An identification card issued by a U.S. uniformed service;
A U.S. passport;
A certificate of U.S. naturalization;
An unexpired driving receipt under s. 343.11; An unexpired identification card receipt under s. 343.50; An identification card issued by a federally recognized Indian tribe in this state;
An unexpired identification card issued by a university or college in this state that is accredited as defined in s. 39.30 (1) (d). The Photo ID Law will be implemented for the May 19, 2015 special elections and every election thereafter (pending any potential future legislative or judicial activity). Thus, there is no existing guidance or clarification that a WTCS student identification card is an “unexpired identification card issued by a university or college in this state that is accredited, as defined in s. 39.90 (1)[.]” Wis. Stat. s. 5.02 (6m) (f). Proposed Policy:
The proposed rule clarifies that a WTCS student identification card is included in the description of student identification cards that may be used as acceptable identification in order to receive a ballot.
On November 9, 2011, the Board made a determination that a Wisconsin Technical College System institution is accredited under Wis. Stat. §39.30 (1)(d). Based on that determination, the Board directed G.A.B. staff to include WTCS student identification cards as an acceptable form of identification for voting in its training and educational materials as part of the agency’s responsibility to administer the voter identification law pursuant to Wis. Stat. §5.05 (1); see also Section 144(1) of 2011 Wisconsin Act 23 (“[T]he government accountability board shall conduct a public informational compaign for the purpose of informing prospective voters of the voter identification requirements of this act.”). Alternatives:
The alternative to promulgating this rule is to significantly restrict the number of electors who may use a student identification card in order to receive a ballot and to create potential confusion for clerks and voters regarding acceptable forms of voter identification on Election Day. The Board originally addressed this issue because G.A.B. staff raised a question about legislative intent as it was developing its implementation approach to training local election officials and educating the public on the voter identification requirement. The issue will again be raised and need to be clarified as the May 19, 2015 special elections approach.
4. Detailed explanation of statutory authority for the rule (including the statutory citation and language):
General Authority
Wis. Stat. s.5.05 (1) provides that the G.A.B. has “the responsibility for the administration of chs. 5 to 12, other laws relating to elections and election campaigns, subch. III of ch. 13, and subch. III of ch. 19.” The G.A.B. may “[p]romulgate rules under ch. 227 applicable to all jurisdictions for the purpose of interpreting or implementing the laws regulating the conduct of elections . . . or ensuring their proper administration.” Wis. Stat. §5.05(1)(f). The Photo ID Law enacted and amended statutes in chs. 5 and 6. See 2011 Wisconsin Act 23. Thus, the G.A.B. has the statutory authority to promulgate the proposed rule to ensure the proper administration of elections. Emergency Rule Authority
The agency is authorized to promulgate the rule as an emergency rule because it was previously directed to do so by the JCRAR pursuant to Wis. Stat. ss. 227.10 (1), 227.26 (2). Further, Board staff believes that an emergency rule is necessary to preserve the public peace and welfare by 1) properly implementing the Legislature’s enacted policy, and 2) remedying potential public confusion about the status of the Photo ID Law and how voters comply with it. Therefore, an emergency rule is necessary to preserving the public peace and welfare before the May 19, 2015 special elections.
Finally, on November 22, 2011, the G.A.B. submitted a Statement of Scope, substantially similar to this Statement, to the Governor. On December 2, 2011, the Governor approved that Statement. See Letter from Gov. Scott Walker to Director Kevin Kennedy (Dec. 2, 2011) (attached hereto as “Exhibit A”). Pursuant to Executive Order #50, Sec. II, Para. 9, an agency must file an approved statement of scope to the “Legislative Reference Bureau within “thirty calendar days of approval if the agency intends to proceed with rulemaking[.]” Given that the G.A.B. did not implement the emergency rule in 2011 due to the court-ordered stays, the Board now must submit a new Statement of Scope to the Governor for approval. This Statement of Scope describes the same objective as did the 2011 Statement, and the Board staff requests the Governor to make a similar approval now.
Permanent Rule
The agency plans to promulgate this rule as both an emergency rule and a permanent rule. This scope statement is submitted in support of both the emergency rule and the permanent rule.
5. Estimate of the amount of time that state employees will spend developing the rule and of other resources necessary to develop the rule:
10 hours.
6. List with description of all entities that may be affected by the proposed rule:
WTCS institutions desiring to issue student identification cards acceptable for voting purposes will be affected by this rule. All students at a WTCS institution also will be affected by this rule as well as Wisconsin’s 1,852 municipal clerks responsible for administering elections and approximately 25,000 poll workers who staff voting locations on Election Day. The impact of the rule will be on town, village and city government. The rule does not impact businesses, private economic sectors or public utility ratepayers.
7. Summary and preliminary comparison with any existing or proposed federal regulation that is intended to address the activities to be regulated by the proposed rule:
The 2002 federal Help America Vote Act (HAVA), 42 USC §15301 et seq., contains a provision requiring states to receive identification from individuals who register to vote for the first time, by mail. HAVA §303 (b)(2)(A)(i)(I). That requirement is a voter registration requirement and is a more general requirement than the state identification requirement for receiving a ballot. The federal requirement simply refers to “current and valid photo identification.” The federal requirement does not delineate specific types of photo identification as does the Wisconsin statute.
8. Anticipated economic impact of implementing the rule (note if the rule is likely to have a significant economic impact on small businesses):
The rule will have minimal or no impact on the governmental entities impacted by the rule. Municipal clerks and poll workers will be provided with informational and training materials on the acceptable forms of identification for voting. This rule merely clarifies that WTCS student identification cards are an “unexpired identification card issued by a university or college in this state that is accredited, as defined in s. 39.90 (1)[.]” Wis. Stat. s. 5.02 (6m) (f). The rule will eliminate possible confusion if a voter offers a technical college student identification card when appearing at the polling place to vote. This rule will not have an impact on small businesses. Contact person: Matthew W. Giesfeldt
