NR 185.07(2)(g)
(g) A detailed analysis and inventory of current solid waste management functions to address the following items for each function:
NR 185.07(2)(g)4.
4. Operational frequencies, methods, procedures, and service areas.
NR 185.07(2)(h)
(h) A comprehensive discussion of compliance with local, state and federal solid waste regulations and plans by existing solid waste management functions and facilities in the planning area.
NR 185.07(2)(i)
(i) An inventory of personnel and equipment that will be available for plan implementation and periodic review in the following areas of expertise:
NR 185.07(3)
(3) Probable solid waste land disposal locations. A list and map of probable locations for solid waste land disposal facilities shall be developed for inclusion in the plan. Locations shall be evaluated from the standpoints of engineering, environmental acceptability, and regulations. Special emphasis shall be given to locations that satisfy present and future needs extending through the entire planning period. Locations shall not be placed on the list unless each satisfies the following minimum requirements:
NR 185.07(3)(a)
(a) Preliminary locational acceptability — Locations shall receive written preliminary locational acceptability from the department through the following process:
NR 185.07(3)(a)1.
1. The entity shall identify all existing literature and data for the planning area relative to soils, ground water, topography, geology, hydrogeology, surface water resources and environmentally sensitive areas.
NR 185.07(3)(a)2.
2. The entity shall prepare a written report to address the following items:
NR 185.07(3)(a)2.a.
a. An analysis and summary of the above literature and its relation to solid waste land disposal locations in the planning area.
NR 185.07(3)(a)3.
3. The report shall be submitted to the department for review and written response for the individual locations. The response shall indicate which locations meet preliminary locational acceptability. The department will confirm or deny preliminary locational acceptability in writing within 30 days, giving the basis therefor. More specific information in addition to that listed above may be required by the department before it makes its written determination.
NR 185.07(3)(b)
(b) Archeological and historical acceptability. A letter from the state historical preservation officer concerning the possibility of the site being an archeological or historical landmark or area.
NR 185.07(4)
(4) Inventory and general evaluation of solid waste management alternatives. NR 185.07(4)(a)
(a) After evaluation of separate functions from the standpoints of technological and economic feasibility, several solid waste management alternatives that appear feasible shall be developed for detailed evaluation. The alternatives developed shall include:
NR 185.07(4)(a)1.
1. The existing solid waste management system including all existing functions (regardless of state of compliance with present solid waste regulations).
NR 185.07(4)(a)2.
2. The existing solid waste management system including all existing functions brought up to compliance with all solid waste regulations.
NR 185.07(4)(a)3.
3. A system containing the following functions: storage, collection, transportation, disposal at only one landfill.
NR 185.07(4)(a)5.
5. A system containing the following functions: storage, collection, transportation, disposal at 2 or more landfills.
NR 185.07 Note
Note: Alternatives 2-7 shall be in compliance with all solid waste regulations.
NR 185.07(5)
(5) Inventory and general evaluation of implementation methods. An inventory, comparison, and general evaluation of several implementation methods for identified solid waste management alternatives shall be made from the following standpoints:
NR 185.07(6)
(6) Detailed evaluation and preliminary selection of solid waste management alternative. This section shall be divided into the following 2 parts:
NR 185.07(6)(a)
(a) Solid waste management alternative evaluation. A detailed evaluation shall be made of the solid waste management alternatives developed in sub.
(4) from the standpoints of economics, technical feasibility, public and social acceptance, compliance with local, state and federal laws and regulations and practicability.
NR 185.07(6)(b)
(b) Preliminary selection of solid waste management alternative. Based on the detailed evaluation, preliminary conclusions and recommendations shall be made as to the relative ranking of each solid waste management alternative from an acceptability standpoint. The ranking methodology shall be outlined. One tentative solid waste management alternative shall be selected for potential implementation and the reasons for selection shall be indicated.
NR 185.07(7)
(7) Detailed evaluation and preliminary selection of implementation methods. A detailed evaluation of the implementation methods developed in sub.
(5) shall be made and preliminary conclusions, recommendations and selections shall be made of the implementation methods for the solid waste management alternative selected in sub.
(6) shall be made.
NR 185.07(8)
(8) Final conclusions, recommendations and decisions. Final conclusions, recommendations and decisions shall be made and indicated relative to what solid waste alternative will be implemented and what implementation methods will be used. The methodology and reasons for the final decisions shall be indicated. The details of the solid waste management functions to be provided and implementation methods shall be indicated. Time lines for solid waste management system development, operation, and periodic review shall be prepared indicating responsibilities and implementation dates. Separate time lines shall be developed for the total system and each waste management function.
NR 185.07(9)
(9) Summary of past and future information, education and public participation programs. The programs developed and implemented pursuant to s.
NR 185.06 shall be summarized in terms of program content and input by affected persons. Future programs to be carried out consistent with the intent of s.
NR 185.06 shall be outlined in terms of time and responsibilities.
NR 185.07(10)(a)
(a) In order to monitor the efficiency and effectiveness of the solid waste management plan after implementation, procedures for annual review and update of the plan shall be outlined. These procedures shall address at a minimum:
NR 185.07(10)(b)
(b) There shall be established procedures and responsibilities for making necessary plan modifications.
NR 185.07(10)(c)
(c) Provisions shall be made for an annual report to the main decision-making body to include an analysis of meeting plan objectives.
NR 185.07(11)
(11) Appendix. An appendix shall include at a minimum, the following:
NR 185.07(11)(b)
(b) Summaries of all applicable local, state and federal solid waste laws, rules and regulations.
NR 185.07(11)(c)
(c) The basis for any projections or estimates where data is nonexistent, insufficient or impractical to generate for the purpose of this plan.
NR 185.07(11)(d)
(d) Other reference material necessary for information and educational purposes.
NR 185.07 History
History: Cr.
Register, February, 1979, No. 278, eff. 3-1-79; correction in (3) made under s. 13.93 (2m) (b) 7., Stats.,
Register, September, 1995, No. 477; correction in (5) made under s. 13.93 (2m) (b) 1., Stats.,
Register, October, 1999, No. 526; correction in (3) (a) 2. b. made under s. 13.92 (4) (b) 7., Stats.,
Register March 2011 No. 663.
NR 185.08
NR 185.08 Upgrading approved plans. An entity with a department approved plan under former
ch. LAD 3, (April, 1972) Wis. Adm. Code, may resubmit the plan to the department with a written request for the department to evaluate the plan under this chapter. The department will evaluate the previously approved plan through the procedure specified in s.
NR 185.05 (4).
NR 185.08 History
History: Cr.
Register, February, 1979, No. 278, eff. 3-1-79.
NR 185.09
NR 185.09 Exemptions. An entity may request exemption from any of the requirements of this chapter by submitting an adequate written request and justification. In reviewing exemption requests, the department may take into account such factors as population, size of the area being served, types, amounts, and sources of solid waste, and other significant factors presented and documented by the entity. Exemption requests shall be reviewed with particular regard to any potential nuisance, hazard to public health and safety, or potential degradation of the environment. Any exemptions granted shall be in writing by the department, stating the reasons therefor.
NR 185.09 History
History: Cr.
Register, February, 1979, No. 278, eff. 3-1-79.
