Justification of sureties.
The plaintiff may within 3 days after notification by the sheriff that the defendant demands a return of the property except to the defendant's sureties by motion to the judge or judicial officer under s. 810.08 (2)
, and the judge or judicial officer shall determine the sufficiency of the sureties provided for the bond.
Sup. Ct. Order, 67 Wis. 2d 585, 758 (1975), 777; Stats. 1975 s. 810.07; 1977 c. 308
Affidavit and justification of sureties. 810.08(1)(1)
The sureties, under this chapter, shall append to their bond their affidavits in which each shall swear that he or she is a resident freeholder and is worth the sum stated in the bond above his or her liabilities in property in this state not exempt from execution.
The justification of sureties under this chapter shall be before a judge on not less than 2 nor more than 6 days' notice. Each surety must swear that he or she is a resident freeholder in this state and is worth the sum stated in the surety's bond above the surety's liabilities in property in this state not exempt from execution. But if there are more than 2 sureties on any bond they may be accepted if they shall justify severally in sums which aggregate double the sum named in the bond.
Sup. Ct. Order, 67 Wis. 2d 585, 758 (1975); Stats. 1975 s. 810.08; 1993 a. 486
Property in building, how taken.
If the property or any part thereof is in a building or enclosure the sheriff may demand its delivery. If the property is not delivered the sheriff shall advise the plaintiff of the refusal of the delivery. The plaintiff may then apply to the court for a warrant upon a sufficient showing of probable cause that the property is contained in the building or enclosure and upon delivery of the warrant of the judicial officer to the sheriff the sheriff may then enter and take the property.
Sup. Ct. Order, 67 Wis. 2d 585, 758 (1975); Stats. 1975 s. 810.09; 1977 c. 308
Property, how kept.
The sheriff shall keep the property taken in a secure place and deliver it to the party entitled thereto upon receiving the sheriff's lawful fees for taking and the sheriff's necessary expenses for keeping the same.
Sup. Ct. Order, 67 Wis. 2d 585, 758 (1975); Stats. 1975 s. 810.10; 1993 a. 486
Claims of 3rd parties; indemnity to officer.
If the property taken is claimed by a 3rd person, the 3rd person may make application to the judge or judicial officer under ss. 810.02
for an order directing that the 3rd person be given delivery of the property so claimed. Any person having possession of the property may move the court to vacate or modify the order directing delivery to the 3rd-party claimant, or post bond in the same manner provided for the defendant.
Sup. Ct. Order, 67 Wis. 2d 585, 758 (1975); Stats. 1975 s. 810.11; 1977 c. 308
; 2005 a. 253
The sheriff shall file a return or any other papers relating to any actions by the sheriff made under this chapter within a reasonable time after service.
Sup. Ct. Order, 67 Wis. 2d 585, 758 (1975); Stats. 1975 s. 810.12; 1977 c. 308
Upon the trial, the court or jury shall find all of the following:
Whether the plaintiff is entitled to possession of the property involved.
Whether the defendant unlawfully took or detained the property involved.
The damages sustained by the successful party from any unlawful taking or unjust detention of the property to the time of the trial.
Sup. Ct. Order, 67 Wis. 2d 585, 758, 777 (1975); Stats. 1975 s. 810.13; 1995 a. 225
Although an original taking of property is lawful, its subsequent detention may be unlawful. Capitol Sand & Gravel Co. v. Waffenschmidt, 71 Wis. 2d 227
, 237 N.W.2d 745
While a wrongful detention claim may arise when an initially lawful possession becomes unlawful by exceeding the owner's authorization, this is not the only factual scenario that gives rise to such a claim. A wrongful detention claim may arise against a possessor of previously converted or wrongfully taken property. Mueller v. TL90108, LLC, 2020 WI 7
, 390 Wis. 2d 34
, 938 N.W.2d 566
Judgment in replevin.
In any action of replevin judgment for the plaintiff may be for the possession or for the recovery of possession of the property, or the value thereof in case a delivery cannot be had, and of damages for the detention; and when the property shall have been delivered to the defendant, under s. 810.06
, judgment may be as aforesaid or absolutely for the value thereof at the plaintiff's option, and damages for the detention. If the property shall have been delivered to the plaintiff under ss. 810.01
and the defendant prevails, judgment for the defendant may be for a return of the property or the value thereof, at the defendant's option, and damages for taking and withholding the same.
Sup. Ct. Order, 67 Wis. 2d 585, 761, 778 (1975); Stats. 1975 s. 810.14; 1993 a. 486
Damages for the loss of use of detained property must be based on a showing that the plaintiff was in a position to use the property and that the property would have been used but for the unlawful detainer. Korb v. Schroedel, 93 Wis. 2d 207
, 286 N.W.2d 589
A successful plaintiff in a replevin action is entitled to damages. If the property is recovered by the owner, the damages are usually measured by interest and, if the property depreciates in value during the time of the wrongful detention, the amount of the depreciation. Global Steel Products v. Ecklund Carriers, Inc. 2002 WI App 91
, 253 Wis. 2d 588
, 644 N.W.2d 269
A party bringing an action for replevin may recover not only possession of personal property but also damages for its detention. To that effect, the legislature has enacted two statutes of repose—s. 893.35 regarding recovering possession of the property and s. 893.51 (1) with respect to damages. Mueller v. TL90108, LLC, 2020 WI 7
, 390 Wis. 2d 34
, 938 N.W.2d 566
Judgment in replevin against principal and sureties.
The judgment in replevin may be entered both against the principal and the sureties on the principal's bond for a return or delivery of the property, as prescribed in ss. 810.01
; and where the officer, to whom the execution thereon is directed, cannot find sufficient property of the principal to satisfy the execution, the officer shall satisfy it out of the property of such sureties; and the execution shall so direct.
Sup. Ct. Order, 67 Wis. 2d 585, 761 (1975), 778; Stats. 1975 s. 810.15; 1993 a. 486