138,15Section 15. 66.1105 (4) (h) 4. of the statutes is repealed. 138,16Section 16. 66.1105 (4e) (b) 1. of the statutes is amended to read: 66.1105 (4e) (b) 1. Adoption of a resolution under par. (a) 1. shall be preceded by a public hearing held by the common council at which interested parties shall be afforded a reasonable opportunity to express their views on the proposed designation of a distressed, or severely distressed, tax incremental district. Notice of the hearing shall be published as a class 2 notice under ch. 985. The notice shall describe the resolution and shall advise that a copy of the resolution will be provided on request. The notice shall also explain that the life of a distressed tax incremental district may be extended, that it may receive excess tax increments from a donor district, and that the life of the donor district may be extended to provide such increments. Before publication, a copy of the notice shall be sent by 1st class mail to the chief executive officer or administrator of all local governmental entities having the power to levy taxes on property within the district and to the school board of any school district that includes property located within the proposed district. For a county with no chief executive officer or administrator, this notice shall be sent to the county board chairperson.
138,17Section 17. 66.1105 (5) (bf) of the statutes is repealed. 138,18Section 18. 66.1105 (5) (bj) of the statutes is repealed. 138,19Section 19. 66.1105 (5) (c) 1. of the statutes is amended to read: 66.1105 (5) (c) 1. For a tax incremental district created before March 3, 2016, if the city adopts an amendment to the original project plan for any district which subtracts territory from the district or which includes additional project costs at least part of which will be incurred after the period specified in sub. (6) (am) 1., the tax incremental base for the district shall be redetermined, if sub. (4) (h) 2., 4., or 5. applies to the amended project plan, either by subtracting from the tax incremental base the value of the taxable property and the value of real property owned by the city, other than property described under s. 66.1105 (5) (bm), 2013 stats. that is subtracted from the existing district or by adding to the tax incremental base the value of the taxable property and the value of real property owned by the city, other than property described in s. 66.1105 (5) (bm), 2013 stats., that is added to the existing district under sub. (4) (h) 2., 4., or 5. or, if sub. (4) (h) 2., 4., or 5. does not apply to the amended project plan, under s. 66.1105 (5) (b), 2013 stats., as of the January 1 next preceding the effective date of the amendment if the amendment becomes effective between January 2 and September 30, as of the next subsequent January 1 if the amendment becomes effective between October 1 and December 31 and if the effective date of the amendment is January 1 of any year, the redetermination shall be made on that date. With regard to a district to which territory has been added, the tax incremental base as redetermined under this paragraph is effective for the purposes of this section only if it exceeds the original tax incremental base determined under s. 66.1105 (5) (b), 2013 stats.
138,20Section 20. 66.1105 (5) (ce) 1. of the statutes is amended to read: 66.1105 (5) (ce) 1. For a tax incremental district created before March 3, 2016, if the city adopts an amendment, to which sub. (4) (h) 2., 4., or 5. applies, the tax incremental base for the district shall be redetermined, either by subtracting from the tax incremental base the value of the taxable property and the value of real property owned by the city, other than property described under s. 66.1105 (5) (bm), 2013, stats., that is subtracted from the existing district or by adding to the tax incremental base the value of the taxable property and the value of real property owned by the city, other than property described in s. 66.1105 (5) (bm), 2013, stats., that is added to the existing district under sub. (4) (h) 2., 4., or 5., as of the January 1 next preceding the effective date of the amendment if the amendment becomes effective between January 2 and September 30, as of the next subsequent January 1 if the amendment becomes effective between October 1 and December 31 and if the effective date of the amendment is January 1 of any year, the redetermination shall be made on that date. With regard to a district to which territory has been added, the tax incremental base as redetermined under this paragraph is effective for the purposes of this section only if it exceeds the original tax incremental base determined under s. 66.1105 (5) (b), 2013 stats.
138,21Section 21. 66.1105 (6) (a) 5. of the statutes is repealed. 138,22Section 22. 66.1105 (6) (a) 9. of the statutes is repealed. 138,23Section 23. 66.1105 (6) (am) 2. c. of the statutes is repealed. 138,24Section 24. 66.1105 (6) (am) 2. d. of the statutes is repealed. 138,25Section 25. 66.1105 (6) (am) 2. e. of the statutes is repealed. 138,26Section 26. 66.1105 (6) (am) 2. f. of the statutes is repealed. 138,27Section 27. 66.1105 (6) (d) 1m. of the statutes is amended to read: 66.1105 (6) (d) 1m. After December 31, 2016, subd. 1. applies only to Tax Incremental District Number One, Tax Incremental District Number Four, and Tax Incremental District Number Five in the City of Kenosha, and no increments may be allocated under that subdivision, after December 31, 2016, unless the allocation is approved by the joint review board.
138,28Section 28. 66.1105 (6) (dm) of the statutes is repealed. 138,29Section 29. 66.1105 (6) (e) 1. b. of the statutes is amended to read: 66.1105 (6) (e) 1. b. Except as provided in subd. 1. e., the The donor tax incremental district and the recipient tax incremental district have been created before October 1, 1995.
138,30Section 30. 66.1105 (6) (e) 1. e. of the statutes is repealed. 138,31Section 31. 66.1105 (7) (ak) 2. of the statutes is amended to read: 66.1105 (7) (ak) 2. Except as provided in par. (am) 4., for a district that is created after September 30, 1995, and before October 1, 2004, and that is not subject to subd. 1., 4., or 5., 23 years after the district was created, and, except as provided in subd. 3., for a district that is created before October 1, 1995, 27 years after the district is created.
138,32Section 32. 66.1105 (7) (ak) 3. of the statutes is repealed. 138,33Section 33. 66.1105 (7) (ar) of the statutes is repealed. 138,34Section 34. 66.1105 (7) (at) of the statutes is repealed. 138,35Section 35. 66.1105 (18) (c) 2. of the statutes is amended to read: 66.1105 (18) (c) 2. Notwithstanding the provisions under sub. (2) (f) 1. k., m., and n., a multijurisdictional tax incremental district may not incur project costs for any area that is outside of the district’s boundaries.
138,36Section 36. 66.1105 (19) of the statutes is repealed.