This is the preview version of the Wisconsin State Legislature site.
Please see http://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov for the production version.
STATE OF WISCONSIN
REAL ESTATE EXAMINING BOARD
IN THE MATTER OF RULEMAKING   :   ORDER OF THE
PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE     :   REAL ESTATE EXAMINING BOARD
REAL ESTATE EXAMINING BOARD   :   ADOPTING RULES                   :   (CLEARINGHOUSE RULE 21-018)
ORDER
An order of the Real Estate Examining Board to amend REEB 12.017 (3) (a), relating to obsolete references to predetermination of criminal convictions in licensure applicants and apprenticeships.
Analysis prepared by the Department of Safety and Professional Services.
ANALYSIS
Statutes interpreted: ss. 111.335 (4) (f), 440.03 (13) (bm), 452.09 (4), and 452.11 (1), Stats.
Statutory authority: ss. 15.08 (5) (b) and 452.07 (1), Stats.
Explanation of agency authority:
Each examining board shall promulgate rules for its own guidance and for the guidance of the profession to which it pertains and define and enforce professional conduct and unethical practices not inconsistent with the law relating to the particular profession. [s. 15.08 (5) (b), Stats.]
Section 452.07 (1), Stats. indicates the board shall promulgate rules for the guidance of the real estate profession and define professional conduct and unethical practice.
Related statute or rule: ss. 111.335 (4) (f), 440.03 (13) (bm), 452.09 (4), and 452.11 (1), Stats.
Plain language analysis:
The Real Estate Examining Board administrative rule REEB 12.011 relates to criminal conviction predeterminations. 2017 Act 278 repealed the Real Estate Examining Board’s authority to promulgate rules establishing a procedure that allows an individual to apply to the Board for a determination of whether the individual would be disqualified from obtaining a license or certificate due to their criminal record. Act 278 established conviction predetermination requirements, and there is no longer the ability for the Board to conduct its own predeterminations. Section 111.335 (4) (f), Stats. provides the requirements in which the predeterminations are reviewed by the Wisconsin Department of Safety and Professional Services. This rule revision also removes the reference under REEB 12.017(3)(a) to apprenticeships, as apprenticeships are no longer licensed under the Board’s administrative rules.
During the first legislative review period, the Legislature made an Indefinite Objection to repealing REEB 12.011. Therefore, the Board filed a Germane Modification request with the legislature to remove that change from the rule draft.
Summary of, and comparison with, existing or proposed federal regulation:
The federal government does not regulate the prelicensure predetermination for members of the real estate profession nor real estate broker apprenticeships.
Comparison with rules in adjacent states:
Illinois: Illinois does not have a process in which an applicant may apply for a predetermination of a criminal conviction before officially applying for real estate licensure. Illinois does not include apprenticeships for real estate.
Iowa: Iowa requires a background check which includes fingerprint submission, to be completed prior to taking a real estate licensure exam. Once the background check has been reviewed and approved, an applicant then must pass a licensure exam. [Iowa Code § 543B.15(9)]
Iowa does not have real estate apprenticeships.
Michigan: Michigan does not have a predetermination process for applications for real estate licensure nor apprenticeships for real estate.
Minnesota: Minnesota does not have a predetermination process for applications for real estate licensure nor apprenticeships for real estate.
Summary of factual data and analytical methodologies:
The Board reviewed REEB 12 as a result of its 2019 biennial report under s. 227.29, Stats., and determined that REEB 12.011 includes an obsolete reference to predetermination standards that should be repealed. It also found that the reference to apprenticeships should be deleted in s. REEB 12.017(3) (a).
Analysis and supporting documents used to determine effect on small business or in preparation of economic impact analysis:
The proposed rules were posted for a period of 14 days to solicit public comment on economic impact, including how the proposed rules may affect businesses, local government units, and individuals. No comments were received.
Fiscal Estimate and Economic Impact Analysis:
The Fiscal Estimate and Economic Impact Analysis document is attached.
Loading...
Loading...
Links to Admin. Code and Statutes in this Register are to current versions, which may not be the version that was referred to in the original published document.