NR 129.06(2)(a)2.2. Ordinary operating expenses and indirect costs incurred by the municipality; NR 129.06(2)(a)4.4. Costs for which payment has been or will be received under another state or federal cost sharing or grant program; NR 129.06(2)(a)5.5. Costs attributable to the correction of errors or deficiencies in the mapping due to the consultant’s failure to comply with contract specifications; and NR 129.06(2)(b)(b) Where 2 foot, or less, contour interval mapping is available, the department may, in its discretion, declare that project area ineligible. In exercising this discretion, the department shall consider changes in land development conditions which may render existing mapping obsolete. NR 129.06(3)(3) Allocation of costs. Total project costs may be allocated between eligible and ineligible project areas using one of the following methods: NR 129.06(3)(a)(a) Unit cost method. When this method is used, individual work items are prorated between eligible and ineligible project areas based on an equal cost per unit area. NR 129.06 NoteNote: The following is an example of the calculation of an individual work item using the unit cost method: If the cost of aerial photography is $500.00 per square mile (640 acres), and there are 320 acres of eligible project area, the eligible project cost would be $500.00 × (320/640) = $250.00.
NR 129.06(3)(b)(b) Project cost method. When this method is used, eligible project costs are based on the total estimated cost of mapping only the eligible project area. Field work or data collection (e.g., ground control survey or aerial photography) outside the eligible project area may be eligible if it is necessary for the completion of the project. Projects using this method are required to submit the consultant’s fee schedule showing the breakdown of eligible work items. NR 129.06(3)(c)(c) Original cost estimates based on either method may be increased, using the grant amendment procedure in s. NR 129.07 (2), if it is determined upon completion of the final maps that the actual eligible project area is significantly larger than the area originally estimated to be eligible. NR 129.06 HistoryHistory: Cr. Register, May, 1980, No. 293, eff. 6-1-80; am. Register, April, 1983, No. 328, eff. 5-1-83. NR 129.07(1)(1) General. Grant funds available under this program shall be allocated to those projects placed on a priority list, as determined by the criteria set forth in s. NR 129.08, in accordance with the following procedure: NR 129.07(1)(a)(a) The department shall establish a priority list for the current fiscal year by March 1 for all applications submitted to the department by February 1 of that year. NR 129.07(1)(b)(b) Grants shall be awarded by April 1 to applicants in the order that they appear on the priority list, based on the total individual points received under the criteria set forth in s. NR 129.08. NR 129.07(1)(c)(c) All applications received after February 1 shall be included on the priority list for the next fiscal year. NR 129.07(1)(d)(d) If there are insufficient funds to award grants to all eligible applicants in a given fiscal, those applications not funded will be included on the priority list for the next fiscal year unless the department receives notification that an applicant wishes to withdraw the application. NR 129.07(2)(2) Amendments. Requests for additional funding, for the mapping of an eligible project area, necessitated by a change in the scope of work and requests for additional funding under s. NR 129.06 (3) (c) may be awarded by the department if unallocated funds remain for the fiscal year in which a grant amendment request is received. Such grant amendments shall be funded on a first-come, first-served basis. If no unallocated funds remain for that fiscal year, a grant amendment request shall be ranked on the priority list for the next fiscal year, according to the number of priority points assigned to the original application under s. NR 129.08. NR 129.07 HistoryHistory: Cr. Register, May, 1980, No. 293, eff. 6-1-80; am. Register, April, 1983, No. 328, eff. 5-1-83. NR 129.08NR 129.08 Criteria for priority ranking. The following criteria shall be used to rank proposed mapping projects for the purpose of determining funding priority: NR 129.08(1)(c)(c) Approximate floodplain study map (e.g., flood hazard boundary map or flood prone area map) or shoreland map is available, 2 points. NR 129.08(2)(2) Flood damage potential (The estimate for flood damage potential shall be based on the total equalized assessed value of all structures in the floodplain area): NR 129.08(3)(3) Potential for future development of floodplain or shoreland areas in the project area: NR 129.08(3)(a)(a) High — evidenced by submission of a plat or plats, or application for 10 or more building permits in the preceding 2 years, or proposal for commercial development, 8 points; NR 129.08(3)(b)(b) Moderate — evidenced by fewer than 10 applications for building permits in the preceding 2 years, 4 points; NR 129.08(3)(c)(c) Low — No applications for building permits in the preceding 2 years, 0 points. NR 129.08(4)(4) Availability of mapping data from other sources: Where the cost of the project can be reduced by utilizing existing data (e.g., aerial photography or ground control surveys acquired through a previous mapping project), additional points shall be as follows: NR 129.08(4)(a)(a) More than 30% reduction in total project cost, 5 points; NR 129.08(4)(c)(c) Less than 10% reduction in total project cost, 0 points. NR 129.08(6)(6) Joint application by 2 or more municipalities: A single application submitted jointly by 2 or more municipalities which promotes the mapping of a continuous reach of a river or contiguous shoreland area, 2 points per municipality. NR 129.08(7)(7) If 2 or more applicants receive the same total points under this section, those applicants shall be ranked on the priority list in the order in which their applications were submitted to the department. NR 129.08 HistoryHistory: Cr. Register, May, 1980, No. 293, eff. 6-1-80; am. Register, April, 1983, No. 328, eff. 5-1-83. NR 129.09(1)(a)(a) Applications shall be submitted to the department by February 1 to be considered for a mapping grant in the current fiscal year. NR 129.09(1)(b)(b) A separate grant application must be submitted to the department for each proposed floodplain or shoreland mapping project. NR 129.09(1)(c)(c) For floodplain mapping, where detailed floodplain studies are not available or in progress for all or part of a given watercourse within the project area, a separate application must be submitted for that portion of the municipality where no detailed engineering studies exist. Each application shall be ranked separately. NR 129.09(1)(d)(d) The department shall review for completeness each application received and shall advise the applicant of any deficiencies, omissions or errors in the application in a letter acknowledging receipt of the application. NR 129.09(2)(2) Contents of application. An application for a grant under this chapter shall be made on forms furnished by the department and shall include the following: NR 129.09(2)(a)(a) Certified copies of the following resolutions of the governing body of the municipality: NR 129.09(2)(a)1.1. Resolutions to be submitted by all municipalities, including each municipality applying for a grant in a joint application: NR 129.09(2)(a)1.a.a. A resolution designating an authorized representative, and authorizing such representative to apply for a grant under s. 87.31, Stats., and this chapter, on behalf of the municipality. NR 129.09(2)(a)1.b.b. A resolution stating that the municipality will adopt the maps developed as a result of the grant project as official zoning maps, and any necessary ordinance or map amendment, within 6 months after approval of the maps by the department. NR 129.09(2)(a)1.c.c. A resolution stating that the municipality agrees to pay a share of the eligible costs which is equal to the state share. NR 129.09(2)(a)2.2. Additional resolutions to be submitted by only those municipalities which will be responsible for either doing the mapping work or for contracting with a mapping consultant for photogrammetric or related services: NR 129.09(2)(a)2.a.a. A resolution stating that the municipality assumes responsibility for the solicitation and selection of a mapping consultant, and the administration of any contracts or subcontracts with the mapping consultant and any subcontractors. NR 129.09(2)(a)2.b.b. A resolution stating that all eligible services will be performed under the direct supervision of a person who holds a certificate of registration from the state of Wisconsin as a registered land surveyor or professional engineer. NR 129.09(2)(a)2.c.c. A resolution stating that the municipality will insure that all maps developed as a result of the grant project will meet, or exceed, the specifications set forth in s. NR 129.13. NR 129.09(2)(c)(c) Identification of all the municipalities involved in the proposed mapping project; NR 129.09(2)(e)(e) An itemized description of the estimated costs for the project; NR 129.09(2)(f)(f) Proposed contracts or subcontracts, including the mapping consultant’s fee schedule unless the eligible project costs have been allocated on a unit cost basis under s. NR 129.06 (3) (a); and NR 129.09(2)(g)(g) Other information needed to determine eligible project area or priority ranking, as requested by the department. NR 129.09 NoteNote: Application forms may be obtained, at no charge, from the Bureau of Water Grants, Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, P.O. Box 7921, Madison, Wisconsin 53707 or from any District Office of the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources.
NR 129.09 HistoryHistory: Cr. Register, May, 1980, No. 293, eff. 6-1-80; am. Register, April, 1983, No. 328, eff. 5-1-83. NR 129.10NR 129.10 Limitations on award. Before awarding grant assistance for any mapping project, the department shall determine that: NR 129.10(2)(2) Costs under proposed contracts or subcontracts are fair and reasonable; and NR 129.10(3)(3) The work under the proposed contracts or subcontracts has not been started prior to the grant offer. NR 129.10 HistoryHistory: Cr. Register, May, 1980, No. 293, eff. 6-1-80; am. Register, April, 1983, No. 328, eff. 5-1-83. NR 129.11NR 129.11 State share. The state share shall not exceed 50% of the total eligible project costs. NR 129.11 HistoryHistory: Cr. Register, May, 1980, No. 293, eff. 6-1-80. NR 129.12(1)(1) Completed maps shall be submitted to the department, in accordance with s. NR 129.14, within one year after the date of acceptance of the grant offer unless the department extends that period. If such an extension is warranted by the circumstances and is requested by the grantee prior to the end of the initial one-year project period, the department may extend the project period for up to 3 additional years. NR 129.12(2)(2) If the grantee fails to comply with sub. (1), the grantee may not receive any state funds under this chapter. A new grant application for the uncompleted portion of the mapping project would then be required for ranking in the next priority list. NR 129.12 HistoryHistory: Cr. Register, May, 1980, No. 293, eff. 6-1-80; renum. from NR 129.13 and am., Register, April, 1983, No. 328, eff. 5-1-83. NR 129.13(1)(a)(a) Contracts between the grantee and the mapping consultant, and between the mapping consultant and subcontractors, if any, shall conform to the minimum mapping specifications set forth in this section, unless par. (b) is applicable. NR 129.13 NoteNote: Within the 7 southeastern Wisconsin counties of Kenosha, Milwaukee, Ozaukee, Racine, Walworth, Washington and Waukesha, the department encourages applicants to conduct mapping projects in accordance with specifications for large scale mapping which have been prepared by the Southeastern Wisconsin Regional Planning Commission (SEWRPC). These specifications may be obtained by writing to the:
