Comparison with Rules in Adjacent States
ATCP 99 - Grain
Like all states with a significant grain industry, Minnesota, Michigan, Illinois, Indiana, and Iowa all require persons who buy grain from producers to obtain a grain dealer license, and all persons who store grain for others are required to obtain either a state or federal grain warehouse license. Licensees must file financial statements with the state, and the warehouses must maintain 100% of depositor-owned grain in inventory at all times.
Minnesota requires grain dealers and grain warehouse keepers to post bonds with the state. Indiana, Illinois, and Iowa all have a state indemnity fund that is made up of grain dealer and warehouse assessments. Michigan (like Wisconsin) has a combination of bonds and indemnity fund contributions.
ATCP 100 - Milk
Minnesota requires any wholesale dealer or food processor who contracts with other Minnesota dealers or farmers of milk, cream, or products made from milk or cream, to be licensed as a Wholesale Produce Dealer. Dealers are required to obtain a surety bond and required to maintain trust assets so that assets are freely available to satisfy outstanding obligations. There is no exemption to this requirement.
Michigan requires producer security for all manufacturing and Grade A dairy plants that are a first receiving point for raw milk that will be processed at that facility. Security can be in one or more of several forms including bond, letter of credit, certificate of deposit, or pre-payment. There is no exemption to this requirement.
Illinois, Indiana, and Iowa do not require dairy producer security.
ATCP 101 - Vegetable
Minnesota requires any wholesale dealer or food processor who contracts with other Minnesota dealers for fresh fruits or vegetables to be licensed as a Wholesale Produce Dealer. Dealers are required to obtain a surety bond and required to maintain trust assets so that assets are freely available to satisfy outstanding obligations.
Illinois, Iowa, Michigan, and Indiana lack similar programs.
Summary of Factual Data and Analytical Methodologies
As a result of a large default, the Department and the Council identified the need to evaluate the entire agricultural producer security program. An actuarial study was conducted to, in part, examine the overall sustainability of the Fund and analyze the equitability of assessments contributed by each industry relative to anticipated losses. The Department adopted a number of interim emergency rules as a stopgap measure while it awaited the results of an actuarial study to consider possible permanent rule changes. In December 2015, the Department received the study of the Fund and began working with the Council to develop recommendations for permanent changes in the agricultural producer security program. These proposed rule changes reflect that joint effort. The Council approved the proposal to send a hearing draft to the DATCP Board at its May 2017 meeting.
Producer Security Fund; Assessment Revenues
The following table shows projected assessment revenues for FY 2019-20 (with and without this rule):
Total Projected Fund Assessment Revenues |
| FY 2018-19* Without this rule | FY 2018-19* With this rule | Difference |
Grain Dealers | $ 974,000 | $ 256,000 | $ (718,000) |
Grain Warehouse Keepers | 38,000 | 38,000 | 0 |
Milk Contractors | 771,000 | 621,000 | (150,000) |
Vegetable Contractors | 95,000 | 327,000 | 232,000 |
TOTAL | $ 1,878,000 | $ 1,242,000 | $ ( 636,000) |
* Projection assumes constant procurement volumes, commodity price levels and contractor financial strength.
Under this rule, the fund balance amount attributable to vegetable contractor will build over several years toward the required statutory minimum (it currently falls short of the required minimum).
| Minimum Statutory Balance | Actual Balance as of June 30, 2017 | Maximum Statutory Balance |
Grain Dealers3 | $ 1,000,000 | $ 6,140,594.71 | $ 6,000,000 |
Grain Warehouse Keepers | $ 200,000 | $ 134,966.89 | $ 1,000,000 |
Milk Contractors | $ 3,000,000 | $ 6,176,076.50 | $ 12,000,000 |
Vegetable Contractors | $ 800,000 | ($ 4,501,749.98) | $ 3,000,000 |
Entire Fund | $ 5,000,000 | $ 7,949,888.12 | $ 22,000,000 |
3After the final draft of this rule was approved by the DATCP Board, 2017 Wisconsin Act 155 combined the Fund statutory thresholds for grain dealers and grain warehouse keepers to a $1.2 million minimum and a $7 million maximum. The Department intends to preserve the individual grain dealer threshold of $6 million to qualify for an assessment reduction. Analysis and Supporting Documents used to Determine Effect on Small Business
Members of the Agricultural Producer Security Council, as defined in s. 15.137 (1), Wis. Stats., have worked with the Department in crafting certain rule changes following the 2015 actuarial study. Members represent the following: 15.137(1)(a)1.the Farmers' Educational and Cooperative Union of America, Wisconsin Division;15.137(1)(a)2. the Midwest Food Processors Association, Inc.; 15.137(1)(a)3.the National Farmers' Organization, Inc.; 15.137(1)(a)4.the Wisconsin Agri-Business Association, Inc.;15.137(1)(a)5. the Wisconsin Cheese Makers Association;15.137(1)(a)6. the Wisconsin Corn Growers Association, Inc., the Wisconsin Soybean Association, Inc.;15.137(1)(a)7. the Wisconsin Dairy Products Association, Inc.;15.137(1)(a)8. the Wisconsin Farm Bureau Federation;15.137(1)(a)9. Cooperative Network; and 15.137(1)(a)10.the Wisconsin Potato and Vegetable Growers Association, Inc. Effect on Small Business
This rule will have a positive impact on grain dealers by automatically reducing assessments whenever the grain dealer portion of the Fund balance exceeds its statutory maximum. The rule also reduces deferred payment contract assessments whenever the grain dealer portion of the Fund balance exceeds its statutory maximum.
This rule will have a positive impact on milk contractors by reducing their assessments by 20 percent. The Fund will continue to grow but at a slower pace thus ensuring that they pay a fairer share of the cost of the program.
This rule will increase vegetable contractor fund assessments by 0.2% of their contract obligations to producers. By spreading the increase to achieve the statutory minimum over 18 years, this should have minimal impacts on the vegetable contractors.
DATCP Contact
David A. Woldseth
Department of Agriculture, Trade and Consumer Protection
P.O. Box 8911
Madison, WI 53708-8911
Telephone (608) 224-5164
Section 1. ATCP 99.126 (2) is amended to read:
ATCP 99.126(2)(2) Basic assessment.
ATCP 99.126(2)(a)(a) A contributing grain dealer who reports less than $500,000 in grain payments under s. 126.11 (9) (a), Stats., shall pay a basic assessment equal to the greater of the following amounts: ATCP 99.126(2)(a)2. 2. If the fund balance attributable to grain dealers is less than $6 million on May 31 of the last preceding license year, then The the sum of the amounts calculated under s. 126.15 (1) (a) and (b), Stats. ATCP 99.126(2)(b) (b) A contributing grain dealer who reports at least $500,000 but less than $3 million in grain payments under s. 126.11 (9) (a), Stats., shall pay a basic assessment equal to the greater of the following amounts: ATCP 99.126(2)(b)2. 2. If the fund balance attributable to grain dealers is less than $6 million on May 31 of the last preceding license year, then The the sum of the amounts calculated under s. 126.15 (1) (a) and (b), Stats. ATCP 99.126(2)(c) (c) A contributing grain dealer who reports at least $3 million in grain payments under s. 126.11 (9) (a), Stats., shall pay a basic assessment equal to the greater of the following amounts: ATCP 99.126(2)(c)2. 2. If the fund balance attributable to grain dealers is less than $6 million on May 31 of the last preceding license year, then the The sum of the amounts calculated under s. 126.15 (1) (a) and (b), Stats. Section 2. ATCP 99.126 (3) is repealed and recreated:
(3) Deferred payment assessment. A contributing grain dealer shall pay a deferred payment assessment equal to the amount the grain dealer reports under s.126.11 (9) (b), Stats., in the grain dealer’s license application for that license year multiplied by rates determined as follows:
(a) If the fund balance attributable to grain dealers is greater than $6 million on May 31, the rate is 0.000875 for deferred payment contracts entered into anytime during the following license year.
(b) If the fund balance attributable to grain dealers is not more than $6 million on May 31, the rate is 0.0035 for deferred payment contracts entered into anytime during the following license year.
Section 3. ATCP 100.135 (1) is amended to read:
ATCP 100.135 Contributing milk contractors; fund assessments. (1) General. A contributing milk contractor shall pay an annual fund assessment for each license year. The annual fund assessment shall be calculated under this section, rather than under s. 126.46, Stats. Except as provided in sub. (6) or (10), or s. ATCP 100.13, the annual fund assessment amount is the minimum assessment amount listed in sub. (9) or the sum of the following multiplied by 0.8, whichever is greater: Section 4. ATCP 101.245 (2) is amended to read:
(2) Assessment amount.
ATCP 101.245(2)(a)(a) A contributing vegetable contractor that reports less than $500,000 in contract obligations under s. 126.56 (9) (am), Stats., shall pay a fund assessment equal to the greater of the following amounts:
