Skip navigation Wisconsin State Legislature
This is the preview version of the Wisconsin State Legislature site.
Please see http://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov for the production version.
Up
NR 279.03(5) (5) “Feedstock” means the crude oil and natural gas liquids fed to the topping units.
NR 279.03(6) (6) “New source,” as defined for PSES and PSNS, means any building, structure, facility, or installation from which there is or may be a discharge of pollutants, the construction of which commenced after December 21, 1979.
NR 279.03(7) (7) “New source,” as defined for BPT, BAT, BCT, and NSPS, means any point source the construction of which commenced after December 1, 1982.
NR 279.03(8) (8) “Once-through cooling water” means those waters discharged that are used for the purpose of heat removal and that do not come into direct contact with any raw material, intermediate, or finished product.
NR 279.03(9) (9) “Runoff” means the flow of storm water resulting from precipitation coming into contact with petroleum refinery property.
NR 279.03(10) (10) The following abbreviation shall be used:
“Mgal” means 1000 gallons.
NR 279.03 History History: Cr. Register, October, 1986, No. 370, eff. 11-1-86.
NR 279.10 NR 279.10 Applicability; description of the topping subcategory. The provisions of this subcategory apply to discharges from any facility that produces petroleum products by the use of topping and catalytic reforming, whether or not the facility includes any other process in addition to topping and catalytic reforming. The provisions of this subcategory do not apply to facilities that include thermal processes (coking, vis-breaking, etc.) or catalytic cracking.
NR 279.10 History History: Cr. Register, October, 1986, No. 370, eff. 11-1-86.
NR 279.12 NR 279.12 Effluent limitations guidelines representing the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the application of the best practicable control technology currently available (BPT).
NR 279.12(1) (1) Except as provided in 40 CFR 125.30-125.32 any existing point source subject to this subcategory shall achieve the following effluent limitations representing the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the application of the best practicable control technology currently available (BPT): - See PDF for table PDF - See PDF for table PDF
NR 279.12 Note 1 See footnote following table in s. NR 279.13 (4).
NR 279.12 Note 2 Within the range of 6.0 to 9.0.
NR 279.12(2) (2) The limits set forth in sub. (1) shall be multiplied by the following factors to calculate the maximum for any one day and maximum average of daily values for 30 consecutive days.
NR 279.12(2)(a) (a) Size factor. - See PDF for table PDF
NR 279.12(2)(b) (b) Process factor. - See PDF for table PDF
NR 279.12 Note Note: See the comprehensive example in s. NR 279.42 (2) (c).
NR 279.12(3) (3) The following allocations constitute the quantity and quality of pollutants or pollutant properties controlled by this subsection and attributable to ballast, which may be discharged after the application of best practicable control technology currently available, by a point source subject to this subcategory, in addition to the discharge allowed by sub. (2). The allocation allowed for ballast water flow, as kg/cu m (lb/M gal), shall be based on those ballast waters treated at the refinery. - See PDF for table PDF - See PDF for table PDF
NR 279.12 Note 1 See footnote following table in s. NR 279.13 (4).
NR 279.12 Note 2 Within the range of 6.0 to 9.0.
NR 279.12(4) (4) The quantity and quality of pollutants or pollutant properties controlled by this subsection, attributable to once-through cooling water, are excluded from the discharge allowed by sub. (2). Once-through cooling water may be discharged with a total organic carbon concentration not to exceed 5 mg/l.
NR 279.12(5) (5) Effluent limitations for contaminated runoff. The following effluent limitations constitute the quantity and quality of pollutants or pollutant properties controlled by this subsection and attributable to contaminated runoff, which may be discharged after the application of the best practicable control technology currently available by a point source subject to this subcategory.
NR 279.12(5)(a) (a) If wastewater consists solely of contaminated runoff and is not commingled or treated with process wastewater, it may be discharged if it does not exceed 15 mg/l oil and grease and 110 mg/l total organic carbon (TOC) based upon an analysis of any single grab or composite sample.
NR 279.12(5)(b) (b) If contaminated runoff is commingled or treated with process wastewater, or if wastewater consisting solely of contaminated runoff which exceeds 15 mg/l oil and grease or 110 mg/l TOC is not commingled or treated with any other type of wastewater, the quantity of pollutants discharged may not exceed the quantity determined by multiplying the flow of contaminated runoff as determined by the department times the concentrations listed in the following table: - See PDF for table PDF - See PDF for table PDF
NR 279.12 Note 1 In any case in which the applicant can demonstrate that the chloride ion concentration in the effluent exceeds 1,000 mg/l (1,000 ppm), the department may substitute TOC as a parameter in lieu of COD. A TOC effluent limitation shall be based on effluent data from the particular refinery which correlates TOC to BOD. If in the judgment of the department, adequate correlation data are not available, the effluent limitations for TOC shall be established at a ratio of 2.2 to 1 to the applicable effluent limitations for BOD.2
NR 279.12 Note 2 Within the range 6.0 to 9.0.
NR 279.12 History History: Cr. Register, October, 1986, No. 370, eff. 11-1-86.
NR 279.13 NR 279.13 Effluent limitations guidelines representing the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the application of the best available technology economically achievable (BAT).
NR 279.13(1) (1) Except as provided in 40 CFR 125.30-125.32 any existing point source subject to this subcategory shall achieve the following effluent limitations representing the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the application of the best available technology economically achievable (BAT): - See PDF for table PDF
NR 279.13 Note 1 See footnote following table in s. NR 279.13 (4).
NR 279.13(2) (2) The limits set forth in sub. (1) shall be multiplied by the following factors to calculate the maximum for any one day and maximum average of daily values for 30 consecutive days.
NR 279.13(2)(a) (a) Size factor. - See PDF for table PDF
NR 279.13(2)(b) (b) Process factor. - See PDF for table PDF
NR 279.13 Note Note: See the comprehensive example in s. NR 279.42 (2) (c).
NR 279.13(3) (3) 
NR 279.13(3)(a)(a) In addition to the provisions contained in sub. (1) pertaining to COD, ammonia and sulfide any existing point source subject to this subcategory shall achieve the following effluent limitations representing the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the application of the best available technology economically achievable (BAT). For each of the regulated pollutant parameters listed below, the effluent limitation for a given refinery is the sum of the products of each effluent limitation factor times the applicable process feedstock rate, calculated as provided in 40 CFR 122.45 (b).
NR 279.13 Note Note: Applicable production processes are presented in Appendix A, by process type. The process identification numbers presented in this Appendix A are for the convenience of the reader. They can be cross-referenced in the Development Document for Effluent Limitations Guidelines, New Source Performance Standards, and Pretreatment Standards for the Petroleum Refining Point Source Category (EPA 440/1-82/014), Table III-7, pp. 49-54.
NR 279.13 Note40 CFR 122.45 (b) reads as follows: The calculation of any permit limitations, standards, or prohibitions which are based on production (or other measure of operation) shall be based not upon the designed production capacity but rather upon a reasonable measure of actual production of the facility, such as the production during the high month of the previous year, or the monthly average for the highest of the previous 5 years. For new sources or new dischargers, actual production shall be estimated using projected production. The time period of the measure of production shall correspond to the time period of the calculated permit limitations; for example, monthly production shall be used to calculate average monthly discharge limitations. - See PDF for table PDF
NR 279.13 Note Note: See the comprehensive example in s. NR 279.43 (3) (b).
NR 279.13(4) (4) The following allocations constitute the quantity and quality of pollutants or pollutant properties controlled by this subsection, attributable to ballast, which may be discharged after the application of best available technology economically achievable by a point source subject to the provisions of this subcategory. These allocations are in addition to the discharge allowed by sub. (2). The allocation allowed for ballast water flow, as kg/cu m (lb/M gal), shall be based on those ballast waters treated at the refinery. - See PDF for table PDF
NR 279.13 Note 1 In any case in which the applicant can demonstrate that the chloride ion concentration in the effluent exceeds 1,000 mg/l (1,000 ppm), the Regional Administrator of the EPA may substitute TOC as a parameter in lieu of COD. Effluent limitations for TOC shall be based on effluent data from the plant correlating TOC to BOD5. If in the judgment of the regional administrator, adequate correlation data are not available, the effluent limitations for TOC shall be established at a ratio of 2.2 to 1 to the applicable effluent limitations on BOD5.
NR 279.13(5) (5) The quantity and quality of pollutants or pollutant properties controlled by this subsection, attributable to once-through cooling water, are excluded from the discharge allowed by sub. (2). Once-through cooling water may be discharged with a total organic carbon concentration not to exceed 5 mg/l.
NR 279.13(6) (6) The following effluent limitations constitute the quantity and quality of pollutants or pollutant properties controlled by this subsection and attributable to contaminated runoff, which may be discharged after the application of the best available technology economically achievable by a point source subject to this subcategory.
NR 279.13(6)(a) (a) If wastewater consists solely of contaminated runoff and is not commingled or treated with process wastewater, it may be discharged if it does not exceed 110 mg/l total organic carbon (TOC) based upon an analysis of any single grab or composite sample.
NR 279.13(6)(b) (b) If contaminated runoff is commingled or treated with process wastewater, or if wastewater consisting solely of contaminated runoff which exceeds 110 mg/l TOC is not commingled or treated with any other type of wastewater, the quantity of pollutants discharged may not exceed the quantity determined by multiplying the flow of contaminated runoff as determined by the department times the concentrations listed in the following table: - See PDF for table PDF
NR 279.13 Note 1 In any case in which the applicant can demonstrate that the chloride ion concentration in the effluent exceeds 1000 mg/l (1000 ppm), the department may substitute TOC as a parameter in lieu of COD. A TOC effluent limitation shall be based on effluent data from the particular refinery which correlates TOC to BOD5. If in the judgment of the department, adequate correlation data are not available, the effluent limitations for TOC shall be established at a ratio of 2.2 to 1 to the applicable effluent limitations for BOD5.
NR 279.13 History History: Cr. Register, October, 1986, No. 370, eff. 11-1-86.
NR 279.14 NR 279.14 Effluent limitations guidelines representing the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the application of the best conventional pollutant control technology (BCT).
NR 279.14(1) (1) Any existing point source subject to this subcategory shall achieve the following effluent limitations representing the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the application of the best conventional pollutant control technology (BCT): - See PDF for table PDF - See PDF for table PDF
NR 279.14 Note 1Within the range 6.0 to 9.0.
NR 279.14(2) (2) The limits set forth in sub. (1) shall be multiplied by the following factors to calculate the maximum for any one day and maximum average of daily values for 30 consecutive days.
NR 279.14(2)(a) (a) Size factor. - See PDF for table PDF
NR 279.14(2)(b) (b) Process factor. - See PDF for table PDF
NR 279.14 Note Note: See the comprehensive example in s. NR 279.42 (2) (c).
NR 279.14(3) (3) The following allocations constitute the quantity and quality of pollutants or pollutant properties controlled by this subsection and attributable to ballast, which may be discharged after the application of best conventional pollutant control technology by a point source subject to this subcategory, in addition to the discharge allowed by sub. (2). The allocation allowed for ballast water flow, as kg/cu m (lb/1000 gal), shall be based on those ballast waters treated at the refinery. - See PDF for table PDF
NR 279.14 Note 1Within the range 6.0 to 9.0.
NR 279.14(4) (4) The quantity and quality of pollutants or pollutant properties controlled by this subsection attributable to once-through cooling water, are excluded from the discharge allowed by sub. (2).
NR 279.14(5) (5) The following effluent limitations constitute the quantity and quality of pollutants or pollutant properties controlled by this subsection and attributable to contaminated runoff which may be discharged after the application of the best conventional pollutant control technology by a point source subject to this subcategory.
NR 279.14(5)(a) (a) If wastewater consists solely of contaminated runoff and is not commingled or treated with process wastewater, it may be discharged if it does not exceed 15 mg/l oil and grease based upon an analysis of any single grab or composite sample.
NR 279.14(5)(b) (b) If contaminated runoff is commingled or treated with process wastewater, or if wastewater consisting solely of contaminated runoff which exceeds 15 mg/l oil and grease is not commingled or treated with any other type of wastewater, the quantity of pollutants discharged may not exceed the quantity determined by multiplying the flow of contaminated runoff as determined by the department times the concentrations listed in the following table. - See PDF for table PDF
NR 279.14 Note 1 Within the range of 6.0 to 9.0
NR 279.14 History History: Cr. Register, October, 1986, No. 370, eff. 11-1-86.
NR 279.15 NR 279.15 Pretreatment standards for existing sources (PSES). Except as provided in 40 CFR 403.7 and 403.13 any existing source subject to this subcategory which introduces pollutants into a publicly owned treatment works shall comply with 40 CFR Part 403 and achieve the following pretreatment standards for existing sources (PSES). The following standards apply to the total refinery flow contribution to the POTW: - See PDF for table PDF
NR 279.15 Note 1Where the discharge to the POTW consists solely of sour waters, the owner or operator has the option of complying with this limit or the daily maximum mass limitation for ammonia set forth in s. NR 279.13 (1) and (2).
NR 279.15 History History: Cr. Register, October, 1986, No. 370, eff. 11-1-86.
NR 279.16 NR 279.16 Standards of performance for new sources (NSPS).
NR 279.16(1)(1) Any new source subject to this subcategory shall achieve the following new source performance standards (NSPS): - See PDF for table PDF
NR 279.16 Note 1 See footnote following table in s. NR 279.13 (4).
NR 279.16 Note 2 Within the range of 6.0 to 9.0
NR 279.16(2) (2) The limits set forth in sub. (1) shall be multiplied by the following factors to calculate the maximum for any one day and maximum average of daily values for 30 consecutive days.
NR 279.16(2)(a) (a) Size factor. - See PDF for table PDF
NR 279.16(2)(b) (b) Process factor. - See PDF for table PDF
NR 279.16 Note Note: See the comprehensive example in s. NR 279.42 (2) (c).
NR 279.16(3) (3) The following allocations constitute the quantity and quality of pollutants or pollutant properties controlled by this subsection and attributable to ballast, which may be discharged after the application of best practicable control technology currently available, by a point source subject to this subcategory, in addition to the discharge allowed by sub. (2). The allocation allowed for ballast water flow, as kg/cu m (lb/M gal), shall be based on those ballast waters treated at the refinery. - See PDF for table PDF
NR 279.16 Note 1 See footnote following table in s. NR 279.13 (4).
NR 279.16 Note 2 Within the range of 6.0 to 9.0.
NR 279.16(4) (4) The quantity and quality of pollutants or pollutant properties controlled by this subsection, attributable to once-through cooling water, are excluded from the discharge allowed by sub. (2). Once-through cooling water may be discharged with a total organic carbon concentration not to exceed 5 mg/l.
NR 279.16 History History: Cr. Register, October, 1986, No. 370, eff. 11-1-86.
NR 279.17 NR 279.17 Pretreatment standards for new sources (PSNS). Except as provided in 40 CFR 403.7, any new source subject to this subcategory which introduces pollutants into a publicly owned treatment works shall comply with 40 CFR Part 403 and achieve the following pretreatment standards for new sources (PSNS).
NR 279.17(1) (1) The following standards apply to the total refinery flow contribution to the POTW: - See PDF for table PDF
NR 279.17 Note 1Where the discharge to the POTW consists solely of sour waters, the owner or operator has the option of complying with this daily maximum mass limitation for ammonia set forth in s. NR 279.16 (1) and (2).
NR 279.17(2) (2) The following standard is applied to the cooling tower discharge part of the total refinery flow to the POTW by multiplying:
NR 279.17(2)(a) (a) The standard;
NR 279.17(2)(b) (b) By the total refinery flow to the POTW; and
NR 279.17(2)(c) (c) By the ratio of the cooling tower discharge flow to the total refinery flow. - See PDF for table PDF
NR 279.17 History History: Cr. Register, October, 1986, No. 370, eff. 11-1-86.
NR 279.20 NR 279.20 Applicability; description of the cracking subcategory. The provisions of this subcategory are applicable to all discharges from any facility that produces petroleum products by the use of topping and cracking, whether or not the facility includes any process in addition to topping and cracking. The provisions of this subcategory are not applicable, however, to facilities that include the processes specified in the petrochemical, lube or integrated subcategories.
NR 279.20 History History: Cr. Register, October, 1986, No. 370, eff. 11-1-86.
Down
Loading...
Loading...
Published under s. 35.93, Stats. Updated on the first day of each month. Entire code is always current. The Register date on each page is the date the chapter was last published.