SB462: Bill Text

2019 - 2020 LEGISLATURE

2019 Senate BILL 462

September 27, 2019 - Introduced by Senators Jacque and Bernier, cosponsored by Representatives Tusler, McGuire, Bowen, Edming, Goyke, Kurtz, Mursau, Neubauer, Spreitzer, Tittl, Zamarripa and Vruwink. Referred to Committee on Insurance, Financial Services, Government Oversight and Courts.

SB462,1,3 An Act to renumber and amend 977.08 (3) (b); to amend 977.02 (5) and 977.08 (3) (c); and to create 977.08 (3) (b) 2. of the statutes; relating to: Public Defender Board regulation.

Analysis by the Legislative Reference Bureau

Under current law, the Public Defender Board may promulgate rules to assure that representation of indigent clients by the private bar is at the same level as the representation provided by the state public defender. Under this bill, the board's authority to promulgate rules is expanded to include setting standards for and imposing conditions upon private bar attorney certification, decertification, or recertification to represent clients. The bill also adds the following list of reasons as grounds for which the office of the state public defender may exclude a private bar attorney from a public defender list: 1) the attorney has failed to meet minimum attorney performance standards adopted by the state public defender; 2) the attorney has failed to comply with the supreme court rules of professional conduct for attorneys; 3) the attorney has engaged in conduct that is contrary to the interests of clients, the interests of justice, or the interests of the state public defender; or 4) the state public defender learns of any information that raises a concern about the attorney's character, performance, ability, or behavior.

For further information see the state fiscal estimate, which will be printed as an appendix to this bill.

The people of the state of Wisconsin, represented in senate and assembly, do enact as follows:

SB462,1 Section 1 . 977.02 (5) of the statutes is amended to read:

SB462,2,7 977.02 (5) Promulgate rules establishing procedures to assure that representation of indigent clients by the private bar at the initial stages of cases assigned under this chapter is at the same level as the representation provided by the state public defender, including setting standards for and imposing conditions upon private bar attorney certification, decertification, or recertification to represent clients under this chapter.

SB462,2 Section 2 . 977.08 (3) (b) of the statutes is renumbered 977.08 (3) (b) 1. and amended to read:

SB462,2,16 977.08 (3) (b) 1. A final set of lists for each county shall be prepared, certified, and annually updated by the state public defender. Persons may not be excluded from any a list unless only if the state public defender states in writing the reasons for such action in the context of accordance with subd. 2. and existing rules adopted by the state public defender board. Any attorney thus excluded shall then have the opportunity to may appeal the state public defender's decision to the board, which shall issue a final decision in writing.

SB462,3 Section 3 . 977.08 (3) (b) 2. of the statutes is created to read:

SB462,2,19 977.08 (3) (b) 2. An attorney may be excluded from a list under subd. 1. if any of the following applies:

SB462,2,21 a. The attorney fails or has failed to meet minimum attorney performance standards adopted by the state public defender.

SB462,3,1 b. The attorney fails or has failed to comply with SCR chapter 20.

SB462,3,3 c. The attorney engages in conduct that is contrary to the interests of clients, the interests of justice, or the interests of the state public defender.

SB462,3,5 d. The state public defender learns of any information that raises a concern about the attorney's character, performance, ability, or behavior.

SB462,4 Section 4 . 977.08 (3) (c) of the statutes is amended to read:

SB462,3,11 977.08 (3) (c) A person appointed from the set of lists prepared under par. (b) 1. shall be appointed in order from the top of each list; if any attorney thus appointed states in writing that he or she cannot accept the appointment, he or she shall be placed on the bottom of the list, and the attorney thus elevated to the top of the list shall be appointed.

SB462,3,12 (End)