR 665.1084(2)(i)2.2. Determine the waste organic mass flow entering the process (Eb) according to par. (e) 4.
NR 665.1084(2)(i)3.3. Determine the fraction of organic biodegraded (Fbio) using the procedure in appendix C of 40 CFR part 63, incorporated by reference in s. NR 660.11.
NR 665.1084(2)(i)4.4. Calculate the MRbio using the mass flow rates and fraction of organic biodegraded determined according to subds. 2. and 3., respectively, and the following equation:
´
=
where:
MRbio = Actual organic mass biodegradation rate, kg/hr
Eb = Waste organic mass flow entering process determined according to par. (e) 4., kg/hr
Fbio = Fraction of organic biodegraded determined according to subd. 3.
NR 665.1084(3)(3)Procedure to determine the maximum organic vapor pressure of a hazardous waste in a tank.
NR 665.1084(3)(a)(a) An owner or operator shall determine the maximum organic vapor pressure for each hazardous waste placed in a tank using Tank Level 1 controls according to the standards in s. NR 665.1085 (3).
NR 665.1084(3)(b)(b) An owner or operator shall use either direct measurement as specified in par. (c) or knowledge of the waste as specified in par. (d) to determine the maximum organic vapor pressure which is representative of the hazardous waste composition stored or treated in the tank.
NR 665.1084(3)(c)(c) If the owner or operator uses direct measurement to determine the maximum organic vapor pressure of a hazardous waste, the owner or operator shall do all of the following:
NR 665.1084(3)(c)1.1. ‘Sampling.’ Collect a sufficient number of samples to be representative of the waste contained in the tank. Collect and handle all samples according to written procedures prepared by the owner or operator and documented in a site sampling plan. The plan shall describe the procedure for collecting representative samples of the hazardous waste which minimizes loss of organics throughout the sample collection and handling process and maintains sample integrity. Maintain a copy of the written sampling plan on-site in the facility operating records. An example of acceptable sample collection and handling procedures may be found in Method 25D in Appendix A of 40 CFR part 60, both incorporated by reference in s. NR 660.11.
NR 665.1084(3)(c)2.2. ‘Analysis.’ Any appropriate one of the following methods may be used to analyze the samples and compute the maximum organic vapor pressure of the hazardous waste:
NR 665.1084(3)(c)2.a.a. Method 25E in appendix A of 40 CFR part 60, incorporated by reference in s. NR 660.11.
NR 665.1084(3)(c)2.b.b. Methods described in American Petroleum Institute Publication 2517, Third Edition, February 1989, “Evaporative Loss from External Floating-Roof Tanks”, incorporated by reference in s. NR 660.11.
NR 665.1084(3)(c)2.c.c. Methods obtained from standard reference texts.
NR 665.1084(3)(c)2.d.d. ASTM Method D2879-92, incorporated by reference in s. NR 660.11.
NR 665.1084(3)(c)2.e.e. Any other method approved by the department.
NR 665.1084(3)(d)(d) If the owner or operator uses knowledge to determine the maximum organic vapor pressure of the hazardous waste, the owner or operator shall prepare and record documentation that presents the information used as the basis for the owner’s or operator’s knowledge that the maximum organic vapor pressure of the hazardous waste is less than the maximum vapor pressure limit listed in s. NR 665.1085 (2) (a) 1. for the applicable tank design capacity category. An example of information that may be used is documentation that the hazardous waste is generated by a process for which at other locations it previously has been determined by direct measurement that the waste maximum organic vapor pressure is less than the maximum vapor pressure limit for the appropriate tank design capacity category.
NR 665.1084(4)(4)Procedure for determining no detectable organic emissions for the purpose of complying with this subchapter.
NR 665.1084(4)(a)(a) Conduct the test according to Method 21 in appendix A of 40 CFR part 60, incorporated by reference in s. NR 660.11. Check each potential leak interface (i.e., a location where organic vapor leakage could occur) on the cover and associated closure devices. Potential leak interfaces that are associated with covers and closure devices include, but are not limited to, the interface of the cover and its foundation mounting, the periphery of any opening on the cover and its associated closure device and the sealing seat interface on a spring-loaded pressure relief valve.
NR 665.1084(4)(b)(b) Perform the test when the unit contains a hazardous waste having an organic concentration representative of the range of concentrations for the hazardous waste expected to be managed in the unit. During the test, secure the cover and closure devices in the closed position.
NR 665.1084(4)(c)(c) The detection instrument shall meet the performance criteria of Method 21 in appendix A of 40 CFR part 60, incorporated by reference in s. NR 660.11, except the instrument response factor criteria in section 3.1.2(a) shall be for the average composition of the organic constituents in the hazardous waste placed in the waste management unit, not for each individual organic constituent.
NR 665.1084(4)(d)(d) Calibrate the detection instrument before use on each day of its use by the procedures in Method 21 in appendix A of 40 CFR part 60, incorporated by reference in s. NR 660.11.
NR 665.1084(4)(e)(e) Calibration gases shall be all of the following:
NR 665.1084(4)(e)1.1. Zero air (less than 10 ppmv hydrocarbon in air).
NR 665.1084(4)(e)2.2. A mixture of methane or n-hexane and air at a concentration of approximately, but less than, 10,000 ppmv methane or n-hexane.
NR 665.1084(4)(f)(f) Determine the background level according to Method 21 in appendix A of 40 CFR part 60, incorporated by reference in s. NR 660.11.
NR 665.1084(4)(g)(g) Check each potential leak interface by traversing the instrument probe around the potential leak interface as close to the interface as possible, as described in Method 21 in appendix A of 40 CFR part 60, incorporated by reference in s. NR 660.11. In the case when the configuration of the cover or closure device prevents a complete traverse of the interface, sample all accessible portions of the interface. In the case when the configuration of the closure device prevents any sampling at the interface and the device is equipped with an enclosed extension or horn (e.g., some pressure relief devices), place the instrument probe inlet at approximately the center of the exhaust area to the atmosphere.
NR 665.1084(4)(h)(h) Compare the arithmetic difference between the maximum organic concentration indicated by the instrument and the background level with the value of 500 ppmv except when monitoring a seal around a rotating shaft that passes through a cover opening, in which case the comparison shall be as specified in par. (i). If the difference is less than 500 ppmv, then the potential leak interface is determined to operate with no detectable organic emissions.
Loading...
Loading...
Published under s. 35.93, Stats. Updated on the first day of each month. Entire code is always current. The Register date on each page is the date the chapter was last published.