Wisconsin Legislature: ATCP 50.46(5)(a)1.

(d) Notwithstanding par. (c), a well driller or pump installer registered under s. 280.15, Stats., may certify a well construction or decommissioning under this subsection and an architect registered under ch. 443, Stats., may certify a roof under this subsection.

(2) Conservation engineering practices. For purposes of this section, a conservation engineering practice includes any of those practices identified in subch. VIII, authorized by the department under s. ATCP 50.40 (3), allowed under s. 281.65, Stats., or approved and published, as part of the NRCS field office technical guide or as a formal technical standard by the DNR.

Note: The DNR publishes its technical standards on its website at, for example: http://dnr.wi.gov/topic/stormwater/standards/index.html.

(2m) State soil and water conservation engineer. The department may designate an employee as the state soil and water conservation engineer. The designated person shall be a professional engineer registered under ch. 443, Stats., and demonstrate sufficient training and experience to carry out the functions of the position. The state soil and water conservation engineer shall do all of the following:

(a) Oversee the work of the field engineers who are responsible for certifying conservation engineering practitioners under this section.

(b) Conduct engineering activities requiring job approval authority ratings higher than those authorized under this section including job class ratings of V and above.

(3) Conservation engineering practitioner; initial certification and recertification.

(a) A person who wishes to be certified as a conservation engineering practitioner shall apply to the department or a county land conservation committee. The department or the county land conservation committee shall promptly refer the application to the department’s designated field engineer. The field engineer shall evaluate the applicant and issue a decision granting or denying the request.

(b) Applicants for certification shall apply on a form provided by the department. The application form shall include all of the following:

1. The name and affiliation of the person applying for certification, and the name and affiliation of each DATCP, NRCS, or other agency personnel authorized to grant certification to the applicant.

2. The practices for which certification may be granted, including specific practice types and applicable references to the NRCS technical guide and other formal technical standards authorized under this section.

3. The controlling factor used to distinguish different classes of certification within each practice, and the specific application of the factor to the 5 levels for which certification can be obtained.

4. A maximum certification rating level in the 3 areas of competency for each practice that the applicant is qualified to perform, as specified in sub. (5).

5. Any other information the department determines to be reasonably necessary for certification purposes including certification for practice standards approved by entities other than NRCS.

Note: A person may obtain a certification form by visiting the department website at: https://datcp.wi.gov/Pages/Programs_Services/ATCP50.aspx, or by writing to the following address:

Wisconsin Department of Agriculture, Trade and Consumer Protection

Division of Agricultural Resource Management

P.O. Box 8911

Madison, WI 53708-8911

(c) Certifications issued under this section are for a term of three years and automatically renew unless any of the following occur:

1. The practitioner is not employed by an entity with a supervisor who is authorized to sign the certification.

2. The practitioner fails to meet the education requirements.

3. The practitioner has failed to provide or update information required for certification under par. (b).

4. The practitioner has rescinded the signature on the certification or otherwise indicates an intent to surrender the certification.

(4) Evaluating applicants for certification.

(a) To evaluate an applicant under sub. (3), the department’s field engineer shall complete a department certification form. The field engineer shall rate the applicant under sub. (5) based on the applicant’s demonstrated knowledge, training, experience, and record of appropriately seeking assistance. Evaluations shall be fair and consistent.

(b) To evaluate an applicant, the department’s field engineer may conduct interviews, perform inspections, and require answers and documentation from the applicant. The field engineer may ask engineering staff from NRCS to help evaluate an applicant.

(5) Certification rating.

(a) For each type of agricultural or other conservation engineering practice identified in the required certification form, the department’s field engineer shall identify the most complex of the 5 job classes in the practice for which the applicant is authorized to do each of the following:

1. Conduct planning activities, including site inventory and evaluation functions to define alternative engineering solutions.

2. Certify that design specifications for jobs in that class comply with those identified in subch. VIII, authorized by the department under s. ATCP 50.40 (3), allowed by s. 281.65, Stats., or approved and published, as part of the NRCS field office technical guide or as a formal technical standard by the DNR.

3. Certify that jobs in that class have been installed according to the approved design, and according to any applicable standards and specifications.

(c) In cases where department field engineers may be required to provide a job certification approval level at a level higher than their own, they should consult with a person who has appropriate certification levels in the areas being rated. A person who is certified at a job level under par. (a) may certify their own work at that level for any purpose including funding authorized under this chapter.

(6) Certification decision.

(a) The department’s field engineer shall act on a certification application under sub. (3) within 30 days after the field engineer receives that application, provided that the applicant promptly submits relevant information and documentation requested by the field engineer.

Note: When recertifying an applicant who was previously certified by the department or NRCS, the department’s field engineer may raise one or more rating levels, lower one or more rating levels, or reaffirm one or more rating levels.

(b) Whenever the department’s field engineer certifies a conservation engineering practitioner, the field engineer shall issue a written certification on the department’s certification form. The certification becomes effective when signed by all of the following:

1. The field engineer.

2. The practitioner certified.

3. The practitioner’s supervisor if any.

(c) Whenever the department’s field engineer denies a request under sub. (3) for a specific certification rating, the field engineer shall issue the denial in writing and shall specify the reasons for the denial.

(d) The department’s field engineer shall retain a copy of each certification under par. (b), each denial under par. (c), and any other documentation received or compiled in connection with an application under sub. (3).

(7) Reviewing certification ratings.

(a) A department field engineer shall review each certification rating under sub. (5) at least once every 3 years, and may review a rating at any time. A field engineer shall review a rating whenever a certified conservation engineering practitioner requests that review.

(b) Based on a review under par. (a), a department field engineer shall issue a new certification rating which reaffirms or modifies the prior rating under sub. (5). The field engineer shall provide a copy of each new rating to the person rated. The field engineer may not reduce a rating except for good cause.

(c) A field engineer shall document, in writing, the field engineer’s reasons for reducing a certification rating under sub. (5), or for refusing to make a requested rating change. The field engineer shall provide that documentation to the person rated, and to that person’s supervisor if any.

(8) Appeals.

(a) An affected person may appeal a field engineer’s action under sub. (5), (6) or (7). The affected person shall file that person’s appeal in writing, with the field engineer, within 10 business days after the applicant receives notice of the field engineer’s action. The appeal shall identify the specific matters in dispute and the specific basis for the appeal.

(b) Within 15 business days after the department’s field engineer receives an appeal under par. (a), the field engineer shall hold an informal meeting with the appellant. The meeting may include a representative of the county land conservation committee. The field engineer may hold the informal meeting in person or by telephone.

(c) If an appeal cannot be resolved after an informal meeting under par. (b), the field engineer shall forward the appeal to a department reviewer designated by the administrator of the department’s agricultural resource management division. The reviewer shall hold an informal hearing on the appeal within 10 business days after the reviewer receives the appeal, unless the applicant agrees to a later date for the informal hearing. The reviewer shall hold the informal hearing by telephone or at a location determined by the reviewer. Within 10 business days after the conclusion of the informal hearing, the reviewer shall issue a written decision which affirms, reverses, or modifies the field engineer’s action. The reviewer shall provide a copy of the reviewer’s written decision to the applicant. The decision shall include a notice of the applicant’s right to request a contested case hearing under par. (d).

(d) If an applicant disputes the reviewer’s decision under par. (c), the applicant may file a request with the department under s. 227.42, Stats., for a contested case hearing under ch. 227, Stats., and ch. ATCP 1.

(9) Suspending or revoking certification.

(a) The department may, for cause, suspend or revoke a certification under this section. The department may summarily suspend a certification, without prior notice or hearing, if the department makes a written finding that the summary suspension is necessary to prevent an imminent threat to the public health, safety, or welfare.

(b) An order suspending or revoking a certification shall be signed by the secretary or the secretary’s designee. Proceedings to suspend or revoke a certificate shall be conducted according to ch. 227, Stats., and ch. ATCP 1.

Note: See ss. 92.18 (6) and 93.06 (7), Stats.

1. Any land conservation committee, state agency, or federal agency that employs the individual whose certification is suspended or revoked.

2. State and federal agencies that provide cost-share funds for conservation engineering practices.

(d) The reduction of a certification rating under sub. (7) does not constitute a suspension or revocation under this subsection.

(10) Certification guidelines. The department may publish guidelines for the certification of conservation engineering practitioners under this section. The guidelines may include suggested or required courses, training activities, and types of knowledge and experience that may help applicants qualify for certification at specified rating levels, or be required in order to retain certification at certain rating levels.

(11) Signature and date required; approvals.

(a) Whenever a person certified under this section approves or submits for approval any document related to the design or construction of a conservation engineering practice under sub. (2), that person shall sign and date that document.

(b) Any engineered practice designed by a person certified under this section shall include project documentation establishing that the practice was designed according to applicable standards, and that the design was reviewed and approved for compliance with those standards. Any person approving a design shall have job approval authority at the level required by the engineered practice. For practices requiring a job class authority of III or higher, at least one person other than the practice designer shall review and sign the design as being checked before the design can be approved. For practices requiring job class authority of I or II, the person preparing the design may also review and approve the design.

(12) Scope of certification. No certified conservation engineering practitioner may, for any purpose, including funding under this chapter or s. 281.65, Stats., certify any matter under sub. (5) (a) in a job class more complex than that for which the practitioner is authorized under sub. (5) (a). In the event a practitioner exceeds the authority authorized for certifying conservation practices, the department shall review the matter and may take action under sub. (7) or (9).

History: CR 01-090: cr. Register September 2002 No. 561, eff. 10-1-02; CR 08-075: r. and recr. (2) Register April 2009 No. 640, eff. 5-1-09; CR 13-016: am. (title), r. and recr. (1), (2), cr. (2m), am. (3) (title), renum. (3) to (a) and am., cr. (3) (b), am. (4) (a), (5) (a) (intro.), renum. (5) (a) 1. and 2. to (5) (a) 2. to 3. and am., cr. (5) (a) 1., am. (6) (b), (7) (a), (9) (c) 2., (10), (11) (title), renum. (11) to (11) (a) and am., cr. (11) (b), am. (12) Register February 2014 No. 698, eff. 5-1-14; CR 16-083: am. (3) (title), cr. (3) (c) Register January 2018 No. 745, eff. 2-1-18; CR 23-024: am. (1) (d), (2), (5) (a) 2., r. (5) (b), cr. (5) (c), am. (7) (c), (8) (a), (c), (9) (c) 1., (11) (b) Register May 2024 No. 821, eff. 6-1-24.

ATCP 50.48 Nutrient management planners.

(1) Qualifications. To be qualified under ss. 281.65, 281.66, Stats., and this chapter, a nutrient management planner shall be knowledgeable and competent in all of the following areas:

(a) Compliance with the NRCS conservation practice standard 590.

(b) Soil testing.

(d) Crediting manure, residual legume nitrogen, and other nutrient sources on a field-by-field basis.

(e) Using conservation plans.

(f) Relevant laws related to nutrient management.

(g) Preparing nutrient management plans according to s. ATCP 50.04 (3).

(2) Planners presumptively qualified. An individual is considered a qualified nutrient planner under sub. (1), without any action by the department, if all of the following apply:

(a) The individual is at least one of the following:

1. Recognized as a certified professional crop consultant by the national alliance of independent crop consultants.

2. Recognized as a certified crop adviser or professional agronomist by the American society of agronomy, Wisconsin certified crop advisers board.

3. Registered as a soil scientist by the soil science society of America.

4. The holder of other credentials that the department deems equivalent to those specified under subds. 1. to 3. A landowner is presumptively qualified to prepare a nutrient management plan for that landowner’s farm, but not for others, if the landowner completes a department-approved training course that results in a nutrient management plan in compliance with s. ATCP 50.04 (3) and the course instructor approves the landowner’s first annual plan. The landowner shall complete a department-approved training course at least once every 4 years to maintain that landowner’s presumptive qualification. The course instructor is not required to hold credentials listed in subds. 1. to 3., but the instructor must be knowledgeable and competent in accordance with sub. (1).

(b) The nutrient management planner complies with sub. (3).

Note: The department does not affirmatively certify nutrient management planners. A nutrient management planner who meets all of the requirements under sub. (2) may represent privately or publicly as a qualified nutrient planner, without any certificate from the department. A person qualified only to prepare that person’s own nutrient management plan under sub. (2) (a) 4. may not misrepresent that the person is qualified to prepare nutrient management plans for others.

(3) Nutrient management plans.

(a) A qualified nutrient management planner shall prepare nutrient management plans according to s. ATCP 50.04 (3).

(b) A qualified nutrient management planner may not approve a nutrient management plan that fails to comply with s. ATCP 50.04 (3).

(4) Disqualification. The department may issue a written notice to an individual, declaring that the individual is not a qualified nutrient management planner under this section. The notice shall specify the basis for the department’s declaration. The department may disqualify a nutrient management planner if the planner violates or fails to provide reasonable documentation of compliance with sub. (3) or lacks qualifications required under sub. (1). A person who is named in a disqualification notice under this subsection may request a contested case hearing under s. 227.42, Stats., and ch. ATCP 1.

(5) Misrepresenting qualification. No person may do any of the following, directly or by implication:

(a) Misrepresent that an individual is a qualified nutrient management planner under this section.