Chapter VE 3

VE 3.40 History History: CR 21-062: cr. Register July 2022 No. 799, eff. 8-1-22; correction in numbering (2m) under s. 13.92 (4) (b) 1., Stats., and (2m) title created under s. 13.92 (4) (b) 2., Stats., Register July 2022 No. 799.

VE 3.42 VE 3.42 Witness fees and costs. Witnesses subpoenaed at the request of the disciplinary counsel shall be entitled to compensation from the state for attendance and travel as provided in ch. 885, Stats.

VE 3.42 History History: CR 21-062: cr. Register July 2022 No. 799, eff. 8-1-22.

VE 3.44 VE 3.44 Record of proceedings, transcripts.

VE 3.44(1) (1) Record of oral proceedings. Oral proceedings in a disciplinary proceeding shall be electronically recorded unless the administrative law judge determines that a stenographic record is required.

VE 3.44(2) (2) Electronic recording; copies. If an oral proceeding in a contested case is electronically recorded, a copy of the recording shall be furnished at cost to any party who requests a copy.

VE 3.44(3) (3) Stenographic recording; copies.

VE 3.44(3)(a) (a) If a stenographic recording is made, the reporting service who records the proceeding may charge a fee for an original transcription and for copies. Fees are identified in the state operational purchasing bulletin for reporting services and fees allowed to be charged.

VE 3.44 Note Note: Purchasing bulletins may be obtained through the State Bureau of Procurement, PO Box 7867, Madison WI 53707-7867, call [phone] or email [e-mail].

VE 3.44(3)(b) (b) A person who is without means and who requires a transcript for appeal or other reasonable purposes shall be furnished with a transcript without charge upon the filing of a petition of indigency signed under oath.

VE 3.46 VE 3.46 Proposed decision. The administrative law judge shall prepare a proposed decision for consideration by the board. The proposed decision shall include proposed findings of fact, conclusions of law, and a final order, with a signed opinion explaining the proposed decision.

VE 3.46 History History: CR 21-062: cr. Register July 2022 No. 799, eff. 8-1-22.

VE 3.48 VE 3.48 Assessment of costs.

VE 3.48(1) (1) The proposed decision shall include a recommendation whether all or part of the costs of the proceeding shall be assessed against the respondent.

VE 3.48(2) (2) If a respondent objects to the recommendation that costs be assessed, objections to the assessment of costs shall be filed at the same time as other objections to the proposed decision.

VE 3.48(3) (3) When costs are imposed, the administrative law judge shall file a supporting affidavit with the proposed decision, listing costs incurred to be paid by the respondent. Within 20 days, the disciplinary counsel shall file a supporting affidavit showing costs incurred. The respondent shall file any objection to the affidavits within 15 days after service of the disciplinary counsel’s affidavit.

VE 3.48 History History: CR 21-062: cr. Register July 2022 No. 799, eff. 8-1-22.

VE 3.50 VE 3.50 Service of proposed decision. The administrative law judge shall deliver the proposed decision, with a copy of the record including the electronic recording of the proceedings, to the board. The administrative law judge shall serve the proposed decision on the parties, in the manner agreed to by the parties. Each proposed decision shall contain a notice providing each party, adversely affected by the proposed decision, with an opportunity to file objections and written argument with the board. A party adversely affected by a proposed decision shall have 20 days from the date of service of the proposed decision to file objections and argument.

VE 3.50 Note Note: Objections may be electronically filed at [e-mail] or mailed to the Wisconsin Veterinary Examining Board, PO Box 8911, Madison, WI 53708-8911.

VE 3.50 History History: CR 21-062: cr. Register July 2022 No. 799, eff. 8-1-22.

VE 3.52 VE 3.52 Final decision and order. After the time expires for filing all objections to the proposed decision and order, including assessment of costs, the board shall meet to make a final decision and order in a disciplinary proceeding. The final decision and order shall include a determination whether all or part of the costs of the proceeding shall be assessed against the respondent. If the final decision varies from the administrative law judge’s proposed decision, the final decision shall explain the reasons for all variations.

VE 3.52 History History: CR 21-062: cr. Register July 2022 No. 799, eff. 8-1-22.

subch. IV of ch. VE 3 Subchapter IV — Summary Suspensions and Limitations

VE 3.54 VE 3.54 Scope. This subchapter governs procedures in all summary suspension or limitation proceedings against credential holders before the board.

VE 3.54 History History: CR 21-062: cr. Register July 2022 No. 799, eff. 8-1-22.

VE 3.56 VE 3.56 Petition for summary suspension or limitation.

VE 3.56(1) (1) The disciplinary counsel shall petition the board for a summary suspension or limitation. The petition shall state the name and credential status of the respondent, and an assertion of the facts establishing that the respondent has engaged in or is likely to engage in conduct such that the public health, safety or welfare imperatively requires summary suspension or limitation of the respondent’s credential.

VE 3.56(2) (2) The petitioner shall sign the petition upon oath and make the petition upon information and belief or by affidavit of another person with knowledge of the necessary facts to sustain the petition.

VE 3.56 History History: CR 21-062: cr. Register July 2022 No. 799, eff. 8-1-22.

VE 3.58 VE 3.58 Notice of petition to respondent. Prior to presenting the petition, the petitioner shall give notice to the respondent and respondent’s authorized representative of the time and place when the petition will be presented to the board. Notice may be given by mailing a copy of the petition and notice to the last-known address of the respondent as indicated in the records of the board, pursuant to s. 227.44 (1), Stats. Notice by mail is complete upon mailing. Notice may also be given by electronic transmission if agreed to by the respondent or authorized representative.

VE 3.58 History History: CR 21-062: cr. Register July 2022 No. 799, eff. 8-1-22.

VE 3.60 VE 3.60 Issuance of summary suspension or limitation order.

VE 3.60(1) (1) If the board finds that notice has been given under s. VE 3.58 and finds probable cause to believe that the respondent has engaged in or is likely to engage in conduct such that the public health, safety or welfare imperatively requires emergency suspension or limitation of the respondent’s credential, the board may issue an order for summary suspension or limitation. The order may be issued at any time prior to or subsequent to the commencement of a disciplinary proceeding under s. VE 3.26.

VE 3.60(2) (2) The petitioner may establish probable cause under sub. (1) by affidavit or other evidence.

VE 3.60(3) (3) The summary suspension or limitation order shall be effective upon service, under s. VE 3.62, or upon actual notice of the summary suspension or limitation order to the respondent or respondent’s attorney, whichever is sooner. The order shall continue through the effective date of the final decision and order made in the disciplinary proceeding against the respondent, unless the credential is restored or the limitation is lifted under s. VE 3.64 or the disciplinary proceeding is otherwise terminated.

VE 3.60 History History: CR 21-062: cr. Register July 2022 No. 799, eff. 8-1-22.

VE 3.62 VE 3.62 Contents of summary suspension or limitation order. The summary suspension or limitation order shall include all of the following:

VE 3.62(1) (1) The manner in which the respondent or the respondent’s attorney was notified of the petition for summary suspension or limitation.

VE 3.62(2) (2) The identification of all witnesses providing evidence at the time the petition for summary suspension or limitation was presented and identification of the evidence used as a basis for the decision to issue the summary suspension or limitation order.

VE 3.62(3) (3) A finding that the public health, safety or welfare imperatively requires emergency suspension or limitation of the respondent’s credential.

VE 3.62(4) (4) A statement that the suspension or limitation order is in effect and continues until the effective date of a final order and decision in the disciplinary proceeding against the respondent, unless otherwise ordered by the board.

VE 3.62(5) (5) A statement of the respondent’s right to request a hearing at any time to show cause why the summary suspension or limitation order should not be continued, with the board’s office mailing address or email address where a request for hearing may be filed.

VE 3.62(6) (6) A statement that the hearing to show cause shall be scheduled for hearing on a date within 20 days of receipt by the board of respondent’s request for hearing, unless a later time is requested by or agreed to by the respondent.

VE 3.62 History History: CR 21-062: cr. Register July 2022 No. 799, eff. 8-1-22.

VE 3.64 VE 3.64 Service of summary suspension or limitation order. An order of summary suspension or limitation shall be served upon the respondent by mail or by email if agreed to by respondent or respondent’s attorney.

VE 3.64 History History: CR 21-062: cr. Register July 2022 No. 799, eff. 8-1-22.

VE 3.66 VE 3.66 Hearing to show cause.

VE 3.66(1) (1) A hearing to show cause shall be scheduled for a date no later than 20 days after the filing of the request for hearing with the board, unless a later time is requested by or agreed to by the respondent.

VE 3.66(2) (2) Unless the parties otherwise agree, no discovery is permitted, except for the taking and preservation of evidence as provided in ch. 804, Stats., with respect to witnesses described in s. 227.45 (7) (a) to (d), Stats. A respondent may inspect records under s. 19.35, Stats., the public records law.

VE 3.66(3) (3) At the hearing to show cause, the disciplinary counsel may call, examine and cross-examine witnesses, or present other evidence in order sustain its burden to show, by a preponderance of the evidence, why the summary suspension or limitation order should be continued. The respondent may testify, call, examine and cross-examine witnesses, and offer other evidence to rebut disciplinary counsel’s showing.

VE 3.66(4) (4) Immediately upon conclusion of the hearing to show cause the board shall make findings and an order on the record. If it is determined that the summary suspension or limitation order should not be continued, the suspended credential shall be immediately restored, and any limitation shall be lifted.

VE 3.66 History History: CR 21-062: cr. Register July 2022 No. 799, eff. 8-1-22.

VE 3.68 VE 3.68 Delegation.

VE 3.68(1) (1) The board may delegate authority to preside over and rule in a hearing to show cause to an administrative law judge employed by the division.

VE 3.68(2) (2) A delegation of authority under sub. (1) may be continuing.

VE 3.68 History History: CR 21-062: cr. Register July 2022 No. 799, eff. 8-1-22.

VE 3.70 VE 3.70 Commencement of disciplinary proceeding.

VE 3.70(1) (1) A complaint, under s. VE 3.26, commencing a disciplinary proceeding against the respondent shall be issued no later than 20 days following the issuance of the summary suspension or limitation order or the suspension or limitation shall lapse at the end of the tenth subsequent day, meaning the thirtieth day following the issuance of the summary suspension or limitation order. The formal disciplinary proceeding shall be determined promptly.

VE 3.70(2) (2) If at any time the disciplinary proceeding is not advancing with reasonable promptness, the respondent may make a motion to the administrative law judge for an order granting relief.

VE 3.70(3) (3) If it is found that the disciplinary proceeding is not advancing with reasonable promptness, and the delay is not as a result of the conduct of respondent or respondent’s counsel, a remedy, as would be just, shall be granted including:

VE 3.70(3)(a) (a) An order immediately terminating the summary suspension or limitation.

VE 3.70(3)(b) (b) An order compelling that the disciplinary proceeding be held and determined by a specific date.

VE 3.70 History History: CR 21-062: cr. Register July 2022 No. 799, eff. 8-1-22.

subch. V of ch. VE 3 Subchapter V — Administrative Injunctions

VE 3.72 VE 3.72 Scope; kinds of proceedings. This subchapter governs procedures for public hearings before the department to determine whether a person has engaged in a practice or used a title without a credential required under ch. 89, Stats., and whether to issue a special order for an administrative injunction.

VE 3.72 History History: CR 21-062: cr. Register July 2022 No. 799, eff. 8-1-22.

VE 3.74 VE 3.74 Pleadings to be captioned. All pleadings, notices, orders, and other papers filed in an administrative injunction proceeding shall be captioned: “BEFORE THE DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, TRADE AND CONSUMER PROTECTION” and shall be entitled: “IN THE MATTER OF A PETITION FOR A SPECIAL ORDER TO ENJOIN _________________, RESPONDENT.”

VE 3.74 History History: CR 21-062: cr. Register July 2022 No. 799, eff. 8-1-22.

VE 3.76 VE 3.76 Petition for administrative injunction. Department counsel, on behalf of the division, may petition for a special order from the department to issue an administrative injunction, which shall allege that a person has engaged in a practice or used a title without a credential required under ch. 89, Stats. A petition may be made on information and belief and shall contain:

VE 3.76(1) (1) The name and address of the respondent and the name and address of the department attorney who is prosecuting the petition.

VE 3.76(2) (2) A short statement in plain language of the basis for the belief that the respondent has engaged in a practice or used a title without a credential required under ch. 89, Stats., and specifying the statute or rule alleged to have been violated.

VE 3.76(3) (3) A request in essentially the following form: “Wherefore, the petitioner requests that a public hearing be held and that the department issue a special order enjoining the person from the continuation of the practice or use of the title.”

VE 3.76(4) (4) The signature of the petitioner.

VE 3.76 History History: CR 21-062: cr. Register July 2022 No. 799, eff. 8-1-22.

VE 3.78 VE 3.78 Service and filing of petition.

VE 3.78(1) (1) The petition and other papers required to be served on a respondent may be served by mailing a copy of the paper to the respondent at the last known address of the respondent, by any procedure described in s. 801.14 (2), Stats., or by electronic transmission if agreed to by the respondent or respondent’s attorney. Service by mail is complete upon mailing.

VE 3.78(2) (2) Any paper required to be filed with the department may be mailed to the department secretary’s office and, if an administrative law judge has been designated to preside in the matter, to the administrative law judge and shall be deemed filed on the date of the postmark. Materials submitted by personal service or by inter-departmental mail shall be considered filed on the date they are received at the department secretary’s office or by the administrative law judge. Papers required to be filed may instead be filed and served by facsimile transmission or by electronic mail. For materials transmitted by facsimile, the date received shall determine the date of filing. For materials transmitted by electronic mail, the filing date shall be the date that the electronic mail was sent.

VE 3.78 History History: CR 21-062: cr. Register July 2022 No. 799, eff. 8-1-22.

VE 3.80 VE 3.80 Answer.

VE 3.80(1) (1) An answer to a petition shall state in short and plain terms the defenses to each cause asserted and shall admit or deny the allegations upon which the complainant relies. If the respondent is without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the allegation, the respondent shall so state and this has the effect of a denial. Denials shall fairly meet the substance of the allegations denied. The respondent shall make denials as specific denials of designated allegations or paragraphs but if the respondent intends in good faith to deny only a part or a qualification of an allegation, the respondent shall specify so much of it as true and material and shall deny only the remainder.

VE 3.80(2) (2) The respondent shall set forth affirmatively in the answer any matter constituting an affirmative defense.

VE 3.80(3) (3) Allegations in a petition are admitted when not denied in the answer.

VE 3.80(4) (4) An answer to a petition shall be filed within 20 days from the date of service of the petition.

VE 3.80 History History: CR 21-062: cr. Register July 2022 No. 799, eff. 8-1-22.

VE 3.82 VE 3.82 Administrative law judge.

VE 3.82(1) (1) Designation. The department may request DHA assign an administrative law judge to preside over any administrative injunction proceeding.

VE 3.82(2) (2) Authority and duties. An administrative law judge may, on behalf of the department, do all of the following:

VE 3.82(2)(a) (a) Gain permission from parties for service of all documents to be via electronic transmission, or other means if necessary.

VE 3.82(2)(b) (b) Require parties to clarify positions or issues.