NR 279.52(4)
(4) The quantity and quality of pollutants or pollutant properties controlled by this subsection, attributable to once-through cooling water, are excluded from the discharge allowed by
sub. (2). Once-through cooling water may be discharged with a total organic carbon concentration not to exceed 5 mg/l.
NR 279.52(5)
(5) The following effluent limitations constitute the quantity and quality of pollutants or pollutant properties controlled by this subsection and attributable to contaminated runoff, which may be discharged after the application of the best practicable control technology currently available by a point source subject to this subcategory.
NR 279.52(5)(a)
(a) If wastewater consists solely of contaminated runoff and is not commingled or treated with process wastewater, it may be discharged if it does not exceed 15 mg/l oil and grease and 110 mg/l total organic carbon (TOC) based upon an analysis of any single grab or composite sample.
NR 279.52(5)(b)
(b) If contaminated runoff is commingled or treated with process wastewater, or if wastewater consisting solely of contaminated runoff which exceeds 15 mg/l oil and grease or 110 mg/l TOC is not commingled or treated with any other type of wastewater, the quantity of pollutants discharged may not exceed the quantity determined by multiplying the flow of contaminated runoff as determined by the department times the concentrations listed in the following table:
-
See PDF for table 
NR 279.52 Note
1 In any case in which the applicant can demonstrate that the chloride ion concentration in the effluent exceeds 1,000 mg/l (1,000 ppm), the department may substitute TOC as a parameter in lieu of COD. A TOC effluent limitation shall be based on effluent data from the particular refinery which correlates TOC to BOD5. If in the judgment of the department, adequate correlation data are not available, the effluent limitations for TOC shall be established at a ratio of 2.2 to 1 to the applicable effluent limitations for BOD5.
NR 279.52 Note
2 Within the range 6.0 to 9.0.
NR 279.52 History
History: Cr.
Register, October, 1986, No. 370, eff. 11-1-86.
NR 279.53
NR 279.53 Effluent limitations guidelines representing the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the application of the best available technology economically achievable (BAT). NR 279.53(1)
(1) Except as provided in
40 CFR 125.30 -
125.32, any existing point source subject to this subcategory shall achieve the following effluent limitations representing the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the application of the best available technology economically achievable (BAT):
-
See PDF for table NR 279.53 Note
1 See footnote following table in s.
NR 279.13 (4).
NR 279.53(2)
(2) The limits set forth in
sub. (1) shall be multiplied by the following factors to calculate the maximum for any one day and maximum average of daily values for 30 consecutive days.
NR 279.53(3)(a)(a) In addition to the provisions contained above pertaining to COD, ammonia and sulfide any existing point source subject to this subcategory shall achieve the following effluent limitations representing the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the application of the best available technology economically achievable (BAT). For each of the regulated pollutant parameters listed below, the effluent limitation for a given refinery is the sum of the products of each effluent limitation factor times the applicable process feedstock rate, calculated as provided in
40 CFR 122.45 (b).
NR 279.53 Note
Note: Applicable production processes are presented in Appendix A, by process type. The process identification numbers presented in this Appendix A are for the convenience of the reader. They can be cross-referenced in the Development Document for Effluent Limitations Guidelines, New Source Performance Standards, and Pretreatment Standards for the Petroleum Refining Point Source Category (EPA 440/1-82/014). Table III-7, pp. 49-54.
NR 279.53 Note 40 CFR 122.45(b) reads as follows: The calculation of any permit limitations, standards, or prohibitions which are based on production (or other measure of operation) shall be based not upon the designed production capacity but rather upon a reasonable measure of actual production of the facility, such as the production during the high month of the previous year, or the monthly average for the highest of the previous 5 years. For new sources or new dischargers, actual production shall be estimated using projected production. The time period of the measure of production shall correspond to the time period of the calculated permit limitations; for example, monthly production shall be used to calculate average monthly discharge limitations.
-
See PDF for table NR 279.53(4)
(4) The provisions of
s. NR 279.13 (4) apply to discharges of process wastewater pollutants attributable to ballast water by a point source subject to the provisions of this subcategory.
NR 279.53(5)
(5) The quantity and quality of pollutants or pollutant properties controlled by this subsection, attributable to once-through cooling water, are excluded from the discharge allowed by
sub. (2). Once-through cooling water may be discharged with a total organic carbon concentration not to exceed 5 mg/l.
NR 279.53(6)
(6) The following effluent limitations constitute the quantity and quality of pollutants or pollutant properties controlled by this subsection and attributable to contaminated runoff, which may be discharged after the application of the best available technology economically achievable by a point source subject to this subcategory.
NR 279.53(6)(a)
(a) If wastewater consists solely of contaminated runoff and is not commingled or treated with process wastewater, it may be discharged if it does not exceed 110 mg/l total organic carbon (TOC) based upon an analysis of any single grab or composite sample.
NR 279.53(6)(b)
(b) If contaminated runoff is commingled or treated with process wastewater, or if wastewater consisting solely of contaminated runoff which exceeds 110 mg/l TOC is not commingled or treated with any other type of wastewater, the quantity of pollutants discharged may not exceed the quantity determined by multiplying the flow of contaminated runoff as determined by the department times the concentrations listed in the following table:
-
See PDF for table NR 279.53 Note
1 In any case in which the applicant can demonstrate that the chloride ion concentration in the effluent exceeds 1000 mg/l (1000 ppm), the department may substitute TOC as a parameter in lieu of COD. A TOC effluent limitation shall be based on effluent data from the particular refinery which correlates TOC to BOD5. If in the judgment of the department, adequate correlation data are not available, the effluent limitations for TOC shall be established at a ratio of 2.2 to 1 to the applicable effluent limitations for BOD5.
NR 279.53 History
History: Cr.
Register, October, 1986, No. 370, eff. 11-1-86.
NR 279.54
NR 279.54 Effluent limitations guidelines representing the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the application of the best conventional pollutant control technology (BCT). NR 279.54(1)
(1) Any existing point source subject to this subcategory shall achieve the following effluent limitations representing the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the application of the best conventional pollutant control technology (BCT):
-
See PDF for table NR 279.54 Note
1 Within the range of 6.0 to 9.0.
NR 279.54(2)
(2) The limits set forth in
sub. (1) shall be multiplied by the following factors to calculate the maximum for any one day and maximum average of daily values for 30 consecutive days.
NR 279.54(3)
(3) The provisions of
s. NR 279.14 (3) apply to discharges of process wastewater pollutants attributable to ballast water by a point source subject to the provisions of this subcategory.
NR 279.54(4)
(4) The quantity and quality of pollutants or pollutant properties controlled by this subsection, attributable to once-through cooling water, are excluded from the discharge allowed by
sub. (2).
NR 279.54(5)
(5) The following effluent limitations constitute the quantity and quality of pollutants or pollutant properties controlled by this subsection and attributable to contaminated runoff, which may be discharged after the application of the best conventional pollutant control technology by a point source subject to this subcategory.
NR 279.54(5)(a)
(a) If wastewater consists solely of contaminated runoff and is not commingled or treated with process wastewater, it may be discharged if it does not exceed 15 mg/l oil and grease based upon an analysis of any single grab or composite sample.
NR 279.54(5)(b)
(b) If contaminated runoff is commingled or treated with process wastewater, or if wastewater consisting solely of contaminated runoff which exceeds 15 mg/l oil and grease is not commingled or treated with any other type of wastewater, the quantity of pollutants discharged may not exceed the quantity determined by multiplying the flow of contaminated runoff as determined by the department times the concentrations listed in the following table:
-
See PDF for table NR 279.54 Note
1 Within the range of 6.0 to 9.0.
NR 279.54 History
History: Cr.
Register, October, 1986, No. 370, eff. 11-1-86.
NR 279.55
NR 279.55 Pretreatment standards for existing sources (PSES). Except as provided in
40 CFR 403.7 and
403.13 any existing source subject to this subcategory which introduces pollutants into a publicly owned treatment works shall comply with
40 CFR Part 403 and achieve the following pretreatment standards for existing sources (PSES). The following standards apply to the total refinery flow contribution to the POTW:
-
See PDF for table NR 279.55 Note
1 Where the discharge to the POTW consists solely of sour waters, the owner or operator has the option of complying with this limit or the daily maximum mass limitation for ammonia set forth in s.
NR 279.53 (1) and
(2).
NR 279.55 History
History: Cr.
Register, October, 1986, No. 370, eff. 11-1-86.
NR 279.56
NR 279.56 Standards of performance for new sources (NSPS). NR 279.56(1)(1) Any new source subject to this subcategory shall achieve the following new source performance standards (NSPS):
-
See PDF for table NR 279.56(2)
(2) The limits set forth in
sub. (1) shall be multiplied by the following factors to calculate the maximum for any one day and maximum average of daily values for 30 consecutive days.
NR 279.56(3)
(3) The provisions of
s. NR 279.16 (3) apply to discharges of process wastewater pollutants attributable to ballast water by a point source subject to the provisions of this subcategory.
NR 279.56(4)
(4) The quantity and quality of pollutants or pollutant properties controlled by this subsection, attributable to once-through cooling water, are excluded from the discharge allowed by
sub. (2). Once-through cooling water may be discharged with a total organic carbon concentration not to exceed 5 mg/l.
NR 279.56 History
History: Cr.
Register, October, 1986, No. 370, eff. 11-1-86.
NR 279.57
NR 279.57 Pretreatment standards for new sources (PSNS). Except as provided in
40 CFR 403.7 any existing [new] source subject to this subcategory which introduces pollutants into a publicly owned treatment works shall comply with
40 CFR Part 403 and achieve the following pretreatment standards for new sources (PSNS).
NR 279.57 Note
1 Where the discharge to the POTW consists solely of sour waters, the owner or operator has the option of complying with this limit or the daily maximum mass limitation for ammonia set forth in s.
NR 279.53 (1) and
(2).
NR 279.57(2)
(2) The following standard is applied to the cooling tower discharge part of the total refinery flow to the POTW by multiplying:
NR 279.57 History
History: Cr.
Register, October, 1986, No. 370, eff. 11-1-86.
NR 279.60
NR 279.60 Cross-reference. The federal citations in this chapter correspond to provisions of the Wisconsin administrative code and Wisconsin statutes. The federal citations may be cross-referenced in the following table:
-
See PDF for table NR 279.60 History
History: Cr.
Register, October, 1986, No. 370, eff. 11-1-86.
Appendix A
Processes Included in the Determination of BAT Effluent Limitations for Total Chromium, Hexavalent Chromium, and Phenolic Compounds (4AAP)
Crude Processes:
1. Atmospheric Crude Distillation
2. Crude Desalting
3. Vacuum Crude Distillation
Cracking and Coking Processes:
4. Visbreaking
5. Thermal Cracking
6. Fluid Catalytic Cracking
7. Moving Bed Catalytic Cracking
10. Hydrocracking
15. Delayed Coking
16. Fluid Coking
54. Hydrotreating
Asphalt Processes:
18. Asphalt Production
32. 200°F Softening Point Unfluxed Asphalt
43. Asphalt Oxidizing
89. Asphalt Emulsifying
Lube Processes:
21. Hydrofining, Hydrofinishing, Lube Hydrofining
22. White Oil Manufacture
23. Propane Dewaxing, Propane Deasphalting, Propane Fractioning, Propane Deresining
24. Duo Sol, Solvent Treating, Solvent Extraction, Duotreating, Solvent Dewaxing, Solvent Deasphalting
25. Lube Vac Twr, Oil Fractionation, Batch Still (Naphtha Strip), Bright Stock Treating
26. Centrifuge & Chilling
