Fifth, the rules govern the procedures and standards under which DOJ issues concealed carry certification cards to qualified former federal law enforcement officers pursuant to s.
175.49, Stats. These rules govern all aspects of the certification process for former federal officers who reside in Wisconsin and describe the procedures and standards under which DOJ processes applications, sets and collects fees, and verifies that each applicant meets all of the certification eligibility requirements under s.
175.49 (3) (b), Stats., including procedures and standards for certifying that an applicant has satisfied the firearm qualification requirement under s.
175.49 (3) (b) 5., Stats., and procedures for conducting the statutorily required background check of each applicant to determine whether the applicant is prohibited from possessing a firearm under federal law. The rules also cover: the maintenance and treatment of certification records by DOJ; procedures for renewing a certification card and replacing a card that is lost, stolen, or destroyed; procedures for processing address changes or name changes by a certified former federal officer; procedures and standards for revoking or suspending a certification; and procedures for the administrative review by DOJ of any denial, suspension, or revocation of a certification.
Description of Existing Policies Relevant to the Rule and of New Policies Proposed to be Included in the Rule and an Analysis of Policy Alternatives; the History, Background and Justification for the Proposed Rule
In
2011 Wisconsin Act 35, the state of Wisconsin established a new system under which DOJ is required to issue licenses authorizing eligible Wisconsin residents to carry concealed weapons in Wisconsin and to certify firearms safety and training instructors. The legislation also authorizes DOJ to issue concealed carry certification cards to qualified former federal law enforcement officers who reside in Wisconsin. Because the concealed carry licensing and certification programs established by Act 35 are new, there are no existing DOJ practices or policies that cover the subject areas of the administrative rules here proposed other than the emergency rules that went into effect on November 1, 2011.
Most of the proposed rules simply carry into effect the legislative directives set forth in Act 35. In a few areas, the proposed rules articulate policies which give substance to undefined statutory terms or are needed to ensure that licenses and certification cards are issued only to eligible individuals and that all applicants and licensees are properly identified at all times. Such rules are specifically intended to carry out the legislature's intent reflected in Act 35.
For example, the proposed rules provide definitions of such undefined statutory terms as “firearms safety or training course" and “national or state organization that certifies firearms instructors." Such definitions are necessary to give substantive content to these otherwise undefined statutory terms so as to carry out the legislative purposes of ensuring that all licensees have been trained in firearms and firearms safety and of ensuring that all certified firearms instructors have demonstrated the ability and knowledge required for providing training in firearms and firearms safety. The policy alternative of not defining such terms in DOJ's administrative rules would be contrary to those important legislative purposes.
Similarly, the proposed rules specify the types of information that must be included in a training certificate or affidavit in order for DOJ to find that certificate or affidavit to be sufficient to satisfy the training documentation requirements in s.
175.60 (4) (a), Stats. Such specification is necessary to give substantive content to the statutory documentation requirements so as to carry out the legislative purpose of ensuring that every successful applicant for a concealed carry license has adequately demonstrated completion of at least one of the forms of statutorily required training. The policy alternative of not specifying the required contents of an acceptable training certificate or affidavit in DOJ's administrative rules would be contrary to that important legislative purpose.
Likewise, the proposed rule designating those states other than Wisconsin that conduct a background check for concealed carry licensees comparable to Wisconsin's background check is necessary to comply with the statutory requirement of s.
165.25 (12m), Stats. That rule enables law enforcement officers and others to determine whether a particular concealed carry license issued by another state is entitled to recognition as an “out-of-state license" as defined in s.
175.60 (1) (f), Stats. The alternative of not promulgating such a rule would violate the requirements of s.
165.25 (12m), Stats. and would be contrary to the purpose of facilitating recognition of out-of-state licenses.
The proposed rules also contain procedures for issuing a new concealed carry license or certification card to an individual who changes his or her name, and procedures under which DOJ will work cooperatively with courts and law enforcement agencies in relation to any emergency concealed carry license that may be issued by a court, pursuant to s.
175.60 (9r). These procedures are not specifically required by statute but are necessary to carry out the legislative purposes of ensuring that licenses and certification cards are issued only to eligible individuals and that all applicants and licensees are properly identified at all times. The policy alternative of not including such procedures in DOJ's administrative rules would be contrary to those important legislative purposes.
Statutory Authority for the Rule (Including the Statutory Citation and Language)
Those portions of the proposed rules that establish the amount of the fee to be charged for a concealed carry license are expressly and specifically authorized and required by s.
175.60 (7), Stats., which provides:
SUBMISSION OF APPLICATION. An individual may apply for a license under this section with the department by submitting, by mail or other means made available by the department, to the department all of the following:
(c) A license fee in an amount, as determined by the department by rule, that is equal to the cost of issuing the license but does not exceed $37. The department shall determine the costs of issuing a license by using a 5-year planning period.
Those portions of the proposed rules that establish procedures for the administrative review by DOJ of any denial, suspension, or revocation of a license are expressly and specifically authorized by s.
175.60 (14g), Stats., which provides:
DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW. The department shall promulgate rules providing for the review of any action by the department denying an application for, or suspending or revoking, a license under this section.
Those portions of the proposed rules that establish the amount of the fee to be charged for the renewal of a concealed carry license are expressly and specifically authorized by s.
175.60 (15) (b), Stats., which provides:
The department shall renew the license if, no later than 90 days after the expiration date of the license, the licensee does all of the following:
4. Pays all of the following:
a. A renewal fee in an amount, as determined by the department by rule, that is equal to the cost of renewing the license but does not exceed $12. The department shall determine the costs of renewing a license by using a 5-year planning period.
Those portions of the proposed rules that are not specifically authorized by ss.
175.60 (7),
(14g), and
(15) (b), Stats., as described above, are authorized by s.
227.11 (2) (a), Stats., which provides:
(2) Rule-making authority is expressly conferred as follows:
(a) Each agency may promulgate rules interpreting the provisions of any statute enforced or administered by the agency, if the agency considers it necessary to effectuate the purpose of the statute, but a rule is not valid if the rule exceeds the bounds of correct interpretation. All of the following apply to the promulgation of a rule interpreting the provisions of a statute enforced or administered by an agency:
1. A statutory or nonstatutory provision containing a statement or declaration of legislative intent, purpose, findings, or policy does not confer rule-making authority on the agency or augment the agency's rule-making authority beyond the rule-making authority that is explicitly conferred on the agency by the legislature.
2. A statutory provision describing the agency's general powers or duties does not confer rule-making authority on the agency or augment the agency's rule-making authority beyond the rule-making authority that is explicitly conferred on the agency by the legislature.
3. A statutory provision containing a specific standard, requirement, or threshold does not confer on the agency the authority to promulgate, enforce, or administer a rule that contains a standard, requirement, or threshold that is more restrictive than the standard, requirement, or threshold contained in the statutory provision.
This statute expressly confers on DOJ the general power to determine whether administrative rules interpreting those statutory provisions in Act 35 that are to be enforced or administered by DOJ are necessary to effectuate the purpose of those statutory provisions and, if such necessity is found, to promulgate such administrative rules, as long as those rules do not exceed the bounds of correct interpretation of the governing statutes.
DOJ finds that the rules here proposed are necessary to effectuate those portions of ss.
175.49 and
175.60 that require DOJ to establish and operate procedures governing:
•
the issuance of concealed carry licenses to qualified applicants, including verification that each applicant has satisfied the applicable statutory training requirements, has passed the mandatory background check, and has met all of the other statutory eligibility requirements for a license;
•
the issuance of concealed carry certification cards to qualified former federal law enforcement officers residing in Wisconsin, including verification that each applicant has satisfied the applicable firearm certification requirements, has passed the mandatory background check, and has met all of the other statutory eligibility requirements for certification;
•
the administration of concealed carry licenses and certifications that have been issued by DOJ, including the maintenance and treatment of records; the receipt and processing of information from courts about individuals subject to a court-imposed disqualification from possessing a dangerous weapon; the renewal of licenses and certifications and the replacement of those that are lost, stolen, or destroyed; the processing of address changes or name changes for licenses and certifications; procedures and standards for revoking or suspending a license or certification; procedures for the administrative review by DOJ of any denial, suspension, or revocation of a license or certification; and procedures governing DOJ's cooperation with courts and law enforcement agencies in relation to emergency licenses issued by a court; and
•
the qualification and certification of firearms instructors by DOJ and the identification of those firearm instructors who are certified by a national or state organization.
DOJ further finds that the rules here proposed:
•
do not exceed the bounds of correct interpretation of ss.
175.49 or
175.60;
•
are authorized by the statutes described above and are not based on authority derived from any other statutory or nonstatutory statements or declarations of legislative intent, purpose, findings, or policy;
•
are authorized as necessary interpretations of the specific requirements of ss.
175.49 and
175.60 and are not based on authority derived from any other general powers or duties of DOJ; and
•
do not impose any standards or requirements that are more restrictive than the standards and requirements contained in ss.
175.49 and
175.60.
The rules proposed here may be promulgated as emergency rules under s.
227.24 (1) (a), Stats., which provides:
An agency may promulgate a rule as an emergency rule without complying with the notice, hearing and publication requirements under this chapter if preservation of the public peace, health, safety or welfare necessitates putting the rule into effect prior to the time it would take effect if the agency complied with the procedures.
DOJ finds that the public welfare necessitates promulgating the proposed rules as emergency rules under s.
227.24 (1) (a), Stats. For the reasons already described in Section 1 above, in order to ensure continuity and avoid confusion and disruption in the operation of the rules governing the concealed carry permit program, it is necessary for DOJ to promulgate revised emergency rules that do not include the provisions of the existing emergency rules that were suspended by JCRAR on November 7, 2011. The preservation of such continuity and the avoidance of such confusion and disruption is plainly in the public interest. The public welfare thus necessitates that the proposed rules be promulgated as emergency rules under s.
227.24, Stats. Once these emergency rules have been promulgated, DOJ will continue the permanent rulemaking process that is already under way.
Estimate of the Amount of Time that State Employees will Spend to Develop the Rule and of Other Resources Necessary to Develop the Rule
It is estimated that state employees will spend approximately 10 hours on the rulemaking process for the emergency rules proposed here, primarily for compliance with required rulemaking procedures.
Description of all Entities that may be Impacted by the Rule
The proposed rules governing procedures and standards for the issuance and administration of concealed carry licenses under s.
175.60, Stats., directly affect the interests of all Wisconsin residents who wish to apply for a license to carry a concealed weapon. In addition, the proposed rules also indirectly affect the interest of the general public to the extent that the proper training and licensing of concealed carry licensees generally affects public safety.
The proposed rules governing procedures and standards for the issuance and administration of certification cards under s.
175.49 (3), Stats., directly affect the interests of all former federal law enforcement officers residing in Wisconsin who wish to apply for such certification. In addition, the proposed rules also indirectly affect the interest of the general public to the extent that the proper firearm certification of former law enforcement officers generally affects public safety.
The proposed rules governing the procedures and standards for the qualification and certification of firearms instructors by DOJ under s.
175.60 (4) (b), Stats., directly affect the interests of all eligible persons who wish to apply for such certification. The proposed rules identifying those firearm instructors who are certified by a national or state organization, as provided in s.
175.60 (4) (a), Stats., directly affect the interests of all persons who wish to claim such certification as a basis for providing training in firearms and firearm safety under that statute. In addition, the proposed rules also indirectly affect the interest of the general public to the extent that the proper certification of firearms instructors generally affects public safety.
Summary and Preliminary Comparison of any Existing or Proposed Federal Regulation that is Intended to Address the Activities to be Regulated by the Rule
For persons other than current and former law enforcement officers, the regulation of the carrying of concealed weapons is primarily governed at the state level. Numerous federal statutes and regulations restrict the possession of weapons that have been shipped in interstate commerce, but there are no federal regulations that relate to the licensing of concealed carry by such persons, nor are there federal regulations governing the certification of firearms instructors for concealed carry purposes.
For qualified current and former law enforcement officers, state and local laws restricting the carrying of concealed firearms are federally preempted by 18 U.S.C. ss. 926B-926C (commonly referred to as “H.R. 218"). The provisions in
2011 Wis. Act 35 related to qualified current and former law enforcement officers are state-law codifications of the corresponding provisions in H.R. 218. Similarly, the rules proposed here governing procedures and standards for the issuance and administration of concealed carry certification cards for qualified former federal law enforcement officers also codify corresponding provisions in the federal law.
Contact Person
Assistant Attorney General Clayton P. Kawski, (608) 266-7477.
Natural Resources
Fish, Game, etc., Chs.
NR 1—
This statement of scope was approved by the governor on February 15, 2012.
Rule No.
WM-05-12(E) (Revises Chapter
NR 10)
Relating to
Reestablishing a four day, October, anterless-only firearm deer season in the CWD Management Zone.
Description of the Objective of the Rule
This emergency rule proposal would re-establish the annual October, antlerless-only, four day firearm deer season that has been held in the chronic wasting disease management zone.
Description of Existing Policies Relevant to the Rule and of New Policies Proposed to be Included in the Rule and an Analysis of Policy Alternatives; the History, Background and Justification for the Proposed Rule
Under 2011 ACT 50, if the department elects to continue holding the four day, antlerless-only, firearm deer season prior to the traditional nine day firearm season, it must do so by enacting emergency rules each year. This season may only be held in areas where a chronic wasting disease management zone has been established. The season would begin on Thursday, October 11.
Since 2002, the department has held an October firearm deer season to provide hunting opportunity and for herd management and disease control purposes in the chronic wasting disease management zone. Deer population reduction is the available disease control method most likely to be effective in controlling CWD in free-ranging deer. Over the past 50 years, regulated hunting has been shown to be an ecologically sound, socially beneficial, and fiscally responsible method of managing deer populations. Hunter harvest in the CWD Management Zone during the past eight years appears to have reduced the deer population in this region, although it has not been sufficient to cause substantial, widespread population decline. An October season helps maintain a consistent hunting-season structure that improves hunter understanding of regulations and enhances both compliance and enforcement of those regulations. A consistent season framework also makes it easier to evaluate management efforts.
Statutory Authority for the Rule (Including the Statutory Citation and Language)
In promulgating this rule, ss.
29.014,
29.016 (2) (b),
29.063 and
227.24, Stats., have been interpreted as providing the department with the authority to make modifications to deer hunting seasons.
Estimate of the Amount of Time that State Employees will Spend to Develop the Rule and of Other Resources Necessary to Develop the Rule
Approximately 73 hours will be needed by the department prior to and following adoption by the board.
Description of all Entities that may be Impacted by the Rule
Interested groups and individuals are those who are concerned about deer management including hunters and people whose interests involve agriculture, environment, forestry, wildlife viewing, and non-hunting related outdoor recreation that occurs during deer hunting seasons.
Summary and Preliminary Comparison of any Existing or Proposed Federal Regulation that is Intended to Address the Activities to be Regulated by the Rule
Federal regulations allow states to manage the wildlife resources located within their boundaries provided they do not conflict with regulations established in the Federal Register. None of these rule changes violate or conflict with the provisions established in the Federal Code of Regulations.
Anticipated Economic Impact of the Rule
No economic impacts are anticipated. The hunting season framework proposed in this rule is identical to the season framework that was in place during the previous season.
Contact Person
Scott Loomans, Wildlife Regulation Policy Specialist, 101 S. Webster Street, PO Box 7921, Madison WI 53707-7921, (608) 267-2452 or Kevin Wallenfang, Big Game Specialist, 101 S. Webster Street, PO Box 7921, Madison WI 53707-7921, (608) 261-7589.
Natural Resources
Fish, Game, etc., Chs.
NR 1—
This statement of scope was approved by the governor on February 15, 2012.
Rule No.
WM-03-12(E) (Revises Chapter
NR 10)
Relating to
Modifying Chapter
NR 10 related to the bobcat hunting and trapping season.
Description of the Objective of the Rule
