The ayes and noes were required and the vote was: ayes, 31; noes, 1; absent or not voting, 0; as follows:
Ayes - Senators Agard, Ballweg, Bradley, Cabral-Guevara, Carpenter, Cowles, Felzkowski, Feyen, Hesselbein, Hutton, Jacque, Jagler, James, L. Johnson, Kapenga, Knodl, Larson, LeMahieu, Marklein, Pfaff, Quinn, Roys, Smith, Spreitzer, Stafsholt, Stroebel, Testin, Tomczyk, Wanggaard, Wimberger and Wirch - 31.
Noes - Senator Nass - 1.
Absent or not voting - None - 0.
Confirmed.
WACHS, DANA
Of Eau Claire, as a Congressional District 3 Representative on the Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System, to serve for the term ending May 1, 2029.
Senator LeMahieu moved rejection of the appointment of Dana Wachs.
The ayes and noes were required and the vote was: ayes, 21; noes, 11; absent or not voting, 0; as follows:
Ayes - Senators Ballweg, Bradley, Cabral-Guevara, Felzkowski, Feyen, Hutton, Jacque, Jagler, James, Kapenga, Knodl, LeMahieu, Marklein, Nass, Quinn, Stafsholt, Stroebel, Testin, Tomczyk, Wanggaard and Wimberger - 21.
Noes - Senators Agard, Carpenter, Cowles, Hesselbein, L. Johnson, Larson, Pfaff, Roys, Smith, Spreitzer and Wirch - 11.
Absent or not voting - None - 0.
Rejected.
Senator LeMahieu, with unanimous consent, asked that the appointments of Judy Ziewacz be taken up en masse.
hist193659ZIEWACZ, JUDY K. of Monona, as a Non-Lawyer Member on the Wisconsin Judicial Commission, to serve for the term ending August 1, 2023. hist193660ZIEWACZ, JUDY of Monona, as a Non-Lawyer Member on the Wisconsin Judicial Commission, to serve for the term ending August 1, 2026. Senator LeMahieu moved rejection of the appointments of Judy Ziewacz.
The question was: Rejection?
The ayes and noes were required and the vote was: ayes, 22; noes, 10; absent or not voting, 0; as follows:
Ayes - Senators Ballweg, Bradley, Cabral-Guevara, Cowles, Felzkowski, Feyen, Hutton, Jacque, Jagler, James, Kapenga, Knodl, LeMahieu, Marklein, Nass, Quinn, Stafsholt, Stroebel, Testin, Tomczyk, Wanggaard and Wimberger - 22.
Noes - Senators Agard, Carpenter, Hesselbein, L. Johnson, Larson, Pfaff, Roys, Smith, Spreitzer and Wirch - 10.
Absent or not voting - None - 0.
Rejected.
_____________
Messages from the Assembly
Senate Bill 172
Relating to: establishing and operating community reentry centers and making an appropriation.
hist193661The question was: Concurrence of Assembly Amendment 1 to Senate Bill 172? Concurred in.
Senate Bill 374
Relating to: Wisconsin and Minnesota income tax reciprocity.
hist193662The question was: Concurrence of Assembly Amendment 1 to Senate Bill 374? Concurred in.
Senate Bill 525
Relating to: tinting windows on government-owned vehicles.
hist193663The question was: Concurrence of Assembly Amendment 1 to Senate Bill 525? Concurred in.
Senate Bill 616
Relating to: a sales tax exemption for road-building equipment; increasing the income tax withholding threshold for nonresidents; modifying the certification requirement for a qualified opportunity fund; prohibiting certain lottery games; and extending the capital gains exclusion to family members who inherit certain farms organized as a partnership or limited liability company.
hist193664The question was: Concurrence Assembly Amendment 1 to Senate Bill 616? The ayes and noes were required and the vote was: ayes, 27; noes, 5; absent or not voting, 0; as follows:
Ayes - Senators Agard, Ballweg, Bradley, Cabral-Guevara, Carpenter, Felzkowski, Feyen, Hesselbein, Hutton, Jagler, James, L. Johnson, Larson, LeMahieu, Marklein, Pfaff, Quinn, Roys, Smith, Spreitzer, Stafsholt, Stroebel, Testin, Tomczyk, Wanggaard, Wimberger and Wirch - 27.
Noes - Senators Cowles, Jacque, Kapenga, Knodl and Nass - 5.
Absent or not voting - None - 0.
Concurred in.
Senate Bill 667
Relating to: domestic asset protection trusts.
hist193665The question was: Concurrence of Assembly Amendment 1 to Senate Bill 667? Concurred in.
Senate Bill 791
Relating to: exemptions from public utility regulation regarding electric vehicle charging stations, installation and operation of electric vehicle charging stations by state agencies or local governmental units, and imposing an excise tax on electric vehicle charging.
hist193666The question was: Concurrence of Assembly Amendment 1 to Senate Bill 791? Concurred in.
Senate Bill 822
Relating to: local candidates filing campaign finance reports and making an appropriation.
hist193667The question was: Concurrence of Assembly Amendment 1 to Senate Bill 822? The ayes and noes were required and the vote was: ayes, 31; noes, 1; absent or not voting, 0; as follows:
Ayes - Senators Agard, Ballweg, Bradley, Cabral-Guevara, Carpenter, Cowles, Felzkowski, Feyen, Hesselbein, Hutton, Jacque, Jagler, James, L. Johnson, Kapenga, Knodl, Larson, LeMahieu, Marklein, Pfaff, Quinn, Roys, Smith, Spreitzer, Stafsholt, Stroebel, Testin, Tomczyk, Wanggaard, Wimberger and Wirch - 31.
Noes - Senator Nass - 1.
Absent or not voting - None - 0.
Concurred in.
Senate Bill 990
Relating to: mandatory early literacy professional development.
hist193668The question was: Concurrence of Assembly Amendment 1 to Senate Bill 990? Concurred in.
Assembly Joint Resolution 6
Relating to: the appropriation authority of the legislature and the allocation of moneys Wisconsin receives from the federal government (second consideration).
hist193669The question was: Concurrence of Assembly Amendment 1 to Senate Amendment 1 to Assembly Joint Resolution 6? The ayes and noes were required and the vote was: ayes, 22; noes, 10; absent or not voting, 0; as follows:
Ayes - Senators Ballweg, Bradley, Cabral-Guevara, Cowles, Felzkowski, Feyen, Hutton, Jacque, Jagler, James, Kapenga, Knodl, LeMahieu, Marklein, Nass, Quinn, Stafsholt, Stroebel, Testin, Tomczyk, Wanggaard and Wimberger - 22.
Noes - Senators Agard, Carpenter, Hesselbein, L. Johnson, Larson, Pfaff, Roys, Smith, Spreitzer and Wirch - 10.
Absent or not voting - None - 0.
Concurred in.
_____________
Second reading and amendments of senate joint resolutions and senate bills
Senate Bill 589
Relating to: temporary limited easements for construction crane booms that pass over adjacent real property.
hist193671The question was: Adoption of Senate Substitute Amendment 1 to Senate Bill 589? Adopted.
hist193673Senator LeMahieu, with unanimous consent, asked that the rules be suspended and the bill be given its third reading. Read a third time.
The question was: Passage of Senate Bill 589?
The ayes and noes were demanded and the vote was: ayes, 21; noes, 11; absent or not voting, 0; as follows:
