6. A description of areas and types of proposed public use consistent with the standards established under par. (d) and any restrictions on public use to be proposed for safety or security reasons. The plan shall describe how the public use areas will be accessible to the public.
7. A plan for implementing and enforcing the development and perpetual maintenance of the public use areas, including appropriate ordinances. The plan shall require that the record title owner grant an easement to the department ensuring that future use of public use areas will be consistent with the plan and shall include appropriate mechanisms for department enforcement.
(c) Plan review. 1. The municipality shall consult with any record title holders within the plan area proposed under par. (b) prior to approval by the municipality.
2. Upon adoption of the waterfront development plan by the municipality, the municipality shall provide the plan to the department for review and approval.
3. No later than 90 days after receiving a request for review under this paragraph, the department shall hold a public hearing and shall provide public notice by publishing a class 2 notice under ch. 985 and by posting notice on the department’s website.
4. No later than 90 days following the public hearing under subd. 3., the department shall make a determination under par. (d). The department and the applicant may agree to extend this timeline. The failure of the department to act within 90 days or within any timeline agreed to by the department and the applicant may not be deemed to be an approval by the department.
(d) Determinations by the department. The department may impose additional restrictions and conditions on a plan submitted under par. (c) 2. but may not approve a plan, with or without additional restrictions and conditions, unless the department determines all of the following:
1. The plan meets the requirements of par. (b).
2. The uses proposed in the plan are not inconsistent with existing lake bed grants or submerged land leases.
3. The private uses proposed in the plan will not materially affect the public interest in navigable waters.
4. The amount and location of the public use areas to be developed and maintained under the plan provide a substantial benefit to the public interest in navigable waters. Appropriate uses in public use areas may include concessions open to the public under long-term lease with a municipality if the concessions provide a significant benefit to the public interest in navigable waters.
5. The plan contains sufficient provisions to ensure that the public uses proposed in the plan will be implemented and perpetually maintained.
6. The plan requires that the proceeds from any lease or license to private or public entities to create or operate a concession be used by the municipality to promote the public interest in navigable waters pursuant to a plan approved by the department. This paragraph does not apply to revenue from real property taxes received by the municipality.
7. The boundary established in the plan will not result in a substantial impairment of the public interest in navigable waters and is incidental to the development and perpetual maintenance of the public use areas of the plan.
(e) Effect of determination. 1. An approval under par. (d) constitutes a determination by the department that the public interest in navigable waters is served by implementation of the plan and, with respect to areas that may have been part of the submerged bed of a Great Lakes water at the time of statehood, the boundary established between land that is held in trust by the state or is otherwise publicly owned and land held in private fee title ownership is in the public interest in navigable waters.
2. Following an approval under par. (d), the applicant shall record the approval with the register of deeds and the department shall post the approval on the department’s website. Upon implementation of the portions of the plan approved under par. (d) that relate to the public use areas, and any conditions imposed in the approval related to those areas, areas designated for private use that may have been part of a riverbed at the time of statehood shall not be subject to a navigational servitude and, for areas that may have been part of the submerged bed of a Great Lakes water at the time of statehood, the boundary between land that is held in trust by the state or is otherwise publicly owned and land held in private fee title ownership shall have the same effect as if the boundary were confirmed in a quiet title action granted by a court under s. 841.10.
3. This section does not alter the right of property owners to seek a quiet title action under common law.
(f) Boundary amendments. A municipality may seek to amend a public use boundary approved under par. (d) only by preparing and submitting a new plan using the process under this subsection.
(g) Review. Determinations made under par. (d) are subject to review under ch. 227.
(3) Title to nonriparian parcels. A parcel that may include areas that were part of the submerged bed of a Great Lakes water at the time of statehood and that remained separated from a Great Lakes water by one or more other parcels from December 9, 1977, to the effective date of this subsection .... [LRB inserts date], for which there is a record title holder, and that is not subject to a fill authorization as defined in s. 30.2034 (1) (a), is deemed to be not part of the lake bed of a Great Lakes water and to be held in fee title ownership. For land held in fee title ownership as determined under this subsection, this determination operates in the same manner as if a person were granted quiet title to the property by a court under s. 841.10.
(4) Exception for existing uses. The department shall treat upland property adjacent to a Great Lakes water, all or part of which may have been land that was part of the submerged lake bed of the Great Lakes water at the time of statehood, as property owned by the record title holder for purposes of exercising any regulatory authority, if the property includes portions of land that are upland and the use of such property has not materially changed since the effective date of this subsection .... [LRB inserts date]. In this subsection, “materially changed” means a material modification or termination of an existing use and does not include the maintenance, repair, replacement, restoration, rebuilding, or remodeling of any part of any existing structure or the transfer of the property. This subsection may not be construed as authorizing the combining of existing uses on multiple properties for the purposes of this subsection.
247,3Section 3. 885.335 of the statutes is created to read: 885.335 Actions concerning real estate abutting Great Lakes water. (1) No claim or counterclaim may be made in an action relating to the possession or title of any real estate if the claim or counterclaim is based on an assertion that the property includes portions of land that may have at one time been submerged beneath a Great Lakes water if any of the following apply:
(a) The property is upland, as defined in s. 30.2039 (1) (f), and the use of the property has not materially changed, as defined in s. 30.2039 (4).
(b) The property was designated as land held in fee title ownership by a determination made under s. 30.2039 (2) (d) that establishes the boundary between land held in trust by the state and land held in fee title ownership.
(c) The property is held in fee title ownership as determined under s. 30.2039 (3).
(d) The use of the property is approved under s. 30.2034.
(2) This section does not apply to administrative and judicial review of decisions of the department of natural resources under s. 30.2034 or 30.2039 or ch. 227.
247,4Section 4. Nonstatutory provisions. (1) Notwithstanding s. 13.097 (2), the department of natural resources may not prepare a report under s. 13.097 (2) (a) for this bill.
