By Representatives Brostoff, Cabrera, Anderson, Hebl, Stubbs, Emerson, Bowen, Spreitzer, Shankland, Neubauer, Considine and Sinicki; cosponsored by Senators Larson and Smith.
hist121423To committee on Campaigns and Elections. _____________
Chief Clerk Reports
The Chief Clerk records:
Presented to the Governor on Friday, February 28.
PATRICK E. FULLER
Assembly Chief Clerk
_____________
Executive Communications
State of Wisconsin
Office of the Governor
Madison
February 28, 2020
To the Honorable Members of the Assembly:
The following bills, originating in the Assembly, have been approved, signed and deposited in the office of the Secretary of State:
Bill Number Act Number Date Approved
Respectfully submitted,
TONY EVERS
Governor
_____________
Pursuant to s. 35.095 (1)(b), Wisconsin Statutes, the following 2019 Acts have been published: Act Number Bill Number Publication Date
hist121506Wisconsin Act 105 Assembly Bill 633 February 29, 2020 hist121508Wisconsin Act 107 Assembly Bill 222 February 29, 2020 hist121510Wisconsin Act 109 Assembly Bill 47 February 29, 2020 hist121512Wisconsin Act 110 Assembly Bill 49 February 29, 2020 hist121514Wisconsin Act 112 Assembly Bill 804 February 29, 2020 hist121516Wisconsin Act 113 Assembly Bill 86 February 29, 2020 hist121518Wisconsin Act 114 Assembly Bill 691 February 29, 2020 hist121520Wisconsin Act 115 Assembly Bill 704 February 29, 2020 _____________
Governor’s Veto Messages
February 28, 2020
To the Honorable Members of the Assembly:
I am vetoing 2019 Assembly Bill 26 in its entirety.
This bill relates to direct primary care agreements, which is an arrangement where a health care provider agrees to provide primary care services to a patient in exchange for a subscription fee. Under the bill, requirements would be established for a valid direct primary care agreement and valid direct primary care agreements would be exempt from Wisconsin’s insurance laws. Originally, the bill would have prohibited a health care provider, when selecting patients for a direct primary care agreement, from discriminating on the basis of age, citizenship status, color, disability, gender, gender identity, genetic information, health status, existence of a preexisting medical condition, national origin, race, religion, sex, sexual orientation, or any other protected class. However, many of these protections were removed by an amendment. The current bill provides that a health care provider would only be prohibited from discriminating based on a preexisting medical condition, health status, age, race, creed, color, sex, or disability.
hist121523I am vetoing this bill in its entirety because I object to the Legislature removing discrimination protections for certain individuals. In addition, I object to allowing a health care provider to choose not to enter into a direct primary care agreement with a patient based on the patient’s genetics, national origin, gender identity, citizenship status, or whether the patient is LGBTQ. I believe that all individuals should be treated equally. Respectfully submitted,
TONY EVERS
Governor of Wisconsin
_____________
February 28, 2020
hist121525To the Honorable Members of the Assembly: I am vetoing 2019 Assembly Bill 805 in its entirety.
This bill requires that the Department of Corrections recommend revoking a person's extended supervision, parole, or probation if the person is charged with a crime while on extended supervision, parole, or probation. Individuals who are participating in the alternatives to revocation program at the Department of Corrections are exempt from the sanctions of this bill.
I am vetoing this bill in its entirety because I object to this unfunded mandate on the Department of Corrections that moves Wisconsin in the wrong direction on criminal justice reform. This bill is estimated to have a fiscal impact of more than $200 million in just the first two years and hundreds of millions of dollars in unknown, ongoing costs to state taxpayers in the years to follow. This significant price tag does not include construction costs to build additional state correctional facilities, which would likely be needed, or take into account the fiscal impact on local governments.
Investing in evidence-based programming that addresses barriers to reentry, enhances educational and vocational opportunities for returning citizens, and provides treatment for mental health and substance use issues has shown to be an effective way to reduce recidivism and save taxpayer money while improving public safety. My budget made strides by investing in the Opening Avenues to Reentry Success and Treatment, Alternatives, and Diversion programs. My budget also proposed a two-percent increase in shared revenues for our local governments that would have helped them manage public safety costs. Sadly, this funding increase for local governments was removed by the legislature.
