NR 440.218(4)(g)
(g) A lapsed qualification shall be renewed by one of the following methods:
NR 440.218(4)(g)1.
1. For a lapse of less than 3 years, the HMIWI operator shall complete and pass a standard annual refresher course described in
par. (f).
NR 440.218(4)(g)2.
2. For a lapse of 3 years or more, the HMIWI operator shall complete and pass a training course with the minimum criteria described in
par. (c).
NR 440.218(4)(h)
(h) The owner or operator of an affected facility shall maintain documentation at the facility that addresses all of the following:
NR 440.218(4)(h)6.
6. Procedures for operating the HMIWI and associated air pollution control systems within the standards established under this section.
NR 440.218(4)(h)7.
7. Procedures for responding to periodic malfunction or conditions that may lead to malfunction.
NR 440.218(4)(i)
(i) The owner or operator of an affected facility shall establish a program for reviewing the information listed in
par. (h) annually with each HMIWI operator as follows:
NR 440.218(4)(i)1.
1. The initial review of the information listed in
par. (h) shall be conducted within 6 months after the effective date of this section or prior to assumption of responsibilities affecting HMIWI operation, whichever date is later.
NR 440.218(4)(i)2.
2. Subsequent reviews of the information listed in
par. (h) shall be conducted annually.
NR 440.218(4)(j)
(j) The information listed in
par. (h) shall be kept in a readily accessible location for all HMIWI operators. This information, along with records of training, shall be available for inspection by the EPA or department upon request.
NR 440.218(5)(a)(a) The owner or operator of an affected facility for which construction is commenced after September 15, 1997 shall prepare an analysis of the impacts of the affected facility. The analysis shall consider air pollution control alternatives that minimize, on a site-specific basis, to the maximum extent practicable, potential risks to public health or the environment. In considering the alternatives, the analysis may consider costs, energy impacts, non-air environmental impacts or any other factors related to the practicability of the alternatives.
NR 440.218(5)(b)
(b) Analyses of facility impacts prepared to comply with state, local or other federal regulatory requirements may be used to satisfy the requirements of this subsection, as long as they include the consideration of air pollution control alternatives specified in
par. (a).
NR 440.218(5)(c)
(c) The owner or operator of the affected facility shall complete and submit the siting requirements of this section as required under
sub. (9) (a) 1. c.
NR 440.218(6)
(6) Waste management plan. The owner or operator of an affected facility shall prepare a waste management plan. The waste management plan shall identify both the feasibility and the approach to separate certain components of solid waste from the health care waste stream in order to reduce the amount of toxic emissions from incinerated waste. A waste management plan may include, but is not limited to, elements such as paper, cardboard, plastics, glass, battery or metal recycling; or purchasing recycled or recyclable products. A waste management plan may include different goals or approaches for different areas or departments of the facility and need not include new waste management goals for every waste stream. It should identify, where possible, reasonably available additional waste management measures, taking into account the effectiveness of waste management measures already in place, the costs of additional measures, the emission reductions expected to be achieved and any other environmental or energy impacts they might have. The American Hospital Association publication entitled “An Ounce of Prevention: Waste Reduction Strategies for Health Care Facilities", incorporated by reference in
s. NR 440.17 (2) (L) 1., shall be considered in the development of the waste management plan.
NR 440.218(7)(a)(a) The emission limits under this section apply at all times except during periods of startup, shutdown or malfunction, provided that no hospital waste or medical/infectious waste is charged to the affected facility during startup, shutdown or malfunction.
NR 440.218(7)(b)
(b) The owner or operator of an affected facility shall conduct an initial performance test as required under
s. NR 440.08 to determine compliance with the emission limits using the procedures and test methods listed in
subds. 1. to
12. The use of the bypass stack during a performance test shall invalidate the performance test. The procedures and test methods are as follows:
NR 440.218(7)(b)1.
1. All performance tests shall consist of a minimum of 3 test runs conducted under representative operating conditions.
NR 440.218(7)(b)2.
2. The minimum sample time shall be one hour per test run unless otherwise indicated.
NR 440.218(7)(b)4.
4. Method 3, 3A or 3B of
40 CFR part 60, Appendix A, incorporated by reference in
s. NR 440.17 (1), shall be used for gas composition analysis, including measurement of oxygen concentration. Method 3, 3A or 3B shall be used simultaneously with each reference method.
NR 440.218(7)(b)5.
5. The pollutant concentrations shall be adjusted to 7% oxygen using the following equation:
where:
Cadj is the pollutant concentration adjusted to 7% oxygen.
Cmeas is the pollutant concentration measured on a dry basis
(20.9 - 7) is 20.9% oxygen - 7% oxygen, the defined oxygen correction basis
20.9 is the oxygen concentration in air, percent
%O2 is the oxygen concentration measured on a dry basis, percent
NR 440.218(7)(b)9.
9. Method 23 of
40 CFR part 60, Appendix A, incorporated by reference in
s. NR 440.17 (1), shall be used to measure total dioxin/furan emissions. The minimum sample time shall be 4 hours per test run. If the affected facility has selected the toxic equivalency standards for dioxin/furan, under
sub. (3), the following procedures shall be used to determine compliance:
NR 440.218(7)(b)9.a.
a. Measure the concentration of each dioxin/furan tetra- through octa- congener emitted using Method 23.
NR 440.218(7)(b)9.b.
b. For each dioxin/furan congener measured in accordance with
subd. 9. a., multiply the congener concentration by its corresponding toxic equivalency factor specified in Table 2.
NR 440.218(7)(b)9.c.
c. Sum the products calculated in accordance with
subd. 9. b. to obtain the total concentration of dioxin/furan emitted in terms of toxic equivalency.
NR 440.218(7)(b)10.
10. Method 26 or 26A of
40 CFR part 60, Appendix A, incorporated by reference in
s. NR 440.17 (1), shall be used to measure hydrogen chloride emissions. If the affected facility has selected the percentage reduction standards for hydrogen chloride under
sub. (3), the percentage reduction in hydrogen chloride emissions (%R
HCl) shall be computed using the following formula:
where:
%RHCl is the percentage reduction of hydrogen chloride emissions achieved
Ei is the hydrogen chloride emission concentration measured at the control device inlet, corrected to 7% oxygen, dry basis
Eo is the hydrogen chloride emission concentration measured at the control device outlet, corrected to 7% oxygen, dry basis
NR 440.218(7)(b)11.
11. Method 29 of
40 CFR part 60, Appendix A, incorporated by reference in
s. NR 440.17 (1), shall be used to measure lead, cadmium and mercury emissions. If the affected facility has selected the percentage reduction standards for metals under
sub. (3), the percentage reduction in emissions (%R
metal) shall be computed using the following formula:
where:
%Rmetal is the percentage reduction of metal emission of lead, cadmium or mercury achieved
Ei is the metal emission concentration of lead, cadmium or mercury, measured at the control device inlet, corrected to 7% oxygen, dry basis
Eo is the metal emission concentration of lead, cadmium or mercury, measured at the control device outlet, corrected to 7% oxygen, dry basis
NR 440.218(7)(b)12.
12. Method 22 of
40 CFR part 60, Appendix A, incorporated by reference in
s. NR 440.17 (1), shall be used to determine compliance with the fugitive ash emission limit under
sub. (3) (c). The minimum observation time shall be a series of 3 1-hour observations.
NR 440.218(7)(c)
(c) Following the date on which the initial performance test is completed or is required to be completed under
s. NR 440.08, whichever date comes first, the owner or operator of an affected facility shall do the following, as applicable:
NR 440.218(7)(c)1.
1. Determine compliance with the opacity limit by conducting an annual performance test, no more than 12 months following the previous performance test, using the applicable procedures and test methods listed in
par. (b).
NR 440.218(7)(c)2.
2. Determine compliance with the particulate matter, carbon monoxide and hydrogen chloride emission limits by conducting an annual performance test, no more than 12 months following the previous performance test, using the applicable procedures and test methods listed in
par. (b). If all 3 performance tests over a 3-year period indicate compliance with the emission limit for a pollutant (particulate matter, carbon monoxide or hydrogen chloride), the owner or operator may forego a performance test for that pollutant for the subsequent 2 years. At a minimum, a performance test for particulate matter, carbon monoxide and hydrogen chloride shall be conducted every third year, no more than 36 months following the previous performance test. If a performance test conducted every third year indicates compliance with the emission limit for a pollutant (particulate matter, carbon monoxide or hydrogen chloride), the owner or operator may forego a performance test for that pollutant for an additional 2 years. If any performance test indicates noncompliance with the respective emission limit, a performance test for that pollutant shall be conducted annually until all annual performance tests over a 3-year period indicate compliance with the emission limit. The use of the bypass stack during a performance test shall invalidate the performance test.
NR 440.218(7)(c)3.
3. For large HMIWI, determine compliance with the visible emission limits for fugitive emissions from flyash/bottom ash storage and handling by conducting a performance test using Method 22 of
40 CFR part 60, Appendix A, incorporated by reference in
s. NR 440.17 (1), on an annual basis, no more than 12 months following the previous performance test.
NR 440.218(7)(c)4.
4. Facilities using a CEMS to demonstrate compliance with any of the emission limits under
sub. (3) shall do both of the following:
NR 440.218(7)(c)4.a.
a. Determine compliance with the appropriate emission limits using a 12-hour rolling average, calculated each hour as the average of the previous 12 operating hours, not including startup, shutdown or malfunction.
NR 440.218(7)(d)
(d) The owner or operator of an affected facility equipped with a dry scrubber followed by a fabric filter, a wet scrubber, or a dry scrubber followed by a fabric filter and wet scrubber shall do both of the following:
NR 440.218(7)(d)1.
1. Establish the appropriate maximum and minimum operating parameters, indicated in Table 3 for each control system, as site specific operating parameters during the initial performance test to determine compliance with the emission limits.
NR 440.218(7)(d)2.
2. Following the date on which the initial performance test is completed or is required to be completed under
s. NR 440.08, whichever date comes first, ensure that the affected facility does not operate above any of the applicable maximum operating parameters or below any of the applicable minimum operating parameters listed in Table 3 and measured as 3-hour rolling averages, calculated each hour as the average of the previous 3 operating hours, at all times except during periods of startup, shutdown and malfunction. Operating parameter limits do not apply during performance tests. Operation above the established maximum or below the established minimum operating parameters shall constitute a violation of established operating parameters.
NR 440.218(7)(e)
(e) Except as provided in
par. (h), the following shall constitute a violation of the emission limit indicated for affected facilities equipped with a dry scrubber followed by a fabric filter:
NR 440.218(7)(e)1.
1. Operation of the affected facility above the maximum charge rate and below the minimum secondary chamber temperature, each measured on a 3-hour rolling average, simultaneously shall constitute a violation of the carbon monoxide emission limit.
NR 440.218(7)(e)2.
2. Operation of the affected facility above the maximum fabric filter inlet temperature, above the maximum charge rate, and below the minimum dioxin/furan sorbent flow rate, each measured on a 3-hour rolling average, simultaneously shall constitute a violation of the dioxin/furan emission limit.
NR 440.218(7)(e)3.
3. Operation of the affected facility above the maximum charge rate and below the minimum hydrogen chloride sorbent flow rate, each measured on a 3-hour rolling average, simultaneously shall constitute a violation of the hydrogen chloride emission limit.
NR 440.218(7)(e)4.
4. Operation of the affected facility above the maximum charge rate and below the minimum mercury sorbent flow rate, each measured on a 3-hour rolling average, simultaneously shall constitute a violation of the mercury emission limit.
NR 440.218(7)(e)5.
5. Use of the bypass stack, except during startup, shutdown or malfunction, shall constitute a violation of the particulate matter, dioxin/furan, hydrogen chloride, lead, cadmium and mercury emission limits.
NR 440.218(7)(f)
(f) Except as provided in
par. (h), the following shall constitute a violation of the emission limit indicated for affected facilities equipped with a wet scrubber:
NR 440.218(7)(f)1.
1. Operation of the affected facility above the maximum charge rate and below the minimum pressure drop across the wet scrubber or below the minimum horsepower or amperage to the system, each measured on a 3-hour rolling average, simultaneously shall constitute a violation of the particulate matter emission limit.
NR 440.218(7)(f)2.
2. Operation of the affected facility above the maximum charge rate and below the minimum secondary chamber temperature, each measured on a 3-hour rolling average, simultaneously shall constitute a violation of the carbon monoxide emission limit.
NR 440.218(7)(f)3.
3. Operation of the affected facility above the maximum charge rate, below the minimum secondary chamber temperature, and below the minimum scrubber liquor flow rate, each measured on a 3-hour rolling average, simultaneously shall constitute a violation of the dioxin/furan emission limit.
NR 440.218(7)(f)4.
4. Operation of the affected facility above the maximum charge rate and below the minimum scrubber liquor pH, each measured on a 3-hour rolling average, simultaneously shall constitute a violation of the hydrogen chloride emission limit.
NR 440.218(7)(f)5.
5. Operation of the affected facility above the maximum flue gas temperature and above the maximum charge rate, each measured on a 3-hour rolling average, simultaneously shall constitute a violation of the mercury emission limit.
NR 440.218(7)(f)6.
6. Use of the bypass stack, except during startup, shutdown or malfunction, shall constitute a violation of the particulate matter, dioxin/furan, hydrogen chloride, lead, cadmium and mercury emission limits.
NR 440.218(7)(g)
(g) Except as provided in
par. (h), the following shall constitute a violation of the emission limit indicated for affected facilities equipped with a dry scrubber followed by a fabric filter and a wet scrubber:
NR 440.218(7)(g)1.
1. Operation of the affected facility above the maximum charge rate and below the minimum secondary chamber temperature, each measured on a 3-hour rolling average, simultaneously shall constitute a violation of the carbon monoxide emission limit.
NR 440.218(7)(g)2.
2. Operation of the affected facility above the maximum fabric filter inlet temperature, above the maximum charge rate, and below the minimum dioxin/furan sorbent flow rate, each measured on a 3-hour rolling average, simultaneously shall constitute a violation of the dioxin/furan emission limit.
NR 440.218(7)(g)3.
3. Operation of the affected facility above the maximum charge rate and below the minimum scrubber liquor pH, each measured on a 3-hour rolling average, simultaneously shall constitute a violation of the hydrogen chloride emission limit.
NR 440.218(7)(g)4.
4. Operation of the affected facility above the maximum charge rate and below the minimum mercury sorbent flow rate, each measured on a 3-hour rolling average, simultaneously shall constitute a violation of the mercury emission limit.
NR 440.218(7)(g)5.
5. Use of the bypass stack, except during startup, shutdown or malfunction, shall constitute a violation of the particulate matter, dioxin/furan, hydrogen chloride, lead, cadmium and mercury emission limits.
NR 440.218(7)(h)
(h) The owner or operator of an affected facility may conduct a repeat performance test within 30 days of violation of an applicable operating parameter to demonstrate that the affected facility is not in violation of the applicable emission limits. Repeat performance tests conducted pursuant to this paragraph shall be conducted using the identical operating parameters that indicated a violation under
par. (e),
(f) or
(g).
NR 440.218(7)(i)
(i) The owner or operator of an affected facility using an air pollution control device other than a dry scrubber followed by a fabric filter, a wet scrubber, or a dry scrubber followed by a fabric filter and a wet scrubber to comply with the emission limits under
sub. (3) shall petition the administrator for other site-specific operating parameters to be established during the initial performance test and continuously monitored thereafter. The owner or operator may not conduct the initial performance test until after the petition has been approved by the administrator.
