NR 116.05
NR 116.05
Adoption and upgrading of floodplain zoning ordinances. NR 116.05(1)(1)
Adoption. Municipalities shall adopt, administer and enforce reasonable floodplain zoning ordinances for all floodplains where serious flood damage may occur within their respective jurisdictions. These ordinances shall meet or exceed the standards in this chapter.
NR 116.05(2)
(2) Inclusion in local regulations, codes and programs. Where necessary, to insure the effectiveness of floodplain management and zoning objectives, the standards in this chapter shall be included in subdivision regulations, building and sanitary codes, flood insurance regulations, stormwater management regulations and other related programs.
NR 116.05(3)
(3) Substitution. Where the department finds that one or more of the following regulations, codes or programs will accomplish the purpose of s.
NR 116.01, these regulations, codes or programs may be substituted in lieu of all or portions of floodplain zoning ordinances:
NR 116.05(3)(a)
(a) Zoning, acquisition of flooding easements or purchase of floodplain lands to permit only open space uses in floodplain areas.
NR 116.05(4)
(4) Upgrading ordinances. Within 6 months from the time any of the information listed below is made available to a municipality by the department, the municipality shall upgrade its floodplain zoning ordinance, using the amendment procedure in s.
NR 116.21, to reflect current floodplain information, including, but not limited to, the following:
NR 116.05 History
History: Cr.
Register, February, 1986, No. 362, eff. 3-1-86.
NR 116.06
NR 116.06
Areas to be regulated. Municipalities shall develop floodplain zoning maps, reflecting the best available data, which show the areas to be regulated. They shall also develop floodplain zoning ordinances to define proper uses in those regulated areas. These floodplain maps and zoning ordinances shall regulate all floodplains where serious flood damage may occur. The minimum limits for regulatory purposes shall be all those areas covered by water during the regional flood.
NR 116.06 History
History: Cr.
Register, February, 1986, No. 362, eff. 3-1-86.
NR 116.07
NR 116.07
Standards for hydrologic and hydraulic studies. NR 116.07(1)(1)
General. The standards contained in this section shall be the basis for developing both hydrologic and hydraulic information to be used by municipalities for developing floodplain zoning maps and flood profiles, as defined in s.
NR 116.09, and for administration of existing floodplain zoning ordinances as defined in s.
NR 116.20 (2). The department shall review and approve all studies performed or completed under this section prior to use by any municipality.
NR 116.07(2)
(2) Certification and responsibility of the study contractor. Studies shall be completed under the direct supervision of the study contractor who is a registered professional engineer in the state of Wisconsin. The study contractor shall be responsible for the technical adequacy of the study.
NR 116.07(3)
(3) Hydrologic analysis — determination of regional flood discharge. NR 116.07(3)(a)(a) Techniques. Studies to determine the regional flood flow discharge may use the following techniques, if done in accordance with the requirements of par.
(b):
NR 116.07(3)(a)1.
1. The log-Pearson Type III distribution method as described in Bulletin #17B of the Hydrology Committee, U.S. Water Resources Council, entitled “Guidelines For Determining Flood Flow Frequency", September, 1981.
NR 116.07(3)(a)2.
2. The current USGS empirical equations, developed from regression analysis of stream gaging data. (See USGS publication entitled “Technique for Estimating Magnitude and Frequency of Floods in Wisconsin", by Conger, March, 1981.)
NR 116.07(3)(a)3.
3. Synthetic hydrographs, which are combined and routed through the basin to the downstream end of the study area.
NR 116.07(3)(a)4.
4. When using the synthetic hydrograph technique in subd.
3., the results shall be calibrated to past events where such information is available.
NR 116.07(3)(a)5.
5. Technical Release No. 55 (TR55), entitled “Urban Hydrology For Small Watersheds", Engineering Division, SCS, U.S.D.A., January, 1975.
NR 116.07(3)(b)
(b) Required use of techniques. The following shall be the minimum standards for determining the regional flood flow discharge:
NR 116.07(3)(b)1.
1. The techniques to determine skew under par.
(a) 1. may not be used if data from a gaging station in the watershed is not available or is available for a period of less than 10 years. In other cases, the technique to determine skew in par.
(a) 1. shall be modified as follows:
NR 116.07(3)(b)1.a.
a. If data from a gaging station in the watershed is available for 10 or more years but less than 26 years, the station skew shall be weighted with zero skew in accordance with Bulletin #17B.
NR 116.07(3)(b)1.b.
b. If data from a gaging station in the watershed is available for 26 or more years, the station skew shall be used.
NR 116.07(3)(b)1.c.
c. Skew values differing from those obtained in subd.
1. a. or
b. may be used if they are approved by the department.
NR 116.07(3)(b)2.
2. If the difference in the drainage area at the study site and the drainage area at a gaging station on the same watershed is less than or equal to 50%, the regional flood discharge at the study site shall be determined by transferring the calculated regional flood discharge at the gage by using Bulletin #17B techniques to the study site using a drainage area ratio taken to the “n" power, from page 12 of “Techniques for Estimating Magnitude and Frequency of Floods for Wisconsin Streams", U.S.G.S., Open File Report 80-1214, March 1981.
NR 116.07(3)(b)3.
3. If the difference in the drainage area at the study site and the drainage area at a gaging station in the watershed is more than 50%, or if there is no gaging station in the watershed, at least 2 of the techniques described in par.
(a) 2. to
7. shall be used to determine a weighted value of the regional flood discharge.
NR 116.07(3)(b)4.
4. Comparison of similar drainage basins under par.
(a) 5. shall be based on basin characteristics using Bulletin #17B 100-year discharges.
NR 116.07(3)(b)5.
5. When using USGS empirical equations under par.
(a) 2., the results shall be compared with Bulletin #17B 100-year discharges at gaged sites on similar drainage basins.
NR 116.07(3)(b)6.
6. In all cases where dams or reservoirs, floodplain development or land use upstream have significantly altered the storage capacity or runoff characteristics of the watershed so as to affect the validity of any of the techniques listed in par.
(a), the synthetic hydrograph technique in par.
(a) 3. or the Technical Release No. 55 in par.
(a) 4. shall be used for the determination of the regional flood flow discharge.
NR 116.07(3)(b)7.
7. In rapidly urbanizing watersheds, the municipality shall require that computations for regional flood flow discharges reflect increased runoff from all projected future development. These computations shall be made using one of the following techniques:
NR 116.07(3)(b)7.a.
a. A synthetic hydrograph based upon projected watershed development shall be produced and routed to critical locations within the study limits.
NR 116.07(3)(b)7.b.
b. A mathematical model shall be developed to determine the effects of all projected future development in the watershed on the regional flood flow discharge. Local units of government shall project what percentage of watershed development may occur under existing land use or subdivision ordinances and regional flood discharges shall be based upon that data. Where there are no existing land use or subdivision ordinances which control or regulate future development, total projected development shall be assumed to occupy 70% of the watershed. Where watersheds contain more than one municipality, agreements between those municipalities may be necessary to restrict future watershed development. In order to insure that future regional flood flows do not exceed the regional flood flow discharges used in local regulations, changes in existing land use or subdivision ordinances which may allow an increase or decrease in the projected development in the watershed shall be reflected in regional flood flow discharge values.
NR 116.07(4)
(4) Hydraulic analysis — determination of the regional flood elevation. The following criteria shall be the basis for determining the regional flood profile:
NR 116.07(4)(a)
(a) Reconnaissance. The study contractor is responsible for the collection of all existing data with regard to flooding in the study area. This shall include a literature search of all published reports in the study area and adjacent communities and an information search to obtain all unpublished information on flooding in the immediate and adjacent areas from federal, state and local units of government. This information shall include specific information on past flooding in the area, drainage structures such as bridges and culverts that affect flooding in the area, available topographic maps, available community maps, photos of past flood events and general flooding problems within the community. The study contractor will coordinate the collection of all available data and published reports with the department. A field reconnaissance shall be made by the responsible engineer to determine hydraulic conditions of the study area including type and number of structures, locations of cross sections and other parameters including roughness values which are necessary for the hydraulic analysis.
NR 116.07(4)(b)
(b) Base data. Cross sections to be used for the hydraulic analysis may be obtained by one of several methods, including surveying or aerial photography. New or previously surveyed cross sections or topographic information obtained from aerial photographs may be used independently or in combination as the base data to be used in hydraulic analysis. The elevation datum of all of the information to be used in the hydraulic model shall be verified. All information used shall be referenced directly to NGVD unless the elevation datum is otherwise approved by the department.
NR 116.07(4)(c)
(c) Methodology. Flood profiles shall be calculated by the standard step method, using the Corps of Engineers HEC-2 computer model. Other methods may be used with prior department approval provided that any computer models submitted to the department for review are in a form acceptable for entry into the department's floodplain data repository.
NR 116.07(4)(d)
(d) Floodway determination. The hydraulic floodway lines shall be determined from the limits of effective flow based on the calculated regional flood water surface profile. Transitions shall take into account obstructions to flow such as road approach grades, bridges or natural restrictions. General guidelines for transitions may be found in “HEC-2, Water Surface Profiles-Users Manual, appendix IV, Application of HEC-2 Bridge Routine" published by the Hydrologic Engineering Center, Davis, California. All areas of the floodplain including overbank areas that can be assumed to convey flood waters shall be included in the hydraulic floodway.
NR 116.07(4)(e)
(e) Previous floodplain studies. If differences exist between a study previously approved by the department and the contractor's calculated hydraulic floodways or flood profiles, the study contractor shall document justification and obtain departmental approval for these differences. Where the contractor's study differs from existing flood profiles or hydraulic floodways for adjacent communities, verification of the differences will be necessary for department approval of the hydraulic analysis.
NR 116.07(4)(f)
(f) Calculation of the regional flood profile. The regional flood profile and changes to that profile caused by development in the floodplain, as determined by the hydraulic model, shall be calculated to the nearest 0.01 foot.
NR 116.07(4)(g)
(g) Adequacy of the hydraulic model. The following factors shall be considered by the department to determine the adequacy of the hydraulic model and the regional flood profile. Upon written request by the department the study contractor shall submit written justification for the following factors:
NR 116.07 Note
Note: Significant differences in the energy grade from cross section to cross section are an indication that cross sections should be more closely spaced or that other inaccuracies exist in the hydraulic model.
NR 116.07(4)(g)3.
3. Methods for analyzing the hydraulics of structures such as bridges and culverts.
NR 116.07 Note
Note: In certain circumstances, rapidly varied flow techniques shall be used in combination with a gradually varied flow model such as weir flow over a levee or dike, flow through the spillway of a dam or special applications of bridge flow.
NR 116.07(4)(h)
(h) Special applications. The methods defined in par.
(c) shall be used except in special cases, including circumstances where sediment transport, 2 dimensional flow or valley storage affects the accuracy of the hydraulic model. Where the standard step method is unwarranted, the department shall approve the method used for establishing the final water surface profile.
NR 116.07(4)(i)
(i) Base mapping. In the preparation of a floodplain zoning map to be used by the municipality, the study contractor shall use the best available mapping to delineate floodplain limits.
NR 116.07(4)(j)
(j) Final report. A narrative report shall accompany the maps and profiles and shall include the following:
NR 116.07(4)(j)5.
5. Engineering methods including a detailed description of the methodology used for hydrology, hydraulics and any special applications used in this study.
NR 116.07(4)(j)6.
6. A floodway data table showing cross sections, drainage area, distance between cross sections, floodway top width, discharge, cross sectional area, mean velocity and regional flood elevation.
NR 116.07(4)(j)8.e.
e. Sample calculations of the hydrologic analyses including all unit hydrographs.
NR 116.07(4)(k)
(k) Wave action on the Great Lakes. Standards used to determine the regional flood elevation for all municipalities adjacent to the Great Lakes shall be those specified in the publication, “Guidelines and Specifications for Study Contractors, Federal Emergency Management Agency, September 1982,
appendix 1B, Wave Runup Analysis".
NR 116.07(5)
(5) Document availability. The materials listed in this subsection are incorporated by reference in the corresponding subsections noted. The document referred to in sub.
(3) (a) 1. may be purchased from the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 20402 (mention title and stock number 052-045-00031-2). The document referred to in sub.
(3) (a) 2. is available for inspection at the Geological Survey — Water Resource Division, U.S. Department of the Interior, 1815 University Avenue, Madison, Wisconsin 53706. The document referred to in sub.
(3) (a) 5. is available for inspection at the Soil Conservation Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, 4601 Hammersley Road, Madison, Wisconsin 53711; it may be purchased from the National Technical Information Service, U.S. Department of Commerce, 5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield, Virginia 22151 (mention title and appropriate accession number: TR55 = PB 244531/AS). The document described in sub.
(4) (c) and
(d) is available for inspection at the United States Army Corps' Hydrologic Engineering Center, 609 2nd Street, Davis, California 95616. The document referred to in sub.
(4) (k) is available for inspection at the Federal Emergency Management Agency Region V Office, 300 South Wacker Drive, Chicago, Illinois 60606 (mention title, date and appropriate appendix number).
NR 116.07(6)
(6) Inspection of documents. Copies of the documents referred to in sub.
(5) are also available for inspection in the following offices:
NR 116.07(6)(a)
(a) The department of natural resources, 101 South Webster Street, Madison, Wisconsin;
NR 116.07(6)(b)
(b) The office of the secretary of state, 30 W. Mifflin Street, Madison, Wisconsin;
NR 116.07(6)(c)
(c) The legislative reference bureau, One E. Main Street, Madison, Wisconsin.
NR 116.07 History
History: Cr.
Register, February, 1986, No. 362, eff. 3-1-86; corrections made under s. 13.93 (2m) (b) 6., Stats.,
Register, September, 1995, No. 477; correction in (6) (c) made under s. 13.92 (4) (b) 6., Stats.,
Register March 2011 No. 663.
