NR 466.07(9)
(9) Operating more than one capture system or control device and no never-controlled and no intermittently controllable work stations. If the owner or operator of an affected source operates more than one capture system or more than one control device, and has no never-controlled work stations and no intermittently-controllable work stations, the affected source is in compliance with the 95% overall organic HAP control efficiency requirement for the month if for each press or group of presses controlled by a common control device one of the following is satisfied:
NR 466.07(9)(a)
(a) The organic volatile matter collection and recovery efficiency, R
v, as determined by
sub. (4) (a) 1. a.,
c. and
e. to
g., is equal to or greater than 95%.
NR 466.07(9)(b)
(b) The overall organic HAP control efficiency as determined by
sub. (4) (a) 2. c. and
e. to
g., for each press or group of presses served by that control device and a common capture system, is equal to or greater than 95% and the average capture system operating parameter value for each capture system serving that control device is greater than or less than, as appropriate, the operating parameter value established for that capture system in accordance with
s. NR 466.10 (6) for each 3-hour period.
NR 466.07(9)(c)
(c) The overall organic HAP control efficiency as determined by
sub. (5) (a) 1. a. to
c. and
j., for each press or group of presses served by that control device and a common capture system, is equal to or greater than 95%, the oxidizer is operated such that the average operating parameter value is greater than the operating parameter value established in accordance with
s. NR 466.10 (5) for each 3-hour period, and the average capture system operating parameter value for each capture system serving that control device is greater than or less than, as appropriate, the operating parameter value established for that capture system in accordance with
s. NR 466.10 (6) for each 3-hour period.
NR 466.07 History
History: Cr.
Register, March, 2000, No. 531, eff. 4-1-00.
NR 466.08(1)
(1) The owner or operator of an existing source subject to this chapter shall comply with the provisions of this chapter on or before May 30, 1999.
NR 466.08(2)
(2) The owner or operator of a new MACT source subject to this chapter shall comply with the provisions of this chapter immediately upon startup of the affected source, or May 30, 1996, whichever is later.
NR 466.08(3)
(3) Affected sources which have undergone reconstruction are subject to the requirements for new MACT sources. The costs associated with the purchase and installation of air pollution control equipment are not considered in determining whether the affected source has been reconstructed. Additionally, the costs of retrofitting and replacement of equipment that is installed specifically to comply with this chapter are not considered reconstruction costs.
NR 466.08 Note
Note: Compliance dates are federally enforceable under
40 CFR 63.826 prior to the effective date of this section.
NR 466.08 History
History: Cr.
Register, March, 2000, No. 531, eff. 4-1-00.
NR 466.09
NR 466.09 Performance test methods. NR 466.09(1)(a)
(a) The control device was in operation prior to May 30, 1996 and is equipped with continuous emission monitors for determining inlet and outlet total organic volatile matter concentration; capture efficiency has been determined in accordance with the requirements of this chapter such that an overall HAP control efficiency can be calculated; and the continuous emission monitors are used to demonstrate continuous compliance in accordance with
s. NR 466.10.
NR 466.09(2)(a)(a) For the purpose of meeting the requirements of
s. NR 466.06, the organic HAP weight-fraction of each ink, coating, varnish, adhesive, primer, solvent and other material used in a publication rotogravure affected source shall be determined in accordance with one of the following procedures:
NR 466.09(2)(a)1.
1. Use Method 311 in
40 CFR Part 63, Appendix A, incorporated by reference in
s. NR 484.04, or obtain the results of a Method 311 test performed by the manufacturer of the material. If the organic HAP weight-fraction for any material cannot be determined using Method 311, the owner or operator shall submit an alternate method to the U.S. environmental protection agency for approval by the administrator. The recovery efficiency of the proposed technique shall be determined for all of the target organic HAP and a correction factor, if necessary, shall be determined and applied.
NR 466.09(2)(a)2.
2. Determine the volatile matter content of the material in accordance with
sub. (3) (a), and use this value for the organic HAP content for all compliance purposes.
NR 466.09(2)(a)3.
3. Use formulation data provided by the manufacturer of the material on a CPDS if the manufacturer has done both of the following:
NR 466.09(2)(a)3.a.
a. Included in the organic HAP content determination all HAP present at a level greater than 0.1% in any raw material used, weighted by the mass fraction of each raw material used in the material.
NR 466.09(2)(a)3.b.
b. Determined the HAP content of each raw material present in the formulation by Method 311 in
40 CFR Part 63, Appendix A, incorporated by reference in
s. NR 484.04, or by an alternate method approved by the administrator, or by reliance on a CPDS from a raw material supplier prepared in accordance with subpar. a.
NR 466.09(2)(b)
(b) For the purpose of meeting the requirements of
s. NR 466.07, the organic HAP weight-fraction of each ink, coating, varnish, adhesive, primer, solvent, thinner, reducer, diluent and other material used in a product and packaging rotogravure or wide-web flexographic affected source shall be determined in accordance with one of the following procedures:
NR 466.09(2)(b)1.
1. Use Method 311 in
40 CFR Part 63, Appendix A, incorporated by reference in
s. NR 484.04, or obtain the results of a Method 311 test performed by the manufacturer of the material. If the organic HAP weight-fraction for any material cannot be determined using Method 311, the owner or operator shall submit an alternate method to the U.S. environmental protection agency for approval by the administrator. The recovery efficiency of the proposed technique shall be determined for all of the target organic HAP and a correction factor, if necessary, shall be determined and applied.
NR 466.09(2)(b)2.
2. Determine the volatile matter content of the material in accordance with
sub. (3) (b), and use this value for the organic HAP content for all compliance purposes.
NR 466.09(2)(b)3.
3. Use formulation data provided by the manufacturer of the material on a CPDS if the manufacturer has done both of the following:
NR 466.09(2)(b)3.a.
a. Included in the organic HAP content determination all organic HAP present at a level greater than 0.1% in any raw material used, weighted by the mass fraction of each raw material used in the material.
NR 466.09(2)(b)3.b.
b. Determined the organic HAP content of each raw material present in the formulation by Method 311 in
40 CFR Part 63, Appendix A, incorporated by reference in
s. NR 484.04, or by an alternate method approved by the administrator, or by reliance on a CPDS from a raw material supplier prepared in accordance with subpar. a.
NR 466.09(2)(c)
(c) In the event of any inconsistency between the organic HAP content of a material determined using test data from Method 311 in
40 CFR Part 63, Appendix A, incorporated by reference in
s. NR 484.04, and the organic HAP content of the same material determined using formulation data as allowed under
par. (a) 3. or
(b) 3., the Method 311 test data shall govern, unless after consultation, an owner or operator demonstrates to the satisfaction of the department that the formulation data are correct.
NR 466.09(3)(a)(a) For the purpose of meeting the requirements of
s. NR 466.06, the volatile matter weight-fraction of each ink, coating, varnish, adhesive, primer, solvent, diluent, reducer, thinner and other material used in a publication rotogravure affected source shall be determined in accordance with one of the following procedures:
NR 466.09(3)(a)1.
1. Use Method 24A in
40 CFR Part 60, Appendix A, incorporated by reference in
s. NR 484.04, or obtain the results of a Method 24A test performed by the manufacturer of the material. If the volatile matter weight-fraction for any material cannot be determined using Method 24A, the owner or operator shall submit an alternate method to the U.S. environmental protection agency for approval by the administrator.
NR 466.09(3)(a)2.
2. Use formulation data, or volatile matter content data provided by material suppliers.
NR 466.09(3)(b)
(b) For the purpose of meeting the requirements of
s. NR 466.07, the volatile matter and solids weight-fraction of each ink, coating, varnish, adhesive, primer, solvent, diluent, reducer, thinner and other material used in a product and packaging rotogravure or wide-web flexographic affected source shall be determined in accordance with one of the following procedures:
NR 466.09(3)(b)1.
1. Use Method 24 in
40 CFR Part 60, Appendix A, incorporated by reference in
s. NR 484.04, or obtain the results of a Method 24 test performed by the manufacturer of the material. If the volatile matter or solids weight-fraction for any material cannot be determined using Method 24, the owner or operator shall submit an alternate method to the U.S. environmental protection agency for approval by the administrator.
NR 466.09(3)(b)2.
2. Use formulation data, or volatile matter and solids content data provided by material suppliers.
NR 466.09(3)(c)
(c) In the event of any inconsistency between the volatile matter or solids content of a material determined using formulation data as allowed under
par. (a) 2. or
(b) 2., and the volatile matter or solids content of the same material using the results of Method 24 or 24A in
40 CFR Part 60, Appendix A, incorporated by reference in
s. NR 484.04, the applicable test method shall govern, unless after consultation, the owner or operator can demonstrate to the satisfaction of the department that the formulation data are correct.
NR 466.09(4)
(4) Control device destruction efficiency. A performance test of a control device to determine destruction efficiency for the purpose of meeting the requirements of
ss. NR 466.06 and
466.07, shall be conducted by the owner or operator in accordance with the following requirements:
NR 466.09(4)(a)
(a) An initial performance test to establish the destruction efficiency of an oxidizer and the associated combustion zone temperature for a thermal oxidizer and the associated catalyst bed inlet temperature for a catalytic oxidizer shall be conducted and the data reduced in accordance with the following reference methods and procedure:
NR 466.09(4)(a)6.
6. Use Method 25 in
40 CFR Part 60, Appendix A, incorporated by reference in
s. NR 484.04, to determine organic volatile matter concentration, except as provided for in this subdivision. The owner or operator shall submit notice of the intended test method to the department for approval along with notice of the performance test required under
s. NR 460.06 (2). The owner or operator may use Method 25A in
40 CFR Part 60, Appendix A, incorporated by reference in
s. NR 484.04, if any of the following conditions are met:
NR 466.09(4)(a)6.a.
a. An exhaust gas organic volatile matter concentration of 50 parts per million by volume (ppmv) or less is required to comply with the standards of
s. NR 466.06 or
466.07.
NR 466.09(4)(a)6.b.
b. The organic volatile matter concentration at the inlet to the control system and the required level of control are such to result in exhaust gas organic volatile matter concentrations of 50 ppmv or less.
NR 466.09(4)(a)6.c.
c. Because of the high efficiency of the control device, the anticipated organic volatile matter concentration at the control device exhaust is 50 ppmv or less, regardless of inlet concentration.
NR 466.09(4)(a)7.
7. Each performance test shall consist of 3 separate runs; each run conducted for at least one hour under the conditions that exist when the affected source is operating under normal representative operating conditions. Operations during periods of startup, shutdown and malfunction do not constitute representative conditions for the purpose of a performance test. For the purpose of determining organic volatile matter concentrations and mass flow rates, the average of results of all runs shall apply.
NR 466.09(4)(a)8.
8. Organic volatile matter mass flow rates shall be determined using Equation 20:
NR 466.09(4)(a)9.
9. Emission control device efficiency shall be determined using Equation 21:
NR 466.09(4)(b)
(b) The owner or operator shall record the process information necessary to determine the conditions of the performance test.
NR 466.09(4)(c)
(c) For the purpose of determining the value of the oxidizer operating parameter that will demonstrate continuing compliance, the time-weighted average of the values recorded during the performance test shall be computed. For an oxidizer other than catalytic oxidizer, the owner or operator shall establish as the operating parameter the minimum combustion temperature. For a catalytic oxidizer, the owner or operator shall establish as the operating parameter the minimum gas temperature at the inlet to the catalyst bed. These minimum temperatures are the operating parameter values that demonstrate continuing compliance with the requirements of
ss. NR 466.06 and
466.07.
NR 466.09(5)
(5) Capture efficiency. Except as provided for in
sub. (6), a performance test to determine the capture efficiency of each capture system venting organic emissions to a control device for the purpose of meeting the requirements of
ss. NR 466.06 (4) (a) 2. and
(b) and
466.07 (4) (a) 2.,
(5) (a),
(7) (b) to
(d) and
(9) (b) and
(c) shall be conducted by the owner or operator in accordance with the following procedures:
NR 466.09(5)(a)
(a) For permanent total enclosures, capture efficiency shall be assumed as 100%. Method 204 in
40 CFR Part 51, Appendix M, incorporated by reference in
s. NR 484.04, shall be used to confirm that an enclosure meets the requirements for permanent total enclosure.
NR 466.09(5)(b)
(b) For temporary total enclosures, the capture efficiency shall be determined according to Method 204 and, as applicable, Methods 204A through 204F, in
40 CFR Part 51, Appendix M, incorporated by reference in
s. NR 484.04. The owner or operator may exclude never-controlled work stations from the capture efficiency determinations.
NR 466.09(6)
(6) Alternative capture efficiency. As an alternative to the procedures specified in
sub. (5), an owner or operator required to conduct a capture efficiency test may use any capture efficiency protocol and test methods that satisfy the criteria of either the data quality objective (DQO) or the lower confidence limit (LCL) approach in
40 CFR Part 63, Subpart KK, Appendix A, incorporated by reference in
s. NR 484.04. The owner or operator may exclude never-controlled work stations from the capture efficiency determinations.
NR 466.09 History
History: Cr.
Register, March, 2000, No. 531, eff. 4-1-00;
CR 05-039: am. (1) (b)
Register February 2006 No. 602, eff. 3-1-06;
correction in (2) (b) (intro.) made under s. 13.92 (4) (b) 7, Stats., Register April 2008 No. 628. NR 466.10
NR 466.10 Monitoring requirements. Following the date on which the initial performance test of a control device is completed, to demonstrate continuing compliance with the standard, the owner or operator shall monitor and inspect each control device required to comply with
s. NR 466.06 or
466.07 to ensure proper operation and maintenance by implementing the applicable requirements in this section. Any excursion from the required operating parameters which are monitored in accordance with this section, unless otherwise excused, shall be considered a violation of the emission standard.
NR 466.10(1)
(1) Owners or operators of product and packaging rotogravure or wide-web flexographic presses with intermittently-controllable work stations shall implement one of the following procedures for each dryer associated with a work station:
NR 466.10(1)(a)
(a) Install, calibrate, maintain and operate according to the manufacturer's specifications a flow control position indicator that provides a record indicating whether the exhaust stream from the dryer was directed to the control device or was diverted from the control device. The time and flow control position shall be recorded at least once per hour, as well as every time the flow direction is changed. The flow control position indicator shall be installed at the entrance to any bypass line that could divert the exhaust stream away from the control device to the atmosphere.
NR 466.10(1)(b)
(b) Secure any bypass line valve in the closed position with a car-seal or a lock-and-key type configuration. A visual inspection of the seal or closure mechanism shall be performed at least once every month to ensure that the valve or damper is maintained in the closed position and the exhaust stream is not diverted through the bypass line.
NR 466.10(1)(c)
(c) Ensure that any bypass line valve or damper is in the closed position through continuous monitoring of the valve position. The monitoring system shall be inspected at least once every month to ensure that it is functioning properly.
NR 466.10(1)(d)
(d) Use an automatic shutdown system in which the press is stopped when flow is diverted away from the control device to any bypass line. The automatic system shall be inspected at least once every month to ensure that it is functioning properly.
NR 466.10(2)
(2) All continuous emission monitors shall comply with performance specifications (PS) 8 or 9 in
40 CFR Part 60, Appendix B, incorporated by reference in
s. NR 484.04. The requirements of
40 CFR Part 60, Appendix F, incorporated by reference in
s. NR 484.04, shall also be followed. In conducting the quarterly audits required by Appendix F, owners or operators shall challenge the monitors with compounds representative of the gaseous emission stream being controlled.
NR 466.10(3)
(3) All temperature monitoring equipment shall be installed, calibrated, maintained and operated according to manufacturer's specifications. The calibration of the chart recorder, data logger or temperature indicator shall be verified every 3 months. The owner or operator shall replace the chart recorder, data logger or temperature indicator if either the owner or operator chooses not to perform the calibration, or the equipment cannot be calibrated properly.
NR 466.10(4)
(4) An owner or operator complying with
s. NR 466.06 or
466.07 through continuous emission monitoring of a control device shall install, calibrate, operate and maintain continuous emission monitors to measure the total organic volatile matter concentration at both the control device inlet and outlet.
NR 466.10(5)
(5) An owner or operator complying with the requirements of
s. NR 466.06 or
466.07 through the use of an oxidizer and demonstrating continuous compliance through monitoring of an oxidizer operating parameter shall do the following as appropriate:
NR 466.10(5)(a)
(a) For an oxidizer other than a catalytic oxidizer, install, calibrate, operate and maintain a temperature monitoring device equipped with a continuous recorder. The device shall be accurate to within
±1% of the temperature being monitored in
°C or
± 1
°C, whichever is the greater value. The thermocouple or temperature sensor shall be installed in the combustion chamber at a location in the combustion zone.
NR 466.10(5)(b)
(b) For a catalytic oxidizer, install, calibrate, operate and maintain a temperature monitoring device equipped with a continuous recorder. The device shall be accurate to within
±1% of the temperature being monitored in
°C or
± 1
°C, whichever is the greater value. The thermocouple or temperature sensor shall be installed in the vent stream at the nearest feasible point to the catalyst bed inlet.
NR 466.10(6)
(6) An owner or operator, complying with the requirements of
s. NR 466.06 or
466.07 through the use of a control device and demonstrating continuous compliance by monitoring an operating parameter to ensure that the capture efficiency measured during the initial compliance test is maintained, shall do all of the following:
NR 466.10(6)(a)
(a) Submit to the department, with the compliance status report required by
s. NR 460.08 (8), a plan that does all of the following:
NR 466.10(6)(a)1.
1. Identifies the operating parameter to be monitored to ensure that the capture efficiency measured during the initial compliance test is maintained.
NR 466.10(6)(a)2.
2. Discusses why this parameter is appropriate for demonstrating ongoing compliance.
NR 466.10(6)(c)
(c) Conduct monitoring in accordance with the plan submitted to the department unless comments received from the department require an alternate monitoring scheme.
NR 466.10 History
History: Cr.
Register, March, 2000, No. 531, eff. 4-1-00.
NR 466.11
NR 466.11 Recordkeeping requirements. NR 466.11(2)
(2) Each owner or operator of an affected source subject to this chapter shall maintain on a monthly basis, in accordance with the requirements of
s. NR 460.09 (2) (a), all of the following records:
NR 466.11(2)(a)
(a) Records specified in
s. NR 460.09 (2) (b), of all measurements needed to demonstrate compliance with this chapter, such as continuous emission monitor data, control device and capture system operating parameter data, material usage, HAP usage, volatile matter usage and solids usage that support data that the source is required to report.
NR 466.11(3)
(3) Each owner or operator of an affected source subject to this chapter shall maintain records of all liquid-liquid material balances performed in accordance with the requirements of
ss. NR 466.06 and
466.07. The records shall be maintained in accordance with the requirements of
s. NR 460.09 (2).
NR 466.11(4)
(4) The owner or operator of each facility which commits to the criteria of
s. NR 466.01 (1) (a) 2. shall maintain records of all required measurements and calculations needed to demonstrate compliance with these criteria, including the mass of all HAP containing materials used and the mass fraction of HAP present in each HAP containing material used, on a monthly basis.
