- Laboratories certified to perform PFOS and PFOA analysis in drinking water
- Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources
- Wisconsin Department of Health Services
- Wisconsin Department of Safety and Professional Services
- Treatment installation businesses
7. Summary and preliminary comparison with any existing or proposed federal regulation that is intended to address the activities to be regulated by the proposed rule:
The process for the proposed amendment to ch. NR 809, Wis. Adm. Code, to establish certain MCLs for PFAS, including PFOA and PFOS standards, is consistent with the process for establishing rules for other drinking water contaminants regulated under the federal EPA Safe Dinking Water Act, specifically Title 40 - Protection of the Environment; Chapter 1 - Environmental Protection Agency; Subchapter D - Water Programs. The department has a primacy agreement with the EPA to implement the Safe Drinking Water Act. As a result of the PFOA and PFOS findings from EPA’s UCMR 3 national monitoring of public water supply systems, the EPA issued a PFOA and PFOS Health Advisory Level (HAL) in 2016. The PFOA and PFOS HAL was established based upon laboratory animal and epidemiological human studies indicating adverse health effects related to PFOA and PFOS exposure. Adverse health effects included developmental effects of fetuses during pregnancy or to breastfed infants, cancer, liver effects, immune effects and thyroid effects and other health effects.
In February 2019, the EPA released a Per- and Polyflouralkyl Substances (PFAS) Action Plan. One of the four primary actions in the PFAS Action Plan is initiating steps to evaluate the need for a MCL as part of the Safe Drinking Water Act. The EPA is evaluating criteria to propose a national drinking water regulatory determination for PFOA and PFOS. The EPA is highlighting key PFOA and PFOS information gathered to date and additional data needs.The action plan identifies an anticipated timeline for a PFOA and PFOS regulatory detemination in 2019 to proceed with the federal regulatory process.
8. Anticipated economic impact of implementing the rule (note if the rule is likely to have an economic impact on small businesses):
We anticipate the economic impact of this rule to stakeholders including small businesses to be significant.
Testing will be required at a frequency similar to other synthetic organic compounds having Safe Drinking Water Act MCLs. This testing would occur at least every six years, but may be as often as every quarter for a small subset of public water systems, depending upon their levels of PFAS contaminants detected. This will affect approximately 2,000 public water systems. Currently the cost of this analysis is $325 per sample.
Approximately 15 to 30 systems would need to treat their water or drill a new well (based on data from a neighboring state, Michigan, which did sampling for PFAS and PFOS at 1700 public water systems). The number of systems needing to treat their water or drill a new well may go up if additional PFAS contaminants with MCLs are detected at Wisconsin public water systems. The cost of treatment at a large municipal public water system could be at least 25 million dollars, however that figure could be much lower at smaller systems. Some systems may also choose to drill a new well if it is possible to find an uncontaminated aquifer. The typical cost of a well at a non-transient non-community system is approximately $11,000.
The economic benefits of the avoided cost of impacts on human health may greatly outweigh the costs of treating the water or drilling a new well. The department is still assessing the extent of the economic impact of the rule, but it is projected to be significant in the first few years of implementation and more moderate in later years once initial up-front treatment installation costs are covered.
9. Anticipated number, month and locations of public hearings:
The department anticipates holding four concurrent public hearings in August 2021. Hearing cities are expected to be: Eau Claire, Wausau, Green Bay, Madison. Video conferencing will be used to hold all hearings concurrently, reducing DNR staff time and travel costs. These four locations are expected to provide convenient access to public hearings for interested parties around the state.
Contact Person: Adam DeWeese (608) 264-9229
