One-Hundred and Fourth Regular Session THURSDAY, November 21, 2019
The Chief Clerk makes the following entries under the above date:
_____________
Amendments Offered
hist110886Assembly Amendment 1 to Assembly Bill 467 offered by Representative Tittl. _____________
Introduction and Reference of Proposals
Read first time and referred:
Relating to: changes to a tax incremental district joint review board's voting requirements, requiring that a tax incremental district's project plan include alternative economic projections, and limiting the amount of cash grants a city or village may provide to a developer.
By Representatives Ott, Bowen, Sargent, Wichgers, Born, Ramthun, Gundrum, Brooks, Brandtjen, Kulp, Steffen, Subeck, Considine, Petersen, Skowronski and Hutton; cosponsored by Senators Stroebel, Erpenbach, Craig and Nass.
Relating to: driver's licenses for youth in out-of-home care and making an appropriation.
By Representatives Doyle, Crowley, Vining, Subeck, Zamarripa, C. Taylor, Sinicki, Sargent, Pope, Neubauer, Hebl, Emerson, Brostoff, Bowen, Billings and Anderson; cosponsored by Senators L. Taylor, Larson, Smith and Wirch.
Relating to: searching for a biological sibling who has been adopted, granting rule-making authority, and making an appropriation.
By Representatives L. Myers, Considine, Crowley, Doyle, Subeck, Zamarripa, C. Taylor, Sinicki, Sargent, Neubauer, Hebl, Emerson, Brostoff, Bowen, Billings and Anderson; cosponsored by Senators Smith, Bewley, Wirch and Larson.
Relating to: potato marketing board grant and making an appropriation.
By Representatives VanderMeer, Born, Krug, Mursau, Oldenburg, Skowronski, Spiros and Tusler; cosponsored by Senators Testin and L. Taylor.
Relating to: funding for certain extension services of the University of Wisconsin System and making an appropriation.
By Representatives VanderMeer, Considine, Edming, Krug, Mursau, Oldenburg, Skowronski, Tranel and Tusler; cosponsored by Senators Marklein, Olsen, Ringhand, L. Taylor and Testin.
hist110872To committee on Colleges and Universities. Relating to: cranberry marketing board grant and making an appropriation.
By Representatives VanderMeer, Born, Edming, Krug, Mursau, Oldenburg, Skowronski and Tusler; cosponsored by Senators Testin and Olsen.
Relating to: biennial reports regarding fees charged by executive state agencies.
By Representatives Allen, Steffen, Kulp, Ramthun, Brooks, Dittrich, Wichgers, Knodl, Tusler and Gundrum; cosponsored by Senators Bernier and Stroebel.
hist110874To committee on Government Accountability and Oversight. Relating to: conduit bonding authorities, distributions for property tax relief, and making an appropriation.
By Representatives Allen, Brandtjen, Magnafici, Horlacher, Murphy, Gundrum, Ramthun, Skowronski, Neylon and Thiesfeldt; cosponsored by Senators Nass, Jacque, Stroebel, Craig and Marklein.
_____________
Executive Communications
State of Wisconsin
Office of the Governor
Madison
November 21, 2019
To the Honorable Members of the Assembly:
The following bills, originating in the Assembly, have been approved, signed and deposited in the office of the Secretary of State:
Bill Number Act Number Date Approved
Respectfully submitted,
TONY EVERS
Governor
_____________
Pursuant to s. 35.095 (1)(b), Wisconsin Statutes, the following 2019 Acts have been published: Act Number Bill Number Publication Date
_____________
Governor’s Veto Message
November 21, 2019
To the Honorable Members of the Assembly:
hist110897I am vetoing Assembly Bill 53 in its entirety. This bill relates to pupil records. Under current law, directory data may be disclosed to any person if the public school notifies parents or guardians of the information designated as directory data, provides information on how to opt out of disclosures, and provides sufficient time to use the opt-out procedure. Under this bill, the name of a pupil's parents or guardians would be added to the list of categories that a public school must designate as directory data.
I am vetoing this bill in its entirety because I object to implementing a mandate that will negatively impact the privacy of parents of students in Wisconsin. I also object because the bill provides Wisconsin families with fewer privacy protections than the federal Family Education Rights Privacy Act, which does not include parent or guardian names in its definition of directory data. Wisconsin law should provide greater protections for privacy than federal law, not fewer.
