SB377: Bill Text

SB377,11,18 23.33 (4c) (a) 5. a. In an action under subd. 2m. that is based on the defendant allegedly having a detectable amount of methamphetamine, or gamma-hydroxybutyric acid, or delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol in his or her blood, the defendant has a defense if he or she proves by a preponderance of the evidence that at the time of the incident or occurrence he or she had a valid prescription for methamphetamine or one of its metabolic precursors, or gamma-hydroxybutyric acid, or delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol.

SB377,14 Section 14 . 23.33 (4c) (a) 5. b. of the statutes is created to read:

SB377,11,24 23.33 (4c) (a) 5. b. In an action under subd. 2g. or 3g. that is based on the defendant allegedly having a prohibited tetrahydrocannabinols concentration, the defendant has a defense if he or she proves by a preponderance of the evidence that at the time of the incident or occurrence he or she had a valid prescription for tetrahydrocannabinol or he or she was a qualifying patient, as defined in s. 50.80 (6).

SB377,15 Section 15 . 23.33 (4c) (b) 2n. of the statutes is created to read:

SB377,12,4 23.33 (4c) (b) 2n. `Causing injury while operating with tetrahydrocannabinols concentration at or above specified levels.' No person who has a tetrahydrocannabinols concentration of 5.0 or more may cause injury to another person by the operation of an all-terrain vehicle or utility terrain vehicle.

SB377,16 Section 16 . 23.33 (4c) (b) 3. of the statutes is amended to read:

SB377,12,15 23.33 (4c) (b) 3. `Related charges.' A person may be charged with and a prosecutor may proceed upon a complaint based upon a violation of any combination of subd. 1., 2., or 2m., or 2n. for acts arising out of the same incident or occurrence. If the person is charged with violating any combination of subd. 1., 2., or 2m., or 2n. in the complaint, the crimes shall be joined under s. 971.12. If the person is found guilty of any combination of subd. 1., 2., or 2m., or 2n. for acts arising out of the same incident or occurrence, there shall be a single conviction for purposes of sentencing and for purposes of counting convictions under sub. (13) (b) 2. and 3. Subdivisions 1., 2., and 2m., and 2n. each require proof of a fact for conviction which the others do not require.

SB377,17 Section 17 . 23.33 (4c) (b) 4. a. of the statutes is amended to read:

SB377,12,23 23.33 (4c) (b) 4. a. In an action under this paragraph, the defendant has a defense if he or she proves by a preponderance of the evidence that the injury would have occurred even if he or she had been exercising due care and he or she had not been under the influence of an intoxicant, did not have an alcohol concentration of 0.08 or more, or did not have a detectable amount of a restricted controlled substance in his or her blood, or did not have a tetrahydrocannabinols concentration of 5.0 or more.

SB377,18 Section 18 . 23.33 (4c) (b) 4. b. of the statutes is amended to read:

SB377,13,7 23.33 (4c) (b) 4. b. In an action under subd. 2m. that is based on the defendant allegedly having a detectable amount of methamphetamine, or gamma-hydroxybutyric acid, or delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol in his or her blood, the defendant has a defense if he or she proves by a preponderance of the evidence that at the time of the incident or occurrence he or she had a valid prescription for methamphetamine or one of its metabolic precursors, or gamma-hydroxybutyric acid, or delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol.

SB377,19 Section 19 . 23.33 (4c) (b) 4. c. of the statutes is created to read:

SB377,13,13 23.33 (4c) (b) 4. c. In an action under subd. 2n. that is based on the defendant allegedly having a prohibited tetrahydrocannabinols concentration, the defendant has a defense if he or she proves by a preponderance of the evidence that at the time of the incident or occurrence he or she had a valid prescription for tetrahydrocannabinol or he or she was a qualifying patient, as defined in s. 50.80 (6).

SB377,20 Section 20 . 23.33 (4p) (d) of the statutes is amended to read:

SB377,13,25 23.33 (4p) (d) Admissibility; effect of test results; other evidence. The results of a chemical test required or administered under par. (a), (b) or (c) are admissible in any civil or criminal action or proceeding arising out of the acts committed by a person alleged to have violated the intoxicated operation of an all-terrain vehicle or utility terrain vehicle law on the issue of whether the person was under the influence of an intoxicant or the issue of whether the person had alcohol concentrations or tetrahydrocannabinols concentrations at or above specified levels or a detectable amount of a restricted controlled substance in his or her blood. Results of these chemical tests shall be given the effect required under s. 885.235. This subsection does not limit the right of a law enforcement officer to obtain evidence by any other lawful means.

SB377,21 Section 21. 23.33 (13) (b) 1. of the statutes is amended to read:

SB377,14,4 23.33 (13) (b) 1. Except as provided under subds. 2. and 3., a person who violates sub. (4c) (a) 1., 2., 2g., or 2m. or (4p) (e) shall forfeit not less than $150 nor more than $300.

SB377,22 Section 22 . 23.33 (13) (b) 2. of the statutes is amended to read:

SB377,14,11 23.33 (13) (b) 2. Except as provided under subd. 3., a person who violates sub. (4c) (a) 1., 2., 2g., or 2m. or (4p) (e) and who, within 5 years prior to the arrest for the current violation, was convicted previously under the intoxicated operation of an all-terrain vehicle or utility terrain vehicle law or the refusal law shall be fined not less than $300 nor more than $1,100 and shall be imprisoned not less than 5 days nor more than 6 months.

SB377,23 Section 23 . 23.33 (13) (b) 3. of the statutes is amended to read:

SB377,14,18 23.33 (13) (b) 3. A person who violates sub. (4c) (a) 1., 2., 2g., or 2m. or (4p) (e) and who, within 5 years prior to the arrest for the current violation, was convicted 2 or more times previously under the intoxicated operation of an all-terrain vehicle or utility terrain vehicle law or refusal law shall be fined not less than $600 nor more than $2,000 and shall be imprisoned not less than 30 days nor more than one year in the county jail.

SB377,24 Section 24 . 23.33 (13) (b) 4. of the statutes is amended to read:

SB377,14,21 23.33 (13) (b) 4. A person who violates sub. (4c) (a) 3. or 3g. or (4p) (e) and who has not attained the age of 21 shall forfeit not more than $50.

SB377,25 Section 25 . 23.33 (13) (e) of the statutes is amended to read:

SB377,15,7 23.33 (13) (e) Alcohol, controlled substances or controlled substance analogs, tetrahydrocannabinols; assessment. In addition to any other penalty or order, a person who violates sub. (4c) (a) or (b) or (4p) (e) or who violates s. 940.09 or 940.25 if the violation involves the operation of an all-terrain vehicle or utility terrain vehicle, shall be ordered by the court to submit to and comply with an assessment by an approved public treatment facility for an examination of the person's use of alcohol, controlled substances or controlled substance analogs, or tetrahydrocannabinols. The assessment order shall comply with s. 343.30 (1q) (c) 1. a. to c. Intentional failure to comply with an assessment ordered under this paragraph constitutes contempt of court, punishable under ch. 785.

SB377,26 Section 26 . 23.335 (1) (zgm) 1. of the statutes is amended to read:

SB377,15,10 23.335 (1) (zgm) 1. A controlled substance included in schedule I under ch. 961 other than a tetrahydrocannabinol.

SB377,27 Section 27 . 23.335 (1) (zgm) 5. of the statutes is repealed.

SB377,28 Section 28 . 23.335 (1) (zLg) of the statutes is created to read:

SB377,15,14 23.335 (1) (zLg) “Tetrahydrocannabinols concentration” has the meaning given in s. 340.01 (66m).

SB377,29 Section 29 . 23.335 (12) (a) 2g. of the statutes is created to read:

SB377,15,18 23.335 (12) (a) 2g. No person may engage in the operation of an off-highway motorcycle while the person has a tetrahydrocannabinols concentration of 5.0 or more.

SB377,30 Section 30 . 23.335 (12) (a) 3m. of the statutes is created to read:

SB377,15,22 23.335 (12) (a) 3m. If a person has not attained the age of 21, the person may not engage in the operation of an off-highway motorcycle while he or she has a tetrahydrocannabinols concentration of more than 0.0 but less than 5.0.

SB377,31 Section 31 . 23.335 (12) (a) 4. of the statutes is amended to read:

SB377,16,7 23.335 (12) (a) 4. A person may be charged with and a prosecutor may proceed upon a complaint based upon a violation of any combination of subd. 1., 2., 2g., or 2m. for acts arising out of the same incident or occurrence. If the person is charged with violating any combination of subd. 1., 2., 2g., or 2m., the offenses shall be joined. If the person is found guilty of any combination of subd. 1., 2., 2g., or 2m. for acts arising out of the same incident or occurrence, there shall be a single conviction for purposes of sentencing and for purposes of counting convictions under sub. (23) (c) 2. and 3. Subdivisions 1., 2., 2g., and 2m. each require proof of a fact for conviction which the others do not require.

SB377,32 Section 32 . 23.335 (12) (a) 5. of the statutes is renumbered 23.335 (12) (a) 5. a. and amended to read:

SB377,16,16 23.335 (12) (a) 5. a. In an action under subd. 2m. that is based on the defendant allegedly having a detectable amount of methamphetamine, or gamma-hydroxybutyric acid, or delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol in his or her blood, the defendant has a defense if he or she proves by a preponderance of the evidence that at the time of the incident or occurrence he or she had a valid prescription for methamphetamine or one of its metabolic precursors, or gamma-hydroxybutyric acid, or delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol.

SB377,33 Section 33 . 23.335 (12) (a) 5. b. of the statutes is created to read:

SB377,16,22 23.335 (12) (a) 5. b. In an action under subd. 2g. or 3m. that is based on the defendant allegedly having a prohibited tetrahydrocannabinols concentration, the defendant has a defense if he or she proves by a preponderance of the evidence that at the time of the incident or occurrence he or she had a valid prescription for tetrahydrocannabinol or he or she was a qualifying patient, as defined in s. 50.80 (6).

SB377,34 Section 34 . 23.335 (12) (b) 2g. of the statutes is created to read:

SB377,17,3 23.335 (12) (b) 2g. No person who has a tetrahydrocannabinols concentration of 5.0 or more may cause injury to another person by the operation of an off-highway motorcycle.

SB377,35 Section 35 . 23.335 (12) (b) 3. of the statutes is amended to read:

SB377,17,13 23.335 (12) (b) 3. A person may be charged with and a prosecutor may proceed upon a complaint based upon a violation of any combination of subd. 1., 2., 2g., or 2m. for acts arising out of the same incident or occurrence. If the person is charged with violating any combination of subd. 1., 2., 2g., or 2m. in the complaint, the crimes shall be joined under s. 971.12. If the person is found guilty of any combination of subd. 1., 2., 2g., or 2m. for acts arising out of the same incident or occurrence, there shall be a single conviction for purposes of sentencing and for purposes of counting convictions under sub. (23) (c) 2. and 3. Subdivisions 1., 2., 2g., and 2m. each require proof of a fact for conviction which the others do not require.

SB377,36 Section 36 . 23.335 (12) (b) 4. of the statutes is amended to read:

SB377,17,21 23.335 (12) (b) 4. In an action under this paragraph, the defendant has a defense if he or she proves by a preponderance of the evidence that the injury would have occurred even if he or she had been exercising due care and even if he or she had not been under the influence of an intoxicant to a degree which rendered him or her incapable of safe operation, did not have an alcohol concentration of 0.08 or more, or did not have a detectable amount of a restricted controlled substance in his or her blood, or did not have a tetrahydrocannabinols concentration of 5.0 or more.

SB377,37 Section 37 . 23.335 (12) (b) 5. of the statutes is renumbered 23.335 (12) (b) 5. a. and amended to read:

SB377,18,5 23.335 (12) (b) 5. a. In an action under subd. 2m. that is based on the defendant allegedly having a detectable amount of methamphetamine, or gamma-hydroxybutyric acid, or delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol in his or her blood, the defendant has a defense if he or she proves by a preponderance of the evidence that at the time of the incident or occurrence he or she had a valid prescription for methamphetamine or one of its metabolic precursors, or gamma-hydroxybutyric acid, or delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol.

SB377,38 Section 38 . 23.335 (12) (b) 5. b. of the statutes is created to read:

SB377,18,11 23.335 (12) (b) 5. b. In an action under subd. 2g. that is based on the defendant allegedly having a prohibited tetrahydrocannabinols concentration, the defendant has a defense if he or she proves by a preponderance of the evidence that at the time of the incident or occurrence he or she had a valid prescription for tetrahydrocannabinol or he or she was a qualifying patient, as defined in s. 50.80 (6).

SB377,39 Section 39 . 23.335 (12) (i) of the statutes is amended to read:

SB377,18,22 23.335 (12) (i) Chemical tests; effect of test results. The results of a chemical test required or administered under par. (f) or (g) are admissible in any civil or criminal action or proceeding arising out of the acts committed by a person alleged to have violated the intoxicated operation of an off-highway motorcycle law on the issue of whether the person was under the influence of an intoxicant or the issue of whether the person had alcohol concentrations or tetrahydrocannabinols concentrations at or above specified levels or a detectable amount of a restricted controlled substance in his or her blood. Results of these chemical tests shall be given the effect required under s. 885.235. Paragraphs (f) to (h) do not limit the right of a law enforcement officer to obtain evidence by any other lawful means.

SB377,40 Section 40 . 23.335 (23) (c) 1. of the statutes is amended to read:

SB377,19,3 23.335 (23) (c) 1. Except as provided under subds. 2., 3., and 4., a person who violates sub. (12) (a) 1., 2., 2g., or 2m. or (h) shall forfeit not less than $150 nor more than $300.

SB377,41 Section 41 . 23.335 (23) (c) 2. of the statutes is amended to read:

SB377,19,9 23.335 (23) (c) 2. Except as provided under subds. 3. and 4., a person who violates sub. (12) (a) 1., 2., 2g., or 2m. or (h) and who, within 5 years prior to the arrest for the current violation, was convicted previously under the intoxicated operation of an off-highway motorcycle law shall be fined not less than $300 nor more than $1,100 and shall be imprisoned not less than 5 days nor more than 6 months.

SB377,42 Section 42 . 23.335 (23) (c) 3. of the statutes is amended to read:

SB377,19,16 23.335 (23) (c) 3. Except as provided in subd. 4., a person who violates sub. (12) (a) 1., 2., 2g., or 2m. or (h) and who, within 5 years prior to the arrest for the current violation, was convicted 2 or more times previously under the intoxicated operation of an off-highway motorcycle law shall be fined not less than $600 nor more than $2,000 and shall be imprisoned not less than 30 days nor more than one year in the county jail.

SB377,43 Section 43 . 23.335 (23) (c) 4. of the statutes is amended to read:

SB377,19,19 23.335 (23) (c) 4. A person who violates sub. (12) (a) 3. or 3m. or (h) and who has not attained the age of 21 shall forfeit not more than $50.

SB377,44 Section 44 . 30.50 (10m) (a) of the statutes is amended to read:

SB377,19,22 30.50 (10m) (a) A controlled substance included in schedule I under ch. 961 other than a tetrahydrocannabinol.

SB377,45 Section 45 . 30.50 (10m) (e) of the statutes is repealed.

SB377,46 Section 46 . 30.50 (13p) of the statutes is created to read:

SB377,20,2 30.50 (13p) “Tetrahydrocannabinols concentration" means the number of nanograms of tetrahydrocannabinols per milliliter of blood.

SB377,47 Section 47 . 30.50 (13t) of the statutes is created to read:

SB377,20,5 30.50 (13t) “Tetrahydrocannabinols concentration” has the meaning given in s. 340.01 (66m).

SB377,48 Section 48 . 30.681 (1) (b) (title) of the statutes is amended to read:

SB377,20,8 30.681 (1) (b) (title) Operating after using a controlled substance or, alcohol, or tetrahydrocannabinols.

SB377,49 Section 49 . 30.681 (1) (b) 1g. of the statutes is created to read:

SB377,20,11 30.681 (1) (b) 1g. No person may engage in the operation of a motorboat while the person has a tetrahydrocannabinols concentration of 5.0 or more.

SB377,50 Section 50 . 30.681 (1) (bn) (title) of the statutes is amended to read:

SB377,20,14 30.681 (1) (bn) (title) Operating with alcohol or tetrahydrocannabinols concentrations at specified levels; below legal drinking age.

SB377,51 Section 51 . 30.681 (1) (bn) of the statutes is renumbered 30.681 (1) (bn) 1.

SB377,52 Section 52 . 30.681 (1) (bn) 2. of the statutes is created to read:

SB377,20,19 30.681 (1) (bn) 2. A person who has not attained the legal age, as defined in s. 961.70 (2), may not engage in the operation of a motorboat while he or she has a tetrahydrocannabinols concentration of more than 0.0 but less than 5.0.

SB377,53 Section 53 . 30.681 (1) (c) of the statutes is amended to read:

SB377,21,4 30.681 (1) (c) Related charges. A person may be charged with and a prosecutor may proceed upon a complaint based upon a violation of any combination of par. (a) or (b) 1., 1g., 1m., or 2. for acts arising out of the same incident or occurrence. If the person is charged with violating any combination of par. (a) or (b) 1., 1g., 1m., or 2., the offenses shall be joined. If the person is found guilty of any combination of par. (a) or (b) 1., 1g., 1m., or 2. for acts arising out of the same incident or occurrence, there shall be a single conviction for purposes of sentencing and for purposes of counting convictions under s. 30.80 (6) (a) 2. and 3. Paragraphs (a) and (b) 1., 1g., 1m., and 2. each require proof of a fact for conviction which the others do not require.

SB377,54 Section 54 . 30.681 (1) (d) of the statutes is renumbered 30.681 (1) (d) 1. and amended to read:

SB377,21,13 30.681 (1) (d) 1. In an action under par. (b) 1m. that is based on the defendant allegedly having a detectable amount of methamphetamine, or gamma-hydroxybutyric acid, or delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol in his or her blood, the defendant has a defense if he or she proves by a preponderance of the evidence that at the time of the incident or occurrence he or she had a valid prescription for methamphetamine or one of its metabolic precursors, or gamma-hydroxybutyric acid, or delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol.

SB377,55 Section 55 . 30.681 (1) (d) 2. of the statutes is created to read:

SB377,21,19 30.681 (1) (d) 2. In an action under par. (b) 1g. or (bn) 2. that is based on the defendant allegedly having a prohibited tetrahydrocannabinols concentration, the defendant has a defense if he or she proves by a preponderance of the evidence that at the time of the incident or occurrence he or she had a valid prescription for tetrahydrocannabinol or he or she was a qualifying patient, as defined in s. 50.80 (6).

SB377,56 Section 56 . 30.681 (2) (b) (title) of the statutes is amended to read:

SB377,21,22 30.681 (2) (b) (title) Causing injury after using a controlled substance or, alcohol, or tetrahydrocannabinols.

SB377,57 Section 57 . 30.681 (2) (b) 1g. of the statutes is created to read:

SB377,21,25 30.681 (2) (b) 1g. No person who has a tetrahydrocannabinols concentration of 5.0 or more may cause injury to another person by the operation of a motorboat.

SB377,58 Section 58. 30.681 (2) (c) of the statutes is amended to read:

SB377,22,11 30.681 (2) (c) Related charges. A person may be charged with and a prosecutor may proceed upon a complaint based upon a violation of any combination of par. (a) or (b) 1., 1g., 1m., or 2. for acts arising out of the same incident or occurrence. If the person is charged with violating any combination of par. (a) or (b) 1., 1g., 1m., or 2. in the complaint, the crimes shall be joined under s. 971.12. If the person is found guilty of any combination of par. (a) or (b) 1., 1g., 1m., or 2. for acts arising out of the same incident or occurrence, there shall be a single conviction for purposes of sentencing and for purposes of counting convictions under s. 30.80 (6) (a) 2. and 3. Paragraphs (a) and (b) 1., 1g., 1m., and 2. each require proof of a fact for conviction which the others do not require.

SB377,59 Section 59 . 30.681 (2) (d) 1. a. of the statutes is amended to read: