ETF 11.06(6)(6) Department records. No additional identification or evidence of authenticity, beyond a statement or certification from a custodian or deputy custodian, is required as a pre-requisite for admitting into evidence documents or photocopies of documents from the department record of a particular participating employer, participant or annuitant, including beneficiary claim documents. When a photocopy of a departmental record is offered under this subsection, any party shall be permitted, upon request, to compare the photocopy and the original. ETF 11.06(7)(7) Close of hearing and evidence. Evidence in any appeal shall be closed when due opportunity to furnish relevant evidence, including proper examination of witnesses and rebuttal, has been afforded to all parties. If by stipulation of the parties or direction of the examiner, documentary evidence is introduced after close of testimony, the evidence is closed when the document is received or when the specified time for furnishing it has expired without it being submitted. The examiner may extend the original time limit for filing documentary evidence. Before the examiner makes a proposed or final decision, the examiner may reopen the hearing for the taking of further evidence. ETF 11.06 HistoryHistory: Cr. Register, June, 1992, No. 438, eff. 7-1-92; CR 07-066: am. (1), Register March 2008 No. 627, eff. 4-1-08; CR 11-040: am. (4) (c) Register July 2012 No. 679, eff. 8-1-12; CR 19-126: r. (3), am. (4) (a), (b) Register May 2021 No. 785, eff. 6-1-21; correction in (4) (a) made under s. 35.17, Stats., Register May 2021 No. 785. ETF 11.07(1)(1) Disposition of an appeal under this section requires no further action by the hearing examiner or board. After the parties have informed the hearing examiner in writing that the appeal has been disposed of informally pursuant to this section, the hearing examiner shall forward the record to the appeals coordinator. ETF 11.07(2)(2) An appeal may be resolved informally by an agreement between all parties to dismiss the appeal with or without prejudice. The department shall then make an order dismissing the appeal as agreed, attach it to the agreement and file it with the record. ETF 11.07(3)(3) If the appellant withdraws the appeal, in writing, the appeal shall be immediately dismissed by the department. This dismissal shall be with prejudice if more than 90 days have elapsed from notice of the determination appealed from, or if an applicable time limit or statute of limitations expired while the dismissed appeal was pending. ETF 11.07 HistoryHistory: Cr. Register, June, 1992, No. 438, eff. 7-1-92; CR 11-044: am. (1) Register July 2012 No. 679, eff. 8-1-12. ETF 11.08ETF 11.08 Final disposition by hearing examiner. ETF 11.08(1)(1) The hearing examiner’s findings, conclusions and order dismissing an appeal as provided in this section shall be the final decision of the board. ETF 11.08(2)(2) The hearing examiner shall prepare and issue a dismissal, in the form and manner required by this chapter for a final decision, under the following circumstances: ETF 11.08(2)(a)(a) If the examiner determines that a party has defaulted, resolving the issues on appeal, or that the appellant has failed to appear or pursue the appeal. ETF 11.08(2)(b)(b) If the examiner determines that the appeal is wholly or partially time-barred for one or more of the following reasons: ETF 11.08(2)(b)1.1. The appeal was not filed within 90 days after the department determination appealed from was sent by mail or e-mail to the person aggrieved by the determination. The entire appeal shall be dismissed. ETF 11.08(2)(b)2.2. The issue is the classification of an employee as a protective occupation participant or participating employee and with respect to service rendered more than 7 years prior to the date the appeal is received by the department. Any portion of the appeal not time-barred may proceed. In s. 40.06 (1) (e) 1., Stats., and this subdivision only, “appeal ... received by the department” means the request by the employee to review the employer’s determination, not the challenge to the department’s resulting determination. ETF 11.08(2)(b)3.3. The appeal concerns a request to correct an alleged error with respect to service credits or contribution, premium or benefit payments and the request was made more than 7 full calendar years after the date of the alleged error or beyond another applicable limitation specifically provided by statute. If the alleged error is the result of fraud the applicable limitation is instead 3 years from the date the aggrieved person discovered the facts constituting the fraud. Any portion of the appeal not time-barred may proceed. ETF 11.08(2)(c)(c) The appeal is moot. When an appeal seeks correction of an administrative error, and the department has acknowledged and corrected the error, the appeal, or the appropriate portion of the appeal, is moot. Any portion of the appeal not moot may proceed. ETF 11.08(2)(d)(d) The appellant does not have a substantial interest affected by the determination made by the department. ETF 11.08(2)(e)(e) There is no material issue of fact or law and under the undisputed material facts and law, the appellant is ineligible for the claimed right or benefit or fails to meet all the qualifications for the claimed right or benefit established by statute, administrative rule and applicable contract. ETF 11.08(2)(f)(f) No issue has been identified which can be resolved by the hearing examiner or board under this chapter or ch. 40, Stats. ETF 11.08(2)(g)(g) There is no remaining issue to be decided from the issues that are set forth in the department determination letter. ETF 11.08(3)(3) In addition to final decision-making authority granted by sub. (2), the hearing examiner shall also make the final decision of the board if the issues on appeal are limited to one or more of the following: ETF 11.08(3)(a)(a) The numeric result of a mathematical calculation by the department, not involving any challenge to the application of law in choosing the appropriate values or formulas used to make the calculation. ETF 11.08(3)(b)(b) The amount of a reduction in duty disability benefits under s. 40.65, Stats., resulting from receipt of other benefits. ETF 11.08(3)(c)(c) The appeal of denial of a disability annuity under s. 40.63, Stats., where the sole reason for the department’s denial was that the employer did not certify as provided in s. 40.63 (1) (c), Stats., that the employee’s leave of absence or termination was the result of the disability. ETF 11.08(4)(4) The hearing examiner shall issue the final decision of an appeal if the board has adopted a motion delegating final decision making authority to the hearing examiner for that specific appeal. ETF 11.08(5)(5) The hearing examiner shall not exercise final decision-making authority under sub. (2) (c), (d) or (e), (3) or (4), if the decision necessarily involves the interpretation of a statute, rule or clause of a contract authorized under ch. 40, Stats., which the examiner finds to be ambiguous. The hearing examiner shall prepare a proposed decision and allow the board to make the necessary interpretation. ETF 11.08(5m)(5m) The hearing examiner shall issue the final decision of an appeal if each of the parties informs the hearing examiner in writing that they agree to have the appeal decided pursuant to a motion for summary judgment. The motion must be filed with the hearing examiner and include the signatures of the parties. ETF 11.08(6)(6) The hearing examiner may issue a proposed decision if the grant of final authority under this section is not, in the examiner’s opinion, clearly applicable to the particular appeal before the examiner. ETF 11.08 HistoryHistory: Cr. Register, June, 1992, No. 438, eff. 7-1-92; CR 11-040: am. (2) (b) 1. Register July 2012 No. 679, eff. 8-1-12; CR 11-044: am. (2) (b) 1., cr. (2) (f), (g), (5m) Register July 2012 No. 679, eff. 8-1-12; correction in (2) (b) 4. made under s. 13.92 (4) (b) 7., Stats., Register November 2018 No. 755; CR 19-126: am. (2) (b) 3. Register May 2021 No. 785, eff. 6-1-21. ETF 11.09(1)(1) Contents. The proposed decision shall be in the same form and comply with the same standards as is required for a final decision. If the hearing examiner concludes that the decision may depend upon the interpretation of an ambiguous statute, the proposed decision shall include the hearing examiner’s basis for concluding that the statute is ambiguous as a matter of law and a recommended interpretation giving the same weight to the interpretations of the department, attorney general and administrative rules as is required for a final decision. If the proposed decision does not dispose of an issue raised by a party, the hearing examiner shall state in the proposed decision why ch. 40, Stats., or this chapter does not permit such a disposition. ETF 11.09(2)(2) Copy to each party. A copy of the proposed decision shall be mailed to each party or the party’s attorney of record, with notice of the opportunity to file an objection and the manner and time limit for doing so. ETF 11.09(3)(3) Objections. Any party may file a written objection to the proposed decision with the hearing examiner within 20 days of the date of the notice of the proposed decision. The party shall specify, in detail, the following: ETF 11.09(3)(a)(a) Each provision of the proposed decision to which the party objects and the basis for each objection. ETF 11.09(3)(b)(b) Each change the party requests the board to make in the proposed decision and the legal grounds for the change. If minor, the requested change may be described as a specific edit to the proposed decision. If extensive or major changes are requested, the party may attach a draft proposed decision, clearly marked as that party’s draft, to that party’s objections. ETF 11.09(3)(c)(c) Any written objections to the proposed decision shall be included in the record of the appeal that is forwarded to the board. ETF 11.09 NoteNote: The written objection shall be filed with the division of hearings and appeals at the following address: 5005 University Avenue Suite 201, P.O. Box 7875, Madison, WI 53707-7875.
ETF 11.09(4)(4) Argument. A party filing objections to a proposed decision shall attach to the objections a written copy of any argument by the party in support of the objections. The board shall consider only written arguments, timely filed with the objection. The board shall not entertain oral argument. ETF 11.09(5)(5) Agenda. Board staff shall place the appeal on the agenda for the regular board meeting next following the expiration of the time limit for filing objections. The appeals coordinator shall provide each board member with a copy of the record, including the proposed decision and the timely filed objections to the proposed decision. If board members would have less than 7 calendar days to review the record, proposed decision and timely objections, or the board’s agenda is already full, the appeal may instead be added to the agenda of the subsequent regular board meeting. Nothing in this subsection shall prevent the board from electing to hear an appeal case at a special meeting of the board. ETF 11.09 HistoryHistory: Cr. Register, June, 1992, No. 438, eff. 7-1-92; CR 11-040: am. (3) (intro.) Register July 2012 No. 679, eff. 8-1-12; CR 11-044: am. (1), (3) (intro.), cr. (3) (c) Register July 2012 No. 679, eff. 8-1-12; CR 19-126: am. (5) Register May 2021 No. 785, eff. 6-1-21. ETF 11.10(1)(1) The secretary and department employees may respond to any request made by the board or a board member for information required in the ordinary course of exercising the board’s regulatory and supervisory functions, even if the information requested may pertain to the subject matter of an appeal currently pending before the board or a hearing examiner. ETF 11.10(2)(2) Except as provided in sub. (1), no person involved in an appeal proceeding or factually related matter as a party, an advocate for any party or as a witness may make any ex parte communication relative to the merits of the appeal to the hearing examiner or a board member prior to the final decision of the case. ETF 11.10 HistoryHistory: Cr. Register, June, 1992, No. 438, eff. 7-1-92. ETF 11.105ETF 11.105 Board member conflict of interest. ETF 11.105(1)(1) No board member or employee of the department may participate in any appeal directly related to a specific benefit, credit, claim or application of the person. ETF 11.105(2)(2) No board member may participate in deciding an appeal to which the board member is a party. No board member who is the director of the office of state employment relations, or the director’s designee, may participate in deciding an appeal to which the office of state employment relations is a party. No board member who is the chief executive, chairperson or member of the governing body of a participating employer may participate in deciding an appeal in which that particular participating employer is a party. A board member barred under this subsection from participating in the board’s decision of an appeal shall not make any ex parte communications to the board or another board member concerning that appeal and shall not participate in any way in the board’s quasi-judicial deliberations. ETF 11.105 NoteNote: See s. 40.01 (3), Stats. ETF 11.105 HistoryHistory: Cr. Register, June, 1992, No. 438, eff. 7-1-92. ETF 11.11(1)(1) In accordance with s. 40.03 (3), Stats., board staff shall arrange for legal counsel to advise the board during its consideration of a final decision. ETF 11.11(2)(2) Any legal counsel asked to represent the board under sub. (1) shall fully disclose any real or apparent conflict of interest to the board chair and state whether counsel is able to render objective advice to the board. The board chair may waive the conflict on behalf of the board. ETF 11.11(3)(3) Counsel appointed under sub. (1) shall provide legal representation to the board including all of the following: ETF 11.11(3)(a)(a) Advising the board during its deliberations and making specific recommendations for action by the board. ETF 11.11 HistoryHistory: Cr. Register, June, 1992, No. 438, eff. 7-1-92; CR 09-047: am. (1) and (2), r. and recr. (3) Register May 2010 No. 653, eff. 6-1-10. ETF 11.12(1)(1) Form. Final decisions, and proposed decisions to be considered by the board, shall be in writing and include: ETF 11.12(1)(a)(a) Findings of fact, consisting of a concise and separate statement of the ultimate conclusion upon each material issue of fact, without recital of evidence. If the findings of fact do not include an ultimate conclusion on an issue raised by a party, a statement shall be made indicating why ch. 40, Stats., or this chapter do not authorize the hearing examiner to make such a ruling. ETF 11.12(1)(c)(c) A list of names and addresses of all persons who are considered parties for purposes of judicial review. ETF 11.12(1)(d)(d) An order stating either that the department determination is affirmed or, where the department determination is not affirmed, remanding the matter to the department with instructions to take necessary action on the matter, consistent with the final decision. In the following cases, the decision shall include the specified additional orders and findings: ETF 11.12(1)(d)1.1. ‘Disability; employer certification.’ Where the appeal is of a determination denying a disability annuity under s. 40.63, Stats., and the sole basis of the denial was the absence of an employer certification that the employee’s leave of absence or termination is the result of the disability, the decision shall include a finding whether the employer’s negative certification or failure to certify was reasonable and correct. If the employer’s action was unreasonable or incorrect, the decision shall include an order to the employer to make the certification and an order to the department to process the disability application when the certification is received. ETF 11.12(1)(d)2.2. ‘Participating employee; protective occupation.’ Where the issue of the appeal is whether a person is a participating employee or protective occupation participant, an affirmative decision shall include an order to the participating employer to make the necessary report on that person as required by s. 40.06 (1) (e), Stats. ETF 11.12(1)(d)3.3. ‘Overpayment refund.’ If the final decision concludes that the appellant has overpaid the Wisconsin retirement system and a refund is due, the final decision shall include an order to the appeals coordinator to compute the amount of the refund, as provided in this chapter. That computation shall be incorporated by reference into the final decision and order to the department to pay the refund. ETF 11.12(1)(d)4.4. ‘Group insurance.’ If the appeal involves a right or benefit under a group insurance plan provided under ch. 40, Stats., and the insurer is not the public employee trust fund, a final decision favorable to the insured shall include the group insurance board decision of whether the insurer’s continued failure to grant the right or benefit to the insured shall be regarded as a breach of the contract between the insurer and the board. ETF 11.12(1)(e)(e) The final decision shall be signed by the board chair or designee. ETF 11.12(2)(2) Standards. Final decisions of the board shall be drafted to meet the following standards: ETF 11.12(2)(a)(a) Findings. Each finding of the final decision shall be based on evidence in the record which proves the findings to a reasonable certainty by the greater weight of the credible evidence, or to a higher standard of proof expressly required by this chapter or other law. ETF 11.12(2)(b)(b) Factual basis. The factual basis of the final decision shall be solely the evidence and matters officially noticed. Hearsay evidence may be relied upon as the basis for factual findings to the same extent permitted in a Wisconsin court of law. ETF 11.12(2)(c)(c) Specific statutory authorization. The final decision may not order or authorize any action solely to further a purpose of the public employee trust fund unless the action is specifically authorized by a provision of ch. 40, Stats., other than s. 40.01 (2), Stats. ETF 11.12(2)(d)(d) Consistent with law. The final decision may not be contrary to law. Where the final decision concerns a benefit program qualifying for tax exempt or tax deferred treatment under federal law, the final decision shall be consistent with the applicable federal code and regulations to the extent necessary to preserve the qualified status of the program. ETF 11.12(3)(3) Interpretation of ambiguous statute. If the final decision necessarily depends on the interpretation of a statute which is ambiguous as a matter of law, the board shall interpret the statute. As soon as possible after a statute is found ambiguous under this subsection, the department shall propose an administrative rule interpreting the ambiguous statute. ETF 11.12(4)(4) Due deference to rule, attorney general opinion. In interpreting a provision of ch. 40, Stats., the board shall give great weight to a written opinion of the attorney general and to the interpretation of the department. The board shall give controlling weight to an administrative rule of the department interpreting the statute. ETF 11.12(5)(5) Closed session deliberations. The board shall meet in closed session, in its quasi-judicial capacity to review the proposed decision of an appeal and take action on the appeal, as follows: ETF 11.12(5)(a)(a) Parties to the appeal and their attorneys of record may not be present during the closed session, except that board staff and advisory staff of the department who were not involved in the proceedings or in making the underlying department determination may be present at the discretion of the board. ETF 11.12(5)(b)(b) Following the closed session on the appeal, the board shall reconvene in open session to briefly summarize the board’s action on the appeal for the minutes. The summary shall, so far as possible, respect the confidentiality of individual personal information. ETF 11.12(5)(c)(c) As an alternative to agreeing upon a final decision to be reduced to writing, the board may order an appeal to be returned to a hearing examiner for additional fact finding. ETF 11.12(6)(6) Variance from proposed decision. The board’s final decision may vary from the proposed decision but, if so, the board’s final decision shall include an explanation of the basis for each variance. ETF 11.12(7)(7) Notice. The appeals coordinator shall mail a copy of the final decision to each party or that party’s attorney of record by first class mail. Each party, or that party’s attorney of record shall also be mailed notice of the right to petition the board for a rehearing, the right to judicial review of an adverse decision, the time limits for filing a petition for rehearing or judicial review and the name of the board to be named as respondent. ETF 11.12(8)(8) Board contact with parties. Unless the board specifically requests information from the parties, no party to an appeal of a determination made by the department may contact any member of the board about that appeal prior to the issuance of a final decision by the board. ETF 11.12 HistoryHistory: Cr. Register, June, 1992, No. 438, eff. 7-1-92; CR 07-066: am. (2) (b), Register March 2008 No. 627, eff. 4-1-08; CR 11-040: am. (5) (a) Register July 2012 No. 679, eff. 8-1-12; CR 11-044: am. (1) (a), cr. (8) Register July 2012 No. 679, eff. 8-1-12; CR 19-126: am. (1) (d) 3., (7) Register May 2021 No. 785, eff. 6-1-21. ETF 11.13(1)(1) The hearing examiner and appeals coordinator shall create a record of each appeal, which shall include all of the following: ETF 11.13(1)(a)(a) All applications, pleading, motions, intermediate rulings and exhibits and appendices. ETF 11.13(1)(b)(b) Evidence received or considered, stipulations and admissions.
/exec_review/admin_code/etf/11
true
administrativecode
/exec_review/admin_code/etf/11/08/6
Department of Employee Trust Funds (ETF)
administrativecode/ETF 11.08(6)
administrativecode/ETF 11.08(6)
section
true
