This is the preview version of the Wisconsin State Legislature site.
Please see http://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov for the production version.
hist190623The question was: Assembly Bill 644 having been read three times, shall the bill be passed?
Motion carried.
Representatives Shelton and Sortwell asked unanimous consent to be recorded as voting No on the previous question. Granted.
hist190624Representative August asked unanimous consent that the rules be suspended and that Assembly Bill 644 be immediately messaged to the Senate. Granted.
_____________
Message from the Senate
From: Richard Champagne, Senate Chief Clerk.
Mr. Speaker:
I am directed to inform you that the Senate has
Passed and asks concurrence in:
hist190625Senate Bill 613
_____________
Action on the Senate Message
hist190627Representative August asked unanimous consent that the rules be suspended and that Senate Bill 613 be withdrawn from the Senate message and taken up at this time. Granted.
hist190628Senate Bill 613
Relating to: limiting the recovery of noneconomic damages from a commercial motor vehicle carrier.
By Senator Tomczyk; cosponsored by Representatives Gundrum, Spiros, Armstrong, Callahan, Donovan, Rettinger and Dallman.
hist190629The question was: Shall Senate Bill 613 be ordered to a third reading?
Motion carried.
Representative August asked unanimous consent that the rules be suspended and that Senate Bill 613 be given a third reading. Granted.
hist190631The question was: Senate Bill 613 having been read three times, shall the bill be concurred in?
Motion carried.
hist190632Representative August asked unanimous consent that the rules be suspended and that Senate Bill 613 be immediately messaged to the Senate. Granted.
Assembly Bill 647
Relating to: limiting the recovery of noneconomic damages from a commercial motor vehicle carrier.
hist190633Representative August asked unanimous consent that Assembly Bill 647 be laid on the table. Granted.
hist190634Assembly Bill 671
Relating to: protective occupation annuitants in the Wisconsin Retirement System who are rehired by a participating employer.
hist190635The question was: Shall Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 to Assembly Bill 671 be adopted?
Motion carried.
hist190636The question was: Shall Assembly Bill 671 be ordered engrossed and read a third time?
Motion carried.
hist190637Representative August asked unanimous consent that the rules be suspended and that Assembly Bill 671 be given a third reading. Granted.
hist190644The question was: Assembly Bill 671 having been read three times, shall the bill be passed?
Motion carried.
hist190681Representative Wittke asked unanimous consent to be added as a coauthor of Assembly Bill 671. Granted.
hist190645Representative August asked unanimous consent that the rules be suspended and that Assembly Bill 671 be immediately messaged to the Senate. Granted.
hist190646Representative August asked unanimous consent that Senate Bill 633 be withdrawn from today's calendar and taken up at this time. Granted.
hist190647Senate Bill 633
Relating to: designating and marking the Ho-Chunk World War II Code Talkers Memorial Highway.
hist190648The question was: Shall Senate Bill 633 be ordered to a third reading?
Motion carried.
hist190649Representative August asked unanimous consent that the rules be suspended and that Senate Bill 633 be given a third reading. Granted.
hist190656The question was: Senate Bill 633 having been read three times, shall the bill be concurred in?
Motion carried.
hist190657Representative August asked unanimous consent that the rules be suspended and that Senate Bill 633 be immediately messaged to the Senate. Granted.
Assembly Bill 678
Relating to: designating and marking the Ho-Chunk World War II Code Talkers Memorial Highway.
hist190658Representative August asked unanimous consent that Assembly Bill 678 be laid on the table. Granted.
hist190659Assembly Bill 689
Relating to: pay for performance grant requirements, use of public lands to provide temporary residence for the homeless, and providing a penalty.
hist190281Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 to Assembly Bill 689 offered by Representative Bare.
_____________
Point of Order
hist190661Representative August rose to the point of order that Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 to Assembly Bill 689 was not germane under Assembly Rule 54 (3)(f).
Speaker Pro Tempore Petersen ruled the point of order well taken.
hist190662Representative Subeck appealed the decision of the Chair.
hist190664The question was: Shall the ruling of the Chair stand as the ruling of the Assembly?
The roll was taken.
The result follows:
Ayes - Representatives Allen, Armstrong, August, Behnke, Binsfeld, Bodden, Brandtjen, Brooks, Callahan, Dallman, Dittrich, Donovan, Duchow, Edming, Goeben, Green, Gundrum, Gustafson, Hurd, S. Johnson, Katsma, Kitchens, Krug, Kurtz, Macco, Magnafici, Maxey, Melotik, Michalski, Moses, Murphy, Mursau, Nedweski, Neylon, Novak, O'Connor, Oldenburg, Penterman, Petersen, Petryk, Plumer, Pronschinske, Rettinger, Rodriguez, Rozar, Sapik, Schmidt, Schraa, Schutt, Snyder, Sortwell, Spiros, Steffen, Summerfield, Swearingen, Tittl, Tranel, Tusler, VanderMeer, Wichgers, Wittke, Zimmerman and Speaker Vos - 63.
Noes - Representatives C. Anderson, J. Anderson, Andraca, Baldeh, Bare, Billings, Cabrera, Clancy, Conley, Considine, Doyle, Drake, Emerson, Goyke, Haywood, Hong, Jacobson, Joers, Madison, McGuire, Moore Omokunde, Myers, Neubauer, Ohnstad, Ortiz-Velez, Palmeri, Ratcliff, Riemer, Shankland, Shelton, Sinicki, Snodgrass, Stubbs, Subeck and Vining - 35.
Absent or not voting - Representative Born - 1.
Motion carried.
hist190665The question was: Shall Assembly Amendment 1 to Assembly Bill 689 be adopted?
Motion carried.
hist190666The question was: Shall Assembly Bill 689 be ordered engrossed and read a third time?
Motion carried.
hist190667Representative Born asked unanimous consent that his leave of absence be lifted. Granted.
Representative August asked unanimous consent that the rules be suspended and that Assembly Bill 689 be given a third reading. Granted.
hist190694The question was: Assembly Bill 689 having been read three times, shall the bill be passed?
The roll was taken.
The result follows:
Ayes - Representatives August, Behnke, Binsfeld, Bodden, Born, Brandtjen, Brooks, Callahan, Dallman, Dittrich, Donovan, Duchow, Edming, Goeben, Green, Gundrum, Gustafson, Hurd, S. Johnson, Katsma, Kitchens, Krug, Kurtz, Macco, Magnafici, Maxey, Melotik, Michalski, Moses, Murphy, Mursau, Nedweski, Neylon, Novak, O'Connor, Oldenburg, Penterman, Petersen, Petryk, Plumer, Pronschinske, Rettinger, Rozar, Sapik, Schmidt, Schraa, Schutt, Snyder, Spiros, Steffen, Summerfield, Swearingen, Tittl, Tranel, Tusler, VanderMeer, Wichgers, Wittke, Zimmerman and Speaker Vos - 60.
Noes - Representatives Allen, C. Anderson, J. Anderson, Andraca, Armstrong, Baldeh, Bare, Billings, Cabrera, Clancy, Conley, Considine, Doyle, Drake, Emerson, Goyke, Haywood, Hong, Jacobson, Joers, Madison, McGuire, Moore Omokunde, Myers, Neubauer, Ohnstad, Ortiz-Velez, Palmeri, Ratcliff, Riemer, Rodriguez, Shankland, Shelton, Sinicki, Snodgrass, Sortwell, Stubbs, Subeck and Vining - 39.
Absent or not voting - None.
Motion carried.
hist190695Representative August asked unanimous consent that the rules be suspended and that Assembly Bill 689 be immediately messaged to the Senate. Granted.
hist190696Representative August asked unanimous consent that the rules be suspended and that Senate Bill 688 be withdrawn from the Senate message and taken up at this time. Granted.
hist190700Senate Bill 688
Relating to: local government competitive bidding thresholds and requiring school districts to utilize competitive bidding.
By Senators Stroebel, Felzkowski and Tomczyk; cosponsored by Representatives Brooks, Behnke, Bodden, Brandtjen, Dittrich, Moses, O'Connor, Rozar, Sortwell and Zimmerman.
hist190505Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 to Senate Bill 688 offered by Representative McGuire.
_____________
Point of Order
hist190697Representative August rose to the point of order that Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 to Senate Bill 688 was not germane under Assembly Rule 54 (3)(f).
Speaker Pro Tempore Petersen ruled the point of order well taken.
hist190698Representative Billings appealed the decision of the Chair.
hist190699The question was: Shall the ruling of the Chair stand as the ruling of the Assembly?
Loading...
Loading...