NR 661.1035(2)(c)
(c) When a remanufacturer or other person that stores or treats the hazardous secondary material chooses to use test data to determine the organic removal efficiency or total organic compound concentration achieved by the control device, a performance test plan shall be developed and include all of the following:
NR 661.1035(2)(c)1.
1. A description of how it is determined that the planned test is going to be conducted when the hazardous secondary material management unit is operating at the highest load or capacity level reasonably expected to occur. This shall include the estimated or design flow rate and organic content of each vent stream and define the acceptable operating ranges of key process and control device parameters during the test program.
NR 661.1035(2)(c)2.
2. A detailed engineering description of the closed-vent system and control device including all of the following:
NR 661.1035(2)(c)3.
3. A detailed description of sampling and monitoring procedures, including sampling and monitoring locations in the system, the equipment to be used, sampling and monitoring frequency, and planned analytical procedures for sample analysis.
NR 661.1035(2)(d)1.
1. A list of all information references and sources used in preparing the documentation.
NR 661.1035(2)(d)3.
3. If engineering calculations are used, a design analysis, specifications, drawings, schematics, and piping and instrumentation diagrams based on the appropriate sections of “APTI Course 415: Control of Gaseous Emissions,” incorporated by reference in s.
NR 660.11, or other engineering texts acceptable to the department that present basic control device design information. Documentation provided by the control device manufacturer or vendor that describes the control device design in accordance with this subdivision may be used to comply with this requirement. The design analysis shall address the vent stream characteristics and control device operation parameters as follows:
NR 661.1035(2)(d)3.a.
a. For a thermal vapor incinerator, the design analysis shall consider the vent stream composition, constituent concentrations, and flow rate. The design analysis shall also establish the design minimum and average temperature in the combustion zone and the combustion zone residence time.
NR 661.1035(2)(d)3.b.
b. For a catalytic vapor incinerator, the design analysis shall consider the vent stream composition, constituent concentrations, and flow rate. The design analysis shall also establish the design minimum and average temperatures across the catalyst bed inlet and outlet.
NR 661.1035(2)(d)3.c.
c. For a boiler or process heater, the design analysis shall consider the vent stream composition, constituent concentrations, and flow rate. The design analysis shall also establish the design minimum and average flame zone temperatures, combustion zone residence time, and description of method and location where the vent stream is introduced into the combustion zone.
NR 661.1035(2)(d)3.d.
d. For a flare, the design analysis shall consider the vent stream composition, constituent concentrations, and flow rate. The design analysis shall also consider the requirements specified in s.
NR 661.1033 (4).
NR 661.1035(2)(d)3.e.
e. For a condenser, the design analysis shall consider the vent stream composition, constituent concentrations, flow rate, relative humidity, and temperature. The design analysis shall also establish the design outlet organic compound concentration level, design average temperature of the condenser exhaust vent stream, and design average temperatures of the coolant fluid at the condenser inlet and outlet.
NR 661.1035(2)(d)3.f.
f. For a carbon adsorption system such as a fixed-bed adsorber that regenerates the carbon bed directly on-site in the control device, the design analysis shall consider the vent stream composition, constituent concentrations, flow rate, relative humidity, and temperature. The design analysis shall also establish the design exhaust vent stream organic compound concentration level, number and capacity of carbon beds, type and working capacity of activated carbon used for carbon beds, design total steam flow over the period of each complete carbon bed regeneration cycle, duration of the carbon bed steaming and cooling or drying cycles, design carbon bed temperature after regeneration, design carbon bed regeneration time, and design service life of carbon.
NR 661.1035(2)(d)3.g.
g. For a carbon adsorption system such as a carbon canister that does not regenerate the carbon bed directly on-site in the control device, the design analysis shall consider the vent stream composition, constituent concentrations, flow rate, relative humidity, and temperature. The design analysis shall also establish the design outlet organic concentration level, capacity of carbon bed, type and working capacity of activated carbon used for carbon bed, and design carbon replacement interval based on the total carbon working capacity of the control device and source operating schedule.
NR 661.1035(2)(d)4.
4. A statement signed and dated by the remanufacturer or other person that stores or treats the hazardous secondary material certifying that the operating parameters used in the design analysis reasonably represent the conditions that exist when the hazardous secondary material management unit is or would be operating at the highest load or capacity level reasonably expected to occur.
NR 661.1035(2)(d)5.
5. A statement signed and dated by the remanufacturer or other person that stores or treats the hazardous secondary material certifying that the control device is designed to operate at an efficiency of 95 percent or greater unless the total organic concentration limit specified in s.
NR 661.1032 (1) is achieved at an efficiency less than 95 weight percent or the total organic emission limits specified in s.
NR 661.1032 (1) for affected process vents at the facility can be attained by a control device involving vapor recovery at an efficiency less than 95 weight percent. A statement provided by the control device manufacturer or vendor certifying that the control equipment meets the design specifications may be used to comply with this requirement.
NR 661.1035(2)(d)6.
6. If performance tests are used to demonstrate compliance, all test results.
NR 661.1035(3)
(3) Design documentation and monitoring, operating, and inspection information for each closed-vent system and control device required to comply with the provisions of this section shall be recorded and kept up-to-date at the facility. The information shall include all of the following:
NR 661.1035(3)(a)
(a) Description and date of each modification that is made to the closed-vent system or control device design.
NR 661.1035(3)(b)
(b) Identification of operating parameter, description of monitoring device, and diagram of monitoring sensor location or locations used to comply with s.
NR 661.1033 (6) (a) and
(b).
NR 661.1035(3)(d)
(d) Date, time, and duration of each period that occurs while the control device is operating when any monitored parameter exceeds the value established in the control device design analysis as follows:
NR 661.1035(3)(d)1.
1. For a thermal vapor incinerator designed to operate with a minimum residence time of 0.50 second at a minimum temperature of 760
°C, the period when the combustion temperature is below 760
°C.
NR 661.1035(3)(d)2.
2. For a thermal vapor incinerator designed to operate with an organic emission reduction efficiency of 95 weight percent or greater, the period when the combustion zone temperature is more than 28
°C below the design average combustion zone temperature established as a requirement under sub.
(2) (d) 3. a. NR 661.1035(3)(d)3.
3. For a catalytic vapor incinerator, the period when any of the following occur:
NR 661.1035(3)(d)3.a.
a. Temperature of the vent stream at the catalyst bed inlet is more than 28
°C below the average temperature of the inlet vent stream established as a requirement under sub.
(2) (d) 3. b. NR 661.1035(3)(d)3.b.
b. Temperature difference across the catalyst bed is less than 80 percent of the design average temperature difference established as a requirement under sub.
(2) (d) 3. b. NR 661.1035(3)(d)4.
4. For a boiler or process heater, the period when any of the following occur:
NR 661.1035(3)(d)4.b.
b. Position changes where the vent stream is introduced to the combustion zone from the location established as a requirement under sub.
(2) (d) 3. c. NR 661.1035(3)(d)6.
6. For a condenser that complies with s.
NR 661.1033 (6) (b) 6. a., the period when the organic compound concentration level or readings of organic compounds in the exhaust vent stream from the condenser are more than 20 percent greater than the design outlet organic compound concentration level established as a requirement under sub.
(2) (d) 3. e. NR 661.1035(3)(d)7.a.
a. Temperature of the exhaust vent stream from the condenser is more than 6
°C above the design average exhaust vent stream temperature established as a requirement under sub.
(2) (d) 3. e. NR 661.1035(3)(d)7.b.
b. Temperature of the coolant fluid exiting the condenser is more than 6
°C above the design average coolant fluid temperature at the condenser outlet established as a requirement under sub.
(2) (d) 3. e. NR 661.1035(3)(d)8.
8. For a carbon adsorption system such as a fixed-bed carbon adsorber that regenerates the carbon bed directly on-site in the control device and complies with s.
NR 661.1033 (6) (b) 7. a., period when the organic compound concentration level or readings of organic compounds in the exhaust vent stream from the carbon bed are more than 20 percent greater than the design exhaust vent stream organic compound concentration level established as a requirement under sub.
(2) (d) 3. f. NR 661.1035(3)(d)9.
9. For a carbon adsorption system such as a fixed-bed carbon adsorber that regenerates the carbon bed directly on-site in the control device and complies with s.
NR 661.1033 (6) (b) 7. b., period when the vent stream continues to flow through the control device beyond the predetermined carbon bed regeneration time established as a requirement under sub.
(2) (d) 3. f. NR 661.1035(3)(e)
(e) Explanation for each period recorded under par.
(d) of the cause for control device operating parameter exceeding the design value and the measures implemented to correct the control device operation.
NR 661.1035(3)(f)
(f) For a carbon adsorption system operated subject to requirements specified in s.
NR 661.1033 (7) or
(8) (b), the date when existing carbon in the control device is replaced with fresh carbon.
NR 661.1035(3)(g)1.
1. Date and time when control device is monitored for carbon breakthrough and the monitoring device reading.
NR 661.1035(3)(g)2.
2. Date when existing carbon in the control device is replaced with fresh carbon.
NR 661.1035(3)(i)
(i) A remanufacturer or other person that stores or treats the hazardous secondary material designating any components of a closed-vent system as unsafe to monitor pursuant to s.
NR 661.1033 (15) shall record in a log that is kept at the facility the identification of closed-vent system components that are designated as unsafe to monitor in accordance with the requirements under s.
NR 661.1033 (15), an explanation for each closed-vent system component stating why the closed-vent system component is unsafe to monitor, and the plan for monitoring each closed-vent system component.
NR 661.1035(3)(j)1.
1. The instrument identification number, the closed-vent system component identification number, and the operator name, initials, or identification number.
NR 661.1035(3)(j)2.
2. Date the leak was detected and the date of first attempt to repair the leak.
NR 661.1035(3)(j)4.
4. Maximum instrument reading measured by Method 21 in appendix A of
40 CFR part 60, incorporated by reference in s.
NR 660.11, after it is successfully repaired or determined to be nonrepairable.
NR 661.1035(3)(j)5.
5. The words “Repair delayed” and the reason for the delay if the leak was not repaired within 15 calendar days after discovery of the leak. Documentation of the delay may include:
NR 661.1035(3)(j)5.a.
a. The remanufacturer or other person that stores or treats the hazardous secondary material may develop a written procedure that identifies the conditions that justify a delay of repair. In such cases, reasons for delay of repair may be documented by citing the relevant sections of the written procedure.
NR 661.1035(3)(j)5.b.
b. If delay of repair was caused by depletion of stocked parts, the remanufacturer or other person that stores or treats the hazardous secondary material shall document that the spare parts were sufficiently stocked on-site before depletion and the reason for depletion.
NR 661.1035(4)
(4) Records of the monitoring, operating, and inspection information required under sub.
(3) (c) to
(j) shall be maintained by the remanufacturer or other person for at least 3 years following the date of each occurrence, measurement, maintenance, corrective action, or record.
NR 661.1035(5)
(5) For a control device other than a thermal vapor incinerator, catalytic vapor incinerator, flare, boiler, process heater, condenser, or carbon adsorption system, the remanufacturer or other person shall record monitoring and inspection information indicating proper operation and maintenance of the control device in the facility operating record.
NR 661.1035(6)
(6) Up-to-date information and data used to determine whether or not a process vent is subject to the requirements in s.
NR 661.1032 including supporting documentation as required by s.
NR 661.1034 (4) (b) when application of the knowledge of the nature of the hazardous secondary material stream or the process by which it was produced is used, shall be recorded by the remanufacturer or other person in a log that is kept at the facility.
NR 661.1035 History
History: CR 19-082: cr.
Register August 2020 No. 776, eff. 9-1-20; correction in (2) (d) 3. made under s.
35.17, Stats.,
Register August 2020 No. 776;
correction in (2) (a) made under s. 13.92 (4) (b) 7., Stats., Register April 2021 No. 784. NR 661.1050
NR 661.1050
Applicability. The regulations in this subchapter apply to equipment that contains hazardous secondary material excluded under the remanufacturing exclusion under s.
NR 661.0004 (1) (za), unless the equipment operations are subject to the requirements of an applicable Clean Air Act regulation codified under
40 CFR part 60,
61, or
63, or subject to ch.
NR 440, subchs.
III and
IV of ch. NR 446, or chs.
NR 447 to
469.
NR 661.1050 History
History: CR 19-082: cr.
Register August 2020 No. 776, eff. 9-1-20; correction in numbering made under s.
13.92 (4) (b) 1., Stats., and correction made under s.
35.17, Stats.,
Register August 2020 No. 776;
correction made under ss. 13.92 (4) (b) 7. and 35.17, Stats., Register April 2021 No. 784. NR 661.1051 History
History: CR 19-082: cr.
Register August 2020 No. 776, eff. 9-1-20.
NR 661.1052
NR 661.1052
Standards: pumps in light liquid service. NR 661.1052(1)(a)
(a) Except as provided in subs.
(4) to
(6), the remanufacturer or other person shall monitor each pump in light liquid service monthly to detect leaks by the methods specified in s.
NR 661.1063 (2).
NR 661.1052(1)(b)
(b) The remanufacturer or other person shall check each pump in light liquid service by visual inspection each calendar week for indications of liquids dripping from the pump seal.
NR 661.1052(2)(a)
(a) If an instrument reading of 10,000 ppm or greater is measured, a leak is detected.
NR 661.1052(2)(b)
(b) If there are indications of liquids dripping from the pump seal, a leak is detected.
NR 661.1052(3)(a)
(a) When a leak is detected, it shall be repaired as soon as practicable, but not later than 15 calendar days after it is detected, except as provided in s.
NR 661.1059.
NR 661.1052(3)(b)
(b) A first attempt at repair, such as tightening the packing gland, shall be made no later than 5 calendar days after each leak is detected.
NR 661.1052(4)
(4) Each pump equipped with a dual mechanical seal system that includes a barrier fluid system is exempt from the requirements under sub.
(1), provided all of the following requirements are met:
NR 661.1052(4)(a)
(a) Each dual mechanical seal system shall be one of the following:
NR 661.1052(4)(a)1.
1. Operated with the barrier fluid at a pressure that is at all times greater than the pump stuffing box pressure.
NR 661.1052(4)(a)2.
2. Equipped with a barrier fluid degassing reservoir that is connected by a closed-vent system to a control device that complies with the requirements specified in s.
NR 661.1060.
NR 661.1052(4)(a)3.
3. Equipped with a system that purges the barrier fluid into a hazardous secondary material stream with no detectable emissions to the atmosphere.
NR 661.1052(4)(b)
(b) The barrier fluid system may not be a hazardous secondary material with organic concentrations 10 percent or greater by weight.
NR 661.1052(4)(c)
(c) Each barrier fluid system shall be equipped with a sensor that will detect failure of the seal system, the barrier fluid system, or both.
NR 661.1052(4)(d)
(d) Each pump shall be checked the remanufacturer or other person by visual inspection, each calendar week, for indications of liquids dripping from the pump seals.
NR 661.1052(4)(e)1.1. Each sensor as described in par.
(c) shall be checked by the remanufacturer or other person daily or be equipped with an audible alarm that shall be checked monthly to ensure that it is functioning properly.
NR 661.1052(4)(e)2.
2. A remanufacturer or other person that stores or treats the hazardous secondary material shall determine, based on design considerations and operating experience, a criterion that indicates failure of the seal system, the barrier fluid system, or both.
