This is the preview version of the Wisconsin State Legislature site.
Please see http://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov for the production version.
Representative Felzkowski asked unanimous consent that the rules be suspended and that Senate Bill 298 be given a third reading. Granted.
The question was: Senate Bill 298 having been read three times, shall the bill be concurred in?
Motion carried.
Representative Felzkowski asked unanimous consent that the rules be suspended and that Senate Bill 298 be immediately messaged to the Senate. Granted.
_____________
Special Order of
Business at 11:37 A.M.
Senate Bill 351
Relating to: a sales tax exemption for tangible personal property temporarily stored in this state.
The question was: Shall Senate Bill 351 be ordered to a third reading?
Motion carried.
Representative Felzkowski asked unanimous consent that the rules be suspended and that Senate Bill 351 be given a third reading. Granted.
The question was: Senate Bill 351 having been read three times, shall the bill be concurred in?
Motion carried.
Representative Felzkowski asked unanimous consent that the rules be suspended and that Senate Bill 351 be immediately messaged to the Senate. Granted.
_____________
Special Order of
Business at 11:38 A.M.
Senate Bill 369
Relating to: federal emergency management assistance payments to municipalities.
The question was: Shall Senate Bill 369 be ordered to a third reading?
Motion carried.
Representative Felzkowski asked unanimous consent that the rules be suspended and that Senate Bill 369 be given a third reading. Granted.
The question was: Senate Bill 369 having been read three times, shall the bill be concurred in?
Motion carried.
Representative Felzkowski asked unanimous consent that the rules be suspended and that Senate Bill 369 be immediately messaged to the Senate. Granted.
_____________
Special Order of
Business at 11:39 A.M.
Senate Bill 387
Relating to: including crop insurance proceeds in the manufacturing and agricultural tax credit.
The question was: Shall Senate Bill 387 be ordered to a third reading?
Motion carried.
Representative Felzkowski asked unanimous consent that the rules be suspended and that Senate Bill 387 be given a third reading. Granted.
The question was: Senate Bill 387 having been read three times, shall the bill be concurred in?
Motion carried.
Representative Felzkowski asked unanimous consent that the rules be suspended and that Senate Bill 387 be immediately messaged to the Senate. Granted.
_____________
Special Order of
Business at 11:40 A.M.
Senate Bill 422
Relating to: time for issuing a certificate of election.
The question was: Shall Senate Bill 422 be ordered to a third reading?
Motion carried.
Representative Felzkowski asked unanimous consent that the rules be suspended and that Senate Bill 422 be given a third reading. Granted.
The question was: Senate Bill 422 having been read three times, shall the bill be concurred in?
Motion carried.
Representative Felzkowski asked unanimous consent that the rules be suspended and that Senate Bill 422 be immediately messaged to the Senate. Granted.
_____________
Special Order of
Business at 11:41 A.M.
Senate Bill 437
Relating to: the revenue limit ceiling for school districts.
The question was: Shall Senate Bill 437 be ordered to a third reading?
Motion carried.
Representative Felzkowski asked unanimous consent that the rules be suspended and that Senate Bill 437 be given a third reading. Granted.
The question was: Senate Bill 437 having been read three times, shall the bill be concurred in?
Motion carried.
Representative Neylon asked unanimous consent to be recorded as voting "No" on the previous question. Granted.
Representative Felzkowski asked unanimous consent that the rules be suspended and that Senate Bill 437 be immediately messaged to the Senate. Granted.
_____________
Special Order of
Business at 11:43 A.M.
Senate Bill 468
Relating to: funding the public defender pay progression and making an appropriation.
Assembly Amendment 1 to Senate Bill 468 offered by Representative Born.
The question was: Shall Assembly Amendment 1 to Senate Bill 468 be adopted?
Motion carried.
The question was: Shall Senate Bill 468 be ordered to a third reading?
Motion carried.
Representative Felzkowski asked unanimous consent that the rules be suspended and that Senate Bill 468 be given a third reading. Granted.
The question was: Senate Bill 468 having been read three times, shall the bill be concurred in as amended?
The roll was taken.
The result follows:
Ayes - Representatives Allen, Anderson, August, Ballweg, Billings, Born, Bowen, Brandtjen, Brooks, Brostoff, Cabrera, Considine, Crowley, Dittrich, Doyle, Duchow, Edming, Emerson, Felzkowski, Fields, Goyke, Gruszynski, Gundrum, Haywood, Hebl, Hesselbein, Hintz, Horlacher, Hutton, Jagler, James, Katsma, Kerkman, Kitchens, Knodl, Kolste, Krug, Kuglitsch, Kulp, Kurtz, Loudenbeck, Macco, Magnafici, McGuire, B. Meyers, Milroy, Murphy, Mursau, L. Myers, Neubauer, Neylon, Novak, Nygren, Ohnstad, Oldenburg, Ott, Petersen, Petryk, Plumer, Pope, Pronschinske, Quinn, Ramthun, Riemer, Rodriguez, Rohrkaste, Sanfelippo, Sargent, Schraa, Shankland, Sinicki, Skowronski, Snyder, Sortwell, Spiros, Spreitzer, Stafsholt, Steffen, Steineke, Stubbs, Stuck, Subeck, Summerfield, Swearingen, Tauchen, C. Taylor, Thiesfeldt, Tittl, Tranel, Tusler, VanderMeer, Vining, Vorpagel, Vruwink, Wichgers, Wittke, Zamarripa, Zimmerman and Speaker Vos - 99.
Noes - None.
Absent or not voting - None.
Motion carried.
Representative Sanfelippo asked unanimous consent to be recorded as voting "No" on the previous question. Granted.
Representative Felzkowski asked unanimous consent that the rules be suspended and that Senate Bill 468 be immediately messaged to the Senate. Granted.
_____________
Special Order of
Business at 11:44 A.M.
Senate Bill 489
Relating to: allowing reimbursement of certain expenses for patients participating in cancer clinical trials.
The question was: Shall Senate Bill 489 be ordered to a third reading?
Motion carried.
Representative Felzkowski asked unanimous consent that the rules be suspended and that Senate Bill 489 be given a third reading. Granted.
The question was: Senate Bill 489 having been read three times, shall the bill be concurred in?
Loading...
Loading...