Sincerely,
DANIEL A. CARLTON, JR.
Administrator
_____________
Second reading and amendments of senate joint resolutions and senate bills
Senate Joint Resolution 2
Relating to: conditions for release prior to conviction, including the imposition of bail (second consideration).
hist161286Senator LeMahieu, with unanimous consent, asked that the rules be suspended and the joint resolution be given its third reading. Senate Joint Resolution 2
Read a third time.
hist161288The question was: Adoption of Senate Joint Resolution 2? The ayes and noes were required and the vote was: ayes, 23; noes, 9; absent or not voting, 0; as follows:
Ayes - Senators Ballweg, Bradley, Cabral-Guevara, Cowles, Felzkowski, Feyen, Hutton, Jacque, Jagler, James, Kapenga, LeMahieu, Marklein, Nass, Pfaff, Quinn, Stafsholt, Stroebel, Testin, Tomczyk, Wanggaard, Wimberger and Wirch - 23.
Noes - Senators Agard, Carpenter, Hesselbein, L. Johnson, Larson, Roys, Smith, Spreitzer and Taylor - 9.
Absent or not voting - None - 0.
Adopted.
Senator LeMahieu, with unanimous consent, asked that all action be immediately messaged to the Assembly:
Messaged.
_____________
Consideration of resolutions and joint resolutions not requiring a third reading
Senate Joint Resolution 3
Relating to: proclaiming February 20 to 26, 2023, as American Birkebeiner Week in Wisconsin.
hist161357The question was: Adoption of Senate Joint Resolution 3? Adopted.
Senator Stafsholt, with unanimous consent, asked to be recorded as voting “No” on the question of adoption of Senate Joint Resolution 3.
Senate Joint Resolution 4
Relating to: providing for an advisory referendum on the question of requiring able-bodied, childless adults to look for work in order to receive taxpayer-funded welfare benefits.
Senator LeMahieu raised the point of order that Senate Substitute Amendment 1 to Senate Joint Resolution 4 was not germane, pursuant to Senate Rule 50 (6)(b). hist161291The Chair ruled the point of order well taken hist161292Senator Smith appealed the ruling of the Chair. The question was: Shall the Decision of the Chair stand as the judgment of the Senate?
The ayes and noes were required and the vote was: ayes, 21; noes, 11; absent or not voting, 0; as follows:
Ayes - Senators Ballweg, Bradley, Cabral-Guevara, Cowles, Felzkowski, Feyen, Hutton, Jacque, Jagler, James, Kapenga, LeMahieu, Marklein, Nass, Quinn, Stafsholt, Stroebel, Testin, Tomczyk, Wanggaard and Wimberger - 21.
Noes - Senators Agard, Carpenter, Hesselbein, L. Johnson, Larson, Pfaff, Roys, Smith, Spreitzer, Taylor and Wirch - 11.
Absent or not voting - None - 0.
The Decision of the Chair stands as the judgment of the Senate.
hist161293The question was: Adoption of Senate Joint Resolution 4? The ayes and noes were demanded and the vote was: ayes, 22; noes, 10; absent or not voting, 0; as follows:
Ayes - Senators Ballweg, Bradley, Cabral-Guevara, Cowles, Felzkowski, Feyen, Hutton, Jacque, Jagler, James, Kapenga, LeMahieu, Marklein, Nass, Pfaff, Quinn, Stafsholt, Stroebel, Testin, Tomczyk, Wanggaard and Wimberger - 22.
Noes - Senators Agard, Carpenter, Hesselbein, L. Johnson, Larson, Roys, Smith, Spreitzer, Taylor and Wirch - 10.
Absent or not voting - None - 0.
