ATCP 50.46(3)(c)1.1. The practitioner is not employed by an entity with a supervisor who is authorized to sign the certification. ATCP 50.46(3)(c)3.3. The practitioner has failed to provide or update information required for certification under par. (b). ATCP 50.46(3)(c)4.4. The practitioner has rescinded the signature on the certification or otherwise indicates an intent to surrender the certification. ATCP 50.46(4)(a)(a) To evaluate an applicant under sub. (3), the department’s field engineer shall complete a department certification form. The field engineer shall rate the applicant under sub. (5) based on the applicant’s demonstrated knowledge, training, experience, and record of appropriately seeking assistance. Evaluations shall be fair and consistent. ATCP 50.46(4)(b)(b) To evaluate an applicant, the department’s field engineer may conduct interviews, perform inspections, and require answers and documentation from the applicant. The field engineer may ask engineering staff from NRCS to help evaluate an applicant. ATCP 50.46(5)(a)(a) For each type of agricultural or other conservation engineering practice identified in the required certification form, the department’s field engineer shall identify the most complex of the 5 job classes in the practice for which the applicant is authorized to do each of the following: ATCP 50.46(5)(a)1.1. Conduct planning activities, including site inventory and evaluation functions to define alternative engineering solutions. ATCP 50.46(5)(a)2.2. Certify that design specifications for jobs in that class comply with those identified in subch. VIII, authorized by the department under s. ATCP 50.40 (3), allowed by s. 281.65, Stats., or approved and published, as part of the NRCS field office technical guide or as a formal technical standard by the DNR. ATCP 50.46(5)(a)3.3. Certify that jobs in that class have been installed according to the approved design, and according to any applicable standards and specifications. ATCP 50.46(5)(c)(c) In cases where department field engineers may be required to provide a job certification approval level at a level higher than their own, they should consult with a person who has appropriate certification levels in the areas being rated. A person who is certified at a job level under par. (a) may certify their own work at that level for any purpose including funding authorized under this chapter. ATCP 50.46(6)(a)(a) The department’s field engineer shall act on a certification application under sub. (3) within 30 days after the field engineer receives that application, provided that the applicant promptly submits relevant information and documentation requested by the field engineer. ATCP 50.46 NoteNote: When recertifying an applicant who was previously certified by the department or NRCS, the department’s field engineer may raise one or more rating levels, lower one or more rating levels, or reaffirm one or more rating levels.
ATCP 50.46(6)(b)(b) Whenever the department’s field engineer certifies a conservation engineering practitioner, the field engineer shall issue a written certification on the department’s certification form. The certification becomes effective when signed by all of the following: ATCP 50.46(6)(c)(c) Whenever the department’s field engineer denies a request under sub. (3) for a specific certification rating, the field engineer shall issue the denial in writing and shall specify the reasons for the denial. ATCP 50.46(6)(d)(d) The department’s field engineer shall retain a copy of each certification under par. (b), each denial under par. (c), and any other documentation received or compiled in connection with an application under sub. (3). ATCP 50.46(7)(a)(a) A department field engineer shall review each certification rating under sub. (5) at least once every 3 years, and may review a rating at any time. A field engineer shall review a rating whenever a certified conservation engineering practitioner requests that review. ATCP 50.46(7)(b)(b) Based on a review under par. (a), a department field engineer shall issue a new certification rating which reaffirms or modifies the prior rating under sub. (5). The field engineer shall provide a copy of each new rating to the person rated. The field engineer may not reduce a rating except for good cause. ATCP 50.46(7)(c)(c) A field engineer shall document, in writing, the field engineer’s reasons for reducing a certification rating under sub. (5), or for refusing to make a requested rating change. The field engineer shall provide that documentation to the person rated, and to that person’s supervisor if any. ATCP 50.46(8)(a)(a) An affected person may appeal a field engineer’s action under sub. (5), (6) or (7). The affected person shall file that person’s appeal in writing, with the field engineer, within 10 business days after the applicant receives notice of the field engineer’s action. The appeal shall identify the specific matters in dispute and the specific basis for the appeal. ATCP 50.46(8)(b)(b) Within 15 business days after the department’s field engineer receives an appeal under par. (a), the field engineer shall hold an informal meeting with the appellant. The meeting may include a representative of the county land conservation committee. The field engineer may hold the informal meeting in person or by telephone. ATCP 50.46(8)(c)(c) If an appeal cannot be resolved after an informal meeting under par. (b), the field engineer shall forward the appeal to a department reviewer designated by the administrator of the department’s agricultural resource management division. The reviewer shall hold an informal hearing on the appeal within 10 business days after the reviewer receives the appeal, unless the applicant agrees to a later date for the informal hearing. The reviewer shall hold the informal hearing by telephone or at a location determined by the reviewer. Within 10 business days after the conclusion of the informal hearing, the reviewer shall issue a written decision which affirms, reverses, or modifies the field engineer’s action. The reviewer shall provide a copy of the reviewer’s written decision to the applicant. The decision shall include a notice of the applicant’s right to request a contested case hearing under par. (d). ATCP 50.46(8)(d)(d) If an applicant disputes the reviewer’s decision under par. (c), the applicant may file a request with the department under s. 227.42, Stats., for a contested case hearing under ch. 227, Stats., and ch. ATCP 1. ATCP 50.46(9)(a)(a) The department may, for cause, suspend or revoke a certification under this section. The department may summarily suspend a certification, without prior notice or hearing, if the department makes a written finding that the summary suspension is necessary to prevent an imminent threat to the public health, safety, or welfare. ATCP 50.46(9)(b)(b) An order suspending or revoking a certification shall be signed by the secretary or the secretary’s designee. Proceedings to suspend or revoke a certificate shall be conducted according to ch. 227, Stats., and ch. ATCP 1. ATCP 50.46(9)(c)(c) The department shall notify all of the following persons of any suspension or revocation under this subsection: ATCP 50.46(9)(c)1.1. Any land conservation committee, state agency, or federal agency that employs the individual whose certification is suspended or revoked. ATCP 50.46(9)(c)2.2. State and federal agencies that provide cost-share funds for conservation engineering practices. ATCP 50.46(9)(d)(d) The reduction of a certification rating under sub. (7) does not constitute a suspension or revocation under this subsection. ATCP 50.46(10)(10) Certification guidelines. The department may publish guidelines for the certification of conservation engineering practitioners under this section. The guidelines may include suggested or required courses, training activities, and types of knowledge and experience that may help applicants qualify for certification at specified rating levels, or be required in order to retain certification at certain rating levels. ATCP 50.46(11)(a)(a) Whenever a person certified under this section approves or submits for approval any document related to the design or construction of a conservation engineering practice under sub. (2), that person shall sign and date that document. ATCP 50.46(11)(b)(b) Any engineered practice designed by a person certified under this section shall include project documentation establishing that the practice was designed according to applicable standards, and that the design was reviewed and approved for compliance with those standards. Any person approving a design shall have job approval authority at the level required by the engineered practice. For practices requiring a job class authority of III or higher, at least one person other than the practice designer shall review and sign the design as being checked before the design can be approved. For practices requiring job class authority of I or II, the person preparing the design may also review and approve the design. ATCP 50.46(12)(12) Scope of certification. No certified conservation engineering practitioner may, for any purpose, including funding under this chapter or s. 281.65, Stats., certify any matter under sub. (5) (a) in a job class more complex than that for which the practitioner is authorized under sub. (5) (a). In the event a practitioner exceeds the authority authorized for certifying conservation practices, the department shall review the matter and may take action under sub. (7) or (9). ATCP 50.46 HistoryHistory: CR 01-090: cr. Register September 2002 No. 561, eff. 10-1-02; CR 08-075: r. and recr. (2) Register April 2009 No. 640, eff. 5-1-09; CR 13-016: am. (title), r. and recr. (1), (2), cr. (2m), am. (3) (title), renum. (3) to (a) and am., cr. (3) (b), am. (4) (a), (5) (a) (intro.), renum. (5) (a) 1. and 2. to (5) (a) 2. to 3. and am., cr. (5) (a) 1., am. (6) (b), (7) (a), (9) (c) 2., (10), (11) (title), renum. (11) to (11) (a) and am., cr. (11) (b), am. (12) Register February 2014 No. 698, eff. 5-1-14; CR 16-083: am. (3) (title), cr. (3) (c) Register January 2018 No. 745, eff. 2-1-18; CR 23-024: am. (1) (d), (2), (5) (a) 2., r. (5) (b), cr. (5) (c), am. (7) (c), (8) (a), (c), (9) (c) 1., (11) (b) Register May 2024 No. 821, eff. 6-1-24. ATCP 50.48ATCP 50.48 Nutrient management planners. ATCP 50.48(1)(1) Qualifications. To be qualified under ss. 281.65, 281.66, Stats., and this chapter, a nutrient management planner shall be knowledgeable and competent in all of the following areas: ATCP 50.48(1)(a)(a) Compliance with the NRCS conservation practice standard 590. ATCP 50.48(1)(d)(d) Crediting manure, residual legume nitrogen, and other nutrient sources on a field-by-field basis. ATCP 50.48(2)(2) Planners presumptively qualified. An individual is considered a qualified nutrient planner under sub. (1), without any action by the department, if all of the following apply: ATCP 50.48(2)(a)1.1. Recognized as a certified professional crop consultant by the national alliance of independent crop consultants. ATCP 50.48(2)(a)2.2. Recognized as a certified crop adviser or professional agronomist by the American society of agronomy, Wisconsin certified crop advisers board. ATCP 50.48(2)(a)3.3. Registered as a soil scientist by the soil science society of America. ATCP 50.48(2)(a)4.4. The holder of other credentials that the department deems equivalent to those specified under subds. 1. to 3. A landowner is presumptively qualified to prepare a nutrient management plan for that landowner’s farm, but not for others, if the landowner completes a department-approved training course that results in a nutrient management plan in compliance with s. ATCP 50.04 (3) and the course instructor approves the landowner’s first annual plan. The landowner shall complete a department-approved training course at least once every 4 years to maintain that landowner’s presumptive qualification. The course instructor is not required to hold credentials listed in subds. 1. to 3., but the instructor must be knowledgeable and competent in accordance with sub. (1). ATCP 50.48(2)(c)(c) The department has not disqualified the nutrient management planner under sub. (4). ATCP 50.48 NoteNote: The department does not affirmatively certify nutrient management planners. A nutrient management planner who meets all of the requirements under sub. (2) may represent privately or publicly as a qualified nutrient planner, without any certificate from the department. A person qualified only to prepare that person’s own nutrient management plan under sub. (2) (a) 4. may not misrepresent that the person is qualified to prepare nutrient management plans for others.
ATCP 50.48(4)(4) Disqualification. The department may issue a written notice to an individual, declaring that the individual is not a qualified nutrient management planner under this section. The notice shall specify the basis for the department’s declaration. The department may disqualify a nutrient management planner if the planner violates or fails to provide reasonable documentation of compliance with sub. (3) or lacks qualifications required under sub. (1). A person who is named in a disqualification notice under this subsection may request a contested case hearing under s. 227.42, Stats., and ch. ATCP 1. ATCP 50.48(5)(5) Misrepresenting qualification. No person may do any of the following, directly or by implication: ATCP 50.48(5)(a)(a) Misrepresent that an individual is a qualified nutrient management planner under this section. ATCP 50.48(5)(b)(b) Represent, contrary to a valid written notice under sub. (4), that an individual is a qualified nutrient management planner under this section. ATCP 50.48(5)(c)(c) Misrepresent that a person is qualified to perform nutrient management plans for others, if that is not the case. ATCP 50.48(6)(6) Records. A qualified nutrient management planner shall keep copies of all nutrient management plans that the qualified nutrient management planner prepares or approves for funding under s. 92.14 or 281.65 for a landowner claiming farmland preservation tax credits under s. 71.613, Stats. The qualified nutrient management planner shall retain the records for at least 4 years, and shall make them available for inspection and copying by the department or its agent upon request. The qualified nutrient management planner under s. ATCP 50.48 (3) shall complete the nutrient management checklist form provided by the department. The qualified nutrient management planner shall have reasonable documentation to substantiate each checklist response and shall provide it to the department or its agent upon request and in a format that allows for determination of compliance with s. ATCP 50.04 (3). Minimum documentation requirements are outlined in NRCS conservation practice standard 590 nutrient management (December 2015) and Wisconsin Conservation Planning Technical Note WI-1 (February, 2016) and include: ATCP 50.48(6)(a)(a) Narrative summarizing the farms implementation and operation of the nutrient management plan. ATCP 50.48(6)(b)(b) Maps of the farm identifying fields, soils, and spreading restrictions and prohibitions. ATCP 50.48(6)(c)(c) Crop, field, and nutrient information, such as crop rotation, tillage, soil nutrient levels and nutrient applications. ATCP 50.48 NoteNote: An example of reasonable documentation for substantiating checklist responses and determining compliance is a database file from nutrient management planning software.
ATCP 50.48 HistoryHistory: CR 01-090: cr. Register September 2002 No. 561, eff. 10-1-02; CR 05-013: am. (2) (a) 3. Register May 2007 No. 617, eff. 6-1-07; CR 16-083: am. (1) (a), (2) (a) 2. to 4., (6) Register January 2018 No. 745, eff. 2-1-18; correction in (2) (a) 4., (6) made under s. 35.17, Stats., Register January 2018 No. 745; CR 23-024: am. (1) (a), (2) (a) 4., (4), renum. (6) to (6) (intro.) and am., cr. (6) (a) to (c) Register May 2024 No. 821, eff. 6-1-24. ATCP 50.50ATCP 50.50 Soil and manure testing laboratories. ATCP 50.50(1)(1) Certified laboratory. A nutrient management plan shall be based on soil tests conducted at the University of Wisconsin or another soil testing laboratory certified by the department. The department may certify a laboratory according to this section. ATCP 50.50(2)(2) Applying for certification. A laboratory operator may apply to the department for certification under sub. (1). An operator shall submit a separate application, on a form provided by the department, for each laboratory for which the operator seeks certification. The application shall include all of the following: ATCP 50.50(2)(c)(c) The name and telephone number of the individual who is responsible for on-site administration of the laboratory. ATCP 50.50(2)(d)(d) The soil tests, test methods, and nitrogen estimation methods used by the laboratory. The laboratory shall be capable of performing the following tests according to methods prescribed by the University of Wisconsin-Extension in Nutrient Application Guidelines for Field, Vegetable, and Fruit Crops in Wisconsin, UWEX Publication A2809 (2012), and by the University of Wisconsin-Madison soil science department in Wisconsin Procedures for Soil Testing, Plant Analysis and Feed & Forage Analysis, Soil Fertility Series (October, 2013) and shall be capable of estimating nitrogen levels based on those tests:
/exec_review/admin_code/atcp/020/50
true
administrativecode
/exec_review/admin_code/atcp/020/50/vi/46/8/c
Department of Agriculture, Trade and Consumer Protection (ATCP)
Chs. ATCP 20-54; Agricultural Resource Management
administrativecode/ATCP 50.46(8)(c)
administrativecode/ATCP 50.46(8)(c)
section
true
