AB742: Bill Text

AB742,,1 2023 ASSEMBLY BILL 742

December 6, 2023 - Introduced by Representatives August and Shelton, cosponsored by Senators Ballweg and Smith. Referred to Committee on Ways and Means.

AB742,,2 An Act to repeal 60.85 (2) (b) 7., 60.85 (5) (e), 66.1105 (2) (f) 1. m., 66.1105 (4) (h) 4., 66.1105 (5) (bf), 66.1105 (5) (bj), 66.1105 (6) (a) 5., 66.1105 (6) (a) 9., 66.1105 (6) (am) 2. c., 66.1105 (6) (am) 2. d., 66.1105 (6) (am) 2. e., 66.1105 (6) (am) 2. f., 66.1105 (6) (dm), 66.1105 (6) (e) 1. e., 66.1105 (7) (ak) 3., 66.1105 (7) (ar), 66.1105 (7) (at), 66.1105 (19), 71.07 (5e), 71.10 (4) (gy), 71.28 (5e), 71.30 (3) (es), 71.47 (5e), 71.49 (1) (es), 77.51 (5m), 77.585 (9), 120.135, 121.91 (4) (h) and 565.28 (2); to renumber and amend 77.54 (14m) and 565.28 (1); to amend 60.85 (2) (c), 60.85 (3) (h) 4., 60.85 (3) (h) 5. a., 60.85 (3) (h) 5. c., 66.1105 (2) (f) 1. (intro.), 66.1105 (2) (f) 1. n., 66.1105 (2) (j), 66.1105 (4) (a), 66.1105 (4) (e), 66.1105 (4) (h) 1., 66.1105 (4) (h) 2., 66.1105 (4e) (b) 1., 66.1105 (5) (c) 1., 66.1105 (5) (ce) 1., 66.1105 (6) (d) 1m., 66.1105 (6) (e) 1. b., 66.1105 (7) (ak) 2., 66.1105 (18) (c) 2., 70.47 (8) (d), 70.48, 71.05 (6) (a) 15., 71.07 (6) (am) 1., 71.07 (6) (am) 2. d., 71.08 (1) (intro.), 71.21 (4) (a), 71.26 (2) (a) 4., 71.34 (1k) (g), 71.45 (2) (a) 10., 77.52 (13), 77.53 (10), 121.07 (6) (a) (intro.), 177.0202 (title), 177.0202 (1) (intro.), 177.0210 (1) (intro.), 177.0607 (4), 177.1505 (4) and 565.27 (2) (b) 3.; and to create 71.07 (6) (am) 1m., 177.01 (7a), 177.01 (7d) (c) 5., 177.01 (13b) (c) 8., 177.01 (14d) (c) 5., 177.01 (16) (e) and 177.0607 (3) (d) of the statutes; relating to: eliminating obsolete statutory references regarding property, sales, and income taxes; the uniform unclaimed property act; and lottery games.

AB742,,3 Analysis by the Legislative Reference Bureau

This bill does all of the following:

Obsolete statutory references

The bill repeals obsolete statutory references relating to tax incremental financing districts and obsolete references relating to a capital improvement fund for schools.

Electronic assessment rolls

Under current law, when a board of review changes an assessor’s valuation of property, the clerk is required to revise the assessment roll by using red ink to cross out the assessor’s valuation and enter the board’s valuation. The bill modifies the requirement to reflect the use of electronic assessment rolls. Under the bill, the clerk is required to enter the board’s valuation and a note about the change to the assessor’s valuation into the assessment roll, but there is no requirement to use red ink or to cross out the assessor’s valuation.

Internet equipment in the broadband market

The bill eliminates obsolete tax deductions, credits, and exemptions for certain Internet equipment used in the broadband market and purchased before July 1, 2009.

Objecting to property tax assessments

Under current law, when the local board of review conducts a hearing to consider an objection to a person’s property tax assessment, the board must, at the request of the assessor or the person making an objection, compel the attendance of witnesses. The bill eliminates the option for the person making the objection to request the attendance of witnesses. This option was included in 2007 Wisconsin Act 86. However, the state supreme court found the entire act to be unconstitutional in Metropolitan Associates v. City of Milwaukee, 2011 WI 20. Another act, 2017 Wisconsin Act 358, repealed other provisions the court found unconstitutional under Metropolitan Associates.

Sales tax exemption certificates

Under current law, drugs prescribed for the treatment of a human being by a person authorized to prescribe the drugs, and dispensed on prescription filled by a pharmacist, are exempt from the sales tax. Generally, a person does not need to present to the seller a sales tax exemption certificate issued by DOR to claim the exemption.

Under current law, insulin furnished by a pharmacist to a person for treatment of diabetes as directed by a physician is considered to be dispensed on prescription and, therefore, exempt from the sales tax. However, a person must present a tax exemption certificate to claim the exemption. The bill modifies the exemption for insulin so that insulin furnished by a pharmacist to a person for treatment of diabetes of a human being is exempt from the sales tax and the purchaser is not required to present an exemption certificate.

Current law also provides sales tax exemptions for patient health care records that are sold to the patient and for farm-raised fish sold to a fish farm. In order to claim either exemption, the purchaser must present to the seller an exemption certificate issued by DOR. The bill eliminates the requirement that a purchaser present an exemption certificate to claim the exemption for patient health care records or for farm-raised fish.

Married persons tax credit

This bill updates references to, and incorporates definitions from, the Internal Revenue Code for the purpose of claiming the married persons tax credit.

Unclaimed property

This bill make technical changes to the state’s adoption of the Revised Uniform Unclaimed Property Act. For example, under current law, a “loyalty card” means, in part, a record given without direct monetary consideration under an award, reward, benefit, loyalty, incentive, rebate, or promotional program. The bill creates the term “financial organization loyalty card” and defines that term, in part, as a card or electronic record given without direct monetary consideration under an award, reward, benefit, loyalty, incentive, rebate, or promotional program established by a financial organization.

Lottery games

With regard to lottery games, current law requires that all drawings to select among winning numbers, among entries, or among finalists must be recorded on both videotape and audiotape. This bill modifies that provision so that all such drawings must be documented with a video and audio recording.

The bill also eliminates an obsolete provision related to lottery prizes received on or before October 21, 1998, and payable over a 10-year period. Under current law, the recipient of such a prize had until December 31, 2000, to change the form of the payment from an annuity to a lump-sum payment.

For further information see the state fiscal estimate, which will be printed as an appendix to this bill.

AB742,,4 The people of the state of Wisconsin, represented in senate and assembly, do enact as follows:

AB742,1 Section 1. 60.85 (2) (b) 7. of the statutes is repealed.

AB742,2 Section 2. 60.85 (2) (c) of the statutes is amended to read:

AB742,,7 60.85 (2) (c) Except as provided in par. (b) 7., no No town may exercise any power under this subsection within the extraterritorial zoning jurisdiction of a city or village, as that term is defined in s. 62.23 (7a) (a), unless the city’s or village’s governing body adopts a resolution which approves the town’s exercise of power under this subsection within such an extraterritorial zoning jurisdiction.

AB742,3 Section 3. 60.85 (3) (h) 4. of the statutes is amended to read:

AB742,,9 60.85 (3) (h) 4. Declares the district to be either an agricultural project district, forestry project district, manufacturing project district, or tourism project district, and identifies the North American Industry Classification System industry number of each activity under each project for which project costs are to be expended; or declares the district to be a project described in sub. (2) (b) 7.

AB742,4 Section 4. 60.85 (3) (h) 5. a. of the statutes is amended to read:

AB742,,11 60.85 (3) (h) 5. a. That not less than 75 percent, by area, of the real property within the district is to be used for projects of a single one of the project types listed under sub. (2) (b) 1. to 4. or 7. and in accordance with the declaration under subd. 4.

AB742,5 Section 5. 60.85 (3) (h) 5. c. of the statutes is amended to read:

AB742,,13 60.85 (3) (h) 5. c. That the project costs of the district are limited to those specified under sub. (2) (b) and relate directly to a project described in sub. (2) (b) 7. or to promoting agriculture, forestry, manufacturing, or tourism development.

AB742,6 Section 6. 60.85 (5) (e) of the statutes is repealed.

AB742,7 Section 7. 66.1105 (2) (f) 1. (intro.) of the statutes is amended to read:

AB742,,16 66.1105 (2) (f) 1. (intro.) “Project costs” mean any expenditures made or estimated to be made or monetary obligations incurred or estimated to be incurred by the city which are listed in a project plan as costs of public works or improvements within a tax incremental district or, to the extent provided in this subd. 1. (intro.) or subds. 1. k., 1. m., and 1. n., or sub. (20) (c), without the district, plus any incidental costs, diminished by any income, special assessments, or other revenues, including user fees or charges, other than tax increments, received or reasonably expected to be received by the city in connection with the implementation of the plan. For any tax incremental district for which a project plan is approved on or after July 31, 1981, only a proportionate share of the costs permitted under this subdivision may be included as project costs to the extent that they benefit the tax incremental district, except that expenditures made or estimated to be made or monetary obligations incurred or estimated to be incurred by a 1st class city, to fund parking facilities ancillary to and within one mile from public entertainment facilities, including a sports and entertainment arena, shall be considered to benefit any tax incremental district located in whole or in part within a one-mile radius of such parking facilities. To the extent the costs benefit the municipality outside the tax incremental district, a proportionate share of the cost is not a project cost. “Project costs” include:

AB742,8 Section 8. 66.1105 (2) (f) 1. m. of the statutes is repealed.

AB742,9 Section 9. 66.1105 (2) (f) 1. n. of the statutes is amended to read:

AB742,,19 66.1105 (2) (f) 1. n. With regard to a tax incremental district that is located anywhere other than a city to which sub. (6) (d) applies, and subject Subject to sub. (4m) (d), project costs incurred for territory that is located within a one-half mile radius of the district’s boundaries and within the city that created the district.

AB742,10 Section 10. 66.1105 (2) (j) of the statutes is amended to read:

AB742,,21 66.1105 (2) (j) “Tax incremental base” means the aggregate value, as equalized by the department of revenue, of all taxable property located within a tax incremental district on the date as of which the district is created, determined as provided in sub. (5) (b). The base of districts created before October 1, 1980, does not include the value of property exempted under s. 70.111 (17).

AB742,11 Section 11. 66.1105 (4) (a) of the statutes is amended to read:

AB742,,23 66.1105 (4) (a) Holding of a public hearing by the planning commission at which interested parties are afforded a reasonable opportunity to express their views on the proposed creation of a tax incremental district and the proposed boundaries of the district. Notice of the hearing shall be published as a class 2 notice, under ch. 985. Before publication, a copy of the notice shall be sent by first class mail to the chief executive officer or administrator of all local governmental entities having the power to levy taxes on property located within the proposed district and to the school board of any school district which includes property located within the proposed district. For a county with no chief executive officer or administrator, notice shall be sent to the county board chairperson.

AB742,12 Section 12. 66.1105 (4) (e) of the statutes is amended to read:

AB742,,25 66.1105 (4) (e) At least 14 days before adopting a resolution under par. (gm), holding of a public hearing by the planning commission at which interested parties are afforded a reasonable opportunity to express their views on the proposed project plan. The hearing may be held in conjunction with the hearing provided for in par. (a). If the city anticipates that the proposed project plan’s project costs may include cash grants made by the city to owners, lessees, or developers of land that is located within the tax incremental district, the hearing notice shall contain a statement to that effect. Notice of the hearing shall be published as a class 2 notice, under ch. 985. The notice shall include a statement advising that a copy of the proposed project plan will be provided on request. Before publication, a copy of the notice shall be sent by 1st class mail to the chief executive officer or administrator of all local governmental entities having the power to levy taxes on property within the district and to the school board of any school district which includes property located within the proposed district. For a county with no chief executive officer or administrator, notice shall be sent to the county board chairperson.

AB742,13 Section 13. 66.1105 (4) (h) 1. of the statutes is amended to read:

AB742,,27 66.1105 (4) (h) 1. Subject to subds. 2., 4., 5., and 6., the planning commission may, by resolution, adopt an amendment to a project plan. The amendment is subject to approval by the local legislative body and approval requires the same findings as provided in par. (g) and, if the amendment adds territory to a district under subd. 2., approval also requires the same findings as provided in par. (gm) 4. c. Any amendment to a project plan is also subject to review by a joint review board, acting under sub. (4m). Adoption of an amendment to a project plan shall be preceded by a public hearing held by the plan commission at which interested parties shall be afforded a reasonable opportunity to express their views on the amendment. Notice of the hearing shall be published as a class 1 notice, under ch. 985. The notice shall include a statement of the purpose and cost of the amendment and shall advise that a copy of the amendment will be provided on request. Before publication, a copy of the notice shall be sent by 1st class mail to the chief executive officer or administrator of all local governmental entities having the power to levy taxes on property within the district and to the school board of any school district which includes property located within the proposed district. For a county with no chief executive officer or administrator, this notice shall be sent to the county board chairperson.

AB742,14 Section 14. 66.1105 (4) (h) 2. of the statutes, as affected by 2023 Wisconsin Act 8, is amended to read:

AB742,,29 66.1105 (4) (h) 2. Except as provided in subds. 4., 5., 7., 9., 10., and 11., the planning commission may adopt an amendment to a project plan under subd. 1. to modify the district’s boundaries, not more than 4 times during the district’s existence, by subtracting territory from the district in a way that does not remove contiguity from the district or by adding territory to the district that is contiguous to the district and that is served by public works or improvements that were created as part of the district’s project plan. A single amendment to a project plan that both adds and subtracts territory shall be counted under this subdivision as one amendment of a project plan.

AB742,15 Section 15. 66.1105 (4) (h) 4. of the statutes is repealed.

AB742,16 Section 16. 66.1105 (4e) (b) 1. of the statutes is amended to read:

AB742,,32 66.1105 (4e) (b) 1. Adoption of a resolution under par. (a) 1. shall be preceded by a public hearing held by the common council at which interested parties shall be afforded a reasonable opportunity to express their views on the proposed designation of a distressed, or severely distressed, tax incremental district. Notice of the hearing shall be published as a class 2 notice under ch. 985. The notice shall describe the resolution and shall advise that a copy of the resolution will be provided on request. The notice shall also explain that the life of a distressed tax incremental district may be extended, that it may receive excess tax increments from a donor district, and that the life of the donor district may be extended to provide such increments. Before publication, a copy of the notice shall be sent by 1st class mail to the chief executive officer or administrator of all local governmental entities having the power to levy taxes on property within the district and to the school board of any school district that includes property located within the proposed district. For a county with no chief executive officer or administrator, this notice shall be sent to the county board chairperson.

AB742,17 Section 17. 66.1105 (5) (bf) of the statutes is repealed.

AB742,18 Section 18. 66.1105 (5) (bj) of the statutes is repealed.

AB742,19 Section 19. 66.1105 (5) (c) 1. of the statutes is amended to read:

AB742,,36 66.1105 (5) (c) 1. For a tax incremental district created before March 3, 2016, if the city adopts an amendment to the original project plan for any district which subtracts territory from the district or which includes additional project costs at least part of which will be incurred after the period specified in sub. (6) (am) 1., the tax incremental base for the district shall be redetermined, if sub. (4) (h) 2., 4., or 5. applies to the amended project plan, either by subtracting from the tax incremental base the value of the taxable property and the value of real property owned by the city, other than property described under s. 66.1105 (5) (bm), 2013 stats. that is subtracted from the existing district or by adding to the tax incremental base the value of the taxable property and the value of real property owned by the city, other than property described in s. 66.1105 (5) (bm), 2013 stats., that is added to the existing district under sub. (4) (h) 2., 4., or 5. or, if sub. (4) (h) 2., 4., or 5. does not apply to the amended project plan, under s. 66.1105 (5) (b), 2013 stats., as of the January 1 next preceding the effective date of the amendment if the amendment becomes effective between January 2 and September 30, as of the next subsequent January 1 if the amendment becomes effective between October 1 and December 31 and if the effective date of the amendment is January 1 of any year, the redetermination shall be made on that date. With regard to a district to which territory has been added, the tax incremental base as redetermined under this paragraph is effective for the purposes of this section only if it exceeds the original tax incremental base determined under s. 66.1105 (5) (b), 2013 stats.

AB742,20 Section 20. 66.1105 (5) (ce) 1. of the statutes is amended to read:

AB742,,38 66.1105 (5) (ce) 1. For a tax incremental district created before March 3, 2016, if the city adopts an amendment, to which sub. (4) (h) 2., 4., or 5. applies, the tax incremental base for the district shall be redetermined, either by subtracting from the tax incremental base the value of the taxable property and the value of real property owned by the city, other than property described under s. 66.1105 (5) (bm), 2013, stats., that is subtracted from the existing district or by adding to the tax incremental base the value of the taxable property and the value of real property owned by the city, other than property described in s. 66.1105 (5) (bm), 2013, stats., that is added to the existing district under sub. (4) (h) 2., 4., or 5., as of the January 1 next preceding the effective date of the amendment if the amendment becomes effective between January 2 and September 30, as of the next subsequent January 1 if the amendment becomes effective between October 1 and December 31 and if the effective date of the amendment is January 1 of any year, the redetermination shall be made on that date. With regard to a district to which territory has been added, the tax incremental base as redetermined under this paragraph is effective for the purposes of this section only if it exceeds the original tax incremental base determined under s. 66.1105 (5) (b), 2013 stats.

AB742,21 Section 21. 66.1105 (6) (a) 5. of the statutes is repealed.

AB742,22 Section 22. 66.1105 (6) (a) 9. of the statutes is repealed.

AB742,23 Section 23. 66.1105 (6) (am) 2. c. of the statutes is repealed.

AB742,24 Section 24. 66.1105 (6) (am) 2. d. of the statutes is repealed.

AB742,25 Section 25. 66.1105 (6) (am) 2. e. of the statutes is repealed.

AB742,26 Section 26. 66.1105 (6) (am) 2. f. of the statutes is repealed.

AB742,27 Section 27. 66.1105 (6) (d) 1m. of the statutes is amended to read:

AB742,,46 66.1105 (6) (d) 1m. After December 31, 2016, subd. 1. applies only to Tax Incremental District Number One, Tax Incremental District Number Four, and Tax Incremental District Number Five in the City of Kenosha, and no increments may be allocated under that subdivision, after December 31, 2016, unless the allocation is approved by the joint review board.

AB742,28 Section 28. 66.1105 (6) (dm) of the statutes is repealed.

AB742,29 Section 29. 66.1105 (6) (e) 1. b. of the statutes is amended to read:

AB742,,49 66.1105 (6) (e) 1. b. Except as provided in subd. 1. e., the The donor tax incremental district and the recipient tax incremental district have been created before October 1, 1995.

AB742,30 Section 30. 66.1105 (6) (e) 1. e. of the statutes is repealed.

AB742,31 Section 31. 66.1105 (7) (ak) 2. of the statutes is amended to read: