SB799,15,119
250.20
(1) (j) “Poverty line" means the nonfarm federal poverty line for the
10continental United States, as defined
by the federal department of labor under in 42
11USC 9902 (2).
Note: Removes reference to the U.S. Department of Labor. Since the enactment
of P.L.
97-35 in 1981, the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1981, the federal poverty
line has been defined at
42 USC 9902 (2).
42 USC 9902 (2) establishes a process for
determining the federal poverty line that does not involve any action by the U.S.
Department of Labor.
SB799,58
12Section
58. 255.06 (1) (e) of the statutes is amended to read:
SB799,15,1513
255.06
(1) (e) “Poverty line" means the nonfarm federal poverty line for the
14continental United States, as defined
by the federal department of labor under in 42
15USC 9902 (2).
Note: Removes reference to the U.S. Department of Labor. Since the enactment
of P.L.
97-35 in 1981, the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1981, the federal poverty
line has been defined at
42 USC 9902 (2).
42 USC 9902 (2) establishes a process for
determining the federal poverty line that does not involve any action by the U.S.
Department of Labor.
SB799,16,318
301.19
(4) Unless the governor has declared a state of emergency under s.
19323.10, the department
of corrections may not expand the capacity of, or
1substantially modify the structure or physical security of, a juvenile correctional
2facility established under s. 301.16 (1w) without prior approval by the governing
3body of the city, village, or town in which the juvenile correctional facility is located.
Note: Section 301.01 (1) defines “department” for all of ch. 301 to mean “the
department of corrections.” This change strikes unnecessary words to consistently use
the defined term.
SB799,60
4Section
60. 341.14 (8v) (title) and (8w) (title) of the statutes are repealed.
Note: The other subsections in s. 341.14 do not have titles.
SB799,61
5Section
61. 343.301 (3) (b) of the statutes is amended to read:
SB799,16,126
343.301
(3) (b) If the court finds that the person who is subject to an order under
7sub. (1g) has a household income that is at or below 150 percent of the nonfarm
8federal poverty line for the continental United States, as defined
by the federal
9department of labor under in 42 USC 9902 (2), the court shall limit the person's
10liability under par. (a) to one-half of the cost of equipping each motor vehicle with
11an ignition interlock device and one-half of the cost per day per vehicle of
12maintaining the ignition interlock device.
Note: Removes reference to the U.S. Department of Labor. Since the enactment
of P.L.
97-35 in 1981, the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1981, the federal poverty
line has been defined at
42 USC 9902 (2).
42 USC 9902 (2) establishes a process for
determining the federal poverty line that does not involve any action by the U.S.
Department of Labor.
SB799,62
13Section
62. 345.05 (1) (c) of the statutes is amended to read:
SB799,16,1714
345.05
(1) (c) “Municipality" means any county, city, village, town, school
15district
as enumerated in s. 67.01 (5), sewer district, drainage district, commission
16formed by a contract under s. 66.0301 (2), and, without restriction because of failure
17of enumeration, any other political subdivision of the state.
Note: Strikes unnecessary phrase.
1985 Wis. Act 225 removed the enumeration
of types of school districts in s. 67.01 (5), making the phrase “as enumerated in s. 67.01
(5)” unnecessary.
SB799,63
18Section
63. 440.032 (1) (d) of the statutes is repealed.
Note: Removes extraneous definition. Section 440.032 (1) (d) provides a definition
of “Wisconsin interpreting and transliterating assessment” in s. 440.032, but that term
does not otherwise appear in s. 440.032.
SB799,17,63
440.032
(3m) Exam administration in Wisconsin. The department of health
4services shall administer in this state the performance examinations of the Board for
5Evaluation of Interpreters or its successor, unless the department
of safety and
6professional services approves another administrator of the examinations.
Note: Inserts the full name of the intended department to avoid ambiguity.
SB799,17,139
632.866
(3) (b) (intro.) An insurer, pharmacy benefit manager, or utilization
10review organization shall grant an exception to the step therapy protocol if the
11prescribing provider submits complete, clinically relevant written documentation
12supporting a step therapy
protocol exception request and any of the following are
13satisfied:
Note: Inserts missing word. The term “step therapy protocol” is defined in s.
632.866 (1) (e). “Protocol” is inserted after “step therapy” so that the defined term is used
consistently in the section.
SB799,18,816
632.866
(3) (f) An insurer, pharmacy benefit manager, or utilization review
17organization shall grant or deny a request for any exception to the step therapy
18protocol within 3 business days of receipt of the complete, clinically relevant written
19documentation required under par. (b) to support a step therapy
protocol exception
20request under par. (b) or the receipt of a request to appeal a previous decision that
21includes the complete, clinically relevant written documentation supporting a step
1therapy
protocol exception request. In exigent circumstances, an insurer, pharmacy
2benefit manager, or utilization review organization shall grant or deny a request for
3an exception to the step therapy protocol by the end of the next business day after
4receipt of the complete, clinically relevant written documentation supporting a step
5therapy
protocol exception request under par. (b). If the insurer, pharmacy benefit
6manager, or utilization review organization does not grant or deny a request or an
7appeal under the time specified under this paragraph, the exception is considered
8granted.
Note: Inserts missing word in three locations. The term “step therapy protocol”
is defined in s. 632.866 (1) (e). “Protocol” is inserted after “step therapy” so that the
defined term is used consistently in the section.
SB799,67
9Section
67. 938.31 (5) (title) of the statutes is created to read:
SB799,18,1010
938.31
(5) (title)
Indian juveniles.
Note: The other subsections in s. 938.31 have titles.
SB799,18,1413
990.01
(21m) Motorcycle. “Motorcycle"
is a motor vehicle as defined has the
14meaning given in s. 340.01 (32).
Note: Section 340.01 (32) defines the term “motorcycle,” not “motor vehicle.” This
Section clarifies that the term “motorcycle” in s. 990.01 (21m), as renumbered from s.
990.01 (43m) by
2019 Wis. Act 50, eff. 5-1-20, has the same meaning as in s. 340.01 (32).
Note: The “(3) or” was erroneously underscored. The underscored language was
current law. No change was intended.
SB799,71
3Section 71
. 2019 Wisconsin Act 8, section
71 is amended by replacing “301.01
4(1n) (by
Section 35), 301.20, 938.02 (4) (by
Section 50), 938.34 (2) (a) (by
Section 57)
5and (b) (by
Section 59) and (4m) (intro.) (by
Section 62), 938.48 (3) (by
Section 78)”
6with “301.01 (1n) (by
Section 35),
301.03 (10) (d) (by Section 38), 301.20, 938.02 (4)
7(by
Section 50), 938.34 (2) (a) (by
Section 57) and (b) (by
Section 59) and (4m) (intro.)
8(by
Section 62),
938.357 (4) (am) (by Section 70), 938.48 (3) (by
Section 78)”.
Note: “301.03 (10) (d) (by
Section 38)” and “938.357 (4) (am) (by
Section 70)” were
removed from
2017 Wis. Act 185, section
112 (1), by
2019 Wis. Act 8, section
71, without
being stricken. The change was intended.
Note: Removes erroneous references in the effective date section of the act. Section
78.12 (4) (a) 4. and (5) were not affected by
2019 Wis. Act 9.
SB799,73
11Section 73
.
Renumbering and cross-reference changes under s. 13.92
12(1) (bm) 2., stats. Each statute listed in column A was renumbered to the statute
13number in column B, and cross-references to the renumbered statute were changed
14in the statutes listed in column C to agree with the renumbered statute, under
15section 13.92 (1) (bm) 2. of the statutes:
Note: Confirms renumbering and corresponding cross-reference changes under
s. 13.92 (1) (bm) 2.
-
See PDF for table SB799,74
1Section 74
.
Corrections of obvious nonsubstantive errors under s.
235.17 (2), stats. In the sections of the statutes listed in column A, the text shown
3in column B was changed to the text shown in column C to correct obvious
4nonsubstantive errors under s. 35.17 (2) of the statutes:
Note: Confirms correction of obvious nonsubstantive errors in the statutes under
s. 35.17 (2).
-
See PDF for table SB799,75
1Section 75
. Effective dates. This act takes effect on the day after
2publication, except as follows:
SB799,27,43
(1)
The treatment of s. 990.01 (21m) takes effect on May 1, 2020, or on the day
4after publication, whichever is later.