Ins 6.62(2)
(2) No intermediary may solicit, advertise, or market in this state or accept an application or place coverage for a person who resides in this state with a multiple employer trust or association unless prior to solicitation, advertising, marketing, acceptance of the application, or placing the coverage:
Ins 6.62(2)(a)
(a) The multiple employer trust or association files with the office the information required under sub.
(5); or
Ins 6.62(3)
(3) No multiple employer trust or association may solicit, advertise, or market in this state or accept an application for coverage from a person who is a resident, or who has employees who are residents, of this state unless prior to soliciting, advertising, marketing, or accepting an application it files with the office the information required under sub.
(5).
Ins 6.62(4)
(4) If subsequent to a filing under sub.
(2) or
(3) changes occur so that the information contained in the filing is no longer accurate, the multiple employer trust or association or intermediary which made the filing shall within 15 days of the date the change is effective make a filing under sub.
(5) with the correct information.
Ins 6.62(5)
(5) A multiple employer trust or association or intermediary required to file information under sub.
(2),
(3), or
(4) shall file a properly completed form prescribed by the commissioner and shall attach:
Ins 6.62(5)(a)
(a) A copy of any insurance policy or contract covering benefits or coverage offered by the multiple employer trust or association;
Ins 6.62(5)(b)
(b) A copy of the organizational documents of the multiple employer trust or association, including the articles of incorporation, bylaws or trust instrument; and
Ins 6.62(5)(c)
(c) A statement that the benefits or coverage are fully insured or a description of the extent to which they are not fully insured.
Ins 6.62(6)
(6) A violation of sub.
(2),
(3), or
(4) is an unfair and deceptive trade practice under s.
628.34 (12), Stats., constitutes a method or practice in the conduct of business which endangers the legitimate interests of customers and the public under s.
628.10 (2), Stats., and, if the multiple employer trust or association is an unauthorized insurer, establishes that the person violating the rule should have known that the multiple employer trust or association is an unauthorized insurer for the purpose of ss.
618.39 and
618.44, Stats.
Ins 6.62(7)
(7) This section is in addition to any provision of chs.
600 to
646, Stats.
Ins 6.62 Note
Note: This rule requires use of a reporting form “Multiple Employer Trust Filing" which may be obtained from the Office of the Commissioner of Insurance, 121 E. Wilson Street, P.O. Box 7873, Madison, Wisconsin, 53707-7873.
Ins 6.62 History
History: Emerg. cr. eff. 1-1-90; cr.
Register, May, 1990, No. 413, eff. 6-1-90.
Ins 6.63(1)(1)
The renewal fee to be paid biennially in a payment type prescribed by the commissioner, by each licensed individual intermediary-agent is:
Resident agent $ 35.00
Nonresident agent $ 70.00
Ins 6.63(2)
(2) Renewal fees are due on the last day of the intermediary's birth month every other year. OCI will send a renewal fee notice in a manner prescribed by the commissioner at least 60 days prior to the fee due date to each intermediary.
Ins 6.63(3)
(3) Any resident individual intermediary whose license is terminated for failing to pay renewal fees or failing to complete required continuing education or revoked for failing to pay unemployment insurance contributions or failing to pay delinquent taxes may, within 12 months from the termination or revocation date, apply to be relicensed for the same license without completing prelicensing education or passing a written examination. Resident licensees who are required to complete continuing education must have all previous requirements met. The application fee shall be as specified in s.
628.10 (5) (a), Stats. If a resident license has been terminated or revoked for more than 12 months, the intermediary shall, in order to be relicensed, satisfy the examination and licensing requirements established by s.
Ins 6.59.
Ins 6.63(4)
(4) Intermediaries with a Surplus Lines license shall pay an annual renewal fee of $100.00 on or before the assigned expiration date each year. OCI will send a renewal fee notice in a manner prescribed by the commissioner at least 60 days prior to the fee due date to each intermediary surplus lines agent at the address on file with the office of the commissioner of insurance. Any resident individual intermediary whose surplus lines license is terminated for failing to pay renewal fees or revoked for failing to pay unemployment insurance contributions or failing to pay delinquent taxes must apply to be relicensed.
Ins 6.63 History
History: Cr.
Register, December, 1977, No. 264, eff. 1-1-78; am. (1) to (3),
Register, September, 1981, No. 309, eff. 1-1-82; r. and recr. (4) to (6),
Register, October, 1981, No. 310, eff. 11-1-81; am. (1),
Register, November, 1995, No. 479, eff. 12-1-95;
CR 01-074: am. (3) to (5), r. (2),
Register January 2002 No. 553, eff. 2-1-02;
CR 05-111: r. and recr.
Register October 2006 No. 610, eff. 11-1-06;
CR 09-022: am. (1) (a), (2) and (3), r. (1) (b)
Register August 2009 No. 644, eff. 9-1-09; renumber of (1) (a) to (1) made under s.
13.92 (4) (b) 1., Stats.,
Register August 2009 No. 644;
CR 19-025: am. (2) to (4)
Register August 2020 No. 776, eff. 9-1-20.
Ins 6.66
Ins 6.66
Proper exchange of business. Ins 6.66(1)(1)
The purpose of this rule is to interpret s.
628.61, Stats., regarding the proper exchange of business between agent intermediaries.
Ins 6.66(2)
(2) Proper exchange of business means the forwarding of insurance business from one agent who cannot, after due consideration, place the business with any of the insurers for which the agent is listed because of capacity problems, the refusal of the company to accept the risk or the onerous conditions it imposes on the insured, to another agent licensed for those lines of insurance whose insurers are able to accommodate the risk under conditions more favorable to the insured. The agent forwarding the business is entitled to split the commission involved. Proper exchange of business is not the regular course of business and such forwarding of business is thereby distinguished from brokerage by its occasional and exceptional nature.
Ins 6.66(3)
(3) No agent may properly exchange business with another agent, unless:
Ins 6.66(3)(a)
(a) The agent forwarding the business to a listed agent is licensed for the lines of business that are being exchanged;
Ins 6.66(3)(b)
(b) The agent who receives the business and agrees to place it is licensed in the line or lines of insurance involved in the exchange; and
Ins 6.66(3)(c)
(c) Both the agent forwarding the business and the agent who places the business with the insurer sign the insurance application, or if no application is completed, the names of the agents involved in the transaction appear on the policy issued.
Ins 6.66(4)
(4) No agent shall accept business solicited by another intermediary-agent which he or she knows, or has reason to know, is not exchanged in compliance with the provisions of this rule.
Ins 6.66(5)(a)(a) In the absence of evidence to the contrary, an intermediary-agent shall be presumed to have exceeded the occasional exchange of business if he or she places more than 5 insurance risks per calendar year with any single insurer with which he or she is not listed as an intermediary-agent, or exchanges in total more than 25 insurance risks per calendar year.
Ins 6.66(5)(b)
(b) The burden of showing that specialty lines, non-standard and professional liability business placed through surplus lines intermediaries in accordance with s.
618.41, Stats., or written on an excess rate or other individually rated risk basis beyond the limits prescribed for other exchanges of business in par.
(a) is occasional and otherwise in compliance with this rule, shall be upon the intermediary-agent soliciting and forwarding such business.
Ins 6.66(6)
(6) The exchange of business among intermediary-agents and participation by intermediaries in risk sharing plans approved according to ch.
619, Stats., shall not be limited in any way by this section.
Ins 6.66 History
History: Cr.
Register, March, 1979, No. 279, eff. 4-1-79; am. (4) (d),
Register, May, 1979, No. 281, eff. 6-1-79; am. (1), (2) (intro.) and (3), r. (2) (a) and (4), renum. (2) (b), to (d) to be (2) (a) to (c) and am.,
Register, September, 1982, No. 321, eff. 10-1-82; renum. (1) to (3) and (7) to be (2) to (4) and (6) and am. (6), cr. (1), r. (6),
Register, August, 1988, No. 392, eff. 9-1-88.
Ins 6.67
Ins 6.67
Unfair discrimination in life and disability insurance. Ins 6.67(1)(1)
Purpose. The purpose of this rule is to identify specific acts or practices in life and disability insurance found to be unfairly discriminatory under s.
628.34 (3) (b), Stats.
Ins 6.67 Note
Note: The need for a rule has arisen because of questions as to whether life and disability insurers are in all cases fairly “charging different premiums or offering different terms of coverage except on the basis of classifications related to the nature and degree of the risk covered." (s.
628.34 (3), Stats.) The main purpose of the rule is to make clear that life and disability insurers cannot classify individuals arbitrarily—without a rational basis for each decision.
Ins 6.67(2)
(2) Applicability and scope. This rule shall apply to all life and disability insurance policies delivered or issued for delivery in Wisconsin on or after January 1, 1980 and to all existing life and disability group, blanket and franchise insurance policies subject to Wisconsin insurance law which are amended or renewed on or after January 1, 1980.
Ins 6.67(2m)(b)
(b) “Territorial classification" means an arrangement of persons into categories based upon geographic characteristics other than zip code.
Ins 6.67(3)
(3) Specific examples. The following are specific examples of unfair discrimination under s.
628.34 (3) (b), Stats.
Ins 6.67(3)(a)
(a) Refusing to insure, or refusing to continue to insure, or limiting the amount, extent or kind of coverage available to an individual or charging a different rate for the same coverage solely because of physical or mental impairment, other than blindness or partial blindness, except where the refusal, limitation or rate differential is based on sound actuarial principles or is related to actual or reasonably anticipated experience.
Ins 6.67(3)(b)
(b) Except as provided in subds.
1. and
2., refusing to insure, or refusing to continue to insure, or limiting the amount, extent or kind of coverage available to an individual, or charging an individual a different rate for the same coverage solely because of blindness or partial blindness.
Ins 6.67(3)(b)1.
1. Individuals who are blind or partially blind may be subject to standards based on sound actuarial principles or actual or reasonably anticipated experience with respect to any other condition they may have, including a condition which is the cause of the blindness or partial blindness.
Ins 6.67(3)(b)2.
2. Refusal to insure under sub.
(3) includes a denial of disability insurance on the basis that the policy presumes disability if the insured loses his or her eyesight. However, an insurer may exclude from coverage, or apply a waiting period, to coverage of treatment of blindness or partial blindness if that condition exists at the time the policy is issued.
Ins 6.67(4)
(4) Insurer responsibility. An insurer has the burden of proof to show that an act, standard or practice of the insurer is based on sound actuarial principles or is related to actual or reasonably anticipated experience in any action to enforce s.
628.34 (3) (b), Stats. For the anticipated experience to be reasonable it must be based on medical or actuarial research on morbidity or mortality.
Ins 6.67(5)(a)
(a) An insurer may not use sexual orientation in the underwriting process or in the determination of insurability, premium, terms of coverage, or nonrenewal.
Ins 6.67(5)(b)
(b) No insurer may include any inquiry about the applicant's or insured's sexual orientation in an application for disability or life insurance coverage or directly or indirectly investigate in connection with an application for disability or life insurance coverage the applicant's or insured's sexual orientation.
Ins 6.67(5)(c)
(c) No insurer may use the marital status, occupation, gender, medical history, beneficiary designation, or the zip code or territorial classification of an applicant or insured or any other factor to establish, or aid in establishing, the applicant's or insured's sexual orientation.
Ins 6.67 History
History: Cr.
Register, December, 1979, No. 288, eff. 1-1-80; r. (4) under s. 13.93 (2m) (b) 16., Stats.,
Register, December, 1984, No. 348; am. (1), r. and recr. (3), cr. (4),
Register, April, 1987, No. 376, eff. 5-1-87; correction in (2), (3) (b) 2. and (4) made under s. 13.93 (2m) (b) 14., 12. and 1., Stats.,
Register, April, 1987, No. 376; cr. (5),
Register, May, 1987, No. 377, eff. 6-1-87.
Ins 6.68
Ins 6.68
Unfair discrimination based on geographic location or age of risk. Ins 6.68(1)(1)
Purpose. The purpose of this rule is to identify specific acts or practices found to be unfair trade practices that are unfairly discriminatory under s.
628.34, Stats.
Ins 6.68(2)
(2) Applicability and scope. This rule shall apply to property and casualty insurance contracts delivered or issued for delivery in Wisconsin on or after the effective date of the rule.
Ins 6.68(3)
(3) Specific examples of unfair trade practices under s. 628.34, Stats. The following are hereby identified as specific acts or practices which are unfairly discriminatory.
Ins 6.68(3)(a)
(a) Making or permitting any unfair discrimination between individuals or risks of the same class and of essentially the same hazards by refusing to issue, refusing to renew, cancelling or limiting the amount of insurance coverage on a property or casualty risk because of the geographic location of the risk, unless:
Ins 6.68(3)(a)1.
1. The refusal, cancellation or limitation is for a business purpose which is not a mere pretext for unfair discrimination, or
Ins 6.68(3)(a)2.
2. The refusal, cancellation or limitation is required by law or regulatory mandate.
Ins 6.68 Note
Note: Paragraph (a) is intended to prohibit insurance underwriting shortcuts which unfairly label risks as poor risks because of their geographic location. A refusal, nonrenewal, cancellation or limitation of insurance coverage is prohibited if the reason for such refusal, nonrenewal, cancellation or limitation is the geographic location of the risk. An exception to this general rule is provided, however, in situations where the refusal, nonrenewal, cancellation or limitation is based upon a legitimate business need and the refusal, nonrenewal, cancellation or limitation is not a mere pretext for unfair discrimination. Examples of such situations include refusals to insure when the risk is located in areas prone to natural catastrophes, i.e., earthquakes, floods, hurricanes, and refusals to insure because the insurer already has a very high concentration of risks in a particular geographic area. It is intended that the person charged with a violation of this rule be given the burden of proof in establishing any “business purpose" exception. The burden of proving that a refusal, nonrenewal, cancellation or limitation of insurance coverage is not subterfuge for unfair discrimination should likewise fall upon the person charged with a violation of this rule.
Ins 6.68(3)(b)
(b) Making or permitting any unfair discrimination between individuals or risks of the same class and of essentially the same hazards by refusing to issue, refusing to renew, cancelling or limiting the amount of insurance coverage on a residential property risk of 4 units or less, or the personal property contained therein, because of the age of the residential property, unless:
Ins 6.68(3)(b)1.
1. The refusal, cancellation or limitation is for a business purpose which is not a mere pretext for unfair discrimination, or
Ins 6.68(3)(b)2.
2. The refusal, cancellation or limitation is required by law or regulatory mandate.
Ins 6.68(3)(c)
(c) Refusing to insure a risk solely because the applicant was previously denied coverage, terminated by another insurer or had obtained coverage in a residual market.
Ins 6.68 History
History: Cr.
Register, September, 1979, No. 285, eff. 10-1-79; r. (4) under s. 13.93 (2m) (b) 16., Stats.,
Register, December, 1984, No. 348.
Ins 6.70
Ins 6.70
Combinations of lines and classes of insurance. This rule defines and delimits the permissible combinations of the lines and classes of insurance defined and delimited by s.
Ins 6.75 which may be written in the same policy. Except as provided in this rule, lines and classes of insurance may not be combined in the same policy.
Ins 6.70(1)
(1) Combination with separate premium charges. Subject to s.
Ins 2.05, any combination of the lines and classes of insurance defined and delimited by s.
Ins 6.75, except for those described in s.
Ins 6.75 (2) (h),
(i) and
(k), may be written in the same policy if a statement of separate premium charge is shown on the declarations page or on the face of the policy or in a separate written statement furnished to the policyholder. The requirement for a statement of separate premium charge does not prohibit such charges equitably reflecting differences in expected losses or expenses as contemplated by s.
625.11 (4), Stats.
Ins 6.70(2)
(2) Combination with or without separate premium charges. Any combination of the lines and classes of insurance defined and delimited by s.
Ins 6.75 (2) (a),
(b),
(d),
(e),
(f) and
(j) may be written in the same policy with or without showing separate premium charges.
Ins 6.70 History
History: Emerg. cr. eff. 6-22-76; cr.
Register, September, 1976, No. 249, eff. 10-1-76; r. and recr.
Register, August, 1977, No. 260, eff. 9-1-77.
Ins 6.72(1)(1)
Except as otherwise provided by law or by order of the commissioner, no single risk assumed by any insurance company shall exceed 10% of surplus as regards policyholders, except that in an assessable mutual company it may be a greater amount not exceeding 3 times the average policy or
1/
4 of 1% of the insurance in force, whichever is the greater. Upon the business mentioned in s.
Ins 6.75 (2) (h), the maximum single risk may be a greater amount not exceeding 50% of the admitted assets. Any reinsurance taking effect simultaneously with the policy shall be deducted from the original risk assumed in determining compliance with this subsection.
Ins 6.72(2)
(2) In a mutual company organized for the insurance or guaranty of depositors or deposits in banks or trust companies, the maximum single risk may be fixed at a higher amount by the bylaws. Any such company may effect reinsurance in any authorized or unauthorized company that complies with s.
627.23, Stats. Insurance in any unauthorized company shall be reported annually and the same taxes paid upon the premiums as are paid by authorized companies.
Ins 6.72 History
History: Emerg. cr. eff. 6-22-76; cr.
Register, September, 1976, No. 249, eff. 10-1-76; r. and recr.
Register, August, 1981, No. 308, eff. 9-1-81; am. (1),
Register, January, 1992, No. 433, eff. 2-1-92.
Ins 6.74
Ins 6.74
Suretyship and risk limitations of surety obligations. Ins 6.74(1)(1)
Purpose. The purpose of this rule is to establish minimum requirements for the transaction of surety obligations.
Ins 6.74(2)
(2) Scope. This rule shall apply to the limitations on bond penal amounts imposed on insurers engaged in the business of suretyship. This section shall not apply to insurers issuing only that type of surety insurance known as municipal bond insurance.
Ins 6.74(3)(a)
(a) For purposes of this rule suretyship shall be construed to be insurance.
Ins 6.74(3)(b)
(b) An insurance corporation authorized to write fidelity insurance may guarantee the fidelity of, or become the surety for:
Ins 6.74(3)(b)1.1. persons holding positions of public or private trust; 2. the performance of any act, duty or obligation or the refraining from any act; 3. the performance of any contract; 4. bonds of insurance companies required by law as a condition of transacting business; 5. indemnifying banks, brokers and other financial or moneyed associations or corporations, against the loss of documents and money, except against loss caused by marine risks or risks of transportation or navigation; 6. indemnifying any federal land bank against loss by reason of defective title to or incumbrances on real property on which such bank may have a mortgage.
Ins 6.74(3)(c)
(c) As used in this rule any one surety risk shall be equivalent to the penal amount established on the surety bond.
Ins 6.74(4)
(4) Risk limitations on surety obligations. Ins 6.74(4)(a)(a) No corporation shall execute any suretyship obligation or expose itself to any loss on any one surety bond in an amount in excess of one-tenth of its capital and surplus as reported in its most recent filed annual statement, unless it shall be protected in the excess of that amount:
Ins 6.74(4)(a)1.
1. By reinsurance in a corporation licensed to transact surety business where the risk is located; or
Ins 6.74(4)(a)2.
2. By the cosuretyship of a surety corporation likewise licensed.
Ins 6.74(4)(b)
(b) A surety corporation may execute transportation or warehousing bonds for the United States internal revenue taxes to an amount equal to 5 times the underwriting limitation specified in par.
(a) of this rule.
Ins 6.74(4)(c)
(c) No corporation writing surety shall guarantee the deposits of any single financial institution in an aggregate amount in excess of the underwriting limitation set forth in par.
(a) unless it shall be protected in excess of that amount by reinsurance or cosuretyship as specified in par.
(a).
