ATCP 50.46(9)(c)2.2. State and federal agencies that provide cost-share funds for conservation engineering practices. ATCP 50.46(9)(d)(d) The reduction of a certification rating under sub. (7) does not constitute a suspension or revocation under this subsection. ATCP 50.46(10)(10) Certification guidelines. The department may publish guidelines for the certification of conservation engineering practitioners under this section. The guidelines may include suggested or required courses, training activities, and types of knowledge and experience that may help applicants qualify for certification at specified rating levels, or be required in order to retain certification at certain rating levels. ATCP 50.46(11)(a)(a) Whenever a person certified under this section approves or submits for approval any document related to the design or construction of a conservation engineering practice under sub. (2), that person shall sign and date that document. ATCP 50.46(11)(b)(b) Any engineered practice designed by a person certified under this section shall include project documentation establishing that the practice was designed according to applicable standards, and that the design was reviewed and approved for compliance with those standards. Any person approving a design shall have job approval authority at the level required by the engineered practice. For practices requiring a job class authority of III or higher, at least one person other than the practice designer shall review and sign the design as being checked before the design can be approved. For practices requiring job class authority of I or II, the person preparing the design may also review and approve the design. ATCP 50.46(12)(12) Scope of certification. No certified conservation engineering practitioner may, for any purpose, including funding under this chapter or s. 281.65, Stats., certify any matter under sub. (5) (a) in a job class more complex than that for which the practitioner is authorized under sub. (5) (a). In the event a practitioner exceeds the authority authorized for certifying conservation practices, the department shall review the matter and may take action under sub. (7) or (9). ATCP 50.46 HistoryHistory: CR 01-090: cr. Register September 2002 No. 561, eff. 10-1-02; CR 08-075: r. and recr. (2) Register April 2009 No. 640, eff. 5-1-09; CR 13-016: am. (title), r. and recr. (1), (2), cr. (2m), am. (3) (title), renum. (3) to (a) and am., cr. (3) (b), am. (4) (a), (5) (a) (intro.), renum. (5) (a) 1. and 2. to (5) (a) 2. to 3. and am., cr. (5) (a) 1., am. (6) (b), (7) (a), (9) (c) 2., (10), (11) (title), renum. (11) to (11) (a) and am., cr. (11) (b), am. (12) Register February 2014 No. 698, eff. 5-1-14; CR 16-083: am. (3) (title), cr. (3) (c) Register January 2018 No. 745, eff. 2-1-18; CR 23-024: am. (1) (d), (2), (5) (a) 2., r. (5) (b), cr. (5) (c), am. (7) (c), (8) (a), (c), (9) (c) 1., (11) (b) Register May 2024 No. 821, eff. 6-1-24. ATCP 50.48ATCP 50.48 Nutrient management planners. ATCP 50.48(1)(1) Qualifications. To be qualified under ss. 281.65, 281.66, Stats., and this chapter, a nutrient management planner shall be knowledgeable and competent in all of the following areas: ATCP 50.48(1)(a)(a) Compliance with the NRCS conservation practice standard 590. ATCP 50.48(1)(d)(d) Crediting manure, residual legume nitrogen, and other nutrient sources on a field-by-field basis. ATCP 50.48(2)(2) Planners presumptively qualified. An individual is considered a qualified nutrient planner under sub. (1), without any action by the department, if all of the following apply: ATCP 50.48(2)(a)1.1. Recognized as a certified professional crop consultant by the national alliance of independent crop consultants. ATCP 50.48(2)(a)2.2. Recognized as a certified crop adviser or professional agronomist by the American society of agronomy, Wisconsin certified crop advisers board. ATCP 50.48(2)(a)3.3. Registered as a soil scientist by the soil science society of America. ATCP 50.48(2)(a)4.4. The holder of other credentials that the department deems equivalent to those specified under subds. 1. to 3. A landowner is presumptively qualified to prepare a nutrient management plan for that landowner’s farm, but not for others, if the landowner completes a department-approved training course that results in a nutrient management plan in compliance with s. ATCP 50.04 (3) and the course instructor approves the landowner’s first annual plan. The landowner shall complete a department-approved training course at least once every 4 years to maintain that landowner’s presumptive qualification. The course instructor is not required to hold credentials listed in subds. 1. to 3., but the instructor must be knowledgeable and competent in accordance with sub. (1). ATCP 50.48(2)(c)(c) The department has not disqualified the nutrient management planner under sub. (4). ATCP 50.48 NoteNote: The department does not affirmatively certify nutrient management planners. A nutrient management planner who meets all of the requirements under sub. (2) may represent privately or publicly as a qualified nutrient planner, without any certificate from the department. A person qualified only to prepare that person’s own nutrient management plan under sub. (2) (a) 4. may not misrepresent that the person is qualified to prepare nutrient management plans for others.
ATCP 50.48(4)(4) Disqualification. The department may issue a written notice to an individual, declaring that the individual is not a qualified nutrient management planner under this section. The notice shall specify the basis for the department’s declaration. The department may disqualify a nutrient management planner if the planner violates or fails to provide reasonable documentation of compliance with sub. (3) or lacks qualifications required under sub. (1). A person who is named in a disqualification notice under this subsection may request a contested case hearing under s. 227.42, Stats., and ch. ATCP 1. ATCP 50.48(5)(5) Misrepresenting qualification. No person may do any of the following, directly or by implication: ATCP 50.48(5)(a)(a) Misrepresent that an individual is a qualified nutrient management planner under this section. ATCP 50.48(5)(b)(b) Represent, contrary to a valid written notice under sub. (4), that an individual is a qualified nutrient management planner under this section. ATCP 50.48(5)(c)(c) Misrepresent that a person is qualified to perform nutrient management plans for others, if that is not the case. ATCP 50.48(6)(6) Records. A qualified nutrient management planner shall keep copies of all nutrient management plans that the qualified nutrient management planner prepares or approves for funding under s. 92.14 or 281.65 for a landowner claiming farmland preservation tax credits under s. 71.613, Stats. The qualified nutrient management planner shall retain the records for at least 4 years, and shall make them available for inspection and copying by the department or its agent upon request. The qualified nutrient management planner under s. ATCP 50.48 (3) shall complete the nutrient management checklist form provided by the department. The qualified nutrient management planner shall have reasonable documentation to substantiate each checklist response and shall provide it to the department or its agent upon request and in a format that allows for determination of compliance with s. ATCP 50.04 (3). Minimum documentation requirements are outlined in NRCS conservation practice standard 590 nutrient management (December 2015) and Wisconsin Conservation Planning Technical Note WI-1 (February, 2016) and include: ATCP 50.48(6)(a)(a) Narrative summarizing the farms implementation and operation of the nutrient management plan. ATCP 50.48(6)(b)(b) Maps of the farm identifying fields, soils, and spreading restrictions and prohibitions. ATCP 50.48(6)(c)(c) Crop, field, and nutrient information, such as crop rotation, tillage, soil nutrient levels and nutrient applications. ATCP 50.48 NoteNote: An example of reasonable documentation for substantiating checklist responses and determining compliance is a database file from nutrient management planning software.
ATCP 50.48 HistoryHistory: CR 01-090: cr. Register September 2002 No. 561, eff. 10-1-02; CR 05-013: am. (2) (a) 3. Register May 2007 No. 617, eff. 6-1-07; CR 16-083: am. (1) (a), (2) (a) 2. to 4., (6) Register January 2018 No. 745, eff. 2-1-18; correction in (2) (a) 4., (6) made under s. 35.17, Stats., Register January 2018 No. 745; CR 23-024: am. (1) (a), (2) (a) 4., (4), renum. (6) to (6) (intro.) and am., cr. (6) (a) to (c) Register May 2024 No. 821, eff. 6-1-24. ATCP 50.50ATCP 50.50 Soil and manure testing laboratories. ATCP 50.50(1)(1) Certified laboratory. A nutrient management plan shall be based on soil tests conducted at the University of Wisconsin or another soil testing laboratory certified by the department. The department may certify a laboratory according to this section. ATCP 50.50(2)(2) Applying for certification. A laboratory operator may apply to the department for certification under sub. (1). An operator shall submit a separate application, on a form provided by the department, for each laboratory for which the operator seeks certification. The application shall include all of the following: ATCP 50.50(2)(c)(c) The name and telephone number of the individual who is responsible for on-site administration of the laboratory. ATCP 50.50(2)(d)(d) The soil tests, test methods, and nitrogen estimation methods used by the laboratory. The laboratory shall be capable of performing the following tests according to methods prescribed by the University of Wisconsin-Extension in Nutrient Application Guidelines for Field, Vegetable, and Fruit Crops in Wisconsin, UWEX Publication A2809 (2012), and by the University of Wisconsin-Madison soil science department in Wisconsin Procedures for Soil Testing, Plant Analysis and Feed & Forage Analysis, Soil Fertility Series (October, 2013) and shall be capable of estimating nitrogen levels based on those tests: ATCP 50.50 NoteNote: Copies of the Nutrient Application Guidelines for Field, Vegetable, and Fruit Crops in Wisconsin. UWEX Publication A2809 (2012) and the Wisconsin Procedures for Soil Testing, Plant Analysis and Feed & Forage Analysis, Soil Fertility Series (October, 2013) are on file at the department and legislative reference bureau. To obtain a copy of the A2809, see s. ATCP 50.04 (3) (f) 4. (note). Copies of the Wisconsin Procedures publication are available at the University of Wisconsin website at: https://uwlab.soils.wisc.edu/about-us/lab-procedures-and-methods/. ATCP 50.50(2)(e)(e) Documentation showing that the laboratory is qualified and equipped to perform accurate soil tests and nitrogen estimates under par. (d). ATCP 50.50(2)(f)(f) License conditions specified by the department, including compliance with subs. (4) to (6). ATCP 50.50(3)(3) Action on certification request. The department shall grant or deny a certification request under sub. (2) within 30 days after the department receives a complete request. The department may grant a certification request based on information provided under sub. (2). A certification is nontransferable. A certification remains in effect until withdrawn by the department. ATCP 50.50(4)(4) Nutrient recommendations. If a certified laboratory recommends nutrient applications to a landowner that exceed the amounts required to achieve applicable crop fertility levels recommended by the University of Wisconsin Extension in Nutrient Application Guidelines for Field, Vegetable and Fruit Crops in Wisconsin, UWEX publication A2809 (2012), the laboratory shall make those recommendations in writing and shall disclose all of the following in the same document: ATCP 50.50(4)(b)(b) The nutrient application amounts required to achieve applicable crop fertility levels recommended by the University of Wisconsin-Extension. The laboratory shall disclose these amounts so the landowner can easily compare them with the laboratory’s recommended amounts. ATCP 50.50(4)(c)(c) The following statement, clearly and conspicuously printed adjacent to the laboratory’s recommended nutrient applications: IMPORTANT NOTICE
Our recommended nutrient applications exceed the amounts required to achieve applicable crop fertility levels recommended by the University of Wisconsin. The amounts required to achieve the UW’s recommended crop fertility levels are shown for comparison. Excessive nutrient applications may increase your costs, and may cause surface water and groundwater pollution. If you apply nutrients at the rates we recommend, you will not comply with state soil and water conservation standards. You may contact your county land conservation committee for more information.
ATCP 50.50(5)(5) Records. A certified soil testing laboratory shall keep records of all of the following for at least 4 years, and shall make those records available for inspection and copying by the department upon request: ATCP 50.50(5)(b)(b) Copies of all nutrient application recommendations made by the laboratory. ATCP 50.50(6)(a)(a) The department or its agent may review the performance of a soil testing laboratory certified under this section. The department or its agent may do any of the following as part of its review: ATCP 50.50(6)(a)4.4. Evaluate the laboratory’s proficiency in testing check samples provided by the department or its agent. ATCP 50.50(6)(b)(b) A laboratory operator shall cooperate with a reasonable review under par. (a). ATCP 50.50(7)(a)(a) The department may deny, suspend, revoke, or impose conditions on a certification under this section if the department finds that the laboratory has done any of the following: ATCP 50.50(7)(b)(b) If the department denies, suspends, revokes, or imposes conditions on a laboratory certification, the department shall give the laboratory operator written notice of the department’s reasons for that action. ATCP 50.50(7)(c)(c) A laboratory operator may request a contested case hearing under s. 227.42, Stats. and ch. ATCP 1 on the department’s action under this subsection. ATCP 50.50(8)(8) Manure testing laboratories. Manure nutrient values determined by laboratory analyses do not qualify under s. ATCP 50.04 (3) (dm) 2. unless the laboratory performing those analyses complies with all of the following: ATCP 50.50(8)(a)(a) The laboratory participates in the manure analysis proficiency program administered by the Minnesota department of agriculture, or in an equivalent proficiency program administered by the University of Wisconsin soil analysis laboratory, and provides copies of proficiency reports to the department upon request. ATCP 50.50 NoteNote: A manure testing laboratory may qualify under sub. (8), regardless of whether the laboratory is certified as a soil testing laboratory under sub. (1). A laboratory may contact the department, at the following address, for information on how to enroll in a manure analysis proficiency program under par. (a):
ATCP 50.50 NoteWis. Department of Agriculture, Trade and Consumer Protection
Agricultural Resource Management Division
Nutrient Management Program
PO Box 8911
Madison, WI 53708-8911
ATCP 50.50(8)(b)(b) The laboratory is capable of performing all of the following manure analyses according to methods prescribed by the University of Wisconsin-Extension in Recommended Methods of Manure Analysis, UWEX publication A3769 (2003):
