SB270: Bill Text

The bill requires DOT to notify the owner of the relevant utility facility upon receipt of a damages claim. The owner may respond to the claim by providing additional information related to the claim. DOT must consider all information provided and, if DOT determines that a utility relocation delay occurred, must compensate the contractor for costs incurred as a result.

Under the bill, if a utility relocation delay was caused by a utility facility owner’s failure to complete a relocation in accordance with an approved plan, the utility facility owner is liable to DOT for any compensation paid to a contractor as a result of a utility relocation delay. The owner must make payment to DOT within 60 days, subject to the right to appeal DOT’s determination. If the owner fails to make the required payment, DOT may seek remedy by filing a civil suit against the owner.

The bill requires DOT to submit a report to the Joint Committee on Finance within four years providing specified information about utility relocation damages claims received by DOT. Within six months of receipt of the report, JFC must make a recommendation as to whether the process created by the bill should be amended or repealed.

For further information see the state fiscal estimate, which will be printed as an appendix to this bill.

SB270,,4 The people of the state of Wisconsin, represented in senate and assembly, do enact as follows:

SB270,1 Section 1. 84.01 (31) of the statutes is amended to read:

SB270,,6 84.01 (31) Accommodation of utility facilities within highway rights-of-way. Notwithstanding ss. 84.06 (4), 84.063, 84.065, and 84.093, the department may, upon finding that it is feasible and advantageous to the state, negotiate and enter into an agreement to accept any plant or equipment used for the conveyance, by wire, optics, radio signal, or other means, of voice, data, or other information at any frequency over any part of the electromagnetic spectrum, or to accept any services associated with the collection, storage, forwarding, switching, and delivery incidental to such communication, as payment for the accommodation of a utility facility, as defined in s. 84.063 (1) (b) (f), within a highway right-of-way. Any agreement under this subsection is exempt from ss. 16.70 to 16.75, 16.755 to 16.82, and 16.85 to 16.89, but ss. 16.528, 16.752, and 16.754 apply to such agreement.

SB270,2 Section 2. 84.062 (1) (L) of the statutes is amended to read:

SB270,,8 84.062 (1) (L) “Project” means a project involving a highway improvement, as defined in s. 84.063 (1) (a) (d).

SB270,3 Section 3. 84.063 (1) (a) of the statutes is renumbered 84.063 (1) (d).

SB270,4 Section 4. 84.063 (1) (b) of the statutes is renumbered 84.063 (1) (f).

SB270,5 Section 5. 84.063 (1) (c) of the statutes is created to read:

SB270,,12 84.063 (1) (c) “Contractor” means a person who is seeking or has entered into a highway improvement contract with the department under s. 84.06.

SB270,6 Section 6. 84.063 (1) (e) of the statutes is created to read:

SB270,,14 84.063 (1) (e) “Owner” means an owner of a utility facility.

SB270,7 Section 7. 84.063 (1) (g) of the statutes is created to read:

SB270,,16 84.063 (1) (g) “Utility relocation delay” means a change in operations of a contractor or the rescheduling of work by a contractor that is caused by the uncompleted relocation or adjustment of a utility facility located in the right-of way, regardless of whether the relocation or adjustment of the utility facility is identified in a plan under sub. (3).

SB270,8 Section 8. 84.063 (4m) of the statutes is created to read:

SB270,,18 84.063 (4m) Utility relocation delay damages claims. (a) A contractor that incurs costs as a result of a utility relocation delay may file a utility relocation delay damages claim with the department.

SB270,,19 (b) The department shall notify the owner of the relevant utility facility upon receipt of a claim under par. (a). The owner may respond to the claim by providing additional information related to the claim.

SB270,,20 (c) The department shall consider all information provided by the contractor under par. (a) and, if applicable, the owner under par. (b). If the department determines that a utility relocation delay occurred, the department shall compensate the contractor for costs incurred as a result of the utility relocation delay and may not impose liquidated damages. The amount of compensation under this paragraph shall be calculated and paid in accordance with the department’s standard specifications for compensable delays.

SB270,,21 (d) 1. If a utility relocation delay identified under par. (c) was caused by an owner’s failure to complete a relocation in accordance with a work plan approved by the department under sub. (3), the owner shall be liable to the department for compensation paid to a contractor under par. (c). An owner shall not be liable under this subdivision when the failure to complete a relocation is caused by circumstances outside of the owner’s reasonable control. The department may not assess against the owner any fees, costs, or expenses in excess of the compensation paid under par. (c). Subject to subd. 2., an owner shall make payment to the department no later than 60 days after receiving notice of the amount owed.

SB270,,22 2. An owner may appeal the decision of the department under subd. 1. as provided in s. 227.42 if the owner previously responded to the claim as provided in par. (b). Any amount that the owner owes to the department under subd. 1. shall be stayed pending the appeal.

SB270,,23 3. If an owner fails to make payment of amounts owed to the department under this paragraph, the department may seek remedy by filing a civil suit against the owner.

SB270,,24 (e) The department may not consider amounts paid or owed under par. (d) when making a determination on an owner’s permit application, amounts paid to the owner under par. (4) (a) or s. 84.09, or any other matter involving the owner.

SB270,9 Section 9. Trans 220.06 (7) (c) of the administrative code is amended to read:

SB270,,26 Trans 220.06 (7) (c) If the owner fails to provide a work plan as provided in s. Trans 220.05, or fails to complete the alteration or relocation of its facilities in accordance with the work plan approved by the department as provided in s. Trans 220.05, the owner shall be liable to the contractor for all delay costs and liquidated damages incurred by the contractor which are The department shall compensate the contractor for any costs caused by or which grow out of failure of the owner to carry out and complete its work in accordance with the approved work plan attributed to a utility relocation delay as defined in s. 84.063 (1) (g), Stats., and may not impose liquidated damages. The owner shall be liable, subject to the right to appeal the decision of the department under s. 227.42, Stats., for compensation paid by the department to a contractor under this paragraph for a utility relocation delay, as defined in s. 84.063 (1) (g), Stats., that was caused by the owner’s failure to complete a relocation in accordance with the work plan approved by the department as provided in s. Trans 220.05. The owner shall not be liable to the department for any delay if the owner’s failure to complete the relocation in accordance with the work plan approved by the department was due to circumstances outside of the owner’s reasonable control.

SB270,10 Section 10. Nonstatutory provisions.

SB270,,28 (1) No later than the last day of the first month following the effective date of this subsection, the department of transportation shall update its standard specifications for compensable delays to conform with the requirements under s. 84.063 (4m).

SB270,,29 (2) No later than 4 years after the effective date of this subsection, the department of transportation shall submit a report to the joint committee on finance detailing utility relocation damages claims received by the department, including total claims received, claims denied, payments made to contractors, damages recovered from owners, the length and impact of delays, and net expenditures by the department. No later than 6 months after receipt of the report under this subsection, the joint committee on finance shall make a recommendation to the legislature as to whether s. 84.063 (4m) should be amended or repealed.

SB270,,30 (end)