Chapter 52

Date ....

Witness No. 2:

(print) Name ....

Address ....

Phone number(s) ....

Signature ....

Date ....

OPTION II: NOTARY PUBLIC

State of ....

County of ....

This document was acknowledged before me on .... (date), by (name of adult with a functional impairment) and ..... (name of supporter).

Signature of notary ....

(Seal, if any, of notary)

Printed name ....

My commission expires: ....

52.20(2) (2) The department of health services shall prepare and provide access to a supported decision-making agreement instrument and accompanying information for adults with functional impairments, family members of adults with functional impairments, education professionals and school districts, health care and social service professionals, county clerks, and local bar associations. The department may charge a reasonable fee for the cost of preparation and distribution.

52.20 History History: 2017 a. 345; 2021 a. 238 s. 44.

subch. III of ch. 52 SUBCHAPTER III

DUTY OF CERTAIN PERSONS WITH
RESPECT TO AGREEMENT

52.30 52.30 Reliance on agreement; limitation of liability.

52.30(1) (1) A person who receives the original or a copy of a supported decision-making agreement shall rely on the agreement, except if the person has cause to believe that the adult with a functional impairment is being abused, neglected, unduly influenced, or financially exploited by the supporter as described under s. 52.32.

52.30(2) (2) A person is not subject to criminal or civil liability and has not engaged in professional misconduct for an act or omission if the act or omission is done in good faith and in reliance on a supported decision-making agreement.

52.30(3) (3) Any health care provider that respects and acts consistently with the authority given to a supporter by a duly executed supported decision-making agreement shall be immune from any action alleging that the agreement was invalid unless the entity, custodian, or organization had actual knowledge or notice that the adult with a functional impairment had revoked such authorization, that the agreement was invalid, or that the supporter had committed abuse, neglect, or financial exploitation as described in s. 52.14 (2) (a).

52.30(4) (4) Any health care provider that provides health care based on the consent of an adult with a functional impairment, made with supports and services provided through a duly executed supported decision-making agreement, shall be immune from any action alleging that the adult with a functional impairment lacked capacity to provide informed consent unless the entity, custodian, or organization had actual knowledge or notice that the adult with a functional impairment had revoked such authorization, that the agreement was invalid, or that the supporter had committed abuse, neglect, or financial exploitation as described in s. 52.14 (2) (a).

52.30(5) (5) Any public or private entity, custodian, or organization that discloses personal information about an adult with a functional impairment to a supporter who is authorized to access, collect, or obtain or assist the adult with a functional impairment in accessing, collecting, or obtaining that information shall be immune from any action alleging that it improperly or unlawfully disclosed such information to the supporter unless the entity, custodian, or organization had actual knowledge that the adult with a functional impairment had revoked such authorization.

52.30(6) (6) This section may not be construed to provide immunity from actions alleging that a health care provider has done any of the following:

52.30(6)(a) (a) Caused personal injury as a result of a negligent, reckless, or intentional act.

52.30(6)(b) (b) Acted inconsistently with the expressed wishes of an adult with a functional impairment.

52.30(6)(c) (c) Failed to provide information to either an adult with a functional impairment or his or her supporter that would be necessary for informed consent.

52.30(6)(d) (d) Otherwise acted inconsistently with applicable law.

52.30(7) (7) The existence or availability of a supported decision-making agreement does not relieve a health care provider of any legal obligation to provide services to individuals with disabilities, including the obligation to provide reasonable accommodations or auxiliary aids and services, including interpretation services and communication supports to individuals with disabilities under the federal Americans with Disabilities Act.

52.30(8) (8) A supporter acting in the context of a valid supported decision-making agreement is immune from civil liability for his or her acts or omissions in performing duties as the supporter if he or she performs the duties in good faith, in conformance with the supported decision-making agreement or document of the adult with a functional impairment, and with the degree and prudence that an ordinarily prudent person exercises in his or her own affairs.

52.30 History History: 2017 a. 345; 2021 a. 238 s. 44.

52.32 52.32 Reporting of suspected abuse, neglect, or financial exploitation.

52.32(1) (1) If a person who receives a copy of a supported decision-making agreement or is aware of the existence of a supported decision-making agreement has cause to believe that the adult with a functional impairment is being abused, neglected, or financially exploited by the supporter, the person may report under s. 46.90 or 55.043 the alleged abuse, neglect, or financial exploitation.

52.32(2) (2) Nothing in this section may be construed as eliminating or limiting a person’s requirement to report under any other statute or regulation.

52.32 History History: 2017 a. 345; 2021 a. 238 s. 44.