Relating to: supervision of local bridge projects funded under certain local bridge maintenance programs.
By Senators James, Ballweg, Cowles, Marklein and Spreitzer; cosponsored by Representatives Brooks, Rozar, Brandtjen, Dittrich, Edming, Gundrum, Hurd, Jacobson, Mursau, Penterman and Schmidt.
hist190755The question was: Shall Senate Bill 753 be ordered to a third reading? Motion carried.
hist190756Representative August asked unanimous consent that the rules be suspended and that Senate Bill 753 be given a third reading. Granted. hist190757The question was: Senate Bill 753 having been read three times, shall the bill be concurred in? Motion carried.
hist190758Representative August asked unanimous consent that the rules be suspended and that Senate Bill 753 be immediately messaged to the Senate. Granted. Assembly Bill 808
Relating to: supervision of local bridge projects funded under certain local bridge maintenance programs.
hist190759Representative August asked unanimous consent that Assembly Bill 808 be laid on the table. Granted. hist190765Representative August asked unanimous consent that Senate Bill 787 be withdrawn from today's calendar and taken up at this time. Granted. Senate Bill 787
hist190766Relating to: limitations on the total value of taxable property that may be included in a tax incremental financing district created in the city of Evansville. hist190760Representative Katsma asked unanimous consent that Senate Bill 787 be referred to the joint committee on Finance. Granted. hist190761Representative Katsma asked unanimous consent that the rules be suspended and that Senate Bill 787 be withdrawn from the joint committee on Finance and taken up at this time. Granted. hist190767The question was: Shall Senate Bill 787 be ordered to a third reading? Motion carried.
hist190768Representative August asked unanimous consent that the rules be suspended and that Senate Bill 787 be given a third reading. Granted. hist190769The question was: Senate Bill 787 having been read three times, shall the bill be concurred in? The roll was taken.
The result follows:
Ayes - Representatives Allen, C. Anderson, J. Anderson, Andraca, Armstrong, August, Baldeh, Bare, Behnke, Billings, Binsfeld, Bodden, Born, Brandtjen, Brooks, Cabrera, Callahan, Clancy, Conley, Considine, Dallman, Dittrich, Donovan, Doyle, Drake, Duchow, Edming, Emerson, Goeben, Goyke, Green, Gundrum, Gustafson, Haywood, Hong, Hurd, Jacobson, Joers, S. Johnson, Katsma, Kitchens, Krug, Kurtz, Macco, Magnafici, Maxey, McGuire, Melotik, Michalski, Moore Omokunde, Moses, Murphy, Mursau, Myers, Nedweski, Neubauer, Neylon, Novak, O'Connor, Ohnstad, Oldenburg, Ortiz-Velez, Palmeri, Penterman, Petersen, Petryk, Plumer, Pronschinske, Ratcliff, Rettinger, Riemer, Rodriguez, Rozar, Sapik, Schmidt, Schraa, Schutt, Shankland, Shelton, Sinicki, Snodgrass, Snyder, Sortwell, Spiros, Steffen, Stubbs, Subeck, Summerfield, Swearingen, Tittl, Tranel, Tusler, VanderMeer, Vining, Wichgers, Wittke, Zimmerman and Speaker Vos - 98.
Noes - Representative Madison - 1.
Absent or not voting - None.
Motion carried.
hist190770Representative August asked unanimous consent that the rules be suspended and that Senate Bill 787 be immediately messaged to the Senate. Granted. Assembly Bill 834
Relating to: limitations on the total value of taxable property that may be included in a tax incremental financing district created in the city of Evansville.
hist190771Representative August asked unanimous consent that Assembly Bill 834 be laid on the table. Granted. Relating to: required instruction in civics in the elementary and high school grades, high school graduation requirements, and private school educational program criteria.
hist190289Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 to Assembly Bill 898 offered by Representatives Snodgrass, Shelton and Joers. _____________
Point of Order
hist190773Representative August rose to the point of order that Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 to Assembly Bill 898 was not germane under Assembly Rule 54 (3)(f). Speaker Pro Tempore Petersen ruled the point of order well taken.
hist190774Representative Subeck appealed the decision of the Chair. hist190775The question was: Shall the ruling of the Chair stand as the ruling of the Assembly? The roll was taken.
The result follows:
Ayes - Representatives Allen, Armstrong, August, Behnke, Binsfeld, Bodden, Born, Brandtjen, Brooks, Callahan, Dallman, Dittrich, Donovan, Duchow, Edming, Goeben, Green, Gundrum, Gustafson, Hurd, S. Johnson, Katsma, Kitchens, Krug, Kurtz, Macco, Magnafici, Maxey, Melotik, Michalski, Moses, Murphy, Mursau, Nedweski, Neylon, Novak, O'Connor, Oldenburg, Penterman, Petersen, Petryk, Plumer, Pronschinske, Rettinger, Rodriguez, Rozar, Sapik, Schmidt, Schraa, Schutt, Snyder, Sortwell, Spiros, Steffen, Summerfield, Swearingen, Tittl, Tranel, Tusler, VanderMeer, Wichgers, Wittke, Zimmerman and Speaker Vos - 64.
Noes - Representatives C. Anderson, J. Anderson, Andraca, Baldeh, Bare, Billings, Cabrera, Clancy, Conley, Considine, Doyle, Drake, Emerson, Goyke, Haywood, Hong, Jacobson, Joers, Madison, McGuire, Moore Omokunde, Myers, Neubauer, Ohnstad, Ortiz-Velez, Palmeri, Ratcliff, Riemer, Shankland, Shelton, Sinicki, Snodgrass, Stubbs, Subeck and Vining - 35.
Absent or not voting - None.
Motion carried.
hist190776The question was: Shall Assembly Bill 898 be ordered engrossed and read a third time? Motion carried.
hist190777Representative August asked unanimous consent that the rules be suspended and that Assembly Bill 898 be given a third reading. Granted. hist190779The question was: Assembly Bill 898 having been read three times, shall the bill be passed? Motion carried.
Representatives Goeben, Schraa and Shelton asked unanimous consent to be recorded as voting “No” on the previous question. Granted.
hist190780Representative August asked unanimous consent that the rules be suspended and that Assembly Bill 898 be immediately messaged to the Senate. Granted. Relating to: reductions to state aid paid to school districts for payments made under parental choice programs and the Special Needs Scholarship Program.
hist190783The question was: Shall Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 to Assembly Bill 900 be adopted? Motion carried.
hist190784The question was: Shall Assembly Bill 900 be ordered engrossed and read a third time? Motion carried.
hist190785Representative August asked unanimous consent that the rules be suspended and that Assembly Bill 900 be given a third reading. Granted. hist190869The question was: Assembly Bill 900 having been read three times, shall the bill be passed? The roll was taken.
The result follows:
Ayes - Representatives Allen, Armstrong, August, Behnke, Binsfeld, Bodden, Born, Brandtjen, Brooks, Callahan, Dallman, Dittrich, Donovan, Duchow, Edming, Goeben, Green, Gundrum, Gustafson, Hurd, S. Johnson, Katsma, Kitchens, Krug, Kurtz, Macco, Magnafici, Maxey, Melotik, Michalski, Moses, Murphy, Mursau, Nedweski, Neylon, Novak, O'Connor, Oldenburg, Penterman, Petersen, Petryk, Plumer, Pronschinske, Rettinger, Rodriguez, Rozar, Sapik, Schmidt, Schraa, Schutt, Snyder, Sortwell, Spiros, Steffen, Summerfield, Swearingen, Tittl, Tranel, Tusler, VanderMeer, Wichgers, Wittke, Zimmerman and Speaker Vos - 64.
Noes - Representatives C. Anderson, J. Anderson, Andraca, Baldeh, Bare, Billings, Cabrera, Clancy, Conley, Considine, Doyle, Drake, Emerson, Goyke, Haywood, Hong, Jacobson, Joers, Madison, McGuire, Moore Omokunde, Myers, Neubauer, Ohnstad, Ortiz-Velez, Palmeri, Ratcliff, Riemer, Shankland, Shelton, Sinicki, Snodgrass, Stubbs, Subeck and Vining - 35.
Absent or not voting - None.
Motion carried.
hist190870Representative August asked unanimous consent that the rules be suspended and that Assembly Bill 900 be immediately messaged to the Senate. Granted. _____________
Representative August asked unanimous consent that the Assembly stand recessed. Granted.
The Assembly stood recessed.
6:53 P.M.
_____________
Recess
7:49 P.M.
The Assembly reconvened.
Speaker Pro Tempore Petersen in the chair.
The committee on Rules introduced a privileged resolution.
_____________
Introduction and Reference of Proposals
Read first time and referred:
Relating to: establishing special orders of business for Thursday, February 22, 2024.
By committee on Rules
hist190893The question was: Shall Assembly Resolution 28 be adopted? Motion carried.
The following proposals were made a special order of business on Thursday, February 22, pursuant to the adoption of Assembly Resolution 28:
