Illinois Youth camp health, safety and licensing are pursuant to Youth Camp Act 210 ILCS 100 and administrative code sections 810.10-150.
Camp health services in Illinois pursuant to 810.90 (d) only requires a minimum of one person with a current American Red Cross Standard First Aid Certificate or equivalent on the premises at all times when a youth camp is in operation. Camper health recordkeeping is broader than Wisconsin. Illinois requires each youth camp to maintain and keep current a record of first aid cases treated by designated first aid personnel during the camp operating period. Indiana is also similar to Illinois health services staffing per 410 IAC 6-7.2-17a. in requiring that there shall be an individual present who is designated as the health supervisor and who has completed at least the Red Cross Standard First Aid Course or its equivalent.
Illinois requires a lifeguard for supervision at a swimming beach but does not provide any minimum ratio.
Iowa- Resident camp licensing in Iowa is pursuant to childcare administrative rule, IAC 441-109.1 Resident camp programs may be exempt from attaining a child care license through several exemptions, including those that receive national accreditation.
Michigan Camp programs and/or sites are licensed separately, with camper health and safety pursuant to administrative rule, R400. This includes adult and children’s camp types; residential, day, travel, troop, and site.
Michigan already requires camp staff background checks. Michigan is also the most similar to Wisconsin in waterfront camper safety, supervision and health care staffing qualifications. Medication recordkeeping is included using more broad language. A Michigan camp is required to maintain a permanent medical record of treatment prescribed or medication dispensed to campers.
Minnesota Youth camp health, safety and licensing are pursuant to Minnesota state statute 144.71 and rule 4630.2300-.4700.
Minnesota rule does not specify health qualifications of camp staff but does require the camp operator to designate one or more duly licensed practitioners of the healing arts to be called in the case of an emergency. The camper health recordkeeping requirements are broader than ch. ATCP 78, that require detailed records of the individual's illnesses and injuries occurring and the first aid treatments given during the period of attendance at camp. Minnesota requires supervision of waterfront activities, but does not specify any qualifications such as the minimum ratios of lifeguards and attendants to campers set in ch. ATCP 78. Wisconsin is also leading other states to create safety provisions related to camps with challenge courses, such as aerial adventure, ropes courses, climbing walls or zip lines through review and input from national industry subject matter expert representatives from the Association of Challenge Course Technology (ACCT) and Professional Ropes Course Association (PRCA) during the rule revision process.
Summary of Factual Data and Analytical Methodologies
Feedback on the rule was solicited from industry stakeholders, industry professional associations, as well as Department and local health department agent representatives. The proposed changes in criteria for license fees were tested by applying the proposed criteria to all state-inspected recreational and educational camps. Results of the survey indicated a relatively even distribution across simple, moderate and complex proposed license categories. Feedback on the ch. ATCP 78 revision was continuously sought from industry stakeholders to consider ways to minimize adverse impacts on small business. Analysis and Supporting Documents used to Determine Effect on Small Business
Or in Preparation of an Economic Impact Analysis.
The proposed revisions are consistent with industry standards set by groups such as the American Camp Association. The Department believes the changes proposed will have minimal effect on small businesses, as the proposed rule aligns with industry standards. The financial impact of the modernized license and fee model is low, with fees corresponding to the number and type of camp experiences offered, through a tiered model. Camps would be placed into simple, moderate and complex categories, in place of the existing one-size-fits-all model. More complex camps, which generally are larger operations, would pay a higher license fee. The proposed changes in criteria for license fees were tested by applying the proposed criteria to all 59 state-inspected recreational and educational camps. Results of the survey indicated an even distribution across all three proposed license types with: 17 camps estimated to be categorized as simple, 24 camps as moderate, and 18 camps as complex.
The following tiered recreational and educational camp license fee model is proposed in the revision:
—Simple $490
—Simple with Hospitality $540
—Moderate $530
—Moderate with Hospitality $635
—Complex $570
—Complex with Hospitality $715
This update results in cost savings for any camp offering additional hospitality activity such as retail food service, lodging and camping to other adult guests and families within the confines of the camp, utilizing the same camp structures. The hospitality categories enables a camp to offer one, two or all three additional activities in a way that fits with each camp’s business model. This licensing structure also provides a way for adults and families to follow the applicable lodging or campground rule, instead of the health and supervision requirements of ch. ATCP 78 currently in force when camps extend their services beyond campers such as family camps, adult retreats, wedding parties or various online lodging rental platforms. The modernized license model “with hospitality activity” reflects a newly created efficiency and therefore offers a cost savings when bundled to the recreational and educational camp license compared to obtaining multiple licenses separately. The model is efficient because it enables one routine inspection to include all applicable activities thus saving the Department and small business time from multiple inspections when requirements for safe drinking water, garbage disposal, carbon monoxide detection and Wisconsin Food Code standards already exist within ch. ATCP 78. Here are two examples of economic impact of revising the existing license and fee model:
| Current Rec Ed Camp License Fee | Current Retail Food License Fee | Current Campground License Fee | Current Lodging License Fee | Total |
Here are the same camps under the proposed license and fee model:
| Proposed Rec Ed Camp License “Bundled” Fee | Current Combined License Fees | Economic Impact |
Camp A= moderate with hospitality | $635 | $880 | Savings of $245 |
Camp B= complex with hospitality | $715 | $875 | Savings of $160 |
Camp operators will also incur the economic impact associated with newly proposed requirements for camp staff background checks, camp staff training, providing camper safety equipment, and inspection of challenge courses on camp premises. These requirements are consistent with industry standards and the department’s authority pursuant to s. 97.67 (1) Stats. The challenge course inspection and staff background check frequency is proposed for every two years, rather than annually to ease the annual economic burden on small business. For a simple camp operation, the only additional cost would be for background checks. For example, a simple camp with 10 staff, would incur an additional annual cost of approximately $200. For more complex camp operations the following is a breakdown of the overall costs depending on the activities provided. New camper safety provisions for proper protective headgear for campers and staff under 18 when a camp offers challenge course elements, horseback riding, or motorized vehicle usage would be approximately $150 per helmet based on industry stakeholder feedback.
Camps with aquatic program activities will experience reduced costs going forward due to a clarification in the revised rule requirements for rescue poles at waterfront and on a rescue boat. An existing industry standard of an oar or paddle serving as a reaching pole in a rescue boat is now stated in the proposed revision. The revision also does not require a reaching pole at the waterfront since ch. ATCP 78 already requires lifeguard supervision and lifeguards are also required to carry rescue equipment to use in responding to distressed swimmers. New costs would be incurred by business operators in meeting new camper safety requirements in ch. ATCP 78. These costs include the cost of staff time and proper training for supervising specialized program activities, such as archery, horseback riding, firearms, and challenge course elements, and the costs of staff training in camper sexual abuse prevention, and medication administration. Having staff trained in these topics is considered industry best practice and is a voluntary standard of the American Camp Association. Examples of certification courses include: —Archery: National Archery School Program estimated cost of $150 per person
—Firearms: Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources hunting safety course $10 per person for traditional classroom instruction
—Camper sexual abuse prevention: various camp insurance vendors, complimentary
—Medication Administration: WI Department of Public Instruction online module, complimentary
—Challenge Course: ACCT Level 1 certification, $700 per person
—Horseback riding: Certified Horsemanship Association estimated cost of $700 per person
Camps that offer low element and high element challenge courses will bear the financial impact of newly proposed requirements for an on-site inspection of the elements and life safety equipment. These requirements may impose a biennial cost of $900-3,000 per camp that utilize activities such as aerial adventure and ropes courses, climbing walls, and zip lines. There is no other government agency responsible for the safe operation, inspection and upkeep of these challenge courses. Industry stakeholders shared they already pay for these inspections to meet insurance requirements.
Requirements for camp health services training qualifications will be more flexible under the revised rule. The proposed rule raises the EMS target response time from the existing 15 minutes up to the industry standard threshold of 30 minutes. The revised rule also reduces the required training for health services staff to only one or two basic first aid and cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) courses. This will save money and time spent on advanced CPR courses to meet the requirements of the existing rule.
Updates to ch. ATCP 78 also include the addition of provisions for written procedures that camp operators may follow to earn reduced inspection frequency. These proposed revisions are reflective of recently passed legislation. Meeting the new requirements would allow camp operators to demonstrate effective managerial control of public health hazards. The revised rule includes new requirements related to the hiring and maintaining of recreational and educational camp staff. This requirement already exists in most Wisconsin camps. The revised rule proposes performing a criminal background check, including a national sex offender search, for new hires and for existing staff every 24 months. The revised rule also requires camp staff to complete camper sexual abuse prevention training. The criminal background check requirement is estimated to cost $40 per camp staff member. As noted by various industry stakeholders, many insurance companies already offer free camper sexual abuse prevention training modules. The background checks, in combination with staff training, create a less conducive setting for potential offenders at Wisconsin camps serving youth and, by protecting camper health and safety, are consistent with the Department’s mission to protect public health.
Regulatory partners, industry stakeholders and national and state level subject matter experts have all been part of this entire rule revision process through virtual communication methods concurrent with COVID-19 pandemic protocols. The Department also provided rule revision status updates to various industry and regulatory association meetings over the last year. Stakeholders have all shared their eagerness for rule revision.
Fiscal Estimate and Economic Impact Analysis
The Fiscal Estimate and Economic Impact Analysis is attached.
Effect on Small Business
The Department’s Regulatory Review Coordinator may be contacted by:
Telephone: (608) 224-5024
Department Contact Person
Caitlin Jeidy, Program and Policy Analyst – Advanced
Division of Food and Recreational Safety
Department of Agriculture, Trade and Consumer Protection
P.O. Box 8911
Madison, WI 53708-8911
Telephone: (608) 224-4696
Where and When Comments May Be Submitted
Questions and comments related to this this rule may be directed to:
Caitlin Jeidy, Program and Policy Analyst – Advanced
Division of Food and Recreational Safety
Department of Agriculture, Trade and Consumer Protection
P.O. Box 8911
Madison, WI 53708-8911
Telephone: (608) 224-4696
Comments will be accepted up to two weeks after the last public hearing is held on this rule. Hearing dates will be scheduled after this hearing draft rule is approved by the board of agriculture, trade and consumer protection.
_____________________________________________________________________________________
RULE TEXT
SECTION 1. ATCP 78 is repealed and recreated to read:
SUBCHAPTER I
DEFINITIONS, AUTHORITY AND PURPOSE
ATCP 78.01 Authority and purpose. This chapter is promulgated under the authority of ss. 97.67 (4), 97.30 (2) (a), 97.625 and 227.11 (2) (a), Stats., to prescribe rules for recreational and educational camps and hospitality activities for enforcement by the department and agent local health departments to protect public health and safety. ATCP 78.02 Scope. (1) APPLICABILITY. This chapter applies to the operators of recreational and educational camps and to the department and its agents.
(2) VARIANCES. When it appears to the department that strict adherence to a provision of this chapter is impractical for a particular camp, the department may approve a variance from that provision requested by that camp’s operator if the operator provides the department with satisfactory proof that the approval of the variance will not jeopardize the public’s health, safety, or welfare.
