LRB-4346/1
MED&EAW:cjs&cdc
2021 - 2022 LEGISLATURE
January 31, 2022 - Introduced by Representatives Armstrong, Petryk,
Penterman, August, Brandtjen, Cabral-Guevara, Callahan, Dittrich,
Edming, James, Katsma, Kitchens, Knodl, Krug, Kuglitsch, Loudenbeck,
Macco, Magnafici, Moses, Oldenburg, Petersen, Plumer, Schraa, Snyder,
Sortwell, Steffen, Tittl, Tusler, Vorpagel, Wichgers, Zimmerman and
Born, cosponsored by Senators Wimberger, Bernier, Darling, Felzkowski,
Feyen, Marklein, Nass and Stroebel. Referred to Committee on Workforce
Development.
AB938,1,10
1An Act to renumber and amend 108.04 (2) (a) 4. and 108.04 (5) (e);
to amend
216.54 (2) (a) 1., 108.04 (5) (b) and 108.14 (20); and
to create 16.54 (14), 108.04
3(2) (a) 4. d., 108.04 (5) (e) (intro.), 108.04 (5) (e) 2., 108.04 (5) (h), 108.14 (10m),
4108.14 (23m), 108.14 (29) and 108.14 (30) of the statutes;
relating to: various
5changes to the unemployment insurance law, requiring an audit to be
6conducted by the Legislative Audit Bureau, requiring approval by the Joint
7Committee on Finance of certain federally authorized unemployment benefits,
8and authorizing the secretary of administration to transfer employees from any
9executive branch agency to the Department of Workforce Development for
10certain purposes.
Analysis by the Legislative Reference Bureau
Unemployment insurance
This bill makes various changes in the unemployment insurance (UI) law,
which is administered by the Department of Workforce Development. Significant
changes include all of the following:
Misconduct
Currently, if an employee is discharged for misconduct connected with his or her
employment, the employee is ineligible to receive benefits until certain
requalification criteria are satisfied. In addition, all wages earned with the employer
that discharges the employee are excluded in determining the amount of any future
benefits to which the employee is entitled. Current law provides a general definition
of misconduct and also specifies a number of specific actions that constitute
misconduct. This bill does all of the following with respect to what is considered
misconduct:
1. Current law specifically provides that misconduct includes theft of an
employer's property or services with intent to deprive the employer of the property
or services permanently, theft of currency of any value, felonious conduct connected
with an employee's employment with his or her employer, or intentional or negligent
conduct by an employee that causes substantial damage to his or her employer's
property. This bill:
a. Deletes the requirement that the employee have the intent to deprive the
employer of the property or services permanently.
b. Provides that intentional or negligent conduct by an employee that causes
the destruction of an employer's records is also considered misconduct.
c. Adds unauthorized possession of an employer's property, theft or
unauthorized distribution of an employer's confidential or proprietary information,
and use of an employer's credit card or other financial instrument for an
unauthorized or nonbusiness purpose without prior approval from the employer to
the list of what is considered misconduct.
2. Current law specifically provides that misconduct includes absenteeism by
an employee on more than two occasions within the 120-day period before the date
of the employee's termination, unless otherwise specified by his or her employer in
an employment manual of which the employee has acknowledged receipt with his or
her signature, or excessive tardiness by an employee in violation of a policy of the
employer that has been communicated to the employee, if the employee does not
provide to his or her employer both notice and one or more valid reasons for the
absenteeism or tardiness.
This bill instead provides that misconduct includes both of the following: 1) a
violation of an employer's reasonable policy that covers employee absenteeism,
tardiness, or both and that results in an employee's termination, if that termination
is in accordance with that policy and the policy is specified by the employer in an
employment manual of which the employee has acknowledged receipt with his or her
signature; and 2) if an employer does not have a policy covering absenteeism that
meets the criteria just described, absenteeism on more than two occasions within the
120-day period preceding an employee's termination, if the employee does not
provide to the employer both notice and one or more valid reasons for the
absenteeism.
3. The bill specifically provides that misconduct includes a violation by an
employee of an employer's reasonable employment policy that covers the use of social
media specified by the employer in an employment manual of which the employee
has acknowledged receipt with his or her signature.