This is the preview version of the Wisconsin State Legislature site.
Please see http://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov for the production version.
1.   Type A – Jute fiber only for use in channels to reinforce sod.
2.   Type B – For use in channels where the calculated (design) shear stress is 2.0 lbs/ft2 or less. Made with plastic or biodegradable mat.
3.   Type C – A woven mat of 100% organic material for use in channels where the calculated (design) shear stress is 2.0 lbs/ft2 or less. Applicable for use in environmentally sensitive areas where plastic netting is inappropriate.
C.   Class III: A permanent 100% synthetic ECRM or TRM. Class I, Type B erosion mat or Class II, Type B or C erosion mat must be placed over a soil filled TRM.
1.   Type A – An ECRM for use in channels where the calculated (design) shear stress of 2.0 lbs/ft2 or less.
2.   Type B – A TRM for use in channels where the calculated (design) shear stress of 2.0 lbs/ft2 or less.
3.   Type C – A TRM for use in channels where the calculated (design) shear stress of 3.5 lbs/ft2 or less.
4.   Type D – A TRM for use in channels where the calculated (design) shear stress of 5.0 lbs/ft2 or less.
VI.   Installation
A.   ECRM shall be installed after all topsoiling, fertilizing, liming, and seeding is complete.
B.   Erosion mats shall extend for whichever is greater: upslope one-foot minimum vertically from the ditch bottom or 6 inches higher than the design flow depth.
C.   The mat shall be in firm and continuous contact with the soil. It shall be anchored, overlapped, staked and entrenched per the manufacturer's recommendations.
D.   TRM shall be installed in conjunction with the topsoiling operation and shall be followed by ECRM installation.
E.   At time of installation, document the manufacturer and mat type by saving material labels and manufacturer's installation instructions. Retain this documentation until the site is stabilized.
VII.   Considerations
A.   Erosion mats shall be selected so that they last long enough for the grass or other vegetation to become densely established.
B.   Consider using Class II, Type C mats adjacent to waterways where trapping small animals is to be avoided.
C.   Class III TRM may be appropriate as a replacement for riprap as a channel liner. Check the shear stress criteria for the channel to determine mat applicability.
D.   Once a gully has formed in a channel, it is difficult to stabilize due to loss of soil structure. Even when the gully is filled with topsoil and reseeded, the soil has a tendency to dislodge in the same pattern. If gully formation continues to be a problem the design should be reevaluated, including other mat classes or riprap.
E.   It may be difficult to establish permanent vegetation and adequate erosion protection in a channel with continuous flow. Consider riprap or planting wetland species with an ECRM.
F.   Documentation of materials used, monitoring logs, project diary, and weekly inspection forms including erosion and stormwater management plans, should be provided to the authority charged with long term maintenance of the site.
G.   Channel cross sections may be parabolic, v-shaped or trapezoidal. The use of “V" channels is generally discouraged due to erosion problems experienced.
H.   To help determine the appropriate channel liner, designers can refer to the design matrix in the back of the WisDOT PAL. However, for channels not conforming to the typical section shown in the channel matrix or having a depth of flow greater than 6 inches (150 mm), the designer will need to design for an appropriate channel liner. One way to do this is to use the “tractive force" method presented in FHWA's Hydraulic Engineering Circular (HEC) No. 15. This method requires that the calculated maximum shear stress of a channel is not to exceed the permissible shear stress of the channel liner. To use this method, permissible shear stress values are stated next to each device listed in the channel matrix.
VIII.   Plans and Specifications
A.   Plans and specifications for installing erosion mat shall be in keeping with this standard and shall describe the requirements for applying the practice to achieve its intended purpose. The plans and specifications shall address the following:
1.   Location of erosion mat
2.   Installation sequence
3.   Material specification conforming to standard
B.   All plans, standard detail drawings, or specifications shall include schedule for installation, inspection, and maintenance. The responsible party shall be identified.
IX.   Operation and Maintenance
A.   Erosion mats shall at a minimum be inspected weekly and within 24 hours after every precipitation event that produces 0.5 inches of rain or more during a 24-hour period.
B.   If there are signs of rilling under the mat, install more staples or more frequent anchoring trenches. If rilling becomes severe enough to prevent establishment of vegetation, remove the section of mat where the damage has occurred. Fill the eroded area with topsoil, compact, reseed and replace the section of mat, trenching and overlapping ends per manufacturer's recommendations. Additional staking is recommended near where rilling was filled.
C.   If the reinforcing plastic netting has separated from the mat, remove the plastic and if necessary replace the mat.
D.   Maintenance shall be completed as soon as possible with consideration to site conditions.
X.   References
WisDOT “Erosion Control Product Acceptability List" is available online at http://www.dot.wisconsin.gov/business/engrserv/pal.htm.
XI.   Definitions
Channel Erosion: The deepening and widening of a channel due to soil loss caused by flowing water. As rills become larger and flows begin to concentrate, soil detachment occurs primarily as a result of shear.
Erosion Control Revegative Mats (ECRM) (II): Erosion control revegetative mats are designed to be placed on top of soil.
Turf-Reinforcement Mats (TRM) (II): Turf-reinforcement mats are permanent devices constructed from various types of synthetic materials and buried below the surface to help stabilize the soil. TRMs must be used in conjunction with an ECRM or an approved soil stabilizer Type A (as classified in the WisDOT PAL)
Dewatering
1061 (4/07)
Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources
Conservation Practice Standard
Note: Words in the standard that are shown in italics are described in X. Definitions. The words are italicized the first time they are used.
I.   Definition
A compartmented container, settling basin, filter, or other appropriate best management practice through which sediment-laden water is conveyed to trap and retain the sediment.
II.   Purposes
The purpose of this standard is to determine appropriate methods and means to remove sediment from water generated during dewatering activities prior to discharging off-site or to waters of the state. Practices identified in this standard shall be deemed to meet the de-watering performance standard to prevent the discharge of sediment to the maximum extent practicable (MEP) as defined in s. NR 151.11 (6) (c).
III.   Conditions where Practice Applies
This practice applies where sediment laden water needs to be removed for construction or maintenance activities. Dewatering practices shall be in keeping with the effective operating and applicability criteria listed on Figure 2, Dewatering Practice Selection Matrix.
This practice does not apply to:
  Water being discharged directly to groundwater or karst features1. Refer to NR140
  Well dewatering systems. Refer to NR 812
IV.   Federal, State, and Local Laws
Users of this standard shall be aware of applicable federal, state, and local laws, rules, regulations, or permit requirements governing the use and placement of this practice. This may include activities performed under NR 216 and Chapter 30 permits, for water bodies with targeted performance standards per NR 151.004, 303d waterbodies or others. This standard does not contain the text of federal, state, or local laws.
V.   Criteria
This section establishes the minimum allowable limits for design parameters, installation and performance requirements.
Dewatering practices shall be selected based on the predominant soil texture encountered at the dewatering site with consideration given to pumping or flow rates, volumes and device effectiveness. Refer to Figure 1 USDA Soil textural triangle to assist with soil classifications at the site. Figure 2, Dewatering Practice Selection Matrix illustrates acceptable dewatering options and their effective ranges. Practices selected that are not on the matrix must provide an equivalent level of control, with justification provided to the reviewing authority.
A.   Site Assessment - A site assessment shall be conducted and documented to determine the physical site characteristics that will affect the placement, design, construction and maintenance of dewatering activities. The site assessment shall identify characteristics such as ground slopes, soil types, soil conditions, bedrock, sinkholes, drainage patterns, runoff constituents, proximity to regulated structures, natural resources, and specific land uses. The site assessment shall include the following:
  Sanitary and storm sewer locations
  Potential contamination - Odor or discoloration other than sediment, or an oily sheen on the surface of the sediment laden water. If contamination is present, notify DNR Spills Reporting
  Soil textural class for areas where dewatering will occur. Soil investigation shall extend below grading and trenching activities
  Depth to the seasonally highest water table
  Discharge outfall locations
  Distance and conveyance method to receiving waters
B.   General Criteria Applicable To All Dewatering Activities
1.   Contact the WDNR when the discharge from a dewatering practice will enter a WDNR listed Exceptional Resource Water (ERW), Outstanding Resource Water (ORW), or a wetland in an area of special natural resource interest as identified in NR 103.
2.   Contact the owner or operator of the municipal separate stormwater system if the discharge is to a municipal storm water conveyance system. The allowable discharge rate shall be limited by the capacity of the system or requirements of the system owner.
3.   When practical, dewatering effluent shall be collected in a pump truck for transport to a treatment facility or discharged directly to a treatment facility.
4.   For surface dewatering, utilize a floating suction hose, or other method, to minimize sediment being sucked off the bottom.
5.   For discharges that will be directed to locations on-site verify that the anticipated volume of water can be fully contained.
6.   The topography and condition of the ground cover between the pump discharge point and potential receiving waters shall be evaluated for potential erosion. Appropriate stabilization measures shall be incorporated to prevent erosion.
7.   When discharge to a karst feature or other direct groundwater connection can not be avoided, the dewatering system must be designed and operated to maintain compliance with the groundwater quality standards contained in applicable regulations, including ch. NR 140 Wis. Adm. Code.
8.   If the discharge directly or indirectly enters a stream, the discharge flow rate shall not exceed 50 percent of the peak flow rate of the 2-year 24-hour storm event.
C.   Geotextile Bags
1.   Geotextile bags shall meet the criteria listed in Table 1.
Table 1: Properties for Geotextile Bags - See PDF for table PDF
2.   Geotextile bags shall be sized according to the particle size being trapped, expected flow or pumping rate (gallons per minute) per square foot of fabric and a 50% clogging factor. The footprint of the bag shall be no smaller than 100 square feet.
3.   Geotextile bags shall be securely attached to the discharge pipe.
4.   Polymers can be used to enhance the efficiency of geotextile bags. If polymer is used, the polymer shall be approved by the WDNR and meet the criteria stipulated in WDNR Conservation Practice Standard 1051, Sediment Control Water Application of Polymers. The polymer supplier or applicator shall provide certifications showing that products have met the performance requirements of Standard 1051. If the manufacturer has not completed the required testing, the project may be used to gain that certification provided it meets the site requirements of Standard 1051. Any such testing will be monitored by DNR or WisDOT, with testing done by a qualified third party.
D.   Gravity Based Settling Systems
Gravity based systems rely on settling of particles as the primary means of treatment. To effectively accomplish this, quiescent conditions should exist with sufficient detention time. Practices include portable sediment tanks, sediment traps, sediment basins and wet detention basins.
If polymer is used to enhance settling, the polymer shall be approved by the WDNR and meet the criteria stipulated in WDNR Conservation Practice Standard 1051, Sediment Control Water Application of Polymers. The polymer supplier or applicator shall provide certifications showing that products have met the performance requirements of Standard 1051. If the manufacturer has not completed the required testing, the project may be used to gain that certification provided it meets the site requirements of Standard 1051. Any such testing will be monitored by DNR or WisDOT, with testing done by a qualified third party.
1.   Portable Sediment Tank: These tanks are intended to settle only sands, loamy sands, and sandy loams. If polymer is added, these tanks will also be appropriate for settling loams, silt loams and silts. Portable sediment tanks shall have a minimum of two baffled compartments, and be a minimum of three feet deep. The inlet and outlet pipe shall be a minimum diameter of three inches. Use one of the following methods to size a tank:
a.   Settling: Account for settling of the suspended sediments with the following equation:
Sa = 1.83 * Q;
where
Sa = Tank surface area (sq ft)
Loading...
Loading...
Published under s. 35.93, Stats. Updated on the first day of each month. Entire code is always current. The Register date on each page is the date the chapter was last published.