This is the preview version of the Wisconsin State Legislature site.
Please see http://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov for the production version.
NR 463.163(14)(c)(c) Determine and record the 3-hour block average of the recorded temperature measurements for the 3 test runs.
NR 463.163(15)(15)Flux injection rate. The owner or operator shall use the following procedures to establish an operating parameter value or range for the total reactive chlorine flux injection rate:
NR 463.163(15)(a)(a) Continuously measure and record the weight of gaseous or liquid reactive flux injected for each 15-minute period during the HCl and D&F tests, determine and record the 15-minute block average weights, and calculate and record the total weight of the gaseous or liquid reactive flux for the 3 test runs.
NR 463.163(15)(b)(b) Record the identity, composition and total weight of each addition of solid reactive flux for the 3 test runs.
NR 463.163(15)(c)(c) Determine the total reactive chlorine flux injection rate by adding the recorded measurement of the total weight of chlorine in the gaseous or liquid reactive flux injected and the total weight of chlorine in the solid reactive flux using Equation 5:
(Equation 5)
where:
Wt is the total chlorine usage, by weight
F1 is the faction of gaseous or liquid flux that is chlorine
W1 is the weight of reactive flux gas injected
F2 is the fraction of solid reactive chloride flux that is chlorine
NR 463.163 NoteNote: For example, F2 is equal to 0.75 for magnesium chloride
W2 is the weight of solid reactive flux
NR 463.163(15)(d)(d) Divide the weight of total chlorine usage (Wt) for the 3 test runs by the recorded measurement of the total weight of feed for the 3 test runs.
NR 463.163(15)(e)(e) If a solid reactive flux other than magnesium chloride is used, the owner or operator shall derive the appropriate proportion factor subject to approval by the department.
NR 463.163(16)(16)Lime injection. The owner or operator of an affected source or emission unit using a lime-injected fabric filter system shall use the following procedures during the HCl and D&F tests to establish an operating parameter value for the feeder setting for each operating cycle or time period used in the performance test:
NR 463.163(16)(a)(a) For continuous lime injection systems, ensure that lime in the feed hopper or silo is free-flowing at all times.
NR 463.163(16)(b)(b) Record the feeder setting for the 3 test runs. If the feed rate setting varies during the runs, determine and record the average feed rate from the 3 runs.
NR 463.163(17)(17)Bag leak detection system. The owner or operator of an affected source or emission unit using a bag leak detection system shall submit the information described in s. NR 463.17 (2) (f) as part of the notification of compliance status report to document conformance with the specifications and requirements in s. NR 463.15 (6).
NR 463.163(18)(18)Labeling. The owner or operator of each scrap dryer, delacquering kiln or decoating kiln, group 1 furnace, group 2 furnace and in-line fluxer shall submit the information described in s. NR 463.17 (2) (c) as part of the notification of compliance status report to document conformance with the operational standard in s. NR 463.14 (2).
NR 463.163(19)(19)Capture and collection system. The owner or operator of a new or existing affected source or emission unit with an add-on control device shall submit the information described in s. NR 463.17 (2) (b) as part of the notification of compliance status report to document conformance with the operational standard in s. NR 463.14 (3).
NR 463.163 HistoryHistory: CR 04-023: cr. Register December 2008 No. 636, eff. 1-1-09.
NR 463.166NR 463.166Equations for determining compliance.
NR 463.166(1)(1)THC emission limit. The owner or operator of an emission unit subject to a THC emission limit shall use Equation 6 to determine compliance with the THC emission limit in s. NR 463.13:
´
´
´
´
´
´
(Equation 6)
where:
E is the emission rate of measured pollutant, kg/Mg (lb/ton) of feed
C is the measured volume fraction of pollutant, ppmv
MW is the molecular weight of measured pollutant, g/g-mole (lb/lb-mole): THC, as propane, has a molecular weight of 44.11
Q is the volumetric flow rate of exhaust gases, dscm/hr (dscf/hr)
K1 is the conversion factor, 1 kg/1,000 g (1 lb/lb)
K2 is the conversion factor, 1,000 L/m3 (1 ft3/ft3)
Mv is the molar volume, 24.45 L/g-mole (385.3 ft3/lb-mole)
P is the production rate, Mg/hr (ton/hr)
NR 463.166(2)(2)PM, HCL and D&F emission limits.
NR 463.166(2)(a)(a) The owner or operator of an emission unit subject to a PM or HCl emission limit shall use Equation 7 to determine compliance with the PM or HCl emission limit in s. NR 463.13:
´
´
(Equation 7)
where:
E is the emission rate of PM or HCl, kg/Mg (lb/ton) of feed
C is the concentration of PM or HCl, g/dscm (gr/dscf)
Q is the volumetric flow rate of exhaust gases, dscm/hr (dscf/hr)
K1 is the conversion factor, 1 kg/1,000 g (1 lb/7,000 gr)
P is the production rate, Mg/hr (ton/hr)
NR 463.166(2)(b)(b) The owner or operator of an emission unit subject to a D&F emission limit shall use Equation 7A to determine compliance with the emission limit in s. NR 463.13:
´
(Equation 7A)
where:
E is the emission rate of D&F, mg/Mg (gr/ton) of feed;
C is the concentration of D&F, mg/dscm (gr/dscf);
Q is the volumetric flow rate of exhaust gases, dscm/hr (dscf/hr); and
P is the production rate, Mg/hr (ton/hr).
NR 463.166(3)(3)HCL percent reduction standard. The owner or operator of an emission unit subject to the HCl percent reduction standard shall use Equation 8 to determine compliance with the HCl percent reduction standard in s. NR 463.13:
´
(Equation 8)
where:
%R is the percent reduction of the control device
Li is the inlet loading of pollutant, kg/Mg (lb/ton)
Lo is the outlet loading of pollutant, kg/Mg (lb/ton)
NR 463.166(4)(4)Conversion of D&F measurements to TEQ units. To convert D&F measurements to TEQ units, the owner or operator shall use the procedures and equations in Interim Procedures for Estimating Risks Associated with Exposures to Mixtures of Chlorinated Dibenzo-p-Dioxins and -Dibenzofurans (CDDs and CDFs) and 1989 Update (EPA-625/3-89-016), incorporated by reference in s. NR 484.05 (12).
NR 463.166(5)(5)Secondary aluminum processing unit. The owner or operator of a secondary aluminum processing unit shall use the procedures in pars. (a) to (c) or the procedure in par. (d) to determine compliance with emission limits in s. NR 463.13 for a secondary aluminum processing unit.
NR 463.166(5)(a)(a) Use Equation 9 to compute the mass-weighted PM emissions for a secondary aluminum processing unit. Compliance is achieved if the mass-weighted emissions for the secondary aluminum processing unit (EcPM) is less than or equal to the emission limit for the secondary aluminum processing unit (LcPM calculated using Equation 1 in s. NR 463.13 (11)).
å
å
´
(Equation 9)
where:
is the mass-weighted PM emissions for the secondary aluminum processing unit
is the measured PM emissions for individual emission unit i
is the average feed rate for individual emission unit i during the operating cycle or performance test period
n is the number of emission units in the secondary aluminum processing unit
NR 463.166(5)(b)(b) Use Equation 10 to compute the aluminum mass-weighted HCl emissions for the secondary aluminum processing unit. Compliance is achieved if the mass-weighted emissions for the secondary aluminum processing unit (EcHCl) is less than or equal to the emission limit for the secondary aluminum processing unit (LcHCl) calculated using Equation 2 in s. NR 463.13 (11).
å
å
´
(Equation 10)
where:
is the mass-weighted HCl emissions for the secondary aluminum processing unit
is the measured HCl emissions for individual emission unit i
NR 463.166(5)(c)(c) Use Equation 11 to compute the aluminum mass-weighted D&F emissions for the secondary aluminum processing unit. Compliance is achieved if the mass-weighted emissions for the secondary aluminum processing unit is less than or equal to the emission limit for the secondary aluminum processing unit. The emission limit for the secondary aluminum processing unit (LcD&F) is calculated using Equation 3 in s. NR 463.13 (11).
å
å
´
(Equation 11)
where:
is the mass-weighted D&F emissions for the secondary aluminum processing unit
is the measured D&F emissions for individual emission unit i
NR 463.166(5)(d)(d) As an alternative to using the equations in pars. (a) to (c), the owner or operator may demonstrate compliance for a secondary aluminum processing unit by demonstrating that each existing group 1 furnace is in compliance with the emission limits for a new group 1 furnace in s. NR 463.13 (9) and that each existing in-line fluxer is in compliance with the emission limits for a new in-line fluxer in s. NR 463.13 (10).
NR 463.166 HistoryHistory: CR 04-023: cr. Register December 2008 No. 636, eff. 1-1-09.
NR 463.17NR 463.17Notifications.
NR 463.17(1)(1)Initial notifications. The owner or operator shall submit initial notifications to the department as described in pars. (a) to (g).
NR 463.17(1)(a)(a) As required by s. NR 460.08 (2) (a), the owner or operator shall provide notification for an area source that subsequently increases its emissions such that the source is a major source subject to the standard.
NR 463.17(1)(b)(b) The owner or operator of a new or reconstructed affected source, or a source that has been reconstructed such that it is an affected source, that has an initial startup after September 24, 2002 and for which an application for approval of construction or reconstruction is not required under ch. NR 406, shall provide notification that the source is subject to the standard.
NR 463.17(1)(c)(c) As required by s. NR 460.08 (2) (d), the owner or operator of a new or reconstructed major affected source that has an initial startup after September 24, 2002 and for which an application for approval of construction or reconstruction is required by ch. NR 406 shall provide all the following notifications:
NR 463.17(1)(c)1.1. Intention to construct a new major affected source, reconstruct a major source or reconstruct a major source such that the source becomes a major affected source.
NR 463.17(1)(c)2.2. Date when construction or reconstruction was commenced, submitted simultaneously with the application for approval of construction or reconstruction if construction or reconstruction was commenced before September 24, 2002, or no later than 30 days after the date construction or reconstruction commenced if construction or reconstruction commenced after September 24, 2002.
NR 463.17(1)(c)3.3. Anticipated date of startup.
NR 463.17(1)(c)4.4. Actual date of startup.
NR 463.17(1)(d)(d) As required by s. NR 460.08 (2) (d), after September 24, 2002, an owner or operator who intends to construct a new affected source or reconstruct an affected source subject to this subchapter, or reconstruct a source such that it becomes an affected source subject to this subchapter, shall provide notification of the intended construction or reconstruction. The notification shall include all the information required for an application for approval of construction or reconstruction as required by ch. NR 406. For major sources, the application for approval of construction or reconstruction may be used to fulfill these requirements. The application shall be submitted according to one of the following, as applicable:
NR 463.17(1)(d)1.1. The application shall be submitted as soon as practicable before the construction or reconstruction is planned to commence, but no sooner than September 24, 2002, if the construction or reconstruction commences after September 24, 2002.
NR 463.17(1)(d)2.2. The application shall be submitted as soon as practicable before startup but no later than 90 days after September 24, 2002 if the construction or reconstruction had commenced and initial startup had not occurred before September 24, 2002.
Loading...
Loading...
Published under s. 35.93, Stats. Updated on the first day of each month. Entire code is always current. The Register date on each page is the date the chapter was last published.