NR 466.07(7)(b)
(b) The owner or operator of each solvent recovery system used to control one or more product and packaging rotogravure or wide-web flexographic presses, for which the owner or operator chooses to conduct continuous emission monitoring of the control device, conduct an initial test of capture efficiency, and continuously monitor a site specific operating parameter to assure capture efficiency under
sub. (4) (a) 2., shall do both of the following:
NR 466.07(7)(b)1.
1. For each capture system delivering emissions to that solvent recovery system, monitor an operating parameter established in accordance with
s. NR 466.10 (6) to assure capture system efficiency.
NR 466.07(7)(b)2.
2. Determine the organic HAP emissions for those presses served by each capture system delivering emissions to that solvent recovery system according to one of the following:
NR 466.07(7)(b)2.b.
b. In accordance with
subs. (4) (a) 2. b.,
c. and
e. to
g. and
(8), if the presses served by that capture system have one or more never-controlled or intermittently-controllable work stations.
NR 466.07(7)(c)
(c) The owner or operator of each oxidizer used to control emissions from one or more product and packaging rotogravure or wide-web flexographic presses, for which the owner or operator chooses to conduct performance tests of capture efficiency and control device efficiency and continuously monitor capture system and control device operating parameters under
sub. (5) (a) 1., shall do all of the following:
NR 466.07(7)(c)2.
2. For each capture system delivering emissions to that oxidizer, monitor an operating parameter established in accordance with
s. NR 466.10 (6) to assure capture efficiency.
NR 466.07(7)(c)3.
3. Determine the organic HAP emissions for those presses served by each capture system delivering emissions to that oxidizer according to one of the following:
NR 466.07(7)(c)3.b.
b. In accordance with
subs. (5) (a) 1. a. to
c. and
e. and
(8), if the presses served by that capture system have one or more never-controlled or intermittently-controllable work stations.
NR 466.07(7)(d)
(d) The owner or operator of each oxidizer used to control emissions from one or more product and packaging rotogravure or wide-web flexographic presses, for which the owner or operator chooses to conduct continuous emission monitoring of the control device, conduct an initial performance test of capture efficiency and continuously monitor a site specific operating parameter to assure capture efficiency under
sub. (5) (a) 2., shall do both of the following:
NR 466.07(7)(d)1.
1. For each capture system delivering emissions to that oxidizer, monitor an operating parameter established in accordance with
s. NR 466.10 (6) to assure capture efficiency.
NR 466.07(7)(d)2.
2. Determine the organic HAP emissions for those presses served by each capture system delivering emissions to that oxidizer according to one of the following:
NR 466.07(7)(d)2.b.
b. In accordance with
subs. (4) (a) 2. b.,
c.,
e. to
g. and
(8), if the presses served by that capture system have one or more never-controlled or intermittently-controllable work stations.
NR 466.07(7)(e)
(e) The owner or operator of one or more uncontrolled product and packaging rotogravure or wide-web flexographic printing presses shall determine the organic HAP applied on those presses using Equation 8 in
sub. (3) (f). For the purpose of a determination under this paragraph, the organic HAP emitted from an uncontrolled press shall be considered equal to the organic HAP applied on that press.
NR 466.07(7)(f)
(f) If demonstrating compliance with
sub. (2) (c) or
(d), the owner or operator shall determine the solids content of each ink, coating, varnish, adhesive, primer, solvent and other material applied during the month following the procedure in
s. NR 466.09 (3) (b).
NR 466.07(7)(g)
(g) The owner or operator shall determine the organic HAP emissions for the affected source for the month by summing all organic HAP emissions calculated according to
pars. (a),
(b) 2.,
(c) 3.,
(d) 2. and
(e).
NR 466.07(7)(h)
(h) Under this subsection, the affected source is in compliance for the month with an emission limitation, if all operating parameters required to be monitored under
pars. (b) to
(d), were maintained at the appropriate values, and one of the following is satisfied:
NR 466.07(7)(h)1.
1. The total mass of organic HAP emitted by the affected source was not more than 4% of the total mass of inks, coatings, varnishes, adhesives, primers, solvents, diluents, reducers, thinners and other materials applied by the affected source.
NR 466.07(7)(h)2.
2. The total mass of organic HAP emitted by the affected source was not more than 20% of the total mass of solids applied by the affected source.
NR 466.07(7)(h)3.
3. The total mass of organic HAP emitted by the affected source was not more than the equivalent allowable organic HAP emissions for the affected source, H
a, calculated in accordance with
sub. (6).
NR 466.07(7)(h)4.
4. The total mass of organic HAP emitted by the affected source was not more than 5% of the total mass of organic HAP applied by the affected source. The total mass of organic HAP applied by the affected source in the month shall be determined by the owner or operator using Equation 8 in
sub. (3) (f).
NR 466.07(8)
(8) Operating never-controlled or intermittently controllable work stations. Owners or operators determining organic HAP emissions from a press or group of presses having one or more never-controlled or intermittently-controllable work stations and using the procedures specified in
sub. (7) (a) 2.,
(b) 2. b.,
(c) 3. b. or
(d) 2. b., shall do the following for that press or group of presses:
NR 466.07(8)(a)
(a) Determine the sum of the mass of all inks, coatings, varnishes, adhesives, primers and other solids-containing materials which are applied on intermittently-controllable work stations in bypass mode and the mass of all inks, coatings, varnishes, adhesives, primers and other solids-containing materials which are applied on never-controlled work stations during the month, M
Bi.
NR 466.07(8)(b)
(b) Determine the sum of the mass of all solvents, reducers, thinners and other diluents which are applied on intermittently-controllable work stations in bypass mode and the mass of all solvents, reducers, thinners and other diluents which are applied on never-controlled work stations during the month, M
Bj.
NR 466.07(8)(c)
(c) Determine the sum of the mass of all inks, coatings, varnishes, adhesives, primers and other solids-containing materials which are applied on intermittently-controllable work stations in controlled mode and the mass of all inks, coatings, varnishes, adhesives, primers and other solids-containing materials which are applied on always-controlled work stations during the month, M
ci.
NR 466.07(8)(d)
(d) Determine the sum of the mass of all solvents, reducers, thinners and other diluents which are applied on intermittently-controllable work stations in controlled mode and the mass of all solvents, reducers, thinners and other diluents which are applied on always-controlled work stations during the month, M
Cj.
NR 466.07(8)(e)
(e) For each press or group of presses for which the owner or operator uses the provisions of
sub. (7) (a) 2., calculate the organic HAP emitted during the month using Equation 18.
NR 466.07(8)(f)
(f) For each press or group of presses for which the owner or operator uses the provisions of
sub. (7) (b) 2. b.,
(c) 3. b. or
(d) 2. b., the owner or operator shall calculate the organic HAP emitted during the month using Equation 19.
NR 466.07(9)
(9) Operating more than one capture system or control device and no never-controlled and no intermittently controllable work stations. If the owner or operator of an affected source operates more than one capture system or more than one control device, and has no never-controlled work stations and no intermittently-controllable work stations, the affected source is in compliance with the 95% overall organic HAP control efficiency requirement for the month if for each press or group of presses controlled by a common control device one of the following is satisfied:
NR 466.07(9)(a)
(a) The organic volatile matter collection and recovery efficiency, R
v, as determined by
sub. (4) (a) 1. a.,
c. and
e. to
g., is equal to or greater than 95%.
NR 466.07(9)(b)
(b) The overall organic HAP control efficiency as determined by
sub. (4) (a) 2. c. and
e. to
g., for each press or group of presses served by that control device and a common capture system, is equal to or greater than 95% and the average capture system operating parameter value for each capture system serving that control device is greater than or less than, as appropriate, the operating parameter value established for that capture system in accordance with
s. NR 466.10 (6) for each 3-hour period.
NR 466.07(9)(c)
(c) The overall organic HAP control efficiency as determined by
sub. (5) (a) 1. a. to
c. and
j., for each press or group of presses served by that control device and a common capture system, is equal to or greater than 95%, the oxidizer is operated such that the average operating parameter value is greater than the operating parameter value established in accordance with
s. NR 466.10 (5) for each 3-hour period, and the average capture system operating parameter value for each capture system serving that control device is greater than or less than, as appropriate, the operating parameter value established for that capture system in accordance with
s. NR 466.10 (6) for each 3-hour period.
NR 466.07 History
History: Cr.
Register, March, 2000, No. 531, eff. 4-1-00.
NR 466.08(1)
(1) The owner or operator of an existing source subject to this chapter shall comply with the provisions of this chapter on or before May 30, 1999.
NR 466.08(2)
(2) The owner or operator of a new MACT source subject to this chapter shall comply with the provisions of this chapter immediately upon startup of the affected source, or May 30, 1996, whichever is later.
NR 466.08(3)
(3) Affected sources which have undergone reconstruction are subject to the requirements for new MACT sources. The costs associated with the purchase and installation of air pollution control equipment are not considered in determining whether the affected source has been reconstructed. Additionally, the costs of retrofitting and replacement of equipment that is installed specifically to comply with this chapter are not considered reconstruction costs.
NR 466.08 Note
Note: Compliance dates are federally enforceable under
40 CFR 63.826 prior to the effective date of this section.
NR 466.08 History
History: Cr.
Register, March, 2000, No. 531, eff. 4-1-00.
NR 466.09
NR 466.09 Performance test methods. NR 466.09(1)(a)
(a) The control device was in operation prior to May 30, 1996 and is equipped with continuous emission monitors for determining inlet and outlet total organic volatile matter concentration; capture efficiency has been determined in accordance with the requirements of this chapter such that an overall HAP control efficiency can be calculated; and the continuous emission monitors are used to demonstrate continuous compliance in accordance with
s. NR 466.10.
NR 466.09(2)(a)(a) For the purpose of meeting the requirements of
s. NR 466.06, the organic HAP weight-fraction of each ink, coating, varnish, adhesive, primer, solvent and other material used in a publication rotogravure affected source shall be determined in accordance with one of the following procedures:
NR 466.09(2)(a)1.
1. Use Method 311 in
40 CFR Part 63, Appendix A, incorporated by reference in
s. NR 484.04, or obtain the results of a Method 311 test performed by the manufacturer of the material. If the organic HAP weight-fraction for any material cannot be determined using Method 311, the owner or operator shall submit an alternate method to the U.S. environmental protection agency for approval by the administrator. The recovery efficiency of the proposed technique shall be determined for all of the target organic HAP and a correction factor, if necessary, shall be determined and applied.
NR 466.09(2)(a)2.
2. Determine the volatile matter content of the material in accordance with
sub. (3) (a), and use this value for the organic HAP content for all compliance purposes.
NR 466.09(2)(a)3.
3. Use formulation data provided by the manufacturer of the material on a CPDS if the manufacturer has done both of the following:
NR 466.09(2)(a)3.a.
a. Included in the organic HAP content determination all HAP present at a level greater than 0.1% in any raw material used, weighted by the mass fraction of each raw material used in the material.
NR 466.09(2)(a)3.b.
b. Determined the HAP content of each raw material present in the formulation by Method 311 in
40 CFR Part 63, Appendix A, incorporated by reference in
s. NR 484.04, or by an alternate method approved by the administrator, or by reliance on a CPDS from a raw material supplier prepared in accordance with subpar. a.
NR 466.09(2)(b)
(b) For the purpose of meeting the requirements of
s. NR 466.07, the organic HAP weight-fraction of each ink, coating, varnish, adhesive, primer, solvent, thinner, reducer, diluent and other material used in a product and packaging rotogravure or wide-web flexographic affected source shall be determined in accordance with one of the following procedures:
NR 466.09(2)(b)1.
1. Use Method 311 in
40 CFR Part 63, Appendix A, incorporated by reference in
s. NR 484.04, or obtain the results of a Method 311 test performed by the manufacturer of the material. If the organic HAP weight-fraction for any material cannot be determined using Method 311, the owner or operator shall submit an alternate method to the U.S. environmental protection agency for approval by the administrator. The recovery efficiency of the proposed technique shall be determined for all of the target organic HAP and a correction factor, if necessary, shall be determined and applied.
NR 466.09(2)(b)2.
2. Determine the volatile matter content of the material in accordance with
sub. (3) (b), and use this value for the organic HAP content for all compliance purposes.
NR 466.09(2)(b)3.
3. Use formulation data provided by the manufacturer of the material on a CPDS if the manufacturer has done both of the following:
NR 466.09(2)(b)3.a.
a. Included in the organic HAP content determination all organic HAP present at a level greater than 0.1% in any raw material used, weighted by the mass fraction of each raw material used in the material.
NR 466.09(2)(b)3.b.
b. Determined the organic HAP content of each raw material present in the formulation by Method 311 in
40 CFR Part 63, Appendix A, incorporated by reference in
s. NR 484.04, or by an alternate method approved by the administrator, or by reliance on a CPDS from a raw material supplier prepared in accordance with subpar. a.
NR 466.09(2)(c)
(c) In the event of any inconsistency between the organic HAP content of a material determined using test data from Method 311 in
40 CFR Part 63, Appendix A, incorporated by reference in
s. NR 484.04, and the organic HAP content of the same material determined using formulation data as allowed under
par. (a) 3. or
(b) 3., the Method 311 test data shall govern, unless after consultation, an owner or operator demonstrates to the satisfaction of the department that the formulation data are correct.
NR 466.09(3)(a)(a) For the purpose of meeting the requirements of
s. NR 466.06, the volatile matter weight-fraction of each ink, coating, varnish, adhesive, primer, solvent, diluent, reducer, thinner and other material used in a publication rotogravure affected source shall be determined in accordance with one of the following procedures:
NR 466.09(3)(a)1.
1. Use Method 24A in
40 CFR Part 60, Appendix A, incorporated by reference in
s. NR 484.04, or obtain the results of a Method 24A test performed by the manufacturer of the material. If the volatile matter weight-fraction for any material cannot be determined using Method 24A, the owner or operator shall submit an alternate method to the U.S. environmental protection agency for approval by the administrator.
NR 466.09(3)(a)2.
2. Use formulation data, or volatile matter content data provided by material suppliers.
NR 466.09(3)(b)
(b) For the purpose of meeting the requirements of
s. NR 466.07, the volatile matter and solids weight-fraction of each ink, coating, varnish, adhesive, primer, solvent, diluent, reducer, thinner and other material used in a product and packaging rotogravure or wide-web flexographic affected source shall be determined in accordance with one of the following procedures:
NR 466.09(3)(b)1.
1. Use Method 24 in
40 CFR Part 60, Appendix A, incorporated by reference in
s. NR 484.04, or obtain the results of a Method 24 test performed by the manufacturer of the material. If the volatile matter or solids weight-fraction for any material cannot be determined using Method 24, the owner or operator shall submit an alternate method to the U.S. environmental protection agency for approval by the administrator.
NR 466.09(3)(b)2.
2. Use formulation data, or volatile matter and solids content data provided by material suppliers.
NR 466.09(3)(c)
(c) In the event of any inconsistency between the volatile matter or solids content of a material determined using formulation data as allowed under
par. (a) 2. or
(b) 2., and the volatile matter or solids content of the same material using the results of Method 24 or 24A in
40 CFR Part 60, Appendix A, incorporated by reference in
s. NR 484.04, the applicable test method shall govern, unless after consultation, the owner or operator can demonstrate to the satisfaction of the department that the formulation data are correct.
NR 466.09(4)
(4) Control device destruction efficiency. A performance test of a control device to determine destruction efficiency for the purpose of meeting the requirements of
ss. NR 466.06 and
466.07, shall be conducted by the owner or operator in accordance with the following requirements:
NR 466.09(4)(a)
(a) An initial performance test to establish the destruction efficiency of an oxidizer and the associated combustion zone temperature for a thermal oxidizer and the associated catalyst bed inlet temperature for a catalytic oxidizer shall be conducted and the data reduced in accordance with the following reference methods and procedure:
NR 466.09(4)(a)6.
6. Use Method 25 in
40 CFR Part 60, Appendix A, incorporated by reference in
s. NR 484.04, to determine organic volatile matter concentration, except as provided for in this subdivision. The owner or operator shall submit notice of the intended test method to the department for approval along with notice of the performance test required under
s. NR 460.06 (2). The owner or operator may use Method 25A in
40 CFR Part 60, Appendix A, incorporated by reference in
s. NR 484.04, if any of the following conditions are met:
NR 466.09(4)(a)6.a.
a. An exhaust gas organic volatile matter concentration of 50 parts per million by volume (ppmv) or less is required to comply with the standards of
s. NR 466.06 or
466.07.
NR 466.09(4)(a)6.b.
b. The organic volatile matter concentration at the inlet to the control system and the required level of control are such to result in exhaust gas organic volatile matter concentrations of 50 ppmv or less.
NR 466.09(4)(a)6.c.
c. Because of the high efficiency of the control device, the anticipated organic volatile matter concentration at the control device exhaust is 50 ppmv or less, regardless of inlet concentration.
NR 466.09(4)(a)7.
7. Each performance test shall consist of 3 separate runs; each run conducted for at least one hour under the conditions that exist when the affected source is operating under normal representative operating conditions. Operations during periods of startup, shutdown and malfunction do not constitute representative conditions for the purpose of a performance test. For the purpose of determining organic volatile matter concentrations and mass flow rates, the average of results of all runs shall apply.
NR 466.09(4)(a)8.
8. Organic volatile matter mass flow rates shall be determined using Equation 20:
NR 466.09(4)(a)9.
9. Emission control device efficiency shall be determined using Equation 21:
NR 466.09(4)(b)
(b) The owner or operator shall record the process information necessary to determine the conditions of the performance test.
NR 466.09(4)(c)
(c) For the purpose of determining the value of the oxidizer operating parameter that will demonstrate continuing compliance, the time-weighted average of the values recorded during the performance test shall be computed. For an oxidizer other than catalytic oxidizer, the owner or operator shall establish as the operating parameter the minimum combustion temperature. For a catalytic oxidizer, the owner or operator shall establish as the operating parameter the minimum gas temperature at the inlet to the catalyst bed. These minimum temperatures are the operating parameter values that demonstrate continuing compliance with the requirements of
ss. NR 466.06 and
466.07.
