Chapter NR 166

NR 166.17(1)(b) (b) Applicability. Additional financial assistance under par. (a) for a scored project is subject to all of the following:

NR 166.17(1)(b)1. 1. ‘Availability of funds.’ If there are sufficient loan funds available, as determined under s. 281.59, Stats., a municipality may receive loan funds for additional project costs incurred that cause the total eligible project costs to be greater than the amount provided in the original financial assistance agreement. The loan interest rate and loan maturity date shall be determined by the department and DOA.

NR 166.17(1)(b)2. 2. ‘No principal forgiveness.’ The department may not provide additional principal forgiveness funds in the amendment to the financial assistance agreement.

NR 166.17(1)(c) (c) Requesting funds. A municipality may request financial assistance for additional project costs using one of the following options:

NR 166.17(1)(c)1. 1. ‘Request in writing.’ The municipality shall submit a written request to the department that justifies the need for additional financial assistance and details the additional eligible costs. A revised budget shall be submitted with the request indicating in one column the line-item totals in the financial assistance agreement, in a second column the requested additional costs, and in a third column the total project costs requested to be funded through the SDWLP via an amendment to the original financial assistance agreement. If there are other funding sources participating in the project, the revised budget shall indicate all funding changes applicable to the additional financial assistance being requested. All costs in the revised budget shall be assigned to the appropriate budget line items from which disbursement will be requested.

NR 166.17(1)(c)2. 2. ‘Electronic submittal.’ The department may require the written request for an amendment to be submitted as an email message with an attachment, as input into the department’s online application system, or by other appropriate means determined by the department.

NR 166.17(1)(d) (d) Plans and specifications. A municipality shall submit to the department any plans and specifications required for changes in the project that necessitate the amendment to the financial assistance agreement. The department shall issue an amendment for the additional project costs only after the department approves any engineering reports or plans and specifications required for the work related to the additional costs.

NR 166.17(1)(e) (e) Notice of intent to apply. A new notice of intent to apply for funding as described under s. NR 166.08 (1) is not required for purposes of requesting a financial assistance agreement amendment.

NR 166.17(2) (2) Effective date. A financial assistance agreement amendment is effective when executed by all parties to the agreement.

NR 166.17 History History: CR 22-068: cr. Register October 2023 No. 814, eff. 11-1-23.

NR 166.18 NR 166.18 Disputes.

NR 166.18(1) (1) Decision of the department. Except as otherwise provided by law, any dispute arising under this chapter prior to the execution of a financial assistance agreement shall be decided in writing by the department. The department shall serve a copy of the decision on the applicant by mail.

NR 166.18(2) (2) Review of the decision. A final decision of the department may be reviewed under subch. III of ch. 227, Stats., and ch. NR 2.

NR 166.18 History History: CR 22-068: cr. Register October 2023 No. 814, eff. 11-1-23.

NR 166.19 NR 166.19 Records and records retention.

NR 166.19(1) (1) Requirements. The recipient shall maintain SDWLP project-related books, documents, papers, records, and accounting procedures in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, governmental accounting standards board requirements, or another method of accounting accepted by the department or required by the federal government and authorized under the financial assistance agreement and ch. Adm 35 and retain them in accordance with subch. II of ch. 19, Stats. The recipient shall require contractors, including contractors for professional services, to maintain SDWLP project-related books, documents, papers, and records related to the project that are necessary for the recipient’s compliance with this section.

NR 166.19(2) (2) Inspection. The department or its agents may, during normal business hours, inspect and copy the recipient’s SDWLP project-related records and the project-related records of its contractors.

NR 166.19(3) (3) Records retention.

NR 166.19(3)(a) (a) The recipient and its contractors shall retain and make all files, books, documents, and records relating to the construction of the scored project available to the department for a minimum of either 3 years from the date the department notifies the recipient that the project closeout is complete or 3 years from final completion of construction, whichever is later.

NR 166.19(3)(b) (b) If a financial assistance agreement is partially or completely terminated, the records relating to the work terminated shall be kept and made available for a period of 3 years from the date of any resulting final termination settlement.

NR 166.19(3)(c) (c) Records that relate to appeals, disputes, or litigation arising out of the performance of the project shall be retained until any appeals, disputes, or litigation have been finally resolved or for a period of 3 years from the date the department notifies the recipient under s. NR 166.16 (4) (b) 7. that the project closeout is complete, whichever is later.

NR 166.19(3)(d) (d) All other files and records relating to the scored project, including as-built plans, shall be retained for at least the term of the financial assistance agreement for the project.

NR 166.19(4) (4) Federal single audit. Recipients of financial assistance provided directly from the federal capitalization grant shall comply with the federal single audit requirements established in 31 USC 7501 to 7506, OMB circular A–133, and ch. Adm 35.

NR 166.19 History History: CR 22-068: cr. Register October 2023 No. 814, eff. 11-1-23; correction in (4) made under s. 13.92 (4) (b) 7., Stats., Register October 2023 No. 814.

NR 166.20 NR 166.20 Breach of contract.

NR 166.20(1) (1) Upon breach of the financial assistance agreement by the recipient, the department may do any of the following:

NR 166.20(1)(a) (a) Declare the unpaid loan balance mature and immediately payable.

NR 166.20(1)(b) (b) Increase the interest rate on the unpaid balance of the loan to the market interest rate in effect on the date the financial assistance agreement was executed.

NR 166.20(1)(c) (c) Immediately terminate the financial assistance agreement and disburse no additional funds if the financial assistance has not been fully disbursed.

NR 166.20(1)(d) (d) Seek an injunction or any other equitable or judicial relief from a court of appropriate jurisdiction.

NR 166.20(1)(e) (e) Seek any other appropriate administrative remedy.

NR 166.20(2) (2) DOA’s receipt of any payment after the occurrence of a breach of contract does not constitute the department’s waiver of any rights and remedies under this section.

NR 166.20 Note Note: DOA may, under s. 281.59 (11) (b), Stats., seek recovery of some or all financial assistance payments by deducting those amounts from any state payments due to a municipality, or by adding a special charge to the amount of taxes apportioned to and levied upon the county under s. 70.60, Stats.

NR 166.20 History History: CR 22-068: cr. Register October 2023 No. 814, eff. 11-1-23.

NR 166.21 NR 166.21 Noncompliance. Upon failure of the recipient to comply with s. 281.59 or 281.61, Stats., or with provisions of this chapter, the department may do any of the following:

NR 166.21(1) (1) Refuse to enter into a financial assistance agreement.

NR 166.21(2) (2) Seek penalties as provided in ch. 281, Stats.

NR 166.21(3) (3) Seek any other appropriate remedy, relief, or penalty.

NR 166.21 History History: CR 22-068: cr. Register October 2023 No. 814, eff. 11-1-23.

NR 166.22 NR 166.22 Variances.

NR 166.22(1) (1) General. The department may, on its own initiative or pursuant to a written request from an applicant, approve a variance from a requirement of this chapter when it determines that special circumstances make a variance in the best interest of the state. Any variance approved shall be consistent with the objectives of ss. 281.59 and 281.61, Stats.

NR 166.22(2) (2) Applicability. The department may only approve a variance from any non–statutory requirement of this chapter.

NR 166.22(3) (3) Request for variance. An applicant shall submit any request for a variance in writing to the department as soon as it is determined a variance is needed. Each request for a variance shall contain all of the following:

NR 166.22(3)(a) (a) The name of the applicant and the SDWLP project number.

NR 166.22(3)(b) (b) The section of this chapter from which the applicant seeks a variance and a statement explaining why the variance is necessary.

NR 166.22(3)(c) (c) An adequate description of the variance desired, and the facts which the recipient believes warrant the department’s approving the variance.

NR 166.22(3)(d) (d) A statement as to whether the recipient has previously requested the same or a similar variance, and if so, the circumstances of the previous request.

NR 166.22(4) (4) Granting a variance. Before granting a variance, the department shall consider factors such as good cause, circumstances beyond the control of the recipient, emergencies, natural disasters, and financial hardship.

NR 166.22 History History: CR 22-068: cr. Register October 2023 No. 814, eff. 11-1-23.

subch. III of ch. NR 166 Subchapter III — Priority Scoring and Ranking System

NR 166.23 NR 166.23 Priority scoring criteria.

NR 166.23(1) (1) Purpose. The purpose of the priority scoring criteria is to establish a list of eligible projects to be funded in a manner that is in accordance with the federal requirements of the safe drinking water act, 42 USC 300j–12. Consistent with the act, the criteria in subs. (1) to (4) shall apply. The department may require documentation to support any points requested by the municipality. The department may also require a potential applicant to communicate with the department prior to priority evaluation and ranking form submittal to determine what type of documentation is appropriate to show existing contamination for projects that will expand an existing water system or create a new community water system.

NR 166.23(2) (2) General priority. The department shall give first priority to acute public health risks, particularly those related to microbiological organisms, and second priority to situations that pose chronic and longer-term health risks to consumers, such as organic chemical contamination. The scoring criteria also consider issues that are related to infrastructure upgrading or replacement to address those projects, or portions of a project, that are eligible for funding but not included in the first 2 priority groups, including projects to correct significant deficiencies or develop capacity in a water system.

NR 166.23 Note Note: The act requires, to the maximum extent practicable, that priority ranking be given to projects that: 1) address the most serious risk to human health; 2) are necessary to ensure compliance with the requirements of the safe drinking water act, including requirements for filtration; and 3) assist systems most in need on a per household basis according to state affordability criteria.

NR 166.23(3) (3) Risk to human health. The following criteria related to human health risks are divided into acute and chronic risk categories. The department shall assign points to a project based on criteria in a single category in par. (a), if applicable, or a single category in par. (b), if applicable, but not from both. If the severity of the problem is not reflected in any of the categories in par. (a) or (b), the department shall determine the number of points to assign to the project. This subsection also includes par. (c) which the department shall use when assigning points for a project that will eliminate lead service lines. The department shall assign points for risk to human health based on all of the following criteria as applicable to the project:

NR 166.23(3)(a) (a) Violations and exceedances. Project addresses a maximum contaminant level violation, an action level exceedance, or a treatment technique violation, or an acute or a chronic health hazard under any of the following requirements:

NR 166.23(3)(a)1. 1. ‘Acute contaminants.’ Acute contaminants are divided into 3 groups. Points shall be awarded in the following manner for a project that eliminates a problem that poses an acute health hazard from one of these groups:

NR 166.23(3)(a)1.a. a. Five hundred points shall be awarded to a project that proposes to eliminate a microbiological MCL violation that already occurred or will address a confirmed waterborne disease outbreak as defined in s. NR 809.04 (90), or a demonstrated microbiological contamination problem for a newly created community water system or for expanding an existing community water system in accordance with s. NR 166.06 (1) (f).

NR 166.23(3)(a)1.b. b. Four hundred points shall be awarded to a project that eliminates violations of filtration requirements in s. NR 810.29 and disinfection requirements in ss. NR 810.09 and 810.31, or confirmed microbial, including giardia and cryptosporidium, contamination found in finished water.

NR 166.23(3)(a)1.c. c. Three hundred points shall be awarded to a project that eliminates a continuing nitrate or nitrite MCL exceedance, or a demonstrated nitrate or nitrite problem for a newly created community water system or expansion of an existing community water system in accordance with s. NR 166.06 (1) (f).

NR 166.23(3)(a)2. 2. ‘Chronic contaminants.’ Chronic contaminants are divided into 5 subgroups: inorganics, volatile organic chemicals, synthetic organic chemicals, radionuclides, and disinfection byproducts. For a newly created community water system or for expanding an existing community water system in this subdivision, points shall be assigned by determining the 90th percentile sample for the project area. All individual wells or surface water sources in the project area shall be included in the determination. A single water sample from each individual well or surface water source shall be used for the determination. All water samples submitted shall be collected within the same 6-month period and shall be representative of current conditions. If there is no sample for an individual well or surface water source, a value of zero or no detect shall be used in the determination. The maximum point total that shall be awarded in this subdivision is 250 points. Points shall be awarded in the following manner for a project that eliminates a chronic health hazard from these groups of chemicals:

NR 166.23(3)(a)2.a. a. For each subgroup, other than the disinfection byproducts subgroup, only the MCL exceedance of greatest percentage magnitude shall be used for the point calculation, even though multiple contaminant MCL exceedances might be occurring. For exceedances in multiple subgroups, see subd. 2. c. The MCL exceedance shall be divided by the current MCL or AL and then multiplied by 50 to obtain a subgroup point total.

NR 166.23(3)(a)2.b. b. For the disinfection byproducts subgroup, the total sum disinfection byproducts exceedance as defined in s. NR 809.566 shall be used for the calculation.

NR 166.23(3)(a)2.c. c. For MCL exceedances in more than one subgroup, the highest point level of the subgroups shall be used as the primary number to be divided by the current MCL or AL and then multiplied by 50. The other subgroup exceedances will be divided by their respective MCL or AL and then multiplied by 10. The total point value shall be the sum of points in each subgroup.

NR 166.23(3)(b) (b) Anticipated violations and exceedances. Project prevents an anticipated MCL, AL, or treatment technique violation or critical health hazard. Points shall be awarded to a single group under either subd. 1. or 2. to a project that proposes to eliminate an anticipated acute or chronic health hazard under the following requirements:

NR 166.23(3)(b)1. 1. ‘Acute contaminants.’ Acute contaminants are divided into 3 groups. Points shall be awarded from one of the following groups for a project that eliminates an anticipated acute health hazard:

NR 166.23(3)(b)1.a. a. Three hundred points shall be awarded to a project that eliminates an anticipated microbiological MCL violation, where no actual violation has yet occurred.

NR 166.23(3)(b)1.b. b. Two hundred points shall be awarded to a project that proposes to eliminate anticipated violations of filtration requirements, or turbidity, in s. NR 810.29, or anticipated violations of the requirements of the federal long term 2 enhanced surface water treatment rule promulgated by the U.S. environmental protection agency as directed by the U.S. congress.

NR 166.23(3)(b)1.c. c. One hundred points shall be awarded to a project that proposes to eliminate an anticipated nitrate or nitrite violation.

NR 166.23(3)(b)2. 2. ‘Chronic contaminants.’ Chronic contaminants are divided into 5 subgroups: inorganics, volatile organic chemicals, synthetic organic chemicals, radionuclides, and disinfection byproducts. Points shall be awarded in the following manner for a project that eliminates an anticipated chronic health hazard from these groups of chemicals:

NR 166.23(3)(b)2.a. a. Twenty points shall be awarded to a project that proposes to eliminate an anticipated exceedance of an inorganic, volatile organic chemical, synthetic organic chemical, radionuclide, or disinfection byproducts contaminant.

NR 166.23(3)(b)2.b. b. Five points shall be awarded for each additional subgroup addressed by a project that eliminates an anticipated exceedance.

NR 166.23(3)(c) (c) Private LSL replacement. Points shall be awarded to watermain replacement projects that also include the replacement of private LSLs under the following defined quantities:

NR 166.23(3)(c)1. 1. Thirty points shall be awarded if at least 200 private LSLs are being removed as part of the project.

NR 166.23(3)(c)2. 2. Twenty-five points shall be awarded if at least 100 private LSLs but less than 200 are being removed as part of the project.

NR 166.23(3)(c)3. 3. Twenty points shall be awarded if at least 50 private LSLs but less than 100 are being removed as part of the project.

NR 166.23(3)(c)4. 4. Fifteen points shall be awarded if at least 25 private LSLs but less than 50 are being removed as part of the project.

NR 166.23(3)(c)5. 5. Ten points shall be awarded if at least 15 private LSLs but less than 25 are being removed as part of the project.

NR 166.23(3)(c)6. 6. Four points shall be awarded if less than 15 private LSLs are being removed as part of the project.

NR 166.23(3)(c)7. 7. Ten additional points shall be awarded if the project will remove all remaining private LSLs in the municipality.

NR 166.23(4) (4) Secondary contaminant violation or system compliance with ch. nr 811. The department may not award points for specific areas related to secondary contaminant violations or system compliance with ch. NR 811 if the project is already receiving points under sub. (1) for the same issue. The department shall assign points to a project for any of the following criteria that are applicable to the project:

NR 166.23(4)(a) (a) Twenty points shall be awarded if the project will reduce a secondary drinking water contaminant, as listed in s. NR 809.70, to a level below the aesthetic standard.

NR 166.23(4)(b) (b) Twenty points shall be awarded if the project addresses areas of inadequate distribution system pressure, as defined in s. NR 810.10, 810.11, or 811.70 (4).

NR 166.23(4)(c) (c) Twenty points shall be awarded if the project will address a documented storage deficiency, excluding fire demand, within an existing public water supply system.

NR 166.23(4)(d) (d) Twenty points shall be awarded if the project addresses a source or capacity deficiency where there is a demonstrated need within the existing public water supply system.

NR 166.23(4)(e) (e) Twenty points shall be awarded if the project will address system reliability under all operational situations, where there are significant concerns regarding reliability in the existing system, such as lack of redundancy of major components of the water system. Activities for which these points may be awarded include the addition of a second crossing of a river, railroad, or highway to a major system divide; installation of a second surface water intake; or construction of a second well.

NR 166.23(4)(f) (f) Twenty points shall be awarded if a major portion of the project will address significant deficiencies identified in a sanitary survey conducted by the department and the activities to correct deficiencies are related to the scored project activities.

NR 166.23(4)(g) (g) Four points shall be awarded if the project replaces lead joints in water mains.

NR 166.23(4)(h) (h) Four points shall be awarded if the project includes long–term zebra mussel control.