A member political subdivision for which joinder into an RTA is optional may withdraw from an RTA if the governing body of the political subdivision adopts a resolution requesting withdrawal from the RTA and the political subdivision has paid, or made provision for the payment of, all obligations of the political subdivision to the RTA. A member of the SE RTA that must become a member as a result of the membership of the county in which the municipality is located must withdraw from the SE RTA if the county in which the municipality is located withdraws from the SE RTA.
Current law provides limited immunity for cities, villages, towns, counties, and other political corporations and governmental subdivisions, and for officers, officials, agents, and employees of these entities, for acts done in an official capacity or in the course of employment. Claimants must generally follow a specified claims procedure, and liability for damages is generally limited to $50,000, except that no liability may be imposed for performance of a discretionary duty or for punitive damages. If a person suffers damage resulting from the negligent operation of a motor vehicle owned and operated by a county, city, village, town, school district, sewer district, or other political subdivision of the state in the course of its business, the person may file a claim for damages following this claims procedure, and the amount of damages recoverable is limited to $250,000. The bill specifies that this provision related to claims and liability for negligent operation of a motor vehicle by a political subdivision applies to an RTA.
The bill also allows RTAs to participate in organizing municipal insurance mutuals to provide insurance and risk management services.
Professional baseball park districts
Under current law, a professional baseball park district is created in each county with a population of at least 600,000 (presently, only Milwaukee County) and all counties that are contiguous to that county (in relation to Milwaukee County, these counties are Ozaukee County, Racine County, Washington County, and Waukesha County). A district has a variety of powers. Among these, a district may acquire, construct, equip, maintain, improve, operate, and manage baseball park facilities and may set standards governing the use of, and the conduct within, baseball park facilities. A district is authorized to impose a sales tax and a use tax at a rate of no more than 0.1 percent. Also, a district may issue bonds for the purpose of purchasing, acquiring, leasing, constructing, extending, adding to, improving, conducting, controlling, operating, or managing baseball park facilities. Bonds issued by the district must be secured only by the district’s interest in any baseball park facilities, by income from these facilities, and by the sales tax and use tax that the district is authorized to levy. The district may not collect sales taxes after the calendar quarter in which the district certifies to DOR that the district has retired all of its bonds. The sales tax ended on March 31, 2020. The district continues to have outstanding bonds, but these bonds are fully defeased.
The bill eliminates a district’s authority to impose a sales tax as of April 30, 2024. The bill also requires the district to establish a facilities enhancement fund into which it must deposit certain grant payments received from DOA. Moneys from this fund may be used only for purposes related to the development, construction, improvement, repair, and maintenance of baseball park facilities, and specifically may not be used for the securitization or retirement of bonds.
The bill also does the following:
1. Authorizes a district to acquire and manage property related to “baseball park development,” which is defined as “property, other than baseball park facilities, tangible or intangible, operated by a professional baseball team on real estate leased or subleased from a district that is part of the operations of the professional baseball team for any legally permissible use, including retail facilities, hospitality facilities, commercial and residential facilities, health care facilities, and any other functionally related or auxiliary facilities or structures.”
2. Defines what constitutes a “professional baseball team” and limits the establishment of new professional baseball park districts to counties with populations over 600,000 that are the site of baseball park facilities that are home to a professional baseball team.
3. Alters the district termination procedure. Currently, if a district is terminated, the property of the district is transferred to the counties within the jurisdiction of the district. Under the bill, upon termination all district property is transferred to the state. The state then apportions the properties to the constituent counties and the state based on a statutory formula.
Local government civil service system and grievance procedure requirements
The bill modifies the requirements for any grievance system established by local governmental units, including adding a requirement for any civil service system or grievance procedure to include a just cause standard of review for employee terminations. Under current law, a local governmental unit that did not have a civil service system before June 29, 2011, must have established a grievance system. In order to comply with the requirement to have established a grievance system, a local governmental unit may establish either 1) a civil service system under any provision authorized by law, to the greatest extent practicable, if no specific provision for creation of a civil service system applies to the governmental unit or 2) a grievance procedure as set forth in the statutes. Current law requires that any civil service system established or grievance procedure created must contain a grievance procedure that addresses employee terminations, employee discipline, and workplace safety. The bill does not eliminate the requirement for these provisions but instead adds a requirement for a provision relating to a just cause standard of review for employee terminations, including a refusal to renew a teaching contract.
Current law also requires that if a local governmental unit creates a grievance procedure, the procedure must contain certain elements, including a written document specifying the process that a grievant and an employer must follow; a hearing before an impartial hearing officer; and an appeal process in which the highest level of appeal is the governing body of the local governmental unit. The bill provides that the hearing officer must be from the Wisconsin Employment Relations Commission and adds the following two required elements in the grievance procedure: 1) a provision indicating the grievant is entitled to representation throughout the grievance process and 2) a provision indicating that the employer must bear all fees and costs related to the grievance process, except the grievant’s representational fees and costs.
Employment regulations
The bill repeals the preemptions of local governments from enacting or enforcing ordinances related to the following:
1. Regulations related to wage claims and collections.
2. Regulation of employee hours and overtime, including scheduling of employee work hours or shifts.
3. The employment benefits an employer may be required to provide to its employees.
4. An employer’s right to solicit information regarding the salary history of prospective employees.
5. Regulations related to minimum wage.
6. Occupational licensing requirements that are more stringent than a state requirement.
The bill also repeals the following:
1. The prohibition of the state and local governments from requiring any person to waive the person’s rights under state or federal labor laws as a condition of any approval by the state or local government.
2. A provision under which neither the state nor a local government may enact a statute or ordinance, adopt a policy or regulation, or impose a contract, zoning, permitting, or licensing requirement, or any other condition, that would require any person to accept any provision that is a subject of collective bargaining under state labor laws or the federal National Labor Relations Act.
Project labor agreements
Under current law, the state and local units of government are prohibited from engaging in certain practices in letting bids for state procurement or public works contracts. Among these prohibitions, as established by 2017 Wisconsin Act 3, the state and local governments may not do any of the following in specifications for bids for the contracts: 1) require that a bidder enter into an agreement with a labor organization; 2) consider, when awarding a contract, whether a bidder has or has not entered into an agreement with a labor organization; or 3) require that a bidder enter into an agreement that requires that the bidder or bidder’s employees become or remain members of a labor organization or pay any dues or fees to a labor organization. The bill repeals these limitations related to labor organizations. Nonmetallic quarry hours of operation
The bill prohibits a political subdivision from limiting the times that activities related to extracting or processing minerals at a quarry occur if the minerals will be used in a public works project that requires nighttime construction or an emergency repair.
Exception to law enforcement officer citizenship requirement
Under current law, no person may be appointed as a deputy sheriff of any county or police officer of any city, village, or town unless that person is a citizen of the United States. The bill allows the sheriff of a county or the appointing authority of a local law enforcement agency to elect to authorize the appointment of noncitizens who are in receipt of valid employment authorization from the federal Department of Homeland Security as deputy sheriffs or police officers. The bill also prevents the Law Enforcement Standards Board from preventing such a noncitizen from participating in a law enforcement preparatory training program.
Premier resort area exceptions
The bill allows the city of Prescott and the village of Pepin to become premier resort areas notwithstanding the fact that they do not meet the generally applicable requirement that at least 40 percent of the equalized assessed value of the taxable property within a political subdivision be used by tourism-related retailers (the 40-percent requirement). “Tourism-related retailers” is defined to include certain retailers who are classified in the Standard Industrial Classification Manual that is published by the U.S. Office of Management and Budget. The statutory definition lists 21 types of retailers, including variety stores, dairy product stores, gasoline service stations, eating places, drinking places, and hotels and motels.
Currently, a number of cities and villages are authorized to enact an ordinance or adopt a resolution to become a premier resort area notwithstanding the fact that none of these cities or villages meet the 40 percent requirement. As is the case with the villages of Sister Bay, Ephraim, and Stockholm, and the city of Rhinelander, the premier resort area tax may not take effect in Prescott or Pepin unless it is approved in a referendum of the voters.
A premier resort area may impose a tax at a rate of 0.5 percent of the gross receipts from the sale, lease, or rental of goods or services that are subject to the general sales and use tax and are sold by tourism-related retailers. The proceeds of the tax may be used only to pay for infrastructure expenses within the jurisdiction of the premier resort area. The definition of “infrastructure expenses” includes the costs of purchasing, constructing, or improving parking lots; transportation facilities, including roads and bridges; sewer and water facilities; recreational facilities; exposition center facilities; fire fighting equipment; and police vehicles.
MARIJUANA LEGALIZATION AND REGULATION
General; marijuana legalization and regulation
Under the bill, a person who is at least 21 years old may legally possess marijuana. A person who is at least 18 may possess marijuana if the person has certain medical conditions. Under the bill, a person may produce, process, or sell marijuana if the person has a permit. The bill creates an excise tax for the privilege of producing, processing, distributing, or selling marijuana in this state, and all of the revenue collected from the tax is deposited into a segregated fund called the “community reinvestment fund.” Under the bill, a person who may possess medical marijuana is not subject to sales or excise taxes on the purchase or use of the marijuana. The bill does not affect federal law, which generally prohibits persons from manufacturing, delivering, or possessing marijuana and applies to both intrastate and interstate violations.
Legalizing the possession of marijuana
Current law prohibits a person from manufacturing, distributing, or delivering marijuana; possessing marijuana with the intent to manufacture, distribute, or deliver it; possessing or attempting to possess marijuana; using drug paraphernalia; or possessing drug paraphernalia with the intent to produce, distribute, or use a controlled substance. The bill changes state law to allow a resident of this state who is at least 21 to possess no more than two ounces of marijuana and to allow a nonresident of this state who is at least 21 to possess no more than one-quarter ounce of marijuana. The bill also allows a qualifying patient to possess marijuana for medical purposes. Under the bill, generally, a qualifying patient is an individual who has been diagnosed by a physician as having or undergoing a debilitating medical condition or treatment and who is at least 18 years old. The bill also eliminates the prohibition on possessing or using drug paraphernalia that relates to marijuana consumption.
Under the bill, a person who possesses more marijuana than the maximum amount the person is allowed is subject to a penalty, which varies depending on the amount of overage. A person who exceeds the amount by not more than one ounce is subject to a civil forfeiture not to exceed $1,000. A person who exceeds the maximum amount by more than one ounce is guilty of a misdemeanor and subject to a fine of not more than $1,000 or imprisonment not to exceed 90 days or both. The person is guilty of a Class I felony if the person also takes action to hide the amount of marijuana he or she has and has in place a security system to alert him or her to the presence of law enforcement or a method to intimidate, or a system that could injure or kill, a person approaching the area containing the marijuana.
Regulating the production, processing, and sale of marijuana
Under the bill, no person may sell, distribute, or transfer marijuana unless the person has a permit from DOR. A person who violates this prohibition is guilty of a Class I felony if the intended recipient is an adult and is guilty of a Class H felony if the intended recipient is a minor and the person is at least three years older than the minor.
The bill requires a person to obtain separate permits from DOR to produce, process, distribute, or sell marijuana, and requires marijuana producers and processors to obtain additional permits from DATCP. The requirements for obtaining these permits differ based on whether the permit is issued by DOR or DATCP but, in general, a person may not obtain such a permit if he or she is not a resident of this state, is under the age of 21, or has been convicted of certain crimes or committed certain offenses. In addition, a person may not operate under a DOR or DATCP permit within 500 feet of a school, playground, recreation facility, child care facility, public park, public transit facility, or library. A person who holds a permit from DOR must also comply with certain operational requirements.
Under the bill, a permit applicant with 20 or more employees may not receive a permit from DATCP or DOR unless the the applicant certifies that the applicant has entered into a labor peace agreement with a labor organization. The labor peace agreement prohibits the labor organization and its members from engaging in any economic interference with persons doing business in this state, prohibits the applicant from disrupting the efforts of the labor organization to communicate with and to organize and represent the applicant’s employees, and provides the labor organization access to areas in which the employees work to discuss employment rights and the terms and conditions of employment. Current law prohibits the state and any local unit of government from requiring a labor peace agreement as a condition for any regulatory approval. The permit requirements under the bill are not subject to that prohibition.
The bill also requires DATCP and DOR to use a competitive scoring system to determine which applicants are eligible to receive permits. Each department must issue permits to the highest scoring applicants that it determines will best protect the environment; provide stable, family-supporting jobs to local residents; ensure worker and consumer safety; operate secure facilities; and uphold the laws of the jurisdictions in which they operate. Each department may deny a permit to an applicant with a low score.
The bill prohibits a DOR permittee from selling, distributing, or transferring marijuana to a person who is under the age of 21 (a minor) and from allowing a minor to be on premises for which a permit is issued. If a permittee violates one of those prohibitions, the permittee may be subject to a civil forfeiture of not more than $500 and the permit may be suspended for up to 30 days.
Under the bill, a minor who does any of the following is subject to a forfeiture of not less than $250 nor more than $500: procures or attempts to procure marijuana from a permittee; falsely represents his or her age to receive marijuana from a permittee; knowingly possesses marijuana; or knowingly enters any premises for which a permit has been issued without being accompanied by his or her parent, guardian, or spouse who is at least 21 years of age or at least 18 years of age if a qualifying patient.
Under the bill, an individual may cultivate as many as six marijuana plants. Only a person who has a permit from DATCP may produce or process more marijuana plants. A person without a permit who possesses more than six but not more than 12 marijuana plants that have reached the flowering stage is subject to a civil forfeiture not to exceed twice the permitting fee ($250 under the bill). If the person possesses more than 12 plants that have reached the flowering stage, the person is guilty of a misdemeanor and subject to a fine not to exceed $1,000 or imprisonment not to exceed 90 days or both. The person is guilty of a Class I felony if the person also takes action to hide the number of plants he or she has and the person also has in place a security system to alert him or her to the presence of law enforcement or a method to intimidate, or a system that could injure or kill, a person approaching the area containing the plants.
The bill requires DOR to create and maintain a medical marijuana registry program whereby a person who is a qualifying patient may obtain a registry identification card and purchase marijuana from a retail establishment without having to pay the sales or excise taxes imposed on that sale. A qualifying patient is a person who is at least 18 and has been diagnosed by a physician as having a debilitating medical condition such as cancer, glaucoma, AIDS, or another specified condition or is undergoing a debilitating medical treatment.
Previous convictions relating to marijuana
The bill creates a process to review convictions for acts that have been decriminalized under the bill. If the person is currently serving a sentence or on probation for such a conviction, the person may petition a court to dismiss the conviction and expunge the record. If the person has completed a sentence or period of probation for such a conviction, the person may petition a court to expunge the record or, if applicable, redesignate it to a lower crime. Any conviction that is expunged under the bill is not considered a conviction for any purpose under state or federal law.
Registration for THC testing labs
The bill requires DATCP to register entities as tetrahydrocannabinols (THC)-testing laboratories. The laboratories must test marijuana for contaminants; research findings on the use of medical marijuana; and provide training on safe and efficient cultivation, harvesting, packaging, labeling, and distribution of marijuana, security and inventory accountability, and research on medical marijuana.
Discrimination based on marijuana use
Under the fair employment law, no employer or other person may engage in any act of employment discrimination against any individual on the basis of the individual’s use or nonuse of lawful products off the employer’s premises during nonworking hours, subject to certain exceptions, one of which is if the use impairs the individual’s ability to undertake adequately the job-related responsibilities of that individual’s employment. The bill specifically defines marijuana as a lawful product for purposes of the fair employment law, such that no person may engage in any act of employment discrimination against an individual because of the individual’s use of marijuana off the employer’s premises during nonworking hours, subject to those exceptions.
Under current law, an individual may be disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance (UI) benefits if he or she is terminated because of misconduct or substantial fault. The bill specifically provides that an employee’s use of marijuana off the employer’s premises during nonworking hours does not constitute misconduct or substantial fault unless termination for that use is permitted under one of the exceptions under the fair employment law.
Unless federal law requires otherwise, the bill prohibits a hospital, physician, organ procurement organization, or other person from determining the ultimate recipient of an anatomical gift on the sole basis of a positive test for the use of marijuana by a potential recipient.
Drug screening and testing
The bill exempts THC, including marijuana, from drug testing for certain public assistance programs. Currently, a participant in a community service job or transitional placement under the Wisconsin Works program (W2) or a recipient of the FoodShare program, also known as the food stamp program, who is convicted of possession, use, or distribution of a controlled substance must submit to a test for controlled substances as a condition of continued eligibility. DHS is currently required to request a waiver of federal Medicaid law to require drug screening and testing as a condition of eligibility for the childless adult demonstration project in the Medical Assistance program. Current law also requires DHS to promulgate administrative rules to develop and implement a drug screening, testing, and treatment policy for able-bodied adults without dependents in the FoodShare employment and training program. The bill exempts THC from all of those drug-testing requirements and programs. In addition, because THC is not a controlled substance under state law under the bill, the requirement under current law that DCF promulgate administrative rules to create a controlled substance abuse screening and testing requirement for applicants for the work experience program for noncustodial parents under W2 and the Transform Milwaukee Jobs and Transitional Jobs programs does not include THC.
Under current law, DWD must establish a program to test claimants who apply for UI benefits for the presence of controlled substances, as defined under federal law. If a claimant tests positive for a controlled substance, the claimant may be denied UI benefits, subject to certain exceptions and limitations. The bill excludes THC for purposes of this testing requirement. As such, under the bill, an individual who tests positive for THC may not be denied UI benefits.
Grants to counties to support behavioral health services
The bill directs DHS to promulgate administrative rules to establish grants to counties to support mental health and substance use disorder services, to be paid from the revenue generated from the excise tax on marijuana that is deposited into the community reinvestment fund.
MILITARY AFFAIRS
Changes to the Wisconsin Code of Military Justice
The bill makes a number of changes to the Wisconsin Code of Military Justice (WCMJ), including 1) the codification of offenses that have been included as offenses in the federal Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) related to retaliation, sexual harassment, and engagement in prohibited sexual activity with a recruit or trainee; 2) articulation of the limits of punishment under the WCMJ; 3) clarifications as to which courts-martial have primary jurisdiction over certain offenses; 4) removal of certain gender-specific language from the WCMJ; 5) requiring that the adjutant general prescribe rules of procedure for courts-martial arising under the WCMJ; and 6) requiring that the adjutant general prescribe and implement a policy that ensures that a victim of an offense under the WCMJ is treated with dignity, respect, courtesy, sensitivity, and fairness.
Wisconsin National Guard duties related to sexual assault and sexual harassment
The bill requires the adjutant general to submit to the governor and appropriate standing committees of the legislature an annual report containing information related to sexual assaults and sexual harassment reported by members of the Wisconsin National Guard and a summary of National Guard training and policies related to preventing and responding to incidents of sexual assault and sexual harassment.
Wisconsin National Guard misconduct case management system
The bill also requires DMA to establish and maintain a case management system that allows the National Guard to track and manage casework related to misconduct within the National Guard. Additionally, the bill requires DMA to submit to the governor and appropriate standing committees of the legislature an annual report describing any substantive changes to the UCMJ during the prior federal fiscal year, a comparison of those changes to the WCMJ, and recommendations regarding whether those changes should be incorporated into the WCMJ.
Creating an office of homeland security
The bill creates an office of homeland security in DMA that must work with the federal Department of Homeland Security and state and local law enforcement agencies to identify, investigate, assess, report, and share tips and leads linked to emerging homeland security threats. The director of the office of homeland security must be appointed by the adjutant general.
Aerial assistance
The bill provides that DMA may provide aerial assistance for incident awareness and assessment, drug interdiction and counter-drug activities, search and rescue efforts, or disasters and seek reimbursement for such services if provided.
Appropriation for reimbursements for drug house demolition
The bill creates a continuing program revenue appropriation for DMA to receive reimbursements from municipalities for the demolition of certain former drug dwellings.
Recovery of Next Generation 911 costs
Under current law, DMA must contract for the creation, operation, and maintenance of an emergency services IP network to implement what is known as “Next Generation 911,” a modern emergency communication network. The bill requires that the contracts include a provision that the contracted entity reimburse originating service providers, which are the entities that provide services used to connect to the emergency number system, for all their costs incurred in connecting to the Next Generation 911 system.
Statewide public safety interoperable communication system
The bill creates a continuing GPR appropriation to fund the development and operation of a statewide public safety interoperable communication system.
Payment to town of Silver Cliff to rebuild its public safety building
Under current law, DMA may make payments from a state disaster assistance appropriation account to local governmental units for the damages and costs incurred as the result of a disaster if the disaster meets one of the two following requirements: 1) the disaster is not eligible for other funding related to a presidentially declared “major disaster,” or 2) DMA determines the disaster meets a certain per capita impact indicator. Additionally, the entity receiving the grant is required to pay for 30 percent of the amount of damages and costs resulting from the disaster. The bill requires DMA to provide a $1,000,000 payment in fiscal year 2023-24 from the same appropriation to the town of Silver Cliff for the rebuilding of the town’s public safety building that was destroyed by a tornado and exempts the Silver Cliff disaster from the program’s eligibility requirement and 30 percent payment requirement.
NATURAL RESOURCES
Fish, game, and wildlife
Nonresident deer hunting license fee
Under current law, DNR issues approvals that authorize hunting, fishing, and trapping of wild animals. The bill increases the fee for a deer hunting license issued to a person who is not a resident of this state from $157.25 to $182.25.
Inland waters trout stamp fee
Under current law, DNR issues approvals that authorize hunting, fishing, and trapping of wild animals. The holder of a fishing license or sports license may not fish for trout in inland trout waters unless the person also holds a trout stamp. The bill increases the fee for an inland waters trout stamp from $9.75 to $14.75.
Use of ID card to establish residency for DNR approvals
