This is the preview version of the Wisconsin State Legislature site.
Please see http://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov for the production version.
NR 149.444(2)(e)(e) Quadratic calibration models, for which the minimum shall be five.
NR 149.444(2)(f)(f) Cubic calibration models, for which the minimum shall be seven.
NR 149.444(3)(3)Concentration levels of standards. The concentration of the standards chosen to establish a calibration function shall be within the same orders of magnitude as the expected concentration of samples.
NR 149.444(4)(4)Calibration models. The laboratory shall select a calibration model that is appropriate for the expected behavior of the analytical instrument to be calibrated. To generate a calibration model, the laboratory shall select a reduction technique or algorithm that is appropriate for the calibration model and the number of nonzero standards used, subject to all the following:
NR 149.444(4)(a)(a) The selected algorithm or reduction technique shall be describable mathematically and shall provide equations, coefficients, or parameters necessary to characterize the calibration function uniquely, unless an analytical instrument is tuned to conform to a universally accepted scientific law or scale.
NR 149.444 NoteNote: The response of dissolved oxygen meters is generally adjusted to conform to the concentration of oxygen allowable in a given liquid at a specified temperature and pressure. The response of an ion selective electrode is generally tuned to conform to the Nernst equation. The response of a pH meter is tuned to conform to the universally accepted pH scale. When these instruments are adjusted or tuned according to these principles, characterizing the calibration reduction algorithm mathematically is not necessary.
NR 149.444(4)(b)(b) Non-linear functions may not be used to compensate for instrument saturation, insensitivity, or malfunction.
NR 149.444(4)(c)(c) The laboratory may use weighted algorithms, unless the weighted algorithms are chosen to compensate for deviations from the expected behavior of a detector of an analytical instrument resulting from saturation, insensitivity, or malfunction.
NR 149.444(4)(d)(d) Except for methods that allow average response factors and average calibration factors, the laboratory may not use reiterative reduction techniques or algorithms that force calibration functions through zero.
NR 149.444 NoteNote: Reiterative reduction techniques or algorithms that force the calibration function through zero obtain mathematically, by repeated application, a null response for a zero standard that has a nonzero response or adjust calibration parameters to obtain a theoretical null response without analysis of a calibration blank. This paragraph does not prohibit the use of average calibration or response factors or automatic zeroing as part of an initial calibration, when methods, regulations, or covered programs allow those techniques.
NR 149.444(5)(5)Excluding calibration points. If one or more calibration standards are excluded from the calibration, all the following criteria shall be met:
NR 149.444(5)(a)(a) The rationale for the exclusion is documented.
NR 149.444(5)(b)(b) Any required regulatory limits can still be met.
NR 149.444(5)(c)(c) Except for ICP, ICP/MS, and HRGC/MS, if the highest calibration standard is removed, the linear range shall be limited to the remaining high standard concentration.
NR 149.444(6)(6)Evaluating algorithm validity. The laboratory shall establish acceptability criteria for initial calibrations. The type of criteria chosen, and the acceptance range shall be appropriate for the type of analytes to be quantitated, the calibration model selected, and reduction technique or algorithm chosen. Acceptability criteria shall be established using any of the following:
NR 149.444(6)(a)(a) When the x-intercept is used to evaluate the calibration, then the value of the x-intercept of the calibration function for each analyte may not exceed its LOD.
NR 149.444(6)(b)(b) Unless otherwise specified by the method, when RSE is used to evaluate the calibration, the relative standard deviation may not exceed 15% for inorganic analytes or 20% for organic analytes.
NR 149.444(6)(c)(c) Unless otherwise specified by the method, when residuals of each calibration standard are used to evaluate the calibration, the standard recovery for all but the lowest calibration point shall fall within 90% to 110% for inorganic analytes or within 70% to 130% for organic analytes. Recovery for the lowest calibration point shall be within 80% to 120% for inorganic analytes or 50% to 150% for organic analytes.
NR 149.444(6)(d)(d) When average response factors are used to reduce calibration data, the relative standard deviation of the response factors may not exceed 20% unless the method allows a larger percentage.
NR 149.444(6)(e)(e) When linear regression or least squares analysis is used to reduce calibration data, the correlation coefficient (r) of the resultant calibration shall be at least 0.995 for inorganic analytes or 0.99 for organic analytes.
NR 149.444(6)(f)(f) When quadratic (2nd order) or cubic (3rd order) analysis is used to reduce calibration data, the coefficient of determination (r2) of the resultant calibration shall be at least 0.995 for inorganic analytes or 0.99 for organic analytes.
NR 149.444(7)(7)Verifying accuracy. Except for calibrations generated using dissolved oxygen meters, pH meters, or conductivity meters, the laboratory shall verify all initial instrument calibrations after the calibrations are generated, but before the calibrations are used to quantitate any samples, with a second source standard, referred to as an ICV standard. ICV standards shall be treated in the same manner as the standards analyzed for the initial calibration. Unless otherwise required by method, regulation, or covered program, the acceptance criteria for the ICV standard shall be all the following:
NR 149.444(7)(a)(a) Obtaining concentrations within 10% of the theoretical concentrations of all reportable inorganic analytes.
NR 149.444(7)(b)(b) Obtaining concentrations within 20% of the theoretical concentrations of all reportable organic analytes.
NR 149.444(8)(8)Evaluating sensitivity. When methods require an ICB be analyzed after the initial calibration, the ICB shall be treated in the same manner as the initial calibration standards. The concentration of an analyte in an ICB may not exceed its LOD.
NR 149.444 HistoryHistory: CR 17-046: cr. Register February 2021 No. 782, eff. 6-29-21; correction in (2) (intro.) made under s. 35.17, Stats., Register February 2021 No. 782.
NR 149.446NR 149.446Continuing instrument calibration requirements.
NR 149.446(1)(1)General provisions. When an initial instrument calibration is not performed on the day of analysis, the continuing validity of the initial calibration shall be verified prior to analyzing any batch quality control or environmental samples by the analysis of one or more CCV standards, subject to all the following:
NR 149.446(1)(a)(a) Except for multi-peak analytes, CCV standards shall contain all analytes to be reported and may be prepared from the same standards used to generate the initial calibration. CCV standards are required for multi-peak analytes when the analytes are detected and reported in the samples.
NR 149.446(1)(b)(b) CCV standards shall be treated the same as the standards used in the initial calibration. When the method requires that the standards be treated the same as samples, the CCV standards shall be performed with the associated batch so that the CCV standards and samples are all processed together.
NR 149.446(1)(c)(c) Continuing calibration verification is not required for technologies when there are no initial calibrations established.
NR 149.446(1)(d)(d) If an LCS also serves as a CCV standard, the acceptance criteria of the CCV standard shall be used.
NR 149.446(2)(2)frequency.
NR 149.446(2)(a)(a) Continuing calibration verification shall be performed at least once on each analysis day when an initial calibration is not performed and prior to sample analysis and batch quality control analysis.
NR 149.446(2)(b)(b) Continuing calibration verification shall be performed after the consecutive analysis of each group of 20 environmental samples, if 20 or more samples constitute an analytical batch, unless otherwise required by method, regulation, or covered program.
NR 149.446(3)(3)Minimum number of standards and concentration levels.
NR 149.446(3)(a)(a) For linear and quadratic model calibration functions, the laboratory shall analyze at least a single CCV standard. The concentration of the standard shall be within the range established during the initial calibration.
NR 149.446 NoteNote: Linear calibration models include electrometric technologies (pH and ion selective electrode), average response factor, average calibration factor, linear regression, and least squares analysis.
NR 149.446(3)(b)(b) For cubic model calibration functions or third order polynomials, the laboratory shall analyze at least two CCV standards in each instance when a single CCV standard is required by method, regulation, or covered program.
NR 149.446(4)(4)Verifying accuracy.
NR 149.446(4)(a)(a) Unless otherwise required by method, regulation, or covered program, the acceptance criteria for CCV standards shall be within 10% of the theoretical concentrations of all reportable inorganic analytes from an initial calibration.
NR 149.446(4)(b)(b) Unless otherwise required by method, regulation, or covered program, the acceptance criteria for CCV standards shall be within 20% of the theoretical concentrations of all reportable organic analytes from an initial calibration.
NR 149.446(5)(5)Accuracy corrective action.
NR 149.446(5)(a)(a) When a CCV standard fails, the laboratory shall do any of the following:
NR 149.446(5)(a)1.1. Perform corrective action and reanalyze the CCV standard. If the CCV standard does not pass, an initial calibration shall be performed.
NR 149.446(5)(a)2.2. Perform a second consecutive (immediate) CCV standard under the same conditions. If the second CCV standard also fails, then corrective action shall be performed and two consecutive CCV standards shall pass or an initial calibration shall be performed.
NR 149.446(6)(6)Evaluating sensitivity. When the method requires that the standards be treated the same as the samples and when the method requires a CCB, the CCB shall be performed with the associated batch so that the CCB and samples are all processed together. The CCB is processed at the same frequency as the CCV standard. The CCB is subject to the same criteria specified in s. NR 149.48 (5) (d).
NR 149.446 HistoryHistory: CR 17-046: cr. Register February 2021 No. 782, eff. 6-29-21.
NR 149.45NR 149.45Measurement traceability. The laboratory shall maintain all analytical and technical records containing raw and derived data or original observations necessary to allow historical reconstruction of all laboratory activities that contributed to generating reported results. Observations, data, and calculations shall be recorded at the time they are made. At a minimum, the laboratory shall ensure that results of analyses can be linked to sample collection data, preparation records, calibration records, analytical records, test reports, corrective action, and any chemicals used.
NR 149.45 HistoryHistory: CR 17-046: cr. Register February 2021 No. 782, eff. 6-29-21.
NR 149.47NR 149.47Reporting results.
NR 149.47(1)(1)General provisions.
NR 149.47(1)(a)(a) The laboratory shall report results of each test performed by the laboratory in accordance with any requirements or instructions specified in the methods or by the department.
NR 149.47(1)(b)(b) The laboratory shall quantitate sample results only from initial instrument calibrations, unless otherwise allowed by method, regulation, or covered program or unless any of the following applies:
NR 149.47(1)(b)1.1. Samples analyzed by inductively coupled plasma emission spectrophotometers and inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometers having responses at or greater than 90% of the established upper limit of the linear dynamic range of the instruments shall be diluted and reanalyzed.
NR 149.47(1)(b)2.2. When an analyte does not perform as well as most of the analytes in a multi-analyte initial calibration, analysis may proceed, and results reported for these analytes, provided that the results are appropriately qualified as required in this section.
NR 149.47(1)(c)(c) When samples cannot be diluted and reanalyzed, the laboratory shall report sample results with appropriate qualifiers.
NR 149.47(1)(d)(d) The laboratory shall establish procedures for reporting results for samples analyzed by dual column and dual detector systems. These procedures shall establish all the following prior to analysis:
NR 149.47(1)(d)1.1. A primary column or primary detector from which results shall be reported.
NR 149.47(1)(d)2.2. The conditions under which a presumptive identification is confirmed and reported from the secondary column or detector.
NR 149.47(1)(e)(e) When results are greater than the LOQ on dual column or dual detector systems, and the RPD exceeds 40%, then the higher of the two results shall be reported unless the analyst defensibly documents that the higher result is biased due to interference. In this case the laboratory may report the lower result with a qualifier indicating the value of the higher result or report both results.
NR 149.47(1)(f)(f) Excluding microbiological results, MCL exceedances for any regulated analyte associated with ch. NR 809 compliance monitoring shall be reported by the laboratory to the affected water supply facility within 48 hours of completing sample results.
NR 149.47 NoteNote: Laboratories performing bacteriological testing for a covered program are certified or approved under ch. ATCP 77 by the department of agriculture, trade, and consumer protection.
NR 149.47(2)(2)Format and content.
NR 149.47(2)(a)(a) Laboratory test reports shall have formats that facilitate reviewing the content elements specified in this section, unless otherwise provided by pars. (b), (c), and (d). Content elements may be presented in any form, including electronic media.
NR 149.47(2)(b)(b) When tests are performed for internal clients or when a laboratory has a written agreement with a client, the laboratory may issue reports without all the content elements specified in this section. The laboratory shall retain and make available to the department, upon request, records that include the content elements specified in this section.
NR 149.47(2)(c)(c) A laboratory that is operated by a facility whose function is to provide data to monitor the facility’s compliance with covered programs shall retain and make available to the department, upon request, records that include the content elements specified in this section. Laboratory reports with all the content elements specified in this section are not required to be issued if any of the following apply:
NR 149.47(2)(c)1.1. The laboratory is responsible for preparing regulatory reports in a specified format to the department.
NR 149.47(2)(c)2.2. The laboratory provides information to another individual within the facility for preparation of regulatory reports in a specified format to the department.
NR 149.47(2)(d)(d) Unless otherwise specified by the department, for covered programs that receive data on behalf of a facility, directly from a laboratory, or when provided by pars. (b) and (c), test reports from the laboratory shall include all the following information.
NR 149.47(2)(d)1.1. The name of the laboratory where the tests were performed.
NR 149.47(2)(d)2.2. The laboratory’s accreditation identification number.
NR 149.47(2)(d)3.3. The sample identifying information provided by the client or collector.
NR 149.47(2)(d)4.4. Identification of the methods used for preparation and analysis.
NR 149.47(2)(d)5.5. The collection date of the samples.
NR 149.47(2)(d)6.6. Collection, preparation, and analysis times for tests with holding times expressed in hours.
NR 149.47(2)(d)7.7. The dates of analysis, extraction, or digestion, when a holding time has been established for the preparation step.
NR 149.47(2)(d)8.8. When non-aqueous sample results are reported, the laboratory shall indicate whether the non-aqueous sample results were reported on a dry weight or wet weight basis.
NR 149.47(2)(d)9.9. The LOD and LOQ for tests which the department requires reporting to the LOD.
NR 149.47(2)(d)10.10. Except for HRGC/MS analysis, for sample results requiring adjustments, an indication of whether the LOD and LOQ have been adjusted accordingly.
NR 149.47 NoteNote: Sample adjustments are any sample dilutions or sample amounts that were used differently than those used in the initial demonstration of capability and MDL studies.
NR 149.47(2)(d)11.11. The units of measurement.
NR 149.47(2)(d)12.12. The date of the test report.
NR 149.47(2)(d)13.13. Any qualifiers with reported results.
NR 149.47(2)(d)14.14. The identity of the subcontract laboratory, for each reported result generated by a subcontract laboratory.
NR 149.47(3)(3)Amendments to laboratory test reports.
NR 149.47(3)(a)(a) A laboratory may make amendments to a test report already issued by the laboratory in a manner that clearly identifies the reasons for the amendment and that references the original laboratory test report.
NR 149.47(3)(b)(b) Amended reports shall comply with the requirements of this section.
NR 149.47(4)(4)Sample rejection or qualification of results. The laboratory shall handle results for samples received with insufficient volume to complete the requested analyses, samples received beyond holding time, samples received improperly preserved, samples received in inappropriate containers, or samples received showing evidence that the samples have not been collected according to approved procedures as follows:
Loading...
Loading...
Published under s. 35.93, Stats. Updated on the first day of each month. Entire code is always current. The Register date on each page is the date the chapter was last published.