NR 162.49NR 162.49 Project scoring system. Projects shall be scored under one of the following three categories: sewage collection systems, wastewater treatment plants, or storm water projects. NR 162.49(1)(1) Collection system projects. The following factors, when applied to sewage collection system projects in accordance with s. NR 162.50, shall determine the priority scoring for clean water fund program financial assistance pursuant to s. 281.58, Stats.: NR 162.49(1)(a)(a) Project type score. The following points shall be awarded to each sewage collection system project: NR 162.49(1)(a)1.1. Fifty points for a project that the department determines is necessary to prevent a municipality from significantly exceeding an effluent limitation contained in a permit issued under ch. 283, Stats., including eligible projects identified under s. NR 162.03 (1) (a) 2. NR 162.49(1)(a)3.3. Five points for a project to improve a sewage collection system that contributes to violations of a permit issued under ch. 283, Stats., or that has been the subject of an enforcement action pursuant to s. 281.98, Stats., related to a performance standard, including eligible projects or costs identified under s. NR 162.03 (1) (c). NR 162.49(1)(b)(b) Human health score. A sewage collection system project may be awarded points for human health only if the project is necessary to eliminate a health hazard, subject to all of the following: NR 162.49(1)(b)1.1. ‘Replacing failing septic systems.’ A project that reduces the percentage of failing private systems shall be awarded the following points: NR 162.49(1)(b)1.a.a. Thirty points if 70 percent or more of the systems included in the project are failing systems. NR 162.49(1)(b)1.b.b. Twenty-five points if 50 percent to less than 70 percent of the systems included in the project are failing systems. NR 162.49(1)(b)1.c.c. Twenty points if 30 percent to less than 50 percent of the systems included in the project are failing systems. NR 162.49(1)(b)1.d.d. Fifteen points if 15 percent to less than 30 percent of the systems included in the project are failing systems. NR 162.49(1)(b)1.e.e. Ten points if 5 percent to less than 15 percent of the systems included in the project are failing systems. NR 162.49(1)(b)1.f.f. Five points if less than 5 percent but greater than 0 percent of the systems included in the project are failing systems. NR 162.49 NoteNote: Failing septic systems include those with surface water ponding, discharge of sewage to the ground, or high groundwater or crevassed bedrock.
NR 162.49(1)(b)2.2. ‘Elimination or prevention of bypasses and overflows.’ A project that reduces or prevents bypasses and overflows that have occurred within the 5 years prior to the most recent submittal deadline for priority evaluation and ranking form information shall be awarded 15 points. If the most recent bypass or overflow occurred more than 5 years prior to the most recent submittal deadline for priority evaluation and ranking form information, the department shall award 15 points under this subdivision only if the project is part of a larger phased collection system improvement plan required by a court-stipulated action, a consent order, a compliance schedule in a permit, or another type of legal document. NR 162.49(1)(b)3.3. ‘Collection-system related backups.’ A project that is necessary to reduce the number of basement backups related to the sewage collection system from the number of backups that have occurred within the 5 years prior to the most recent submittal deadline for priority evaluation and ranking form information shall be awarded the following points: NR 162.49(1)(b)3.a.a. Fifteen points if the project is necessary to eliminate documented basement backups at 50 or more different municipal addresses. NR 162.49(1)(b)3.b.b. Ten points if the project is necessary to eliminate documented basement backups at 15 to 49 different municipal addresses. NR 162.49(1)(b)3.c.c. Five points if the project is necessary to eliminate documented basement backups at 1 to 14 different municipal addresses. NR 162.49(1)(b)4.4. ‘New collection system and new wastewater treatment plant.’ A project eligible under s. NR 162.03 (1) (d), in which one municipality is constructing both a new wastewater treatment plant and a new collection system to serve only one new sewer service area that includes customers within the applicant’s municipal boundaries, shall be awarded 10 points. NR 162.49(1)(c)(c) Regionalization score. This section does not apply to sanitary sewer extensions within a municipality’s sewer service area. Sewage collection system projects that result in increased regionalization of wastewater treatment and a reduction in the number of locations at which effluent from wastewater treatment plants or individual septic systems is discharged into waters of the state shall be awarded the following points: NR 162.49(1)(c)1.1. Fifty points if the recipient’s project results in elimination of individual septic systems and the recipient becomes a new subscribing municipality to another municipality’s wastewater treatment plant. NR 162.49(1)(c)2.a.a. The recipient will abandon its existing treatment facility and construct new infrastructure to convey its wastewater to a new treatment facility being constructed to accommodate 2 or more municipalities. NR 162.49(1)(c)2.b.b. The recipient will abandon its own existing treatment facility and construct new infrastructure to convey its wastewater to an existing treatment facility owned by another municipality. NR 162.49(2)(2) Wastewater treatment plant projects. The following factors, when applied to wastewater treatment plant projects in accordance with s. NR 162.50, shall determine the priority scoring for CWFP financial assistance under s. 281.58, Stats.: NR 162.49(2)(a)(a) Project type score. The following points shall be awarded to each wastewater treatment plant project: NR 162.49(2)(a)1.1. Fifty points to a project meeting the criteria of s. NR 162.03 (1) (a) 1., necessary to prevent a municipality from significantly exceeding an effluent limitation contained in a permit issued under ch. 283, Stats. NR 162.49(2)(a)3.3. Five points to a project meeting the criteria under s. NR 162.03 (1) (c), necessary to correct violations of an effluent limit contained in a permit issued under ch. 283, Stats. NR 162.49(2)(b)(b) Human health criteria. Projects that directly affect human health shall be awarded points based on the following criteria: NR 162.49(2)(b)1.1. Ten points if the project is necessary to prevent bypasses and overflows at a wastewater treatment plant that has had at least one occurrence of bypass or overflow, as defined in s. NR 210.21, within the 5 years prior to the most recent submittal deadline for priority evaluation and ranking form information. NR 162.49(2)(b)2.2. Five points if the project is necessary to eliminate documented system-related backups that occurred within the 5 years prior to the most recent submittal deadline for priority evaluation and ranking form information caused by conditions at the wastewater treatment plant but not including backups caused by problems in the sewage collection system or backups due to excessive infiltration and inflow. NR 162.49(2)(b)3.3. Ten points if the wastewater treatment works discharges to groundwater. NR 162.49(2)(b)4.4. Ten points if the wastewater treatment works has a groundwater discharge and an effluent limit for total nitrogen. NR 162.49(2)(b)5.5. Five points if the wastewater treatment works has a groundwater discharge and an effluent limit for any compounds other than nitrogen, such as a limit for chlorides. The maximum number of points under this subdivision is 5. NR 162.49 NoteExample – If a treatment works has a groundwater discharge and an effluent limit for chlorides and an effluent limit for phosphorus, the department shall award only 5 points in this subdivision, even though there are 2 compounds for which the permit includes effluent limits.
NR 162.49(2)(b)6.6. Five points if the wastewater treatment works’ permit requires annual disinfection prior to discharge. NR 162.49(2)(b)7.7. Three points if the wastewater treatment works’ permit requires disinfection but on a less than annual basis prior to discharge. NR 162.49(2)(c)(c) Water quality criteria. The department shall award points for water quality parameters, based on the facility’s WPDES permit limits. The department shall use surface water effluent limits in the current WPDES permit when determining the appropriate points to assign in the water quality criteria category as follows: NR 162.49(2)(c)1.1. For BOD limits, the department shall assign points as follows, unless the permit includes a CBOD limit that provides a higher number of points: NR 162.49(2)(c)1.a.a. Sixteen points if the monthly permit limit for BOD, or the most stringent seasonal limit for BOD in the permit, is less than 10 mg/l. NR 162.49(2)(c)1.b.b. Twelve points if the monthly permit limit for BOD, or the most stringent seasonal limit for BOD in the permit, is 10 or more mg/l but less than 15 mg/l. NR 162.49(2)(c)1.c.c. Eight points if the monthly permit limit for BOD, or the most stringent seasonal limit for BOD in the permit, is 15 or more mg/l but less than 20 mg/l. NR 162.49(2)(c)1.d.d. Five points if the monthly permit limit for BOD, or the most stringent seasonal limit for BOD in the permit, is 20 or more mg/l but less than 30 mg/l. NR 162.49(2)(c)1.e.e. Two points if the monthly permit limit for BOD, or the most stringent seasonal limit for BOD in the permit, is 30 or more mg/l. NR 162.49(2)(c)2.2. For CBOD limits, the department shall assign points as follows, unless the permit includes a BOD limit that provides a higher number of points: NR 162.49(2)(c)2.a.a. Sixteen points if the monthly permit limit for CBOD, or the most stringent seasonal limit for CBOD in the permit, is less than 10 mg/l. NR 162.49(2)(c)2.b.b. Twelve points if the monthly permit limit for CBOD, or the most stringent seasonal limit for CBOD in the permit, is 10 or more mg/l but less than 15 mg/l. NR 162.49(2)(c)2.c.c. Eight points if the monthly permit limit for CBOD, or the most stringent seasonal limit for CBOD in the permit, is 15 or more mg/l but less than 20 mg/l. NR 162.49(2)(c)2.d.d. Five points if the monthly permit limit for CBOD, or the most stringent seasonal limit for CBOD in the permit, is 20 or more mg/l but less than 25 mg/l. NR 162.49(2)(c)2.e.e. Two points if the monthly permit limit for CBOD, or the most stringent seasonal limit for CBOD in the permit, is 25 or more mg/l. NR 162.49(2)(c)3.a.a. Sixteen points if the monthly permit limit for TSS, or the most stringent seasonal limit for TSS in the permit, is less than 10 mg/l. NR 162.49(2)(c)3.b.b. Twelve points if the monthly permit limit for TSS, or the most stringent seasonal limit for TSS in the permit, is 10 or more mg/l but less than 15 mg/l. NR 162.49(2)(c)3.c.c. Eight points if the monthly permit limit for TSS, or the most stringent seasonal limit for TSS in the permit, is 15 or more mg/l but less than 20 mg/l. NR 162.49(2)(c)3.d.d. Five points if the monthly permit limit for TSS, or the most stringent seasonal limit for TSS in the permit, is 20 or more mg/l but less than 30 mg/l. NR 162.49(2)(c)3.e.e. Two points if the monthly permit limit for TSS, or the most stringent seasonal limit for TSS in the permit, is 30 or more mg/l. NR 162.49(2)(c)4.a.a. Three points if the monthly permit limit for DO is greater than 6.99 mg/l. NR 162.49(2)(c)4.b.b. One point if the monthly permit limit for DO is 4 or more mg/l but less than or equal to 6.99 mg/l. NR 162.49(2)(c)5.5. For ammonia limits, the department shall assign points for either a chronic limit or an acute limit, whichever provides the highest points, as follows: NR 162.49(2)(c)5.b.b. Fifteen points if the monthly permit limit for chronic ammonia, or the most stringent seasonal limit for chronic ammonia in the permit, is less than 5 mg/l. NR 162.49(2)(c)5.c.c. Ten points if the monthly permit limit for chronic ammonia, or the most stringent seasonal limit for chronic ammonia in the permit, is 5 or more mg/l but less than 10 mg/l. NR 162.49(2)(c)5.d.d. Six points if the monthly permit limit for chronic ammonia, or the most stringent seasonal limit for chronic ammonia in the permit, is 10 or more mg/l but less than 15 mg/l. NR 162.49(2)(c)5.e.e. Two points if the monthly permit limit for chronic ammonia, or the most stringent seasonal limit for chronic ammonia in the permit, is 15 or more mg/l. NR 162.49(2)(c)6.6. For phosphorus limits, the department shall assign points as follows: NR 162.49(2)(c)6.a.a. Twenty points if the monthly permit limit for phosphorus is less than 0.2 mg/l. NR 162.49(2)(c)6.b.b. Fifteen points if the monthly permit limit for phosphorus is 0.2 or more mg/l but less than 0.4 mg/l. NR 162.49(2)(c)6.c.c. Ten points if the monthly permit limit for phosphorus is 0.4 or more mg/l but less than 0.6 mg/l. NR 162.49(2)(c)6.d.d. Five points if the monthly permit limit for phosphorus is 0.6 or more mg/l but less than 0.9 mg/l. NR 162.49(2)(c)6.e.e. Two points if the monthly permit limit for phosphorus is 0.9 or more mg/l but less than 2.5 mg/l. NR 162.49(2)(c)6.f.f. One point if the monthly permit limit for phosphorus is 2.5 or more mg/l. NR 162.49(2)(c)7.7. The department shall assign points as follows if the WPDES permit includes a limit for the specific element: NR 162.49(2)(d)(d) Regionalization score. This section does not apply to sanitary sewer extensions within the municipality’s sewer service area. Treatment works projects that result in new or expanded regionalization of wastewater treatment shall be awarded the following points: NR 162.49(2)(d)1.1. Fifty points if the project results in the recipient’s full or partial ownership of a new treatment facility being constructed to treat wastewater conveyed from 2 or more municipalities. This excludes a situation in which the owner or owners of an existing regional treatment facility will abandon the existing treatment facility and construct a new treatment facility with no new subscribers. NR 162.49(2)(d)2.2. Fifty points if the recipient is upgrading its existing treatment facility to accept and treat increased flows or loadings, or both, conveyed to the plant by one or more new subscribing municipalities, and the increase in flows or loadings is expected to be more than 10 percent of the pre-project design flows or loadings. NR 162.49(3)(3) Storm water management projects. The following factors, when applied to storm water projects in accordance with s. NR 162.50, shall determine the priority scoring for CWFP financial assistance pursuant to s. 281.58, Stats.: NR 162.49(3)(a)(a) Project type score. The following points shall be awarded to each storm water project:
/exec_review/admin_code/nr/100/162
true
administrativecode
/exec_review/admin_code/nr/100/162/v/49/2/a/1
Department of Natural Resources (NR)
Chs. NR 100-199; Environmental Protection – General
administrativecode/NR 162.49(2)(a)1.
administrativecode/NR 162.49(2)(a)1.
section
true