59.26(4m)(a)(a) The sheriff or undersheriff may depute in writing security officers employed by the department of military affairs, subject to the approval of the adjutant general or his or her designee, for the purpose of conducting routine external security checks around military installations in this state. The sheriff or undersheriff shall specify in writing the jurisdiction of an officer deputed under this paragraph. In this paragraph, “external security checks” means a security check of areas immediately adjacent to a military installation, or of critical concern to the installation’s commander as determined by the commander, for the sole purpose of protecting the installation’s state and federal personnel, assets, and equipment. 59.26(4m)(b)(b) The provisions of sub. (8) (b) do not apply to an individual deputed under par. (a), and such a person shall serve at the pleasure of the deputing authority. 59.26(4m)(c)(c) An individual deputed under par. (a) remains a state employee for all purposes. 59.26(5)(5) The sheriff or the undersheriff may also depute in writing other persons to perform particular acts. 59.26(6)(6) Every appointment of an undersheriff or deputy, except deputations to perform a particular act, and every revocation of such appointment shall be in writing and be filed and recorded in the office of the clerk of the circuit court. 59.26(7)(7) In case of a vacancy in the office of sheriff, the undersheriff shall in all things and with like liabilities and penalties execute the duties of the office of sheriff until the vacancy is filled as provided by law. 59.26(8)(a)(a) In any county with a population of less than 750,000, the board, by ordinance, may fix the number of deputy sheriffs to be appointed in that county at not less than that number required by sub. (1) (a) and (b) and may set the salary of those deputies. Subject to sub. (10), the board may provide by ordinance that deputy sheriff positions be filled by appointment by the sheriff from a list of all persons with the 3 highest scores for each position based on a competitive examination. Such competitive examinations may be by a county civil service commission or by the bureau of merit recruitment and selection in the department of administration at the option of the board and it shall so provide by ordinance. The bureau of merit recruitment and selection shall, upon request of the board, conduct such examination according to the methods used in examinations for the state civil service and shall certify an eligible list of the names of all persons with the 3 highest scores on that examination for each position to the sheriff of that county who shall, subject to sub. (10), make an appointment from that list to fill the position within 10 days after he or she receives the eligible list. The county for which such examination is conducted shall pay the cost of that examination. If a civil service commission is decided upon for the selection of deputy sheriffs, then ss. 63.01 to 63.17 shall apply so far as consistent with this subsection, except ss. 63.03, 63.04 and 63.15 and except the provision governing minimum compensation of the commissioners. The ordinance or an amending ordinance may provide for employee grievance procedures and disciplinary actions, for hours of work, for tours of duty according to seniority and for other administrative regulations. Any board provision consistent with this paragraph and existing on July 25, 1951, is validated. If the sheriff fills a deputy sheriff position by promotion, the sheriff shall, subject to sub. (10), make the appointment to the position from a list of 3 deputy sheriffs who receive the highest scores in a competitive examination. Such competitive examinations may be by a county civil service commission or by the bureau of merit recruitment and selection at the option of the board and it shall so provide by ordinance. 59.26(8)(b)1.1. The persons appointed shall hold the office of deputy sheriff on good behavior. In any county operating under this subsection, but not under s. 59.52 (8), whenever the sheriff or undersheriff or a majority of the members of a civil service commission for the selection of deputy sheriffs believes that a deputy has acted so as to show the deputy to be incompetent to perform the duties of deputy sheriff or to have merited suspension, demotion or dismissal, the sheriff, undersheriff or civil service commission shall report in writing to the grievance committee setting forth specifically the complaint against the deputy, and, when the party filing the complaint is a sheriff or undersheriff, may suspend or demote the officer at the time such complaint is filed. The grievance committee shall be appointed in the same manner and at the same time as standing committees of the board are appointed. The committee may be made up of members of the board or other electors of the county, or both. Such members shall be paid in the same manner as members of other board committees. 59.26(8)(b)2.2. The grievance committee shall immediately notify the accused officer of the filing of the charges and on request furnish the accused officer with a copy of the same. 59.26(8)(b)3.3. The grievance committee shall, if the officer requests a hearing, appoint a time and place for the hearing of the charges, the time to be within 3 weeks after the filing of such request for a hearing and the committee shall notify the sheriff or undersheriff or the members of the civil service commission, whichever filed the complaint with the committee, and the accused of the time and place of such hearing. If the accused officer makes no request to the grievance committee, then the committee may take whatever action it considers justifiable on the basis of the charges filed and shall issue an order in writing as provided in subd. 5. The committee may take testimony at the hearing, and any testimony taken shall be transcribed. The chairperson of the committee shall issue subpoenas for the attendance of such witnesses as may be requested by the accused. 59.26(8)(b)4.4. At the hearing the chairperson of the committee may maintain order and enforce obedience to the chairperson’s lawful requirements. If a person at the hearing acts in a disorderly manner and persists after notice from the chairperson, the chairperson may order the person to leave the hearing. If the order is refused the chairperson may order the sheriff or other person to take the disorderly person into custody until the hearing is adjourned for that day. 59.26(8)(b)5.5. At the termination of the hearing the grievance committee shall determine in writing whether or not the charge is well-founded and shall take such action by way of suspension, demotion, discharge or reinstatement as it considers requisite and proper under the circumstances and file the same with the secretary of the committee. 59.26(8)(b)5m.5m. No deputy may be suspended, demoted or discharged by the grievance committee under subd. 3. or 5., based on charges filed by the sheriff, undersheriff or a majority of the members of the civil service commission for the selection of deputies unless the committee determines whether there is just cause, as described in this subdivision, to sustain the charges. In making its determination, the committee shall apply the following standards, to the extent applicable: 59.26(8)(b)5m.a.a. Whether the deputy could reasonably be expected to have had knowledge of the probable consequences of the alleged conduct. 59.26(8)(b)5m.b.b. Whether the rule or order that the deputy allegedly violated is reasonable. 59.26(8)(b)5m.c.c. Whether the sheriff, before filing the charge against the deputy, made a reasonable effort to discover whether the deputy did in fact violate a rule or order. 59.26(8)(b)5m.e.e. Whether the sheriff discovered substantial evidence that the deputy violated the rule or order as described in the charges filed against the deputy. 59.26(8)(b)5m.f.f. Whether the sheriff is applying the rule or order fairly and without discrimination to the deputy. 59.26(8)(b)5m.g.g. Whether the proposed discipline reasonably relates to the seriousness of the alleged violation and to the deputy’s record of service with the sheriff’s department. 59.26(8)(b)6.6. The accused may appeal from the order to the circuit court by serving written notice of the appeal on the secretary of the committee within 10 days after the order is filed. Within 5 days after receiving written notice of the appeal, the board shall certify to the clerk of the circuit court the record of the proceedings, including all documents, testimony and minutes. The action shall then be at issue and shall have precedence over any other cause of a different nature pending in the court, which shall always be open to the trial thereof. The court shall upon application of the accused or of the board fix a date of trial, which shall not be later than 15 days after such application except by agreement. The trial shall be by the court and upon the return of the board, except that the court may require further return or the taking and return of further evidence by the board. The question to be determined by the court shall be: “Upon the evidence is there just cause, as described under subd. 5m., to sustain the charges against the accused?” No costs shall be allowed either party and the clerk’s fees shall be paid by the county. If the order of the committee is reversed, the accused shall be forthwith reinstated and entitled to pay as though in continuous service. If the order of the committee is sustained it shall be final and conclusive. 59.26(8)(c)(c) The board of any county enacting the ordinance provided for in this subsection may provide that any deputy sheriff acting as such at the time of the enactment shall be eligible to such appointment without examination. 59.26(8)(cm)(cm) Any board may by a majority vote establish, by ordinance in connection with the enactment of an ordinance providing for civil service selection and tenure of deputy sheriffs under pars. (a) and (b) or by amendment to such an ordinance previously enacted, a traffic division of the sheriff’s department and fix the number of deputy sheriffs as traffic patrolmen and other employees in said division in which case s. 83.016 shall become inoperative as to that county. The board in such ordinance shall further provide that the personnel in such traffic division of the sheriff’s department shall be appointed and hold their positions in the manner and under the conditions set forth in pars. (a) and (b). The board may also provide that traffic patrolmen who have been appointed under s. 83.016 and who are employed by the county at the time of the enactment of the ordinance under this subsection establishing a traffic division in the sheriff’s department and providing civil service therefor shall be appointed to positions in such traffic division without examination. 59.26(8)(d)(d) Enactment of the ordinances provided for by this subsection shall not preclude the board from thereafter amending or repealing such ordinances, but such amendment or repeal shall not be effective unless voted by the affirmative vote of three-fourths of the members-elect of such board. The civil service provisions of this section shall apply only to such deputies or traffic patrolmen who are regularly employed by the county or sheriff and shall not apply to honorary deputies. Notwithstanding the provisions of this subsection the board may enact a civil service ordinance for county employees under s. 59.52 (8) which civil service ordinance may include deputy sheriffs or traffic patrolmen, or both. 59.26(9)(a)(a) A deputy sheriff in any county may not be suspended or dismissed under sub. (8) or s. 59.52 (8) or 63.10 without pay or benefits, for any action taken that is within the scope of the deputy’s employment, until the matter that is the subject of the suspension or dismissal is disposed of by the grievance committee or civil service commission or the time for appeal of that matter passes without an appeal being made. 59.26(9)(b)(b) An ordinance of any county or a collective bargaining agreement may not diminish or abridge a right of a deputy sheriff that is granted under par. (a). An ordinance of such a county or a collective bargaining agreement may supplement and expand such a right in a manner that is not inconsistent with par. (a). 59.26(9)(c)(c) If the matter that is the subject of the suspension or dismissal is decided adversely to the deputy sheriff by the grievance committee or the civil service commission, the time for appeal passes without an appeal being made or the deputy’s appeal to the circuit court is decided adversely to the deputy, all pay and benefits received by the deputy sheriff between the time of his or her suspension or dismissal and the latest of an adverse ruling by the committee, the commission or the court or the time for appeal passes shall be returned to the county. 59.26(10)(a)(a) Notwithstanding the provisions in subs. (1) (intro.), (2), (3), and (8) (a), and subject to par. (b), if a county provides law enforcement services to a city or village under ss. 59.03 (2) (e) and 62.13 (2s) and if the sheriff appoints additional deputies under sub. (2) to provide the services, the sheriff shall, to the greatest extent possible, fill the additional deputy positions from the ranks of former police officers who lost their positions when their department was abolished under s. 62.13 (2s) (a). With regard to each contract that is entered into under s. 59.03 (2) (e), this provision does not apply on or after the first day of the 25th month beginning after the contract takes effect in the county. 59.26(10)(b)(b) Paragraph (a) applies only to the extent that it is not inconsistent with any collective bargaining agreement that is in effect between a county and its employees. 59.26 AnnotationUpon reinstatement of an unreasonably suspended deputy sheriff, the amount of pay due is to be reduced by amounts earned in other employment during the period of suspension. State ex rel. Klingler v. Baird, 56 Wis. 2d 460, 202 N.W.2d 31 (1972). 59.26 AnnotationThe burden of establishing a lack of reasonable and diligent efforts by suspended deputy sheriffs to seek other employment and the availability of employment is on the employer. State ex rel. Schilling v. Baird, 65 Wis. 2d 394, 222 N.W.2d 666 (1974). 59.26 AnnotationA sheriff’s assignment of a deputy to an undercover drug investigation falls within the constitutionally protected powers of the sheriff and could not be limited by a collective bargaining agreement. Manitowoc County v. Local 986B, 168 Wis. 2d 819, 484 N.W.2d 534 (1992). 59.26 AnnotationUnder s. 59.21 (8) (b) [now sub. (8) (b)], deputies have civil service protections and tenure beyond their initial terms of appointment under sub. (4) and also have protections under collective bargaining agreements not in conflict with the statutes. Heitkemper v. Wirsing, 194 Wis. 2d 182, 533 N.W.2d 770 (1995). See also Brown County Sheriff’s Department v. Brown County Sheriff's Department Non-Supervisory Employees Ass’n, 194 Wis. 2d 265, 533 N.W.2d 766 (1995). 59.26 AnnotationSection 165.85 (4) (b) governs the terms of employment of a probationary sheriff’s deputy so that the discipline procedures under s. 59.21 (8) (b) [now sub. (8) (b)] do not apply and an applicable collective bargaining agreement controls. Hussey v. Outagamie County, 201 Wis. 2d 14, 548 N.W.2d 848 (Ct. App. 1996), 95-2948. 59.26 AnnotationThe court of appeals lacks jurisdiction to hear an appeal of a circuit court order under sub. (8) (b) 6. Public Safety & Justice Committee v. Erickson, 220 Wis. 2d 175, 582 N.W.2d 742 (Ct. App. 1998), 97-1621. 59.26 AnnotationUnder the Wisconsin Constitution, the sheriff has certain powers and prerogatives derived from the common law that cannot be limited by collective bargaining agreements. If a duty is one of those immemorial principal and important duties that characterized the office of sheriff at common law, the sheriff may choose the ways and means of performing the duty and cannot be limited by a collective bargaining agreement. Internal management and administrative duties fall within the “mundane and commonplace” duties not preserved at common law. Dunn County v. WERC, 2006 WI App 120, 293 Wis. 2d 637, 718 N.W.2d 138, 05-1917. 59.26 AnnotationA collective bargaining agreement provision confining the powers of deputies serving as court security officers to the county judicial center and giving the clerk of courts priority over the sheriff in the scheduling, directing, and supervision of those deputies interferes with the sheriff’s duty of attendance on the court, which is a duty preserved for the sheriff by the constitution. Dunn County v. WERC, 2006 WI App 120, 293 Wis. 2d 637, 718 N.W.2d 138, 05-1917. 59.26 AnnotationThe power to hire does not give character and distinction to the office of sheriff; it is not a power peculiar to the office. Certain duties of the sheriff at common law that are peculiar to the office and that characterize and distinguish the office are constitutionally protected from legislative interference, but the constitution does not prohibit all legislative change in the powers and duties of a sheriff as they existed at common law. Internal management and administrative duties that neither give character nor distinction to the office fall within the mundane and common administrative duties that may be regulated by the legislature. Hiring and firing personnel to provide food to inmates is subject to legislative regulation, including collective bargaining under s. 111.70. Kocken v. Wisconsin Council 40, 2007 WI 72, 301 Wis. 2d 266, 732 N.W.2d 828, 05-2742. 59.26 AnnotationThe assignment of deputies to transport federal and state prisoners to and from a county jail pursuant to a contract for the rental of bed space is not a constitutionally protected duty of the sheriff’s office and is thus subject to the restrictions of a collective bargaining agreement. Ozaukee County v. Labor Ass’n of Wisconsin, 2008 WI App 174, 315 Wis. 2d 102, 763 N.W.2d 140, 07-1615. 59.26 AnnotationA sheriff may not be restricted in whom the sheriff assigns to carry out the sheriff’s constitutional duties if the sheriff is performing immemorial, principal, and important duties characterized as belonging to the sheriff at common law. Attending on the courts is one of the duties preserved for the sheriff by the constitution. When a sheriff effects the delivery of prisoners pursuant to court-issued writs, the sheriff is attending on the court and can contract with a private entity for the transportation of prisoners, rather than utilizing deputies employed by the sheriffs department. Brown County Sheriff’s Department Non-Supervisory Labor Ass’n v. Brown County, 2009 WI App 75, 318 Wis. 2d 774, 767 N.W.2d 600, 08-2069. 59.26 AnnotationWhen a collective bargaining agreement (CBA) provided a grievance procedure and stated that “in cases for proper cause, this [grievance] procedure shall be followed insofar as it is consistent with [sub.] (8) (b),” and the court found that use of the grievance procedure in the CBA was “consistent with” sub. (8) (b), sub. (8) (b) allowed a dismissed deputy to choose to appeal the order of the grievance committee to circuit court or utilize the grievance procedure in the CBA. Waukesha County v. WERC, 2014 WI App 20, 352 Wis. 2d 707, 844 N.W.2d 385, 13-0375. 59.26 AnnotationThe sheriff does not have unilateral statutory authority under sub. (2) to determine the total number of deputies to be appointed. Section 59.22 plainly provides that a county board may establish the number of employees in any department or office, including deputies to elective officers, and that section prevails over sub. (2). Thus, the county board, and not the sheriff, has the authority to regulate the number of law enforcement officers employed by the county. Milwaukee Deputy Sheriffs’ Ass’n v. Milwaukee County, 2016 WI App 56, 370 Wis. 2d 644, 883 N.W.2d 154, 15-1577. 59.26 AnnotationWhen a county has a civil service plan for deputy sheriffs, transfers may result in promotion, and such vacancies should be filled by examination and certification of three eligibles to the sheriff for appointment. 61 Atty. Gen. 10.
59.26 AnnotationIn counties where deputy sheriffs are under civil service under s. 59.21 (8) [now sub. (8)], the county board may provide job classifications for deputy sheriff positions that would form the basis of selection of competent personnel who could, on appointment by the sheriff, be assigned to perform duties on a felony squad on a countywide basis. By reason of s. 59.24 (1) [now s. 59.28 (1)], or by means of a posse comitatus, the sheriff could on a case-by-case basis assert leadership, direction, and control over the investigation of a crime in an area that has a police department, and it is the duty of local police to cooperate. 61 Atty. Gen. 79.
59.26 AnnotationSection 63.065 is incorporated by reference into s. 59.21 (8) (a) [now sub. (8) (a)]. 68 Atty. Gen. 124.
59.26 AnnotationThis section does not affect a sheriff’s power to call a posse comitatus. 68 Atty. Gen. 334.
59.26 AnnotationIn counties that have imposed no local residency requirement, only deputy sheriffs or undersheriffs appointed under s. 59.21 (1) [now sub. (1)] are required to be county residents at the time of initial employment. 80 Atty. Gen. 119. 59.26 AnnotationA sheriff represents the county when enforcing the law. Sovereign immunity for state officials under the 11th amendment to the U.S. Constitution does not apply. Abraham v. Piechowski, 13 F. Supp. 2d 870 (1998). 59.2759.27 Sheriff; duties. The sheriff of a county shall do all of the following: 59.27(1)(1) Take the charge and custody of the jail maintained by the county and the persons in the jail, and keep the persons in the jail personally or by a deputy or jailer. 59.27(2)(2) Keep a true and exact register of all prisoners committed to any jail under the sheriff’s charge, in a book for that purpose, which shall contain the names of all persons who are committed to any such jail, their residence, the time when committed and cause of commitment, and the authority by which they were committed; and if for a criminal offense, a description of the person; and when any prisoner is liberated, state the time when and the authority by which the prisoner was liberated; and if any person escapes, state the particulars of the time and manner of such escape. 59.27(3)(3) Attend upon the circuit court held in the sheriff’s county during its session, and at the request of the court file with the clerk thereof a list of deputies for attendance on the court. The court may by special order authorize additional deputies to attend when the court is engaged in the trial of any person charged with a crime. Except as otherwise provided in this section, the board shall establish the rate of compensation and the level of services to be provided. The sheriff or one or more deputies shall attend the court of appeals when it is in session in the sheriff’s county. The state shall reimburse the county from the appropriation under s. 20.660 (1) for the actual salary paid to the sheriff or deputies for the service provided for the court of appeals. 59.27(4)(4) Personally, or by the undersheriff or deputies, serve or execute all processes, writs, precepts and orders issued or made by lawful authority and delivered to the sheriff. 59.27(5)(5) Deliver on demand to the sheriff’s successor in office, when the sheriff’s successor has qualified according to law, the jail and other property of the county and all prisoners in the jail, and all books, records, writs, processes, orders and other papers belonging to the sheriff’s office and in the possession of the sheriff, undersheriff, jailer or deputies, except as provided in s. 59.33, and upon the delivery of these items the successor in office shall execute a receipt to the sheriff therefor. 59.27(6)(6) In counties having a population of 300,000 or more, assign one deputy, to be mutually agreed upon by the sheriff and the district attorney, to the office of the district attorney. 59.27(7)(7) Perform all other duties required of the sheriff by law. 59.27(8)(8) The sheriff is authorized to destroy all sheriff’s dockets, daily jail records and cash books dated prior to 1901. It shall be the duty of the sheriff to retain and safely keep all such records for a period of 8 years, or a shorter period authorized by the public records board under s. 16.61 (3) (b), after which the records may be destroyed. 59.27(9)(9) When the sheriff is required to serve or execute a summons, order or judgment, or to do any other act, the sheriff shall be bound to do so in like manner as upon process issued to the sheriff, and shall be equally liable in all respects for neglect of duty; and if the sheriff is a party the coroner shall perform the service and all statutes relating to sheriffs shall apply to coroners where the sheriff is a party. 59.27(10)(10) To enforce in the county all general orders of the department of safety and professional services relating to the sale, transportation and storage of explosives. 59.27(11)(11) Conduct operations within the county and, when the board so provides, in waters of which the county has jurisdiction under s. 2.04 for the rescue of human beings and for the recovery of human bodies. 59.27(12)(12) Before conducting a sale of foreclosed property, contact the clerk of the federal bankruptcy court to determine whether the court has granted a stay of relief on that property. 59.27(13)(13) Enforce all city, or village, ordinances in a city, or village, in which the sheriff provides law enforcement services under a contract described under s. 62.13 (2s) (a). 59.27 AnnotationDiscussing sheriffs’ powers and duties. Wisconsin Professional Police Ass’n v. County of Dane, 106 Wis. 2d 303, 316 N.W.2d 656 (1982). 59.27 AnnotationA sheriff’s assignment of a deputy to an undercover drug investigation falls within the constitutionally protected powers of the sheriff and could not be limited by a collective bargaining agreement. Manitowoc County v. Local 986B, 168 Wis. 2d 819, 484 N.W.2d 534 (1992). 59.27 AnnotationUnder the Wisconsin Constitution, the sheriff has certain powers and prerogatives derived from the common law that cannot be limited by collective bargaining agreements. If a duty is one of those immemorial principal and important duties that characterized the office of sheriff at common law, the sheriff may choose the ways and means of performing the duty and cannot be limited by a collective bargaining agreement. Internal management and administrative duties fall within the “mundane and commonplace” duties not preserved at common law. Dunn County v. WERC, 2006 WI App 120, 293 Wis. 2d 637, 718 N.W.2d 138, 05-1917. 59.27 AnnotationA collective bargaining agreement provision confining the powers of deputies serving as court security officers to the county judicial center and giving the clerk of courts priority over the sheriff in the scheduling, directing, and supervision of those deputies interferes with the sheriff’s duty of attendance on the court, which is a duty preserved for the sheriff by the constitution. Dunn County v. WERC, 2006 WI App 120, 293 Wis. 2d 637, 718 N.W.2d 138, 05-1917. 59.27 AnnotationThe power to hire does not give character and distinction to the office of sheriff; it is not a power peculiar to the office. Certain duties of the sheriff at common law that are peculiar to the office and that characterize and distinguish the office are constitutionally protected from legislative interference, but the constitution does not prohibit all legislative change in the powers and duties of a sheriff as they existed at common law. Internal management and administrative duties that neither give character nor distinction to the office fall within the mundane and common administrative duties that may be regulated by the legislature. Hiring and firing personnel to provide food to inmates is subject to legislative regulation, including collective bargaining under s. 111.70. Kocken v. Wisconsin Council 40, 2007 WI 72, 301 Wis. 2d 266, 732 N.W.2d 828, 05-2742. 59.27 AnnotationThe assignment of deputies to transport federal and state prisoners to and from a county jail pursuant to a contract for the rental of bed space is not a constitutionally protected duty of the sheriff’s office and is thus subject to the restrictions of a collective bargaining agreement. Ozaukee County v. Labor Ass’n of Wisconsin, 2008 WI App 174, 315 Wis. 2d 102, 763 N.W.2d 140, 07-1615. 59.27 AnnotationA sheriff may not be restricted in whom the sheriff assigns to carry out the sheriff’s constitutional duties if the sheriff is performing immemorial, principal, and important duties characterized as belonging to the sheriff at common law. Attending on the courts is one of the duties preserved for the sheriff by the constitution. When a sheriff effects the delivery of prisoners pursuant to court-issued writs, the sheriff is attending on the court and can contract with a private entity for the transportation of prisoners, rather than utilizing deputies employed by the sheriffs department. Brown County Sheriff’s Department Non-Supervisory Labor Ass’n v. Brown County, 2009 WI App 75, 318 Wis. 2d 774, 767 N.W.2d 600, 08-2069. 59.27 AnnotationStaffing an x-ray and metal detector security screening station is not one of those “certain immemorial, principal, and important duties of the sheriff at common law that are peculiar to the office of sheriff” and is not part of the sheriff’s constitutionally protected powers that cannot be limited by a collective bargaining agreement. Washington County v. Washington County Deputy Sheriff’s Ass’n, 2009 WI App 116, 320 Wis. 2d 570, 772 N.W.2d 697, 08-1210. 59.27 AnnotationThe transport of individuals in conjunction with the service or execution of all processes, writs, precepts, and orders constitute immemorial, principal, and important duties that characterize and distinguish the office of sheriff and fall within the sheriff’s constitutional powers, rights, and duties. As such, the sheriff has the constitutional authority to determine how to carry out those duties and can elect to privatize those duties. That sub. (4) specifically directs that the sheriff must act personally or by means of the sheriff’s undersheriff or deputies is not persuasive. The simple fact that the legislature codified a duty and responsibility of the sheriff, like providing food for jail inmates, does not strip sheriffs of any constitutional protections they may have regarding this duty. Milwaukee Deputy Sheriff’s Ass’n v. Clarke, 2009 WI App 123, 320 Wis. 2d 486, 772 N.W.2d 216, 08-2290. 59.27 AnnotationA sheriff has authority to aid in a rescue on ice on Lake Michigan. 60 Atty. Gen. 62.
59.27 AnnotationNeither a sheriff nor a deputy can solicit or receive compensation not provided by law for official duties, but a deputy, while off duty, can be employed as a private security officer. 61 Atty. Gen. 256.
59.27 AnnotationNeither the sheriff nor the county board may “privatize” the jailer function under sub. (1). 77 Atty. Gen. 94. 59.27 AnnotationNeither a county nor a county sheriff possesses statutory authority to use county funds to establish a revolving bail fund for the purpose of making loans to persons allowing them to post bail for certain kinds of offenses for which they are booked into the county jail. OAG 1-09. 59.2859.28 Peace maintenance; powers and duties of peace officers, cooperation. 59.28(1)(1) Sheriffs and their undersheriffs and deputies shall keep and preserve the peace in their respective counties and quiet and suppress all affrays, routs, riots, unlawful assemblies and insurrections; for which purpose, and for the service of processes in civil or criminal cases and in the apprehending or securing any person for felony or breach of the peace they and every coroner and constable may call to their aid such persons or power of their county as they consider necessary. 59.28(2)(2) County law enforcement agencies may request the assistance of law enforcement personnel or may assist other law enforcement agencies as provided in ss. 66.0313 and 66.0513. 59.28 HistoryHistory: 1995 a. 201 s. 282; Stats. 1995 s. 59.28; 1999 a. 150 s. 672. 59.28 AnnotationSuppression of evidence is not required when a law enforcement officer obtains evidence outside of the officer’s jurisdiction. Any jurisdictional transgression violates the appropriate jurisdiction’s authority, not the defendant’s rights. State v. Mieritz, 193 Wis. 2d 571, 534 N.W.2d 632 (Ct. App. 1995). 59.28 AnnotationA state traffic patrol officer should not, except in extreme emergencies, be impressed into service as part of a posse comitatus under sub. (1). If so impressed, the officer is entitled to worker’s compensation, if injured, from the county or municipality but would not be entitled to regular pay from the state and probably would not be entitled to worker’s compensation from the state. 62 Atty. Gen. 38.
59.28 AnnotationThe statutes do not permit the creation of a separate regional law enforcement agency, and neither the sheriff nor the county board has power to delegate supervisory or law enforcement powers to such an agency. 63 Atty. Gen. 596.
