In order to identify potential changes to the rule, DATCP reviewed recent changes in FDA regulations such as those implementing FSMA, FDA guidance on the applicability of Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Point (“HACCP”) requirements for juice and seafood processors; Wisconsin statutes and rules for food processing plants, retail food establishments, meat establishments, and dairy plants; and current industrial practices. Upon learning of industry concerns about proposed licensing and regulatory requirements for retail food establishments conducting food processing for wholesale activities, DATCP delayed further consideration of the rule and convened a collaborative work group comprised of industry and local health department agent personnel to review and revise the requirements. The work group’s conclusions are reflected in the present revised rule.
Effect on Small Business
A positive impact of this rule revision on all classes of business is the expanded ability of food processing plants to apply for waivers from requirements related to equipment, utensils, processes or procedures. This change may allow the use of new and innovative techniques and processes so long as the processor can demonstrate that food safety is not compromised. In addition, the costs of facility upgrades necessitated by the loss of a grandfather exemption (see following paragraphs) may be mitigated if the license-holder requests a variance from a facility requirement, provided the variance meets the public health intent of the requirement.
No economic impact comments were received during the August 8, 2017-September 7, 2017 comment period.
Supervisors of DATCP staff who inspect all of licensed food processing plants were surveyed to provide an estimate of the number of license-holders that would be affected by new requirements. DATCP staff knowledgeable in facility construction costs were queried about likely costs of new facility requirements. These staff, in turn, consulted commercial equipment and construction personnel to obtain or verify cost estimates. Finally, an informal economic impact comment period was held between August 20 and September 3, 2019. All licensed food processing plants were contacted by either e-mail (1,378 businesses) or mail (531 businesses) and asked for their assessment of costs they would have to bear due to new requirements. Over 200 responses (greater than 11%) were received.
The estimated economic impact is $656,000 across 1900 businesses. Costs have been attributed to possible one-time upgrades in handwashing sinks, toilet rooms, and exit doors that some firms may have to make.
The rule requires handwashing sinks in toilet rooms or food processing areas to meet modern requirements for mixing of hot and cold water and hands-free operation in newly licensed facilities or in facilities operated by a license-holder continuing since on or before November 1, 2009 in which the handwashing sinks are substantially reconstructed or extensively altered. The requirement is already in place for new license-holders or installations of handwashing sinks in already-licensed food processing plants. DATCP estimates that not more 40 businesses would face the costs of new sink installation. DATCP estimates that costs for these businesses would not exceed $1,000 apiece. The total cost estimate includes $40,000 for handwash sink upgrades. Survey response data support this estimate as approximately 70% of respondents indicated that "none" or "slight" costs would be imposed. Comments indicated a high level of existing compliance with this requirement. Cost estimates listed in the comments ranged from a few hundred dollars to less than $10,000 per business. Some commenters who provided relatively higher cost estimates were apparently unaware that less-expensive "wrist paddle" or "foot pedal" operation would meet the requirement and described the costs and challenges of installing and using electronic-sensor operated faucets.
The rule requires newly installed toilet rooms to be contiguous to the food processing area. This requirement applies if either the toilet room was constructed after the date of this rule or in food processing plants newly opened or operated by a new license-holder after the date of this rule. Pre-existing non-contiguous toilet rooms in a food processing plant operated by the same license-holder since on or before the date of this rule would be allowed, provided applicable state and local regulations were met. DATCP estimates that, based on history, not more than 40 businesses choose to install a toilet room in a given year. Costs of construction could vary widely depending on the situation, but a worst-case estimate of $10,400 per business was used in arriving at the figure of $416,000 included in the total estimated economic impact. Survey responses corroborate DATCP's estimate as more than 80% of respondents indicated none or slight costs for compliance. Most of the written comments indicated that firms were in compliance, either with contiguous toilet rooms or non-contiguous toilet rooms that complied with state and local requirements.
The rule contains a provision that food processing plant exit doors open outwards, consistent with long-standing building code requirements. More than 70% of survey respondents indicated none or slight costs of compliance. Most written comments described compliant exit doors or doors that likely would be approved following the Department's variance process. The costs of door replacements described by a small number of commenters were less than $10,000. DATCP estimates that not more than 40 businesses would face costs of $5,000 or less; a figure of $200,000 is included in the total estimated economic impact.
The rule continues to allow firms operated without changes in processing area dimensions by the same license-holder since on or before June 30, 1989, to be exempt from requirements for coving of floor-wall junctions, floor slope and drains, and provision of service sinks or curbed floor drains for disposal of mop water and similar wastes. Since 1989, these requirements have been enforced on all new license holders pursuant to state statute requiring licenses to be non-transferable. The rule clarifies this interrelationship of statute and administrative rule and thus no "new" costs are added to industry or included in the total estimated economic impact. The Department has added flexibility to the previous requirement for coving to reduce costs that would be faced by "grandfathered" businesses that choose to alter their processing area dimensions or by new license-holders operating in a previously grandfathered facility.
Aside from the above facility-related issues, much of the focus of the proposed rule revision is on the clarification and updating of existing regulations, such as the various exemptions from a food processing plant license and the clarification of various record-keeping requirements. These changes are not anticipated to have a significant financial or other impact.
The rule and revised economic impact analysis were posted for comment September 5-19, 2019.
DATCP Contact
Questions and comments related to this rule may be directed to:
Steve Ingham, Administrator
Division of Food and Recreational Safety
Department of Agriculture, Trade and Consumer Protection
P.O. Box 8911
Madison, WI 53708-8911
Telephone: (608) 224-4701
[See PDF for proper formatting of rule]
Section 1. ATCP 70 is repealed and recreated to read:
WHOLESALE FOOD MANUFACTURING
SUBCHAPTER I
SCOPE AND DEFINITIONS
ATCP 70.01 Scope.
ATCP 70.02 Definitions.
Subchapter II. General Requirements
ATCP 70.04 Federal and record keeping requirements.
ATCP 70.06 Food processing plants; licensing; fees.
ATCP 70.08 Construction and maintenance.
ATCP 70.10 Personnel standards.
ATCP 70.12 Equipment and utensils.
ATCP 70.14 Cleaning and sanitizing equipment and utensils.
ATCP 70.16 Cleaning and sanitizing equipment and utensils; exemptions.
ATCP 70.18 Obtaining approval of alternative cleaning and sanitizing frequency.
ATCP 70.20 Water supply.
ATCP 70.22 Food ingredients.
ATCP 70.24 Food handling and storage.
ATCP 70.26 Food packaging and labeling.
ATCP 70.28 Sanitizers and sanitizing methods.
ATCP 70.30 Ready-to-eat foods; reporting pathogens and toxins.
ATCP 70.32 Recall plan.
Subchapter III. Canning Operations; Supplementary Requirements
ATCP 70.34 General.
ATCP 70.36 Low-acid foods packaged in hermetically sealed containers.
ATCP 70.38 Acidified foods.
ATCP 70.40 Facilities and equipment; cleaning.
ATCP 70.42 Handling raw agricultural commodities and by-products.
Subchapter IV. Fish Processing Plants; Marine Shellfish Plants; Supplementary Requirements
ATCP 70.44 Fish processing.
ATCP 70.46 Labeling and sale of smoked fish.
ATCP 70.48 Fish roe.
ATCP 70.50 Marine molluscan shellfish processing.
Subchapter V. Bottling Establishments; Supplementary Requirements
ATCP 70.52 Bottling establishments; general.
ATCP 70.54 Returnable and single-service bottles.
ATCP 70.56 Bottled water product sampling; record keeping; reports.
ATCP 70.58 Labeling bottled products.
Subchapter VI. Juice and Juice HACCP
ATCP 70.60 Juice and Juice HACCP.
Subchapter VII. Effect of Rules on Local Ordinances
ATCP 70.62 Effect of rules on local ordinances.
Subchapter VIII. Variances
ATCP 70.64 Variances.
Note: Chapter Ag 40 as it existed on October 31, 1989, was repealed and a new chapter Ag 40 was created effective November 1, 1989; Chapter Ag 40 was renumbered ch. ATCP 70 under s. 13.93 (2m) (b) 1., Stats., Register, April, 1993, No. 448.
SUBCHAPTER I
SCOPE AND DEFINITIONS
ATCP 70.01 Scope. This chapter applies to all food processing plants, as defined in s. ATCP 70.02 (23). ATCP 70.02 Definitions. As used in this chapter:
(1)
“Alcohol beverage" means an alcohol beverage as defined in s. 125.02 (1), Stats.
