NR 664.0221(5)(b)2.2. The owner or operator demonstrates that the monofill is located, designed and operated so as to assure that there will be no migration of any hazardous constituent into groundwater or surface water at any future time.
NR 664.0221(6)(6)The owner or operator of any replacement surface impoundment unit is exempt from sub. (3) if both of the following apply:
NR 664.0221(6)(a)(a) The existing unit was constructed in compliance with the design standards of 42 USC 6924(o)(1)(A)(i) and (5).
NR 664.0221(6)(b)(b) There is no reason to believe that the liner is not functioning as designed.
NR 664.0221(7)(7)A surface impoundment shall be designed, constructed, maintained and operated to prevent overtopping resulting from normal or abnormal operations; overfilling; wind and wave action; rainfall; run-on; malfunctions of level controllers, alarms and other equipment and human error.
NR 664.0221(8)(8)A surface impoundment shall have dikes that are designed, constructed and maintained with sufficient structural integrity to prevent massive failure of the dikes. In ensuring structural integrity, it may not be presumed that the liner system will function without leakage during the active life of the unit.
NR 664.0221(9)(9)The department shall specify in the operating license all design and operating practices that are necessary to ensure that the requirements of this section are satisfied.
NR 664.0221 HistoryHistory: CR 05-032: cr. Register July 2006 No. 607, eff. 8-1-06; CR 19-082: am. (5) (a) Register August 2020 No 776, eff. 9-1-20.
NR 664.0222NR 664.0222Action leakage rate.
NR 664.0222(1)(1)The department shall approve an action leakage rate for surface impoundment units subject to s. NR 664.0221 (3) or (4). The action leakage rate is the maximum design flow rate that the leak detection system can remove without the fluid head on the bottom liner exceeding one foot. The action leakage rate shall include an adequate safety margin to allow for uncertainties in the design (e.g., slope, hydraulic conductivity, thickness of drainage material), construction, operation and location of the leak detection system, waste and leachate characteristics, likelihood and amounts of other sources of liquids in the leak detection system and proposed response actions (e.g., the action leakage rate shall consider decreases in the flow capacity of the system over time resulting from siltation and clogging, rib layover and creep of synthetic components of the system, overburden pressures, etc.).
NR 664.0222(2)(2)To determine if the action leakage rate has been exceeded, the owner or operator shall convert the weekly or monthly flow rate from the monitoring data obtained under s. NR 664.0226 (4) to an average daily flow rate (gallons per acre per day) for each sump. Unless the department approves a different calculation, the average daily flow rate for each sump shall be calculated weekly during the active life and closure period, and if the unit is closed in accordance with s. NR 664.0228 (2), monthly during the long-term care period when monthly monitoring is required under s. NR 664.0226 (4).
NR 664.0222 HistoryHistory: CR 05-032: cr. Register July 2006 No. 607, eff. 8-1-06.
NR 664.0223NR 664.0223Response actions.
NR 664.0223(1)(1)The owner or operator of surface impoundment units subject to s. NR 664.0221 (3) or (4) shall have an approved response action plan before receipt of waste. The response action plan shall set forth the actions to be taken if the action leakage rate has been exceeded. At a minimum, the response action plan shall describe the actions specified in sub. (2).
NR 664.0223(2)(2)If the flow rate into the leak detection system exceeds the action leakage rate for any sump, the owner or operator shall do all of the following:
NR 664.0223(2)(a)(a) Notify the department in writing of the exceedence within 7 days of the determination.
NR 664.0223(2)(b)(b) Submit a preliminary written assessment to the department within 14 days of the determination, as to the amount of liquids, likely sources of liquids, possible location, size and cause of any leaks and short-term actions taken and planned.
NR 664.0223(2)(c)(c) Determine to the extent practicable the location, size and cause of any leak.
NR 664.0223(2)(d)(d) Determine whether waste receipt should cease or be curtailed, whether any waste should be removed from the unit for inspection, repairs or controls and whether or not the unit should be closed.
NR 664.0223(2)(e)(e) Determine any other short-term and longer-term actions to be taken to mitigate or stop any leaks.
NR 664.0223(2)(f)(f) Within 30 days after the notification that the action leakage rate has been exceeded, submit to the department the results of the analyses specified in pars. (c), (d) and (e), the results of actions taken and actions planned. Monthly thereafter, as long as the flow rate in the leak detection system exceeds the action leakage rate, the owner or operator shall submit to the department a report summarizing the results of any remedial actions taken and actions planned.
NR 664.0223(3)(3)To make the leak and remediation determinations in sub. (2) (c), (d) and (e), the owner or operator shall comply with par. (a) or (b):
NR 664.0223(3)(a)(a) Do all of the following:
NR 664.0223(3)(a)1.1. Assess the source of liquids and amounts of liquids by source.
NR 664.0223(3)(a)2.2. Conduct a fingerprint, hazardous constituent or other analyses of the liquids in the leak detection system to identify the source of liquids and possible location of any leaks, and the hazard and mobility of the liquid.
NR 664.0223(3)(a)3.3. Assess the seriousness of any leaks in terms of potential for escaping into the environment.
NR 664.0223(3)(b)(b) Document why the assessments are not needed.
NR 664.0223 HistoryHistory: CR 05-032: cr. Register July 2006 No. 607, eff. 8-1-06.
NR 664.0226NR 664.0226Monitoring and inspection.