This is the preview version of the Wisconsin State Legislature site.
Please see http://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov for the production version.
STATE OF WISCONSIN
Podiatry Affiliated Credentialing Board
IN THE MATTER OF RULEMAKING PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE
PODIATRY AFFILIATED CREDENTIALING BOARD
PROPOSED ORDER OF THE PODIATRY AFFILIATED CREDENTIALING BOARD
ADOPTING RULES
(CLEARINGHOUSE RULE )
PROPOSED ORDER
An order of the Podiatry Affiliated Credentialing Board to amend Pod 4.03 (2) (b) and create Pod 1.02 (9), 4.04, and Chapter 8 relating to the duty to obtain informed consent.
Analysis prepared by the Department of Safety and Professional Services.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ANALYSIS
Statutes interpreted:
Section 448.697, Stats.
Statutory authority:
Explanation of agency authority:
Section 15.085 (5) (b), Stats., provides that affiliated credentialing boards, such as the Podiatry Affiliated Credentialing Board, “[s]hall promulgate rules for its own guidance and for the guidance of the trade or profession to which it pertains. . .” The proposed rule will provide guidance within the profession as to how podiatrists are to inform patients about treatment options.
Section 227.11 (2) (a), Stats., provides that “[e]ach agency may promulgate rules interpreting the provisions of any statute enforced or administered by the agency, if the agency considers it necessary to effectuate the purpose of the statute, but a rule is not valid if the rule exceeds the bounds of correct interpretation.”
Section 448.675 (4), Stats., states that “[t]he affiliated credentialing board may restore a license which has been voluntarily surrendered or revoked under this subchapter on such terms and conditions as it considers appropriate.”
Section 448.695 (1) (b), Stats., provides that the Podiatry Affiliated Credentialing Board shall promulgate “rules implementing s. 448.697”. Section 448.697, Stats., requires podiatrists to inform patients of their treatment options.
Related statute or rule:
Sections 448.08 and 447.40, Stats.
Plain language analysis:
The duty of certain health care professionals, other than physicians, to obtain informed consent from their patients before conducting treatment had not been codified as a statutory duty prior to the passage of 2013 Wisconsin Act 345. Act 345 sets forth the podiatrists duty to obtain informed consent from their patients and institutes the reasonable podiatrist standard as the standard for informing patients regarding their treatment options. The reasonable podiatrist standard requires disclosure only of the information that a reasonable podiatrist would know and disclose under the circumstances. The proposed rule will incorporate the new standard into the current rules governing podiatric practice and make any additional changes necessary to create consistency with the newly enacted legislation. The proposed rule will also provide clarity to the process of renewing a license after 5 years by updating provisions regarding licensure reinstatement.
Summary of, and comparison with, existing or proposed federal regulation:
Although several federal agencies require investigators to obtain informed consent of human subjects participating in investigative trials, there are no specific federal regulations regarding podiatrists obtaining informed consent from their patients or the reasonable podiatrist standard.
Comparison with rules in adjacent states:
Illinois: Illinois administrative rules are silent with regards to podiatrists’ duty to inform patients of their treatment options (68 il admin 1360). A person seeking to restore a podiatric physician license after it has been expired or placed on inactive status for more than 5 years must interview before the board and submit evidence of either (1) certification of active practice in another jurisdiction and proof of 100 hours continuing education during the 2 years prior to restoration. Such evidence shall include a statement from the appropriate board or licensing authority in the other jurisdiction that the applicant was authorized to practice during the term of active practice; or (2) proof of successful completion of the PM Lexis examination within one year before applying for restoration (68 il admin 1360.60).
Loading...
Loading...
Links to Admin. Code and Statutes in this Register are to current versions, which may not be the version that was referred to in the original published document.